πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ trans rights are human rights πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ
Theme

Avenue Securities Used Social Media Influencers To Sell Misinformation

FINRA Enforcement • AWC No. 2021072581901 • Accepted January 22, 2025

They Hired Influencers to Sell Brazilian Investors a Lie

What It Feels Like to Be Sold a Dream by Someone You Trusted

You are a working person in Brazil. You watch someone online who seems like you. They are not a banker in a suit. They speak your language, they share your frustrations with the economy, and they tell you, with genuine-seeming enthusiasm, that they have found a way out. The U.S. stock market. “If you pray in English, your blessings come in dollar,” one of them said. You believe it. Why wouldn’t you? They seem like they figured it out.

You click the link in their profile. You open an account. You fund it. You trust the system because someone who felt like your peer told you it was safe, it was easy, and it would make you money. Nobody told you that the person smiling at the camera was being paid a monthly fee to say those things. Nobody told you the platform they were endorsing had no one checking whether any of it was true before it went live. Nobody told you that crypto could wipe out everything you put in. Nobody handed you a prospectus. Nobody explained the risks.

What regulators call “promissory statements” and “misleading hashtags” are, for the person on the other end of the screen, the promise of a better life. When that promise is manufactured by a company that knows it has legal obligations to be fair and balanced, and chooses not to meet them, the betrayal is not abstract. It is the money you moved. The risk you took. The hope that turned into a loss you may never recover.

Avenue Securities processed more than 19,000 of these moments. For three years. And the people making those decisions in Miami faced a $300,000 fine that amounts to roughly $15 per account opened through the deceptive campaign. That is the price they paid to gamble with 19,000 people’s financial futures. No individual executive was charged. No one was barred from the industry. The firm keeps operating.

The cruelest part is the structure of the scheme itself. Avenue Securities did not hire the influencers directly. They ran everything through a foreign affiliate. The affiliate paid the influencers. The affiliate gave them the scripts. But the accounts opened. The money flowed. And when FINRA came to look, the firm had no records because they had never required anyone to keep any.


The Documents Don’t Lie: Avenue’s Own Words, Verbatim

The following quotes come directly from FINRA’s Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent, Case No. 2021072581901, accepted January 22, 2025. These are not paraphrases.

“The influencers created social media posts promoting the firm and its affiliates that were not fair and balanced or contained claims that were promissory or misleading. For instance, in one video, an influencer encouraged viewers to invest in real estate investment trusts, stating, ‘they pay, yes, every month. It always pays a dividend.'”
β€” FINRA AWC No. 2021072581901, p. 4
  • The phrase “it always pays a dividend” is a guarantee. REITs do not guarantee dividend payments. Avenue Securities knew its influencers were making this claim and had no system in place to stop or correct it.
  • This statement was directed at retail investors who may have had no prior experience with U.S. securities markets and were relying entirely on the influencer’s word as accurate information.
“If you pray in English, your blessings come in dollar . . . And if you invest in the best stock exchange in the world, the returns too!”
“The firm also provided to influencers ‘Conduct Rules,’ which included guidelines for creating posts and examples of acceptable contentβ€”such as ‘With Avenue, when you invest $1 in the North American market you may have the possibility of saving $$’ or ‘Avenue makes it easy to start your [INVESTMENTS/LOANS/ETC.] in the North American market.'”
β€” FINRA AWC No. 2021072581901, p. 4
  • Avenue Securities directly authored example scripts for influencers to model. This proves the firm’s involvement in content creation, which FINRA defines as “entanglement,” making the influencer posts legally the firm’s own retail communications subject to full regulatory oversight.
  • The phrase “may have the possibility of saving $$” is vague enough to imply financial benefit while avoiding specific claims, a construction FINRA still classified as promissory and misleading in context.
“Some of the influencers also described Avenue Securities as ‘free’, ‘completely free of charge’, or ‘zero fee’ without disclosing that certain fees may apply or providing a prominent link to Avenue Securities’ fee schedule.”
β€” FINRA AWC No. 2021072581901, p. 5
  • FINRA’s own Regulatory Notice 13-23 had already warned firms that claiming accounts are “free” or “no fee” is generally inconsistent with its rules. Avenue Securities had been on notice that this type of claim was problematic and still allowed influencers to use it without correction.
  • The omission of the fee schedule is a material omission. A retail investor deciding whether to open an account based partly on a “zero fee” claim is receiving decision-relevant information that is false.
“From January 2020 through March 2023, Avenue Securities did not have a registered principal approve influencers’ static posts promoting the firm prior to use, nor did the firm maintain records of influencer communications or the dates the communications were used in accordance with FINRA Rule 2210.”
β€” FINRA AWC No. 2021072581901, p. 5
  • This is a three-year failure of the most basic compliance function: reviewing content before it reaches consumers. The required review exists specifically to catch false or misleading claims before they reach investors.
  • The absence of records means there is no way to audit what was said to how many people during this period. Accountability requires records. Without them, the full scope of harm is structurally unknowable.
“Some posts encouraged potential investors to purchase crypto assets but did not clearly explain the risks of the investment, including that investors could lose their entire investment amount.”
β€” FINRA AWC No. 2021072581901, p. 4
  • Crypto assets are among the most volatile investment products available. The legal standard for disclosing total loss risk is not aspirational; it is required. Avenue Securities allowed influencers to promote crypto without this disclosure for three years.
  • Brazilian retail investors targeted by this campaign may have had limited exposure to the regulatory landscape of U.S. securities markets, making accurate risk disclosure even more critical.

Three Years of Unchecked Influence: The Evidence in Numbers

Visual 1: Chronology of Misconduct & Accountability β€” Avenue Securities LLC Nov 2018 FINRA Membership ~14 months Jan 2020 Influencer Campaign Begins 13 months Feb 2021 Forum Post Review Begins (partial) 2 years+ Mar 2023 FINRA Exam Ends; Firm Finally Fixes Review System ~22 months Jan 22, 2025 FINRA Accepts AWC; $300K Fine Total misconduct period: Jan 2020 – Mar 2023 (38 months)
Visual 2: How Avenue Securities Structured the Scheme to Distance Itself from the Content Avenue Securities LLC (Miami, FL) β€” Defendant Foreign Affiliate (Brazil-based) ~25 Influencers (Brazil-based, paid) FINRA (Regulator) 19,000+ Retail Investors (Brazilian residents β€” Victims) Brand guidance & Conduct Rules Monthly fee Referral links Misleading posts $300K fine + Censure
Visual 3: Required Supervision Process vs. What Avenue Securities Actually Did Required by Law What Avenue Actually Did Influencer creates content Promoting the firm Registered Principal Reviews Content before posting (Rule 2210(b)) Approve or Reject Content Fair, balanced, all disclosures present Record Communications Dates used; approver name (Rule 2210(b)(4)) Content Goes Live Reviewed, approved, documented Influencer creates content Paid by foreign affiliate βœ• NO REVIEW Principal approval skipped entirely βœ• NO APPROVAL No compliance check on claims or disclosures βœ• NO RECORDS KEPT 3 years of content: no dates, no approvals on file Content Goes Live Anyway Misleading, unreviewed, unrecorded
Visual 4: What Investors Were Told vs. What Was Actually True What Investors Were Told The Reality “They pay, yes, every month. It always pays a dividend.” REITs can cut or suspend dividends. No investment guarantees recurring income. “Free,” “completely free of charge,” “zero fee” Fees apply. No link to the fee schedule was provided in the influencer posts. Crypto investments promoted with enthusiasm Investors could lose their entire investment. Never disclosed. #GetRich #Millionaire #ExtraIncome No guarantee of returns exists. Hashtags classified as promissory by FINRA. ETFs promoted as investment opportunities Legally required prospectus disclosures absent. Securities Act Rule 482 violated. Content appears organic; influencer seems like a peer All posts were paid advertisements. Not identified as such to viewers.

Who Gets Hurt When the Rules Are Ignored

Public Health of Household Finances

Financial harm at the household level is health harm. When working people are steered into unsuitable investments by misleading content, the consequences are not abstractions on a balance sheet.

  • More than 19,000 accounts were opened through the referral links tied to this influencer campaign, meaning at least 19,000 individuals made financial decisions influenced by communications regulators found to be misleading, promissory, or lacking required risk disclosures.
  • Investors who followed influencer guidance on crypto assets were never told they could lose their entire investment. People who acted on that omission and experienced losses had no warning that their outcome was foreseeable and legally required to be disclosed.
  • Investors who were told Avenue Securities was “free” or “zero fee” made their decision to open and fund accounts based on a false premise. The cost of that error falls entirely on the investor, not on the firm that allowed the false claim to circulate for years.
  • Brazilian retail investors were a specifically targeted demographic. Cross-border investment decisions carry heightened stakes because regulatory recourse is more complex and the investor’s access to U.S. legal protections may be limited or unclear.
  • The content promoting specific ETFs without the legally required prospectus disclosures means investors were deprived of the core information the law requires before they commit money to a registered investment product.
“Investors were also provided a unique referral link, which allowed the firm to track the number of accounts opened… customers opened and funded more than 19,000 new accounts with the firm using the unique referral links.” The firm tracked every referral. It chose not to track a single piece of content that drove them.
Economic Inequality

Deceptive influencer marketing in financial services does not reach people equally. It targets people who are underserved by traditional financial institutions and are looking for accessible entry points into wealth-building.

  • Avenue Securities specifically built its business targeting Brazilian residents seeking to invest in U.S. markets. These are people often navigating a foreign regulatory system without the resources or language access to independently verify claims made by influencers promoting a product in their home country.
  • The use of social media influencers as a distribution channel is a deliberate strategy to reach retail investors who may not have access to a financial advisor, a brokerage relationship, or the financial literacy infrastructure that wealthier investors rely on for vetting.
  • The $300,000 fine represents approximately $15.78 per account opened through the deceptive campaign. The structural incentive here is clear: the expected cost of getting caught is far lower than the revenue generated by 19,000 funded accounts. This is the economics of impunity.
  • No individual executive, board member, or compliance officer was personally sanctioned. The fine is paid by the company, meaning its investors or future customers absorb the cost. The people who made the decision to skip reviews and keep no records face no personal consequence.
  • Firms operating across borders can route accountability through foreign affiliates, as Avenue Securities did here. The foreign affiliate paid the influencers and provided the scripts. The U.S. entity booked the accounts and the revenue. When regulators arrived, the recordkeeping gap meant the full picture of what was said to whom, and when, may never be reconstructed.

What FINRA’s Fine Actually Means in Human Terms

$300,000

Total fine paid by Avenue Securities for three years of misleading, unreviewed, and unrecorded influencer content reaching more than 19,000 funded investor accounts.

That is $15.78 per investor account opened through the deceptive campaign. Less than the cost of a streaming subscription. Per person. For three years of unchecked financial misinformation.

Fine vs. Scale of the Campaign

  • $300,000 total fine divided by 19,000+ accounts equals roughly $15.78 per investor exposed to the deceptive campaign.
  • The campaign ran for 38 months, across approximately 25 influencers, across multiple social media platforms, targeting an international retail investor base with no regulatory experience in U.S. markets.
  • The fine was paid by the firm. No individual was personally fined, suspended, or barred. The people who built this system and let it run for three years keep their licenses and their careers.
  • The firm waived its right to contest the findings in exchange for a $300,000 settlement. It neither admits nor denies the violations, meaning it can legally maintain it did nothing wrong while still agreeing to pay the fine.

Name the People, File the Complaints, Build the Pressure

Avenue Securities, CRD No. 292589, remains a FINRA member firm. The people responsible for this compliance failure are still in the industry. Here is who signed the documents and where to apply pressure.

Named Parties in the AWC

  • Roberto Lee, CEO β€” signed the AWC on behalf of Avenue Securities LLC on December 18, 2024. As the chief executive, he is the senior-most signatory on the settlement admitting to three years of supervisory failures.
  • Ethan Silver, Counsel for Respondent β€” Lowenstein Sandler, 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. The firm’s legal representation in the settlement negotiation.
  • Leah Milbauer, FINRA Enforcement Counsel β€” 99 High Street, Suite 900, Boston, MA 02110. The FINRA official who accepted and signed the AWC on January 22, 2025.

Regulatory Watchlist

These are the agencies with jurisdiction over the conduct described in this investigation. If you or someone you know opened an account through an Avenue Securities influencer referral link, you have standing to file a complaint.

  • FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority): The primary regulator here. File complaints at finra.org/investors/have-problem. FINRA BrokerCheck lists Avenue Securities’ full disciplinary record including this AWC. Look up CRD No. 292589.
  • SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission): The SEC has jurisdiction over Securities Act Rule 482 violations (ETF advertising disclosures) and Exchange Act Section 17(a) recordkeeping violations documented in this AWC. File at sec.gov/tcr.
  • CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau): While CFPB jurisdiction over broker-dealers is limited, the deceptive marketing practices documented here, including false “fee-free” claims, overlap with consumer protection mandates. File at consumerfinance.gov/complaint.
  • FTC (Federal Trade Commission): The FTC has enforcement authority over undisclosed paid endorsements under its Endorsement Guides. Influencer posts paid by Avenue Securities’ affiliate that were not labeled as paid advertisements may constitute FTC violations independent of the FINRA action. Report at reportfraud.ftc.gov.

What You Can Do Right Now

  • If you opened an Avenue Securities account via an influencer link between January 2020 and March 2023, document everything: screenshots, the influencer’s content if you can still find it, your account opening date, and any losses. Contact a securities attorney about your options. The AWC filing establishes FINRA’s factual findings, which can support a civil claim.
  • Share this investigation with Brazilian investment communities on social platforms where the original influencer campaign ran. The people targeted by this campaign are the ones who most need to know it happened.
  • Push FINRA to impose individual sanctions. The current settlement holds no specific person accountable. Contact your elected representatives and demand that financial regulators pursue personal liability against executives who sign off on compliance systems they know are inadequate.
  • Support financial literacy organizations working in immigrant and diaspora communities. Cross-border investor targeting is a growth strategy for firms willing to exploit regulatory knowledge gaps. Community-based financial education is the structural defense.
  • When you see a social media influencer promoting a brokerage or investment platform, ask: Is this labeled as a paid advertisement? Does it include risk disclosures? Is there a referral link in the bio? If the answer to the first two is no, that firm may be violating the same rules Avenue Securities violated for three years.

The source document for this investigation is attached below.

The FINRA website has information about this if you want to take a look: https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2021072581901%20Avenue%20Securities%20LLC%20CRD%20292589%20AWC%20lp%20%282025-1740269998445%29.pdf

There is another FINRA enforcement action against Avenue Securities that you can read about here: https://evilcorporations.com/avenue-securities-21000-errors-in-silence

Explore by category

01

Antitrust

Monopolies and anti-competition tactics used to crush rivals.

View Cases →
02

Product Safety Violations

When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.

View Cases →
03

Environmental Violations

Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.

View Cases →
04

Labor Exploitation

Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.

View Cases →
05

Data Breaches & Privacy

Misuse and mishandling of personal information.

View Cases →
06

Financial Fraud & Corruption

Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.

View Cases →
07

Intellectual Property

IP theft that punishes originality and rewards copying.

View Cases →
08

Misleading Marketing

False claims that waste money and bury critical safety info.

View Cases →
Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 1893