SEC Sues Helios Venture Fund for $9M Ponzi Scheme

Corporate Greed Case Study: Helios Venture Fund and Its Impact on the Hispanic Community

For two years, a dream was sold to families, many of them Hispanic, in and around San Antonio, Texas. It was a dream of “generational wealth”, of using the power of the market to build a secure future.

Imer Gomez, a 28-year-old who called himself an experienced securities trader, was the one selling it. Through his companies, K&G Investment Solutions and later Helios Venture Fund, he promised clients he could deliver double-digit monthly returns by expertly trading on their behalf.

Instead, according to allegations from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), he delivered only ruin, orchestrating a scheme that siphoned approximately $9 million from his clients.


The Corporate Playbook: How the Harm Was Done

The strategy used by Gomez and his companies was a textbook case of financial predation, built on a foundation of calculated falsehoods designed to win trust and exploit hope.

A Narrative of Expertise and Exclusivity

Gomez presented himself as a seasoned professional who wanted to help the Hispanic community get ahead. He created a veneer of legitimacy with official-sounding “Investment Management Services Agreements” and offered a menu of different investment packages, from “Aggressive Day Trading” to “Long Term Growth,” each with its own fee structure.

The Illusion of Safety

Crucially, Gomez assured prospective clients that their money was safe. The agreements explicitly stated that client accounts were insured for up to 75% of their value against a “catastrophic loss”. For people entrusting their savings to him, this promise of a safety net was a powerful incentive.

When one client asked for proof of this insurance in June 2023, Gomez claimed he was legally barred from providing it. In reality, the SEC asserts that no client accounts were ever created, let alone insured.

Manufacturing Success

To keep the money flowing in, Gomez allegedly provided clients with fake performance statements. These were not detailed trading reports but simple one-line emails or images showing an ever-increasing account value. These fabricated gains had a dual effect: they convinced existing clients that their wealth was growing, and they persuaded some to invest even more money into the manufactured success.

The truth, according to investigators, was that none of the clients’ money was ever transferred to a trading platform. Client funds from checks, wires, and online payment apps were simply commingled into bank accounts that Gomez personally controlled.


A Cascade of Consequences: The Real-World Impact

The $9 million that disappeared represented the life savings, retirement funds, and financial futures of the people who trusted Gomez. The SEC complaint details a devastating betrayal where community aspirations were allegedly turned into cash for a predator’s personal use.

Economic Ruin for a Community

While clients believed their money was growing in the market, it was actually being drained to fund a completely different agenda. The SEC alleges the commingled funds were used for:

  • Ponzi Payments: Using money from new clients to pay withdrawal requests from earlier ones, maintaining the illusion of a profitable business.
  • A Lavish Lifestyle: Funding Gomez’s personal expenses.
  • Enriching Insiders: Loaning and transferring approximately $666,000 in client funds to his ex-girlfriend’s father, Eric Claxton, and his wife, Heather Claxton. The Claxtons allegedly used these funds to purchase real estate and have not repaid any of the amounts characterized as loans.
  • Other Ventures: Paying for unrelated businesses and covering commissions for client referrals.

When the inflow of new money could no longer cover the outflows, the scheme collapsed.

Around September 19, 2023, Gomez sent clients a letter blaming a “sudden and unrecoverable liquidation”. To further delay the inevitable, he offered one last drop of false hope: a “guaranteed bailout loan” that he claimed would repay all clients their initial capital by February 1, 2024. No such loan ever existed. The money was gone.


A System Designed for This: Profit, Deregulation, and Power

This section is analysis.

The story of Helios Venture Fund is a disturbing illustration of the environment created by neoliberal capitalism, an economic system that relentlessly prioritizes profit and deregulation. This ideology fosters a culture where individuals are told they must participate in a complex and often predatory financial market to achieve security, placing the burden of navigating that system on them.

Predators like Imer Gomez thrive in this environment. They co-opt the language of empowerment—”building generational wealth”—to exploit the very real anxieties people face in an economy with a frayed social safety net. The promise of high returns is a potent lure in a world where stable, well-paying jobs and pensions are increasingly rare.

The system’s emphasis on individual responsibility for financial success, combined with a lack of proactive regulatory oversight, creates the perfect hunting ground for schemes that target communities rich in trust but lacking access to verified financial expertise. Gomez’s operation went on for two years, accumulating millions before being stopped, a testament to a reactive rather than preventative system.


Dodging Accountability: How the Powerful Evade Justice

The SEC has stepped in to file a civil complaint, seeking to enjoin Gomez from continuing his activities, force him and the other defendants to return their ill-gotten gains, and impose a civil penalty. While these actions are critical for clawing back some of the stolen funds and shutting down the operation, they often fall short of what victims would consider true justice.

In the world of financial crime, civil penalties are often viewed by perpetrators as a “cost of doing business.” They do not carry the same societal weight or deterrent effect as criminal convictions. The legal process is slow, and the recovery of funds is never guaranteed.

For the families who lost everything, the damage is immediate and profound, while the path to even partial restitution is long and uncertain.

This case highlights a fundamental imbalance: the immense, life-altering harm inflicted on victims is met with a legal response that, while necessary, often fails to fully hold individuals accountable in a way that matches the scale of their actions.


Reclaiming Power: Pathways to Real Change

Preventing future tragedies like the one alleged in the Helios case requires more than just prosecuting individual actors after the fact.

It demands a systemic shift. Real change involves strengthening financial regulations and boosting the enforcement powers of agencies like the SEC to be more proactive. It means creating and funding community-based, non-profit financial literacy programs that are insulated from the predatory sales pitches of the financial industry.

Ultimately, it requires building an economy where people are not forced to gamble their life savings in a rigged market to have a chance at a secure retirement or a better life for their children. This means advocating for policies that build collective wealth and security—like stronger unions, expanded social security, and public banking options—that serve the community’s interest, not just the interests of capital.


Conclusion: A Story of a System, Not an Exception

The SEC’s complaint against Imer Gomez and Helios Venture Fund paints a picture of a devastating betrayal. It is a story of trust exploited and futures destroyed.

But!!!! It is a mistake to view this as an isolated incident. The tactics and motivations on display are the logical, predictable outcomes of a late-stage capitalist economy that incentivizes the extraction of wealth by any means necessary.

Imer Gomez is a player who learned to use the tools the system gave him. This story is a window into a much larger crisis, reminding us that without fundamental change, there will always be another Helios waiting to prey on the next community.


All factual claims in this article were derived from the public court document: Complaint, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gomez et al., No. 5:25-cv-00805, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas on July 14, 2025.

There is a press release on the scandal that can be found on the SEC website: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26349

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm the creator this website. I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher studying corporatocracy and its detrimental effects on every single aspect of society.

For more information, please see my About page.

All posts published by this profile were either personally written by me, or I actively edited / reviewed them before publishing. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Articles: 1690