How unbridled profit incentives pave the way for toxic exposure in America’s rental housing | Sound City Realty

Sound City Realty Fined $27,400 for Failing to Disclose Lead Paint Hazards
Corporate Misconduct Accountability Project

Sound City Realty Fined $27,400 for Failing to Disclose Lead Paint Hazards

Tennessee property manager repeatedly failed to warn tenants about lead paint dangers in six older rental units, violating federal law designed to protect children and pregnant women from neurotoxic exposure.

HIGH SEVERITY
TL;DR

Sound City Realty, a Tennessee property management company, violated federal lead-based paint disclosure laws at six rental properties built before 1978. The EPA found the company failed to provide mandatory lead hazard pamphlets to tenants, omitted required warning statements from lease contracts, and performed renovations without proper certification. Families with young children and pregnant women faced potential exposure to a known neurotoxin because the company did not follow basic safety rules. The EPA fined Sound City Realty $27,400 to settle the case.

Lead poisoning causes irreversible harm to children. Every landlord must follow these rules.

6
Properties with disclosure violations
$27,400
Civil penalty assessed
1978
Year after which housing is exempt
0
Admissions of wrongdoing by company

The Allegations: A Breakdown

⚠️
Core Allegations
What Sound City Realty Did · 8 points
01 Sound City Realty entered into lease agreements for six residential properties built before 1978 without providing tenants the EPA-approved lead hazard information pamphlet titled ‘Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home.’ The pamphlet warns that lead exposure is especially harmful to young children and pregnant women. high
02 The company failed to include the mandatory Lead Warning Statement in lease contracts for four properties. Federal law requires this statement to inform tenants that housing built before 1978 may contain lead-based paint and that lessors must disclose any known hazards before renting. high
03 Sound City Realty did not include a statement in lease contracts disclosing the presence of known lead-based paint or indicating no knowledge of such hazards, as required by federal regulation. This omission left tenants uninformed about potential dangers in their homes. high
04 The company failed to obtain required signatures from lessors, agents, and lessees certifying receipt of lead hazard information for two properties. These signatures verify that all parties acknowledge the disclosures and understand the risks. medium
05 Sound City Realty offered to perform or performed renovations at the six properties between January and December 2022 without obtaining firm certification from the EPA. Federal law prohibits any firm from performing renovations that disturb painted surfaces in pre-1978 housing without this certification. high
06 The company performed renovation work that can generate lead dust, such as sanding, scraping, window repair, and removal of building components, without the training and certification designed to protect tenants from contamination. These activities pose direct health risks when done improperly. high
07 Sound City Realty managed properties including units built in 1930, 1947, 1968, 1969, and 1971, all of which fall under federal target housing regulations. The company had a legal duty to comply with lead disclosure and renovation rules at every one of these locations. medium
08 The EPA inspection in December 2022 found that Sound City Realty could not produce required records at the time of the inspection. The company only submitted compliance records after the inspection, on December 7, 2022, and January 25, 2023, revealing the extent of the violations. medium
🏛️
Regulatory Failures
How the System Enabled These Violations · 6 points
01 The EPA conducted only one inspection of Sound City Realty’s business in December 2022, despite the company managing multiple pre-1978 properties over several years. Limited agency resources mean most property managers face minimal risk of detection. high
02 Sound City Realty operated without firm certification for renovation work throughout 2022, demonstrating that companies can perform illegal renovations for extended periods before enforcement action occurs. The system relies on reactive inspections rather than proactive monitoring. high
03 Federal regulations allow companies to settle violations without admitting wrongdoing. Sound City Realty neither admitted nor denied the allegations while paying the penalty, shielding the company from reputational harm and potential civil lawsuits. medium
04 The consent agreement requires only that Sound City Realty certify current compliance and that violations have been corrected. No independent verification, ongoing monitoring, or public reporting of compliance measures is mandated. medium
05 The EPA’s enforcement relies heavily on document review rather than physical inspection of properties or interviews with affected tenants. Violations came to light only through missing paperwork, not through assessment of actual lead hazards or tenant harm. medium
06 The regulatory framework provides no compensation or remediation for tenants who lived in these properties without proper disclosures. The $27,400 penalty goes to the federal treasury, not to the families potentially exposed to lead hazards. high
💰
Profit Over People
The Cost-Benefit Calculation · 6 points
01 Sound City Realty saved money by not purchasing and distributing EPA-approved lead hazard pamphlets, not obtaining firm certification for renovations, and not training staff on compliance requirements. These cost-cutting measures directly increased the company’s profit margins. high
02 Obtaining proper firm certification and hiring certified renovators costs more than using uncertified contractors. Sound City Realty performed or offered renovation services without certification, giving the company a competitive price advantage over compliant firms. high
03 The $27,400 penalty may represent less than the total cost of full compliance across six properties over multiple years. If the company calculated that paying occasional fines costs less than systematic compliance, the violation becomes financially rational under a profit-maximization model. high
04 Sound City Realty continued leasing properties and performing renovations throughout the violation period, generating rental income and service fees while avoiding compliance costs. Tenants paid market-rate rents without receiving the federally mandated safety protections their rent should have included. medium
05 The company’s business model depends on managing older, pre-1978 housing stock where lead-based paint regulations apply. Rather than building compliance costs into their operations, Sound City Realty treated legal requirements as optional, externalizing health risks onto tenants. high
06 Property management firms compete on price and occupancy rates. Companies that skip compliance steps can offer lower fees to property owners or complete turnovers faster, creating market pressure that rewards corner-cutting over tenant safety. medium
🏥
Public Health and Safety
The Human Cost of Lead Exposure · 7 points
01 Lead exposure is especially harmful to young children under age six, causing irreversible neurological damage, cognitive deficits, behavioral problems, and learning disabilities. Families leasing from Sound City Realty had no warning that their children faced this risk. high
02 Pregnant women exposed to lead can experience serious complications. Lead crosses the placental barrier and can harm fetal brain development, yet Sound City Realty failed to warn expectant mothers leasing these properties. high
03 Renovation activities like sanding, scraping, and window repair generate lead dust that spreads throughout a home. Sound City Realty performed these activities without proper containment, cleanup, or tenant notification, maximizing the risk of exposure. high
04 Lead poisoning symptoms may not appear immediately, meaning families could have lived in contaminated conditions for months or years before discovering the harm. The lack of disclosure prevented tenants from taking protective measures or seeking early medical testing. high
05 Children who ingest lead dust from paint chips or contaminated surfaces can suffer permanent IQ reduction and developmental delays. These effects last a lifetime and reduce educational attainment and earning potential, perpetuating cycles of poverty. high
06 The EPA-approved pamphlet that Sound City Realty failed to provide contains specific instructions for reducing lead exposure, recognizing hazards, and protecting children. Depriving tenants of this information eliminated their ability to make informed decisions about their families’ safety. high
07 Workers performing renovations without proper certification and training faced direct exposure to lead dust. These workers may have carried contamination home to their own families, extending the circle of potential victims beyond the rental properties. medium
🏘️
Community Impact
Broader Consequences for Nashville Area Tenants · 6 points
01 Sound City Realty managed rental properties in multiple Nashville-area communities including Madison, Goodlettsville, and several Nashville neighborhoods. The violations affected geographically dispersed families, suggesting systemic company-wide failures rather than isolated incidents. medium
02 Tenants in older, more affordable housing disproportionately face lead hazards. Sound City Realty’s properties, built between 1930 and 1971, likely served lower-income families who have fewer housing alternatives and less bargaining power with landlords. high
03 Children who suffer lead poisoning require additional educational and medical services funded by local school districts and public health systems. Taxpayers bear these costs while the property management company that caused the exposure pays only a one-time federal fine. high
04 When landlords violate disclosure laws with minimal consequences, it signals to other property managers that compliance is optional. This creates a race to the bottom where ethical companies face competitive disadvantage against those willing to cut corners. medium
05 Community trust in the rental housing market erodes when enforcement actions reveal widespread violations. Tenants may feel powerless to protect their families, not knowing whether their current or future landlords are following the law. medium
06 Low-income families facing lead exposure cannot simply move to safer housing. Rental markets in many areas have limited vacancies, security deposits create financial barriers, and families may be locked into leases, trapping them in hazardous conditions. high
⚖️
Corporate Accountability Failures
How Sound City Realty Avoided Real Consequences · 7 points
01 Sound City Realty settled the case without admitting or denying any wrongdoing. This standard settlement practice allows companies to pay fines while publicly maintaining they did nothing wrong, avoiding accountability for the specific harms alleged. high
02 The company faces no criminal charges, no individual liability for officers or employees, and no requirement to compensate affected tenants. The penalty goes entirely to the federal government, leaving victims without direct remedies. high
03 Sound City Realty must only certify that it is currently in compliance and that violations have been corrected. No independent auditor verifies this claim, no follow-up inspections are mandated, and no public compliance reports are required. medium
04 The consent agreement allows Sound City Realty to continue operating immediately with no suspension of business licenses, no probationary period, and no enhanced monitoring. The company resumes normal operations the day the settlement is filed. medium
05 Property owner Juli Schuman signed the consent agreement on behalf of the company. No corporate board review, no shareholder disclosure, and no public explanation of how these violations occurred or what systemic changes would prevent recurrence. medium
06 The settlement contains no provision for tenant notification. Families who lived in these properties during the violation period may never learn they were denied required lead hazard information, preventing them from seeking medical testing or legal remedies. high
07 The EPA’s enforcement relies on companies self-certifying future compliance. Sound City Realty violated the law repeatedly across multiple properties, yet the settlement assumes the company will now voluntarily follow rules it previously ignored. high
📊
Wealth Disparity
How Violations Entrench Inequality · 6 points
01 Low-income families rent older housing where lead hazards are most prevalent. Sound City Realty’s properties, built between 1930 and 1971, target this market segment, meaning the company’s cost-cutting directly harmed economically vulnerable tenants. high
02 Children who suffer lead-induced cognitive damage experience reduced lifetime earnings, perpetuating intergenerational poverty. Sound City Realty’s violations potentially created long-term economic harm that compounds existing wealth inequality. high
03 Wealthy families can afford newer housing built after 1978 or can demand lead inspections and abatement before signing leases. Poor families lack these options and must accept whatever housing they can afford, absorbing risks that more affluent renters avoid. high
04 Medical costs for lead poisoning treatment, educational interventions for affected children, and lost parental income from missed work fall on working-class families. The property management company that caused the exposure pays a flat fine regardless of the actual human costs. high
05 Property owners who hire companies like Sound City Realty benefit from lower management fees when those companies cut compliance costs. The savings flow upward to property investors while health risks flow downward to tenants with no ownership stake. medium
06 Tenants lack the resources to conduct independent lead testing, hire attorneys to challenge lease violations, or relocate to safer housing. This power imbalance allows property managers to violate disclosure laws with minimal risk of tenant-initiated enforcement. high
🎯
The Bottom Line
What This Case Reveals · 6 points
01 Sound City Realty’s violations demonstrate how property management companies can systematically ignore tenant safety regulations when penalties are low and enforcement is sporadic. The $27,400 fine may be less than the cost of full compliance, making violations a rational business decision. high
02 Federal lead-based paint disclosure laws protect vulnerable populations, especially children and pregnant women, from a known neurotoxin. When companies violate these laws across multiple properties over multiple years, it reveals that current enforcement is insufficient to deter misconduct. high
03 The consent agreement structure allows Sound City Realty to settle without admitting wrongdoing, pay a modest penalty, and continue business without meaningful reform. This pattern repeats across industries, signaling that regulatory violations are treated as minor business expenses. high
04 Tenants who rented from Sound City Realty during the violation period receive no compensation, no notification, and no pathway to remedies. The settlement protects the company and the government’s enforcement record but does nothing for the families potentially harmed. high
05 Real estate and property management operate under a profit-driven model that creates incentives to minimize costs, including compliance costs. Without substantially higher penalties or criminal liability for health and safety violations, companies will continue to calculate that breaking the law is cheaper than following it. high
06 This case exemplifies how neoliberal capitalism’s emphasis on deregulation and minimal government intervention creates conditions where public health protections are undermined. When agencies lack resources for proactive enforcement, companies exploit the gaps at the expense of the most vulnerable populations. high

Timeline of Events

July 2019
Sound City Realty enters lease agreement for 1315 Kermit Drive without proper lead disclosures
May 2021
Company leases 606 Ellen Drive Unit A without providing required lead hazard pamphlet
January 2022
Lease renewed at 1315 Kermit Drive, again without proper disclosures
January-December 2022
Sound City Realty performs or offers renovation work at all six properties without firm certification
April 2022
Lease entered for 265 Sunrise Avenue with missing lead warning statement and disclosures
May 2022
316 A Lorna Drive leased without required lead hazard information
August 2022
555 North Dupont Avenue lease executed without proper certification signatures
October 2022
1731 Dr. DB Todd Jr. Boulevard leased with multiple disclosure violations
December 6, 2022
EPA inspector conducts inspection at Sound City Realty’s Nashville office; company cannot produce required records
December 7, 2022
Sound City Realty begins submitting compliance records to EPA after inspection
January 25, 2023
Company provides additional records to EPA, revealing extent of violations
June 7, 2024
Sound City Realty owner Juli Schuman signs consent agreement settling case for $27,400
June 12, 2024
EPA Director signs consent agreement on behalf of the agency
June 13, 2024
Regional Judicial Officer approves and files consent agreement and final order

Direct Quotes from the Legal Record

QUOTE 1 Federal law requires lead hazard disclosure allegations
“Pursuant to Title X, it is a prohibited act under Section 409 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2689, for any person to fail or refuse to comply with a provision of Title X or any rule or order issued under Title X.”

💡 This establishes that Sound City Realty’s failures were not administrative oversights but violations of federal law with legal consequences

QUOTE 2 Why lead disclosure matters health
“Lead exposure is especially harmful to young children and pregnant women. Before renting pre-1978 housing, lessors must disclose the presence of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in the dwelling. Lessees must also receive a federally approved pamphlet on lead poisoning prevention.”

💡 The required warning statement explains exactly why these violations endanger vulnerable populations

QUOTE 3 What Sound City Realty failed to do allegations
“The records submitted by Respondent failed to document that prior to entering the leases referenced in Paragraph 33(c) through (f), Respondent had: Provided the lessees with an EPA-approved lead hazard information pamphlet as required by 40 C.F.R. § 745.107(a)(1); Included as an attachment or within the contracts to lease target housing the appropriate Lead Warning Statement as required by 40 C.F.R. § 745.113(b)(1); and Included as an attachment or within the contracts to lease target housing a statement by the lessor disclosing the presence of known lead-based paint.”

💡 This shows the violations were not isolated incidents but a pattern affecting multiple properties

QUOTE 4 Uncertified renovation work allegations
“At the time Respondent offered to perform and/or performed the renovations, Respondent had not obtained ‘firm certification’ as required by 40 C.F.R. §§ 745.81(a)(2)(ii) and 745.89(a)(1).”

💡 Performing renovations without certification means Sound City Realty had no trained staff to prevent lead contamination during construction work

QUOTE 5 Why renovation certification matters health
“The term ‘renovation’ is defined at 40 C.F.R. § 745.83, to mean, in part, the modification of any existing structure or portion thereof, that results in the disturbance of painted surfaces… The term renovation includes but is not limited to the following: the removal, modification, or repair of painted surfaces or painted components (e.g., modification of painted doors, surface restoration, window repair, surface preparation activity (such as sanding, scraping, or other such activities that may generate paint dust)).”

💡 These common renovation activities generate lead dust that spreads throughout homes when performed without proper safeguards

QUOTE 6 No admission of wrongdoing accountability
“For the purpose of this proceeding, as required by 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(b)(2), Respondent: admits that the EPA has jurisdiction over the subject matter alleged in this CAFO; neither admits nor denies the factual allegations set forth in Section IV (Findings of Facts) of this CAFO; consents to the assessment of a civil penalty as stated below.”

💡 Sound City Realty pays the fine without admitting it did anything wrong, a common settlement structure that shields companies from accountability

QUOTE 7 Self-certification of compliance accountability
“By executing this CAFO, certifies to the best of its knowledge that Respondent is currently in compliance with all relevant requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 745, Subparts E and F, and the Act, and that all violations alleged herein, which are neither admitted nor denied, have been corrected.”

💡 The company that violated the law for years now simply promises it is following the rules, with no independent verification required

QUOTE 8 Pattern across multiple properties allegations
“Based on a review of Respondent’s records to determine Respondent’s compliance with 40 C.F.R. Part 745, Subpart F, the EPA determined that Respondent entered into contracts to lease the residential dwellings that are target housing (‘the Properties’) at the following locations, on the specified dates listed below: a) 555 North Dupont Avenue, #A6, Madison, Tennessee 37115, Year Built – 1968, lease entered on August 12, 2022; b) 606 Ellen Drive, Unit A, Goodlettsville, Tennessee 37072, Year Built – 1971, lease entered on May 1, 2021; c) 1315 Kermit Drive, Nashville, Tennessee 37217, Year Built – 1947, lease entered on July 1, 2019, and lease renewed on January 8, 2022; d) 316 A Lorna Drive, Nashville, Tennessee 37214, Year Built – 1969, lease entered on May 20, 2022; e) 1731 Dr. DB Todd Jr. Boulevard Nashville, Tennessee 37208, Year Built – 1930, lease entered on October 26, 2022; and f) 265 Sunrise Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee 37211, lease entered on April 29, 2022.”

💡 Six separate properties over three years demonstrates systematic non-compliance, not accidental oversight

QUOTE 9 Modest penalty amount profit
“Respondent is assessed a civil penalty of TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($27,400) which shall be paid within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date of this CAFO.”

💡 A penalty under thirty thousand dollars may be less than the cost of compliance across six properties over multiple years

QUOTE 10 Penalties not deductible accountability
“Penalties paid pursuant to this CAFO shall not be deductible for purposes of federal taxes.”

💡 This provision exists because companies routinely treat fines as ordinary business expenses and write them off their taxes

QUOTE 11 No victim compensation accountability
“In accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(c), Respondent’s full compliance with this CAFO shall only resolve Respondent’s liability for federal civil penalties for the violations and facts specifically alleged above.”

💡 The settlement resolves only the government’s enforcement action and provides no relief to tenants who were denied required safety information

QUOTE 12 Business continues unchanged accountability
“Any change in the legal status of Respondent, or change in ownership, partnership, corporate or legal status relating to the company, or changes pertaining to its ownership and/or management of the Properties identified in Paragraph 33, will not in any way alter Respondent’s obligations and responsibilities under this CAFO.”

💡 The company can continue operating immediately with no suspension, no probation, and no enhanced oversight period

QUOTE 13 What tenants never received health
“Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 745.107(a)(1), the lessor shall provide the lessee with an EPA-approved lead hazard information pamphlet. Such pamphlets include the EPA document entitled Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home (EPA #747-K-94-001) or an equivalent pamphlet that has been approved for use in that State by EPA.”

💡 This pamphlet contains specific instructions for protecting children from lead exposure that Sound City Realty’s tenants never received

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly did Sound City Realty do wrong?
Sound City Realty violated federal lead-based paint disclosure laws at six rental properties in the Nashville area. The company failed to provide mandatory lead hazard pamphlets to tenants, omitted required warning statements from lease contracts, did not disclose known lead hazards or lack of knowledge about hazards, and performed renovation work without the required EPA certification. These violations occurred repeatedly across multiple properties between 2019 and 2022.
Why are lead-based paint disclosures required by law?
Federal law requires these disclosures because lead exposure is especially harmful to young children under six years old and pregnant women. Lead is a neurotoxin that causes irreversible brain damage, cognitive deficits, learning disabilities, and behavioral problems. Housing built before 1978 often contains lead-based paint, and tenants have a right to know about this hazard before signing a lease so they can protect their families or choose different housing.
Which properties were affected by these violations?
Six properties managed by Sound City Realty had disclosure violations: 555 North Dupont Avenue in Madison (built 1968), 606 Ellen Drive in Goodlettsville (built 1971), 1315 Kermit Drive in Nashville (built 1947), 316 A Lorna Drive in Nashville (built 1969), 1731 Dr. DB Todd Jr. Boulevard in Nashville (built 1930), and 265 Sunrise Avenue in Nashville (built 1971). All were built before 1978 and subject to federal lead paint disclosure requirements.
How much was Sound City Realty fined?
The EPA assessed a civil penalty of $27,400 against Sound City Realty to settle the case. The company had thirty days to pay the fine. This penalty goes to the federal government, not to the tenants who were denied required safety information.
Did Sound City Realty admit wrongdoing?
No. The consent agreement specifically states that Sound City Realty neither admits nor denies the factual allegations. This is standard practice in EPA settlements and allows companies to pay fines while avoiding formal admissions that could be used against them in other legal proceedings or damage their reputations.
What happens to tenants who rented these properties during the violation period?
The consent agreement provides no compensation, notification, or remedies for affected tenants. Families who lived in these properties without receiving required lead hazard information may never be officially notified that their landlord violated federal law. The settlement resolves only the government’s enforcement action against the company.
Why did Sound City Realty need firm certification for renovations?
Federal law requires any firm performing renovations in pre-1978 housing to obtain EPA certification. This ensures that workers are trained in lead-safe work practices to prevent contaminating homes with lead dust. Activities like sanding, scraping, window repair, and removing painted components can generate dangerous lead dust if not done properly. Sound City Realty performed or offered these services without certification.
How did the EPA discover these violations?
An EPA inspector conducted an inspection at Sound City Realty’s business office in Nashville on December 6, 2022. The company could not produce required compliance records during the inspection. After the inspection, Sound City Realty submitted records on December 7, 2022, and January 25, 2023, which revealed the extent of the violations across multiple properties.
Is Sound City Realty still in business?
Yes. The consent agreement allows Sound City Realty to continue operating immediately with no suspension of business licenses, no probationary period, and no enhanced monitoring. The company simply had to certify that it is now in compliance and pay the $27,400 penalty. No independent verification of current compliance is required.
What can tenants do if their landlord fails to provide lead disclosures?
Tenants can file complaints with the EPA, contact their state or local health department, seek assistance from legal-aid organizations, or consult a private attorney about potential civil remedies. Federal law gives tenants specific rights to receive lead hazard information before signing a lease. Tenants concerned about lead exposure can also request lead testing in their homes and medical testing for their children.
Post ID: 2683  ·  Slug: sound-city-realty-lead-violation-exposed-epa-neoliberalism  ·  Original: 2025-03-19  ·  Rebuilt: 2026-03-20

The EPA has a link where you can click on to read the legal case file for free: https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/RHC/EPAAdmin.nsf/Filings/9DBBC9A739FC5E2B85258B49007E73C7/$File/Sound%20City%20Realty,%20LLC.CAFO.6.13.24%20TSCA-04-2023-3125(b).pdf

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 1742
🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights are human rights 🏳️‍⚧️
Theme