🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights are human rights 🏳️‍⚧️
Theme

378,000 Gallons of Gasoline Leaked Into a Pennsylvania Neighborhood While the Company Handed Out Gift Cards

The Leak They Tried to Call “Maintenance”

On March 3, 2025, Monroe Energy—through its wholly owned subsidiary MIPC, LLC (Monroe Interstate Pipeline Company)—returned Tank 708 to active service at the Chelsea Tank Farm in Aston, Pennsylvania. The tank had been pulled offline in July 2024 after internal corrosion was discovered. It measured approximately 144 feet by 58 feet and had a capacity of roughly 151,111 barrels. It was installed in 1951. It was 74 years old.

Within hours of being returned to service, gasoline began leaking from a manmade hole in the floor of the tank. The leak would continue for nine months.

By the time Monroe Energy finally disclosed the situation to federal regulators and the public in December 2025, at least 9,000 barrels—378,000 gallons—of gasoline had been discharged into the underlying soil, bedrock, and groundwater. The contamination plume migrated off the Tank Farm property and into the surrounding residential neighborhood, where families like Brian and Michelle Mielnik and their four children (ages 8, 12, 14, and 16) were living their lives, unaware that the air they were breathing and the water beneath their homes had been poisoned.

The Chelsea Tank Farm is located in a high-consequence area as defined by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). It is surrounded by residential homes. It contains 12 hazardous-liquid breakout tanks with a total storage capacity of approximately 1.7 million barrels. Monroe Energy uses these facilities to store, distribute, and transport jet fuel and gasoline refined at their Trainer Refinery in Delaware County, which they then ship into Philadelphia County for consumption.

This is a story about what happens when a corporation that markets itself as an industry leader in “safety, health, and environment” as its “first value” rushes a corroded 74-year-old tank back into service without ensuring it is safe to operate. It is a story about a family whose children played in a basement contaminated with benzene while the company knew and said nothing. It is a story about gift cards distributed under the guise of goodwill while an environmental catastrophe unfolded in silence.

378,000
Gallons of gasoline discharged into residential soil and groundwater. Equivalent to approximately 560 average American swimming pools.

The Timeline of Concealment

July 2024: Internal Corrosion Discovered, Tank Removed From Service

On or about July 16, 2024, Monroe Energy discovered staining and caulking on Tank 708 resulting from an internal corrosion failure on the lower right side of the tank. The tank was drained and removed from service. At this point, the responsible course of action would have been to conduct a full structural integrity assessment, metallurgical testing, and root-cause failure analysis before returning the tank to operation.

That did not happen.

March 3, 2025: Tank Returned to Service

On March 3, 2025—eight months after the corrosion failure—MIPC returned Tank 708 to service following what the company described as an “out-of-service inspection.” No evidence suggests that Monroe Energy conducted the thorough safety review that the age and condition of the tank demanded. According to PHMSA’s preliminary findings, Tank 708 began leaking gasoline from a manmade hole in its floor “at least” from March 3, 2025 through December 2, 2025.

Meanwhile, Brian and Michelle Mielnik—whose property at 5917 Chichester Avenue sits directly adjacent to the Chelsea Tank Farm—watched as the line of pine trees along their fence line began to turn brown and die. They did not know why.

August 18, 2025: First Gasoline Odor Discovered On-Site

On August 18, 2025, an MIPC operator reported a petroleum odor during daily rounds at the Chelsea Tank Farm. MIPC personnel determined the source of the odor to be gasoline emanating from an open-ended concrete stormwater drainage pipe in the ground near the southwest corner of Tank 709.

This was more than five months after the leak began.

MIPC took the position that the gasoline did not meet the reportable threshold under 49 C.F.R. Part 195 because less than five gallons were observed. On that basis, the company reported nothing to PHMSA—even as it simultaneously mobilized an emergency response that included booms, vacuum-truck recovery, soil excavation, monitoring outfalls, conducting fence-line air and noise monitoring, and reaching out to neighboring property owners.

The neighbors, including the Mielniks, were not told there was a gasoline leak. Instead, Monroe Energy’s representatives arrived at their doorsteps on a weekly basis beginning in August 2025 to distribute gift cards. The company framed this as a “gesture of goodwill” to thank residents for their “understanding and patience” regarding “maintenance work” that required “the use of light plants and other equipment.”

It was a lie. There was no “maintenance work.” There was a catastrophic environmental release that the company was actively investigating while concealing its existence from the very people most at risk.

August 18-19, 2025: Monroe Reports to Emergency Services—But Not Residents

On either August 18 or 19, 2025, Monroe reported observing “a hydrocarbon” in a storm sewer at the Tank Farm to emergency services in Delaware County. The company then notified the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency. Monroe told emergency services personnel that “there were no known offsite impacts.”

This statement was false. By this time, gasoline had been leaking for more than five months. Soil and groundwater contamination was occurring. The Mielniks’ trees were dying. But Monroe did not notify residents. Monroe did not notify PHMSA. Monroe did not notify the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP).

Instead, on August 19, 2025, Monroe finally alerted PADEP that it had discovered gasoline in a storm sewer and “did not know its origin” but reiterated that “there were no offsite impacts.”

September 3, 2025: Water Treatment Permit Application Reveals the Truth

On September 3, 2025, MIPC requested a temporary discharge authorization (TDA) from PADEP to treat and discharge contaminated water from a temporary water treatment unit at the Tank Farm. In the request, MIPC informed PADEP that it had discovered water with petroleum odors discharging from a concrete drainage pipe into a swale at a flow of five gallons per minute. MIPC stated that the water contained gasoline constituents and that concentrations of hydrocarbons in the water were approximately “1 to 2%.”

PADEP issued the TDA on September 9, 2025. MIPC began treating effluent discharge from the temporary water treatment unit.

By this point, Monroe Energy knew it had “groundwater and gasoline coming out of the ground” severe enough to require an engineered water treatment system. Yet the company still had not disclosed the leak to federal regulators or the public.

October 22, 2025: Tank 708 Isolated, Volume Loss Confirmed

On October 22, 2025—more than seven months after the leak began—MIPC finally isolated Tank 708 and began monitoring its static volume. Approximately 40 days later, on November 30, 2025, MIPC recorded a volume loss of approximately 1,039 barrels—roughly 43,638 gallons—confirming a substantial release from the tank.

MIPC said nothing. It did not warn the surrounding property owners. It did not report the release to PHMSA.

November 18, 2025: Subsurface Investigation Finds Gasoline in All Seven Soil Borings

Beginning on or about November 18, 2025, MIPC conducted a subsurface investigation around the Tank 708 dike, including soil borings. Product was encountered in all of the first seven borings completed within the Tank 708 dike area within the saturated soils where groundwater was located.

At a community meeting on February 4, 2026, Monroe Energy acknowledged that “by November 21st,” the company had completed “about seven soil borings” and had “determined that… Tank 708 needed to be taken out of service.”

Tank 708 was finally removed from service on December 2, 2025—nine months after the leak began.

December 5, 2025: Public Disclosure—Finally

On December 5, 2025, MIPC observed additional gasoline on facility grounds. Months after being alerted to the existence of a significant leak, MIPC reported the release to PHMSA and to the National Response Center, stating that the amount released was unknown but “might be significant” and “might be impacting soil and groundwater.”

MIPC stated that affected soil was observed approximately 35 feet from the Tank Farm’s boundary but that there was “no evidence of offsite impact.”

That same day, MIPC sent a letter to nearby residents, including the Mielniks. The letter stated vaguely that there had been “an issue” at the Tank Farm and that Monroe Energy was “continuing to evaluate any potential impacts.” The letter downplayed the significance of the situation, emphasizing that the source of the odor observed on August 18, 2025 was a mixture of “2% gasoline to 98% water” and that Monroe Energy had “implemented extensive measures” to “evaluate the impacted water.”

The letter made no mention of Tank 708. It made no mention of the 1,039-barrel volume loss confirmed in November. It made no mention of the subsurface contamination found in all seven soil borings. It made no mention of the manmade hole that PHMSA would soon discover.

“Defendants’ December 31, 2025 letter and Fact Sheet misleadingly described the August 18, 2025 discovery as a ‘faint odor’ and stated that its ensuing investigation was a ‘multi-month investigatory process’ that ‘did not yield a clear source or even the presence of a broader issue’ until December 2025.”

December 13, 2025: The Manmade Hole

On December 13, 2025, MIPC discovered the approximately one-quarter inch manmade hole in the floor of Tank 708.

Two days later, MIPC filed an updated report with the National Response Center stating that the release was “at least” 760 barrels into groundwater. On December 17, 2025, however, MIPC reported to PHMSA that Tank 708 had leaked gasoline with an estimated release volume of 9,000 barrels and stated that the source of the leak was believed to be the one-quarter inch hole in the bottom of the tank.

On December 18, 2025, PHMSA investigators deployed to the Chelsea Tank Farm and made a preliminary determination that the hole was manmade and was the source of the gasoline leak from Tank 708. PHMSA further determined that Tank 708 had been leaking gasoline from “at least” March 3, 2025 through December 2, 2025.

Nine months. 378,000 gallons. One family’s children breathing benzene in their bedrooms while corporate representatives handed out gift cards at the door.

9 Months
The length of time Monroe Energy operated a leaking gasoline tank in a residential neighborhood before disclosing the contamination to residents and regulators.

The Non-Financial Ledger: What the Numbers Cannot Measure

Brian and Michelle Mielnik own and reside at 5917 Chichester Avenue in Aston, Pennsylvania, together with their four minor children. Their property is one of nine homes located along the fence line of the Chelsea Tank Farm. It is one of the closest residences to Tank 708.

Since March 2025, the Mielniks watched vegetation on their property die without knowing the reason. Throughout the spring and summer of 2025, they occasionally smelled gasoline from their property. They observed bright lighting and loud activity at the Tank Farm behind their home during this period. They did not know what was happening.

In August 2025, Monroe Energy’s representatives began appearing at their doorstep on a weekly basis to distribute gift cards, apologizing for “the use of light plants and other equipment” related to “maintenance work.” The Mielniks accepted the cards and thought nothing more of it. They trusted that if something dangerous were happening, someone would tell them.

No one did.

It was not until December 5, 2025—nine months after the leak began—that the Mielniks received a letter from Monroe Energy stating that there had been “an issue” at the Tank Farm. Even then, the letter minimized the contamination and provided no indication that their property or their family might be at risk.

April 30, 2026: The Day Everything Changed

On April 30, 2026—more than a year after the leak began—Monroe Energy’s agents finally began collecting sub-slab soil gas and indoor air samples from the Mielniks’ residence. When the agents arrived, they verbally represented to the Mielniks that the testing results showed “only a small increase in VOCs near the basement” and that this was “nothing to worry about.”

This was false.

In reality, the testing results showed that benzene and VOC levels inside the Mielniks’ home were dangerously high. Monroe Energy withheld those results—purportedly to “review the results with their team”—while the Mielnik family, including their four children, continued to live in and breathe the contaminated air.

May 1, 2026: The Evacuation

The next day, May 1, 2026, Monroe Energy asked the Mielniks to meet at their home “to go over the test results.” That afternoon, a crowd of Monroe Energy personnel descended on the Mielnik property in black SUVs. They swept through the home with handheld meters that registered benzene at concentrations even higher than those previously found. They caulked openings. They set up temporary fans. They told the family they had to leave immediately.

The Mielnik children arrived home from school to a house full of strangers in hazmat-adjacent gear. Plaintiff Brian Mielnik was forced to ask his children to hurriedly pack some clothes and to wait outside while he held back his own fear of what was unfolding. Plaintiff Michelle Mielnik, who had no notice of the meeting, returned home briefly before her afternoon softball coaching obligations and was blindsided by the driveway full of black SUVs and the throng of people overrunning her home.

Monroe Energy instructed the Mielniks to relocate to temporary housing. Air filtration units were delivered to the residence. By then, the Mielniks and their children had already been breathing those dangerous levels of benzene and other VOCs for over a year.

The Blood Tests

After being displaced from their residence, the Mielniks underwent blood testing. Results showed elevated toxin levels consistent with VOC and benzene exposure:

  • The Mielniks’ 16-year-old child had elevated alkaline phosphatase levels, which can be associated with exposure to VOCs.
  • Two other family members had elevated phenol levels, which can be associated with benzene exposure.

The reviewing physician advised repeat blood testing every three months for one year for five family members, and every six weeks for the child with elevated alkaline phosphatase levels. The physician also informed the Mielniks that because the blood testing was performed several days after the family had already vacated the residence, any benzene exposure that had occurred while they lived there would not be reflected in the results—even if exposure had occurred.

The Mielniks now face a lifetime of medical monitoring, knowing that the carcinogens their children were exposed to may not manifest as disease for years or even decades.

The Contamination in the Ground Beneath Their Home

In April 2026, Monroe Energy installed two groundwater monitoring wells on the Mielnik property. Testing revealed:

  • 1.7 feet of free-floating gasoline in monitoring well MW-A1
  • 2.1 feet of free-floating gasoline in monitoring well MW-A2

A soil gas sample taken 30 feet from the Mielniks’ residence—under the ground upon which their young children play—tested positive for cyclohexane at 713,000 µg/mÂł and n-hexane at 4,300,000 µg/mÂł, exceeding applicable PADEP screening values.

Sub-slab soil gas monitoring points in two basements of neighborhood residents produced exceedances of PADEP Residential Sub-Slab Soil Gas Vapor Intrusion Screening Values. At the Mielniks’ residence, samples collected on April 30, 2026 detected:

  • Benzene at 671 J µg/mÂł
  • Cyclohexane at 571,000 µg/mÂł
  • N-hexane at 500,000 µg/mÂł

At a nearby residence, samples collected May 4, 2026 detected:

  • Benzene at 2,880 J µg/mÂł
  • Cyclohexane at 152,000 µg/mÂł
  • N-hexane at 230,000 µg/mÂł

Indoor air testing at the Mielniks’ residence detected benzene at 0.987 µg/mÂł and n-hexane at 811 µg/mÂł. Even after a vapor-intrusion mitigation system was installed, benzene, ethylbenzene, and naphthalene persisted in the indoor air. A nearby residence showed similar contamination, with benzene at 3.93 µg/mÂł.

Monroe Energy has refused to provide the Mielniks with information about monitoring well test results from neighboring properties, claiming that doing so would violate the privacy of those neighbors. As a result, the Mielniks are left in the dark as to the extent of the contamination surrounding them—including in the air, water, and soil to which they are also at risk of exposure.

“Plaintiffs love their home. They thought it would be their forever home, where they would raise their children and grow old together. Unfortunately, Defendants’ Leak has turned Plaintiffs’ idyllic forever home into the site of an environmental catastrophe.”

The Vapor-Intrusion Mitigation System

Because of the air contamination caused by the leak, Monroe Energy installed a vapor-intrusion mitigation system in the basement of the Mielniks’ residence. The system is extremely loud and operates continuously, comparable to a vacuum running 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Before learning of the contamination, the Mielniks’ children played in the basement. The space served as a gym, workout area, and laundry room. Because of the noise from the mitigation system—and the fear and anxiety caused by worrying that their indoor air could become more contaminated at any moment if the system fails or if the plume continues to move—the Mielniks are no longer able to enjoy or use their basement. They have stopped allowing their children to play there, concerned for their children’s health and worried they might accidentally turn off the mitigation system.

The Mielniks also now limit their own use of the basement, venturing down only to do laundry.

The Property That Will Never Sell

Since the revelation of the leak and subsequent confirmation of contamination, the Mielniks have experienced profound anxiety, fear, emotional distress, and uncertainty regarding the safety of their home, their health, and the wellbeing of their family. They live with the persistent fear that the exposures they have already had to the VOCs released by Monroe Energy’s leak will cause severe and potentially life-long consequences to them or their minor children.

The property itself has been rendered valueless. Who would purchase a home in a remediation zone, where the air, water, and soil contain dangerous and toxic chemicals? Who would ever want to live so close to Monroe Energy’s Tank Farm after Monroe Energy—despite years of advertising themselves as industry leaders in safety and environmental stewardship—allowed such a catastrophic release to occur and go unnoticed for most of a year?

The Mielniks are now trapped. They cannot sell. They cannot leave. And they cannot trust that the home they thought would be their forever home will not kill them.

1.7 & 2.1 Feet
Depth of free-floating gasoline detected in monitoring wells installed on the Mielnik family’s property in April 2026. Their children played on the ground above.

Legal Receipts: What the Documents Say

This is not a story built on conjecture or anonymous sources. Every fact presented here is derived from the class action complaint filed in Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas on July 13, 2026 (Case ID: 260701519), which in turn cites regulatory orders, inspection reports, and contemporaneous company communications.

PHMSA’s Findings

On December 19, 2025, PHMSA issued a Corrective Action Order (CPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO) under the authority of 49 U.S.C. § 60112 and 49 C.F.R. § 190.233. PHMSA found that continued operation of the facility without corrective measures would be “hazardous to life, property, or the environment” and that failure to issue the CAO without notice would result in “a likelihood of serious harm.”

Among other things, PHMSA required that Tank 708 be taken out of operation, that Monroe Energy conduct independent metallurgical testing and a root-cause failure analysis, and that Monroe Energy create a remedial work plan to address the causes of the accident and verify the integrity of the Tank Farm. The CAO further stated that groundwater sources, wildlife, and vegetation were “likely affected by the Leak.”

PADEP’s Order

On December 23, 2025, PADEP issued an order finding that MIPC:

  • Unlawfully discharged petroleum products into the waters of the Commonwealth, in violation of the Clean Streams Law (35 P.S. § 691.401)
  • Failed to timely notify PADEP of the release, in violation of 25 Pa. Code § 91.33(a)
  • Handled gasoline in a manner contrary to its Air Quality Title V Operating Permit, in violation of the Air Pollution Control Act

PADEP ordered MIPC to “immediately initiate interim remedial measures necessary to prevent or address an immediate threat to human health or the environment from the release,” including:

  • Identifying groundwater supply wells located within 1,000 feet of the Tank Farm’s western property line in Bethel Township, Aston Township, and Upper Chichester Township
  • Notifying all property owners and tenants of any property with a potable groundwater well within that boundary and providing bottled water within 24 hours if requested
  • Requesting access to and testing each groundwater well located within that boundary for VOCs and field-screening each wellhead with a photoionization detector within 30 days
  • Supplying and installing a point-of-entry treatment system on the water supply for any property within that boundary with a groundwater well with VOCs at concentrations exceeding Act 2 medium-specific concentrations
  • Performing daily fence line air monitoring for VOCs, including BTEX

Monroe Energy’s Own Admissions

At a public meeting on February 4, 2026, Regan Howell, the Chief Operating Officer of Monroe Energy and President of MIPC, explicitly acknowledged Monroe Energy’s responsibility for the leak, stating: “We own this problem,” and promising to “make things right.”

Howell avowed that Monroe Energy would “restore and remediate… the impacted properties” and “keep at it until it’s done.”

Later in the same meeting, however, Howell walked back this promise, stating that Monroe Energy would “clean it up” only “to the standards that [PADEP] is enforcing.” Monroe Energy was unable to give a definitive timeline for the clean-up efforts, stating that it might be “a year,” “two years,” or “longer.”

At the same meeting, Monroe Energy acknowledged that it knew “Tank 708 needed to be taken out of service” by November 21, 2025—weeks before PHMSA, Plaintiffs, or Class Members were notified.

Societal Impact Mapping: The Poisoning of Aston

Environmental Degradation

The leak from Tank 708 resulted in a significant subsurface contamination plume that has migrated off the Tank Farm and into the surrounding residential neighborhood. Monroe Energy’s own investigation has confirmed gasoline-related impacts to soil, air, and groundwater across the affected area.

As of July 7, 2026, 110 groundwater monitoring wells have been installed across the Tank Farm and surrounding neighborhood. Of those, 50 wells have been found to contain measurable light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL)—visible free-floating gasoline—including wells on residential properties adjoining the Tank Farm.

Monroe Energy conducted low-flow groundwater sampling for 53 monitoring wells that did not contain LNAPL. Of those 53, petroleum-related contaminants—including benzene and other gasoline-related VOCs—were found in 20 monitoring wells at concentrations above the applicable Act 2 Groundwater Medium-Specific Concentrations (MSCs) and/or Vapor Intrusion Screening Values for Groundwater (SVs).

Four private drinking water wells within 1,000 feet of the Tank Farm’s western boundary have confirmed detections of gasoline-related volatile organic compounds, including BTEX compounds.

Exterior near-source soil gas sampling at the Mielniks’ property detected cyclohexane at 713,000 µg/mÂł and n-hexane at 4,300,000 µg/mÂł, exceeding applicable PADEP screening values. Ambient air samples collected from locations along the Tank Farm’s perimeter fence line on May 29, 2026 showed levels of naphthalene and isopropanol above EPA risk-based chronic screening levels.

As of July 7, 2026, only 69,464 gallons of LNAPL have been recovered—a mere fraction of the 378,000 gallons that Monroe Energy admits to having released. The plume has not been fully delineated, and new contamination continues to be encountered in recently installed monitoring wells on offsite residential properties, despite ongoing recovery efforts.

All of the evidence available suggests that the contamination plume is immense and is continuing to migrate. As it migrates, more and more residents will be directly exposed to the toxic chemicals released by Monroe Energy’s leak.

Public Health

The gasoline released by the leak contains highly toxic and carcinogenic VOCs and chemicals, including:

  • Benzene: A known human carcinogen according to both the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Benzene exposure can result in cancer, disruption of hematopoiesis (the body’s production of blood), suppression of the immune system, and skeletal and neurodevelopmental defects.
  • BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes): Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons commonly found in gasoline and petroleum products. BTEX compounds are often primary contaminants of concern in the remediation of oil or gasoline spills due to their high volatility, mobility, and toxicity.
  • N-hexane: A highly volatile neurotoxic chemical derived from crude oil. Short-term exposure can impact the central nervous system; longer-term exposures are associated with polyneuropathy, muscular weakness, vision impairments, and fatigue.
  • Cyclohexane: A highly volatile chemical that can cause severe respiratory and pulmonary symptoms, including pneumonitis. It can break down the fats in skin tissue, causing dry and cracked skin and even burns with repeated or prolonged skin contact.
  • Isopropanol, naphthalene, and ethylbenzene: Additional toxic compounds detected in air, soil, and groundwater samples.

Short-term exposure to BTEX compounds can cause nausea, vomiting, headaches, dizziness, rashes, and eye and throat irritation. Long-term exposure can have serious health consequences, including anemia, compromised immune system, bone marrow damage, irreversible hearing loss, liver and kidney damage, pregnancy and fertility complications, and leukemia and other forms of cancer.

The chemicals released from Tank 708 are associated with serious diseases that have long latency periods and may not manifest in exposed individuals for years or even decades. Residents in the surrounding communities will have to closely monitor their health, potentially indefinitely. They have experienced, and will continue to experience, the accompanying fear and anxiety that comes from not being able to trust the safety of the water they drink or the air that they breathe.

Economic Inequality

The release has devastated property values in the area. The contamination is public and will impair the value of all properties in the area and the market interest in what were once desirable properties for the foreseeable future.

Families like the Mielniks—who invested their life savings into homes they believed would be their forever homes—are now trapped. They cannot sell contaminated properties. They cannot afford to abandon their mortgages. And they have suffered extreme diminution to their property values, thus creating additional economic damages and losses that substantially affect their financial security and cause additional stress and anxiety.

Monroe Energy initially promised to “restore and remediate” the impacted properties. At a public meeting on February 4, 2026, Monroe Energy’s COO stated: “We own this problem,” and promised to “make things right.” Later in the same meeting, however, Monroe Energy walked back that promise, stating that the company would clean up only “to the standards that [PADEP] is enforcing.”

This is the language of a corporation that has already decided how little it can get away with paying.

110 Wells
Groundwater monitoring wells installed as of July 2026. 50 wells contain visible free-floating gasoline. New contamination continues to be discovered.

What Now? Accountability, Organizing, and the Long Fight Ahead

On July 13, 2026, Brian and Michelle Mielnik—individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated—filed a class action complaint in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas against Monroe Energy, LLC and MIPC, LLC. The complaint asserts eight causes of action: negligence, gross negligence, strict liability for abnormally dangerous activity, public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and medical monitoring.

The proposed class includes:

Plaintiffs estimate that there are at least hundreds of members of the proposed class.

Corporate Leadership and Regulatory Watchlist

The following corporate officers have been identified in connection with Monroe Energy’s operations and public statements regarding the leak:

  • Regan Howell: Chief Operating Officer of Monroe Energy and President of MIPC. Howell publicly acknowledged Monroe Energy’s responsibility for the leak at a February 4, 2026 community meeting, stating “We own this problem,” before walking back the company’s commitment to full remediation later in the same meeting.

Personnel acting on behalf of MIPC used Monroe email addresses in connection with matters alleged in the complaint. MIPC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Monroe Energy.

No individual executives have been criminally charged as of the filing of this complaint. However, the facts alleged—particularly the nine-month concealment of a known environmental release in a residential area, the withholding of air quality test results showing dangerous benzene levels in a home with four children, and the knowing return to service of a corroded tank without adequate safety review—may warrant referral to the U.S. Department of Justice for investigation under environmental criminal statutes.

Regulatory Oversight

The following federal and state agencies have jurisdiction over Monroe Energy’s conduct and the ongoing remediation:

  • Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA): Federal agency responsible for enforcing pipeline safety regulations under 49 U.S.C. § 60101 et seq. PHMSA has issued a Corrective Action Order and continues to monitor Monroe Energy’s compliance.
  • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP): State agency responsible for enforcing the Clean Streams Law (35 P.S. § 691.401 et seq.) and the Air Pollution Control Act. PADEP has issued an order requiring interim remedial measures and ongoing monitoring.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Federal agency with authority to investigate and enforce violations of federal environmental laws, including the Clean Water Act and CERCLA (Superfund).
  • Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA): State agency notified by Monroe Energy in August 2025 but not provided full disclosure of the scope of contamination.

Residents and watchdog organizations should closely monitor PHMSA and PADEP enforcement actions and demand transparency regarding the status of remediation, the full extent of contamination, and any penalties assessed against Monroe Energy.

Organizing and Mutual Aid

The families affected by this disaster did not choose to live next to a ticking time bomb. They are working-class and middle-class people who bought homes in what they believed was a safe suburban neighborhood. They are now facing a corporate adversary with vastly more resources, legal firepower, and political influence.

Here is what you can do:

  • If you live within one mile of the Chelsea Tank Farm in Aston, Pennsylvania: You may be a member of the proposed class. Contact the plaintiffs’ attorneys at Berger Montague PC (215-875-3000) and Locks Law Firm (215-893-3444) to learn about your rights and join the lawsuit.
  • Demand water testing: If you rely on a private well for drinking water and you live within 1,000 feet of the Tank Farm’s western boundary, PADEP’s order requires Monroe Energy to test your well. Do not wait for the company to contact you. Call PADEP’s Southeast Regional Office at (484) 250-5900 and demand testing.
  • Organize your neighbors: Form or join a neighborhood association focused on environmental justice and corporate accountability. Collective action is more powerful than individual complaints. Document everything. Share information. Do not let Monroe Energy control the narrative.
  • Contact your elected representatives: Demand that your state legislators and members of Congress investigate Monroe Energy’s conduct and strengthen pipeline safety regulations to prevent future disasters. This includes Senator Bob Casey, Senator John Fetterman, and Representative Mary Gay Scanlon (PA-05), whose district includes Delaware County.
  • Support local journalism and watchdog organizations: The only reason we know the full scope of this disaster is because legal filings forced disclosure. Support investigative journalism and environmental justice organizations that hold corporations accountable.
  • Reject the gift cards: If Monroe Energy or MIPC representatives appear at your door offering “gestures of goodwill” while withholding information about contamination, document the interaction and refuse to sign any waivers or release forms.

This is a long fight. Monroe Energy has every incentive to delay, minimize, and litigate this case into oblivion. The company’s initial promise to “restore and remediate” was walked back within minutes. The cleanup timeline is indefinite. The contamination plume continues to migrate.

But the families poisoned by this leak are not going away. They cannot sell their homes. They cannot move. And they will not be silent.

The source document for this investigation is attached below.

Explore by category

01

Antitrust

Monopolies and anti-competition tactics used to crush rivals.

View Cases →
02

Product Safety Violations

When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.

View Cases →
03

Environmental Violations

Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.

View Cases →
04

Labor Exploitation

Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.

View Cases →
05

Data Breaches & Privacy

Misuse and mishandling of personal information.

View Cases →
06

Financial Fraud & Corruption

Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.

View Cases →
07

Intellectual Property

IP theft that punishes originality and rewards copying.

View Cases →
08

Misleading Marketing

False claims that waste money and bury critical safety info.

View Cases →
Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 2123