Five Violations, One Toxic Chemical, Zero Oversight: How Libra Industries Left Hazardous Waste Unlabeled in Elk Grove Village
The Non-Financial Ledger: What a Container Label Actually Means
There is a reason the EPA requires every container of hazardous waste to be marked with the words “Hazardous Waste” and a date. It is not bureaucratic box-ticking. It is the difference between a worker who knows what they are standing next to and one who does not.
Tetrachloroethylene is not an abstract risk. It is a dense, colorless liquid with a sharp chemical smell. The EPA classifies it as a probable human carcinogen. Long-term exposure is linked to liver and kidney damage, central nervous system effects, impaired memory, and an elevated risk of certain cancers, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma and bladder cancer. It does not ask permission before it enters your body. It moves through skin contact, through the air you breathe in an enclosed facility, and through groundwater if it leaks into the soil beneath a building.
Libra Industries runs a facility that launders used safety equipment. Think about that for a moment. The whole business model involves handling gear that has already been exposed to industrial hazards, cleaning it, and sending it back out. The workers inside that building at 1951 Arthur Avenue are not executives. They are the people doing the physical labor in a space that, as of the March 2024 EPA inspection, contained unlabeled containers of a toxic solvent, an open container of hazardous material left unsecured, and a storage tank that no licensed engineer had ever formally assessed for structural integrity.
When a tote of hazardous waste sits on a floor without an accumulation start date, the clock on safe storage legally does not exist. A large quantity generator is only permitted to store hazardous waste on-site for 90 days without a treatment, storage, and disposal permit. The date label is what proves compliance. Without it, there is no way to know whether waste has been sitting there for 90 days or 900 days. There is no way for a worker to know what they are moving, stacking, or accidentally puncturing.
When a tank full of hazardous waste has never been inspected daily and has never received a Professional Engineer’s structural assessment, the question is not whether something can go wrong. The question is when, and who is close enough to be hurt when it does. Workers who breathe PERC fumes in an under-regulated environment rarely connect their headaches, their fatigue, or their eventual diagnosis to the facility where they spent years. They rarely have lawyers. They almost never end up in a federal docket. That is what this ledger is for.
“A tote of hazardous waste with no date label and no ‘Hazardous Waste’ marking is not a paperwork problem. It is a person who works in that building not knowing what is in the room with them.”
The $100,675 Libra paid resolves the company’s civil liability with the EPA. It does not pay a single medical bill. It does not restore a single lung or liver. It does not compensate a single worker for years of exposure to a probable carcinogen in a facility that chose, repeatedly, not to follow rules that have been in force since 2006. The legal ledger is settled. The human one is not.
Legal Receipts: What the EPA Document Actually Says
Every quote below is pulled verbatim from Docket No. RCRA-05-2026-0014, the Consent Agreement and Final Order signed and filed with the EPA Region 5 Regional Hearing Clerk on January 26, 2026.
“At all times relevant to this CAFO, Respondent laundered used safety equipment using dry-clean machines. At all times relevant to this CAFO, Respondent’s activities laundering used safety equipment with tetrachloroethylene using dry-clean machines, generated tetrachloroethylene waste. Respondent characterized the hazardous waste it generated at the Facility as ‘waste tetrachloroethylene’ with the waste code D039.”
- This paragraph establishes that Libra’s toxic waste output was a routine, predictable byproduct of their core business operation, not an accident or an isolated incident.
- Waste code D039 designates tetrachloroethylene as a hazardous waste under the federal characteristic waste classification system. Libra knew this, because they filed their own Hazardous Waste Notification with the EPA on May 15, 2008, identifying themselves as a Large Quantity Generator.
- Sixteen years passed between that self-identification and the 2024 inspection that found basic labeling and safety requirements were not being followed.
“At the time of the Inspection, Respondent failed to clearly and visibly mark with the date upon which each period of hazardous waste accumulation began: a) one tote storing hazardous waste; and b) one container storing hazardous waste in the secondary containment of the hazardous waste storage tank. Respondent also failed to clearly and visibly mark one hazardous waste storage tank with the date upon which each period of hazardous waste accumulation began.”
- This violation removes the legal mechanism that enforces the 90-day on-site storage limit. Without a start date, there is no way to determine whether waste has been stored beyond the legal maximum, which would require a full treatment, storage, and disposal permit.
- The violation applied to both portable containers and a fixed tank, indicating the failure was systemic across the facility, not limited to one storage area.
“At the time of the Inspection, Respondent failed to clearly and visibly mark with the words ‘Hazardous Waste:’ a) one tote storing hazardous waste; and b) one container storing hazardous waste in the secondary containment of the hazardous waste storage tank area. Respondent’s failure to clearly and visibly mark hazardous waste storage containers with the words ‘Hazardous Waste’ violated 35 Ill. Adm. Code § 722.134(a)(3).”
- The “Hazardous Waste” label requirement has been in force under Illinois law since February 23, 2006, and under the federal RCRA program since 1980. This is not a new or recently enacted rule.
- A container of D039-classified tetrachloroethylene waste with no “Hazardous Waste” marking is indistinguishable to an uninformed worker from a container of non-hazardous material. In an emergency, that distinction determines response procedures and life-safety decisions.
“At the time of the Inspection, EPA observed one open container containing hazardous waste, at a time when Respondent was not adding or removing waste from the container. Respondent’s failure to close all hazardous waste containers during storage violated 35 Ill. Adm. Code §§ 722.134(a)(1)(A) and 725.273(a).”
- An open container of tetrachloroethylene waste actively releases vapor into the surrounding air. Prolonged inhalation of PERC vapor at occupational levels is one of the primary exposure routes linked to neurological and carcinogenic effects.
- The law requires closure during all storage periods except when actively adding or removing waste. This was not an edge-case ambiguity. The container was open with no active handling in progress when federal inspectors walked in.
“At the time of the Inspection, Respondent had failed to obtain the required written tank assessment of its hazardous waste storage tank by a qualified Professional Engineer. Respondent’s failure to obtain the written assessment of its hazardous waste storage tank from a qualified Professional Engineer violated 35 Ill. Adm. Code §§ 722.134(a)(1)(B) and 725.292(a).”
- The PE assessment requirement exists specifically to verify that the tank’s structure, seams, connections, and pressure controls are sound enough to hold hazardous waste without collapsing, rupturing, or failing. Libra stored PERC waste in a tank that had never received this certification.
- A tank failure containing tetrachloroethylene waste can result in soil and groundwater contamination that persists for decades and creates legal liability and health risks for communities far beyond the facility boundary.
“At the time of the Inspection, Respondent had failed to conduct inspections of its hazardous waste storage tank at least once each operation day. Respondent’s failure to conduct daily inspections of its hazardous waste tanks violated 35 Ill. Adm. Code §§ 722.134(a)(1)(B) and 725.295(a).”
- Daily tank inspections are the early-warning system for leaks and structural degradation. They require checking monitoring and leak detection equipment to confirm the tank is operating within design parameters.
- Without daily inspections, a developing leak or corrosion failure can go undetected. Combined with the absence of a PE structural assessment (Count 4), Libra was operating a hazardous waste tank with no baseline for what “normal” looked like and no daily check to detect when it deviated.
“Pursuant to Section 3008(a) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6928(a), and 40 C.F.R. Part 19, the Administrator of U.S. EPA may assess a civil penalty of up to $124,426 per day for each violation of Subtitle C of RCRA that occurred after November 2, 2015.”
- Libra paid $100,675 in total across five violations. The maximum statutory daily penalty for a single violation is $124,426. The assessed penalty does not represent a single day’s maximum exposure for even one count, let alone all five.
- The EPA states it considered “the seriousness of the violation and any good faith efforts to comply” when setting the penalty amount. The document offers no further detail on what good faith efforts Libra demonstrated.
- Libra “neither admits nor denies the factual allegations” in the agreement, meaning the settlement resolves their civil liability without any legal admission of wrongdoing on the record.
Societal Impact Mapping: Who Pays When Corporations Skip the Rules
Environmental Degradation
The five violations documented in this case each represent a specific failure mode that increases the risk of environmental contamination from tetrachloroethylene, one of the most persistent soil and groundwater contaminants known to regulators.
- Tetrachloroethylene (PERC, waste code D039) is a Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL), meaning it sinks through soil and groundwater rather than floating. Once it enters the subsurface, it can persist for decades and migrate significant distances from the original release point, contaminating municipal and private wells.
- The absence of a Professional Engineer’s structural integrity assessment for the hazardous waste storage tank (Count 4) means the tank’s ability to contain PERC waste was never independently verified. A structurally compromised tank holding DNAPL presents direct subsurface contamination risk for the surrounding Elk Grove Village community.
- The failure to conduct daily tank inspections (Count 5) eliminated the primary operational mechanism for detecting a developing leak before it became a release. Early detection is the difference between a contained incident and a groundwater remediation project that can cost millions and last generations.
- An open, unlabeled container of PERC waste (Counts 2 and 3) in a dry-cleaning facility generates vapor that can condense and drip, creating floor and drain pathway contamination even without a catastrophic spill.
Public Health
The workers inside the Libra Industries facility at 1951 Arthur Avenue represent the first tier of public health exposure, and the surrounding Elk Grove Village community represents a second tier connected through air and groundwater pathways.
- Tetrachloroethylene is classified by the EPA as a likely human carcinogen based on evidence of kidney cancer in humans and multiple cancer types in animal studies. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies it as Group 1 (carcinogenic to humans) for bladder cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
- Occupational exposure to PERC vapor, the route made more likely by the open container violation (Count 3), is associated with central nervous system effects including impaired reaction time, reduced memory function, and mood disturbances at chronic low levels.
- Workers handling unlabeled hazardous waste containers (Counts 1 and 2) cannot make informed decisions about personal protective equipment, safe handling procedures, or when to report symptoms to a healthcare provider who can connect occupational exposure to clinical findings.
- Because Libra operates a safety equipment laundering service, the workers inside this facility likely believe their employer has a professional commitment to safety standards. Operating a hazardous waste program with five simultaneous violations in that context represents a specific kind of institutional betrayal.
- PERC contamination of groundwater in suburban Illinois communities has been documented at multiple dry-cleaning and industrial laundry sites historically. The pattern is well-established by EPA Region 5’s own enforcement history. Elk Grove Village residents within the potential groundwater plume radius of this facility are the downstream holders of a risk they did not choose.
Economic Inequality
The financial structure of this enforcement settlement illustrates exactly how RCRA penalties function less as deterrence and more as a cost of doing business for corporations that can absorb them.
- The $100,675 total penalty across five violations amounts to roughly $20,135 per violation. The maximum statutory penalty is $124,426 per violation per day. Even assuming each violation lasted one single day, Libra paid approximately 16 cents on every dollar the law permits the EPA to collect.
- Libra Industries settled before a formal complaint was even filed. The consent agreement was “commenced and concluded simultaneously,” meaning the company avoided the reputational and legal costs of public litigation while paying a fraction of maximum exposure.
- The penalties paid by Libra are explicitly non-deductible for federal tax purposes under 26 U.S.C. § 6050X, as noted in the CAFO. However, the legal fees and compliance costs to negotiate the settlement likely are deductible, meaning corporate legal defense against an EPA enforcement action can generate a tax advantage unavailable to the communities bearing the risk.
- Workers in facilities like this one, predominantly working-class and often lacking union representation or comprehensive health insurance, bear the compounding costs of occupational chemical exposure: out-of-pocket medical expenses, lost wages during illness, and the near-impossible burden of proving occupational causation in a legal system built around employer-protective workers’ compensation frameworks.
- Groundwater remediation from PERC contamination, if required in Elk Grove Village, would be funded by a mix of EPA Superfund resources (taxpayer money) and potentially liable parties. Communities near dry-cleaning operations with undetected releases have waited years to decades for cleanup while property values depreciate and health monitoring costs accumulate without corporate compensation.
The “Cost of a Life” Metric: What $100,675 Actually Buys
Maximum Penalty vs. What Libra Actually Paid: The Numbers
What Now? The Watchlist and the Work
This case is formally closed. Libra Industries paid its penalty, CEO and Owner William M. Maki signed the agreement, and the EPA’s civil enforcement arm for Region 5 has moved on. But the obligations and the leverage points for accountability have not disappeared.
Watchlist: Regulatory Bodies With Ongoing Jurisdiction
- U.S. EPA Region 5 (Chicago): Retains authority under RCRA § 3008(a) to pursue criminal sanctions and injunctive relief separately from this civil settlement. The CAFO explicitly does not foreclose those options. Contact: EPA Region 5 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division.
- Illinois EPA (IEPA): The State of Illinois has its own authorized RCRA program and independent enforcement authority. The EPA notified the state of this action under RCRA § 3008(a)(2). Illinois residents can contact IEPA’s Bureau of Land, Division of Pollution Control, to inquire about state-level follow-up inspection activity at 1951 Arthur Avenue, Elk Grove Village.
- Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH): Has authority over occupational and environmental health investigations. Workers at the Libra facility who have experienced health effects consistent with PERC exposure can file a complaint or request an investigation.
- U.S. Department of Labor / OSHA Region 5: Occupational Safety and Health Administration has overlapping jurisdiction over worker exposure to chemical hazards including tetrachloroethylene in industrial settings. An OSHA complaint can trigger an independent inspection focused on worker health and safety standards that are separate from the RCRA hazardous waste rules at issue here.
- U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ): If EPA refers criminal violations, DOJ’s Environment and Natural Resources Division holds prosecution authority. The CAFO preserves EPA’s right to make such a referral.
Mutual Aid, Local Organizing, and Grassroots Resistance
- Workers inside the Elk Grove Village facility: You have the right to request an OSHA inspection anonymously. File at osha.gov or call 1-800-321-OSHA. You cannot be legally retaliated against for making a safety complaint, and your name is not disclosed to your employer during the complaint process.
- Elk Grove Village residents near 1951 Arthur Avenue: Request a right-to-know briefing from the Village’s Public Works Department about any groundwater monitoring data at or near industrial facilities in your area. Illinois has a robust Environmental Justice Mapping tool (Illinois EJScreen) that can help you understand cumulative environmental burden in your neighborhood.
- Environmental justice organizations in Cook County and DuPage County: Connect with groups like the Illinois Environmental Council, the Southeast Environmental Task Force, or the Little Village Environmental Justice Organization, which have established frameworks for monitoring corporate compliance in suburban industrial corridors and supporting affected workers in pursuing legal and regulatory remedies.
- Document, date, and preserve: If you work at or near this facility and have observed conditions related to these violations, write down what you saw, when you saw it, and who was present. Dated written records are admissible evidence and are the foundation of any future enforcement or litigation action.
- Share this investigation: The EPA’s docket system is public, but most people never search it. The settlement at Docket No. RCRA-05-2026-0014 is available for public download. Share it with union halls, neighborhood associations, community health workers, and local press in Elk Grove Village and the surrounding Cook County industrial corridor.
The source document for this investigation is attached below.
Libra Industries can be reached by calling 1-800-888-5427 or by emailing info@librasafety.com
I have reached out to Libra Industries for a quote on this scandal and have not yet received an answer yet.
The EPA’s CAFO on this case can be found by visiting: https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/RHC/EPAAdmin.nsf/Filings/5555649976E75DA885258D8C006E0048/$File/RCRA-05-2026-0014_CAFO_LibraIndustriesInc_ElkGroveVillageIllinois_18PGS.pdf
Explore by category
Product Safety Violations
When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.
View Cases →Financial Fraud & Corruption
Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.
View Cases →
