Insider trading and market integrity
A Former Okta Manager Tipped a Friend Before a 34% Stock Drop, SEC Finds
Andrew Neller learned that Oktaβs internal plan was too optimistic, bought put options and told a former colleague to do the same. The SEC says their options produced a combined $269,613.52 in profits after the company lowered its outlook.
What the SEC found
- Okta sales manager Andrew Neller attended a confidential meeting where executives said the company had missed internal targets and needed to revise an overly optimistic plan.
- Neller later spent $22,741.95 on short-dated Okta put options, which increase in value when the underlying stock falls.
- The next day, he warned friend and former colleague Jack Alexander about a likely guidance reduction and specifically advised him to buy September 9 put options.
- Alexander sold all 1,958 Okta shares he owned and spent $31,567.92 on put options before the companyβs earnings announcement.
- Okta lowered its calculated billings outlook by approximately $140 million. Its stock fell 34% the next day.
- The SEC ordered Neller to pay $441,566.95 in disgorgement, interest and a civil penalty under a settlement in which he did not admit most findings.
The order also records a final exchange after the trades were closed: Alexander told Neller to delete their conversation, and Neller agreed.
The text that came after the profits
On the morning after Okta disclosed a weaker full-year outlook, its shares fell from $91.40 to $60.60. Neller and Alexander sold the put options they had bought before the announcement. According to the SEC, Neller made $98,754 and Alexander made $170,859.52.
Then Alexander sent a short instruction that placed the prior dayβs messages in a different light.
βDelete this text conversation. I will.β Jack Alexander to Andrew Neller, as quoted in the SEC order
Neller replied, βYou got it,β and deleted the messages exchanged on August 31 and through that point on September 1, the order says.
Those deleted texts sat at the end of a month-long sequence that began inside a confidential Okta meeting. The SECβs account shows how internal operating problems moved from an employee-only call into brokerage accounts before public investors received the same information.
The confidential warning inside Okta
On August 4, 2022, Neller remotely joined an Okta companywide meeting that was open only to company personnel. Oktaβs chief executive said the company had missed its internal financial targets for the first half of the fiscal year, according to the order.
The internal plan was wrong, too optimistic and in need of adjustment. The chief executive also discussed high employee attrition, particularly in sales, and difficulty integrating Auth0, an identity platform Okta had acquired. He told employees to keep the information confidential.
Neller was not unfamiliar with the rules. Okta had a policy prohibiting employees from trading on material nonpublic information or passing that information and trading advice to others. The SEC says Neller completed training on the policy in 2019, 2020 and 2021.
- Confidential informationInternal targets were missed, the plan needed revision and sales problems were affecting performance.
- Nellerβs tradeHe spent $22,741.95 on out-of-the-money Okta put options on August 30.
- The tip and second tradeHe warned Alexander and recommended a specific put option. Alexander sold his shares and bought puts.
- Public disclosureOkta reduced its outlook, the stock fell 34% and both options positions were sold for profits.
The record therefore does not describe an absence of corporate rules. It describes an employee who had received repeated training and a direct confidentiality warning, then traded and tipped a friend anyway, according to the Commissionβs findings.
The trades were placed before the public announcement
- Confidential company meeting: Neller learned that Oktaβs internal plan was too optimistic, sales attrition was high and the Auth0 integration was causing difficulty.
- Neller bought puts: He spent $22,741.95 on options expiring September 9 with strike prices between $85 and $88.
- The warning: Neller texted Alexander that he expected βa pretty rough day tomorrowβ and thought Okta would report its βfirst miss.β
- Alexander sold his shares: He sold all 1,958 Okta shares he owned for $178,036.58.
- A specific recommendation: Neller wrote, βBuy Sept 9, $87 put options.β Alexander bought $31,567.92 of those options at 12:33 p.m.
- Okta disclosed the problems publicly: The company lowered its calculated billings outlook by approximately $140 million, citing sales integration problems and attrition among the principal reasons.
- The stock fell and the options were sold: Okta shares dropped 34%. Neller and Alexander closed their options positions that morning.
What the messages showed
- Neller referred to information from Oktaβs employee-only call, telling Alexander that the chief executive had discussed lowering the companyβs growth rate βwith the street.β
- He said Okta had a βreplanβ and was lowering sales quotas to retain representatives.
- He moved from a general warning to a specific trade recommendation: September 9 put options with an $87 strike price.
- Alexander accessed brokerage accounts within minutes of the messages and completed the stock sale and options purchase that day.
Nellerβs prediction was not precise in every respect. Oktaβs quarterly results beat expectations, according to the order. The consequential disclosure was the reduction in full-year calculated billings guidance, a non-GAAP business metric, and the explanation that sales integration trouble and attrition were hurting momentum.
The financial result
The options magnified the effect of the stockβs decline. Alexander also avoided losses by selling his Okta shares before the announcement. The order attributes the following amounts to the trades:
The order does not identify individual investors who were harmed, determine losses suffered by particular market participants or state who took the opposite side of the options trades. It also directs Nellerβs payments to the U.S. Treasury rather than establishing a distribution to investors.
The broader market concern is the information imbalance documented by the SEC: an employee and his friend were positioned for a decline before Oktaβs operating problems and reduced outlook became public.
What the SEC order establishes, and what it does not
The Commission found that Neller violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, which prohibit fraud in connection with securities transactions. This was a settled civil administrative proceeding, not a trial verdict or criminal conviction.
| Issue | What the order says | Limit of the record |
|---|---|---|
| Nellerβs conduct | The SEC found that he traded on material nonpublic information and tipped Alexander. | Neller settled without admitting most findings. |
| Alexanderβs conduct | The order describes his stock sale, options purchase, profits, avoided losses and deletion request. | The supplied order does not state the outcome of any separate proceeding involving him. |
| Oktaβs role | The order records Oktaβs insider trading policy, employee training and the confidentiality warning at the meeting. | Okta is not a respondent, and the order does not accuse the company of securities-law violations. |
| Investor harm | The order quantifies profits and avoided losses tied to the trades. | It does not identify specific investor victims or calculate their losses. |
The order contains no Okta response to the enforcement action. Its quoted statements from Okta executives concern the internal meeting and the companyβs public earnings call, not a defense of Nellerβs conduct.
The settlement takes back the profit and adds a larger penalty
Neller agreed to cease and desist from future violations of the federal antifraud provisions. The SEC also ordered three categories of payment:
The payment schedule requires $200,000 within 10 days of the order and the remaining balance by July 30, 2027. Post-order interest applies. If a scheduled payment is missed, SEC staff may make the outstanding amount immediately due.
The central lesson in the order is narrower than a claim that Okta lacked rules. Okta had a policy, Neller had completed multiple trainings and the meeting carried an explicit confidentiality warning. According to the SEC, those safeguards were followed by a personal trade, a tip to a friend and a recommendation precise enough to name the optionβs date and strike price.
The sequence shows why insider trading enforcement is ultimately about access. Public investors learned about Oktaβs reduced outlook after the market closed. Neller and Alexander were already positioned before that disclosure, and the next morning converted the information advantage described by the SEC into six-figure options profits.
Explore by category
Antitrust
Monopolies and anti-competition tactics used to crush rivals.
View Cases →Product Safety Violations
When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.
View Cases →Environmental Violations
Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.
View Cases →Labor Exploitation
Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.
View Cases →Data Breaches & Privacy
Misuse and mishandling of personal information.
View Cases →Financial Fraud & Corruption
Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.
View Cases →Intellectual Property
IP theft that punishes originality and rewards copying.
View Cases →Misleading Marketing
False claims that waste money and bury critical safety info.
View Cases →


