Corporate Accountability Project • Higher Education Sector
Northwestern University · Class Action
2020–2026
Northwestern Kept Full Tuition While Students Got Zoom Classes
A settled class action reveals how an elite university collected billions in tuition during COVID-19 while delivering a fraction of what students paid for.
● HIGH SEVERITY
TL;DR
Northwestern University charged students full tuition rates during Spring, Summer, and Fall 2020, while abruptly shutting its campuses and moving all instruction to remote formats as a result of COVID-19. Students and their families paid for on-campus facilities, in-person learning environments, labs, libraries, campus life, and hands-on instruction. They received a laptop and a Zoom link. Northwestern then spent over five years fighting the lawsuit before agreeing to a $4 million settlement. That figure represents a fraction of the tuition collected from affected students. Northwestern has not admitted wrongdoing.
Paying for a world-class university means paying for a world-class experience. When that experience disappears, so should the price tag. Demand accountability for institutions that profit while students lose.
Key Numbers
$4M
Total gross settlement fund
$153
Approx. payout per Spring 2020 student
$61
Approx. payout per Summer 2020 student
$36
Approx. payout per Fall 2020 student
$1.39M
Max attorney fees and costs requested
5+
Years Northwestern fought the lawsuit
3
Academic quarters affected (Spring, Summer, Fall 2020)
$45K
Max service awards for the 3 named plaintiffs
Core Allegations
Core Allegations
What Northwestern did · 6 points
▾
| 01 | Northwestern transitioned all in-person instruction and campus educational services to a fully remote format during Spring 2020, Summer 2020, and Fall 2020, without reducing or refunding tuition to students who had contracted and paid for on-campus education. | high |
| 02 | Plaintiffs allege Northwestern breached its contract with students by failing to deliver the in-person, campus-based educational experience that tuition payments were understood to purchase. | high |
| 03 | Plaintiffs allege Northwestern was unjustly enriched by retaining full tuition payments while delivering a materially inferior educational product for at least three consecutive academic terms. | high |
| 04 | Northwestern moved to dismiss the lawsuit twice: first in February 2021, and again in November 2021. Both motions were denied, with the court also rejecting Northwestern’s subsequent motion for reconsideration in February 2023. | medium |
| 05 | The settlement class covers all full-time students enrolled in degree-conferring programs at Northwestern’s U.S. campuses during the affected quarters whose tuition was not fully funded by the university, representing a large population of paying students who received diminished services. | medium |
| 06 | Northwestern engaged in over two years of contested fact discovery and two separate private mediation sessions before agreeing to settle in May 2025, five years after the original harm occurred. | medium |
Profit Over People
Revenue prioritized over student welfare · 5 points
▾
| 01 | Northwestern collected full tuition for a minimum of three academic terms during which it did not and could not deliver the campus experience those payments were understood to fund, including physical classrooms, labs, libraries, student spaces, and in-person faculty interaction. | high |
| 02 | The university made no proactive move to refund or proportionally reduce tuition despite eliminating on-campus delivery. Students and families were left to pursue litigation at their own expense and risk to recover even a fraction of what they paid. | high |
| 03 | The settlement’s per-student payouts ($36 to $153 depending on the term) represent a small fraction of Northwestern’s actual per-term tuition charges, which run into the tens of thousands of dollars. Students will recover pennies on the dollar for what was taken from them. | high |
| 04 | Up to $1,390,100.85 of the $4 million gross settlement fund is allocated to attorney fees and costs, meaning the net amount distributed to affected students is substantially less than the headline figure. The settlement administrator’s fees further reduce the pool available to students. | medium |
| 05 | Any unclaimed or uncashed settlement funds do not revert to students but return to Northwestern’s own emergency aid fund, allowing the university to benefit from the residual of a settlement it created the need for through its own conduct. | medium |
Economic Fallout
Financial harm to students and families · 4 points
▾
| 01 | Students who took on federal or private loans to fund their Northwestern tuition during Spring, Summer, and Fall 2020 are now repaying debt on an education they did not fully receive. The interest on that debt continues to accrue against them personally. | high |
| 02 | International students who had paid premium tuition partly on the premise of accessing U.S.-based campus infrastructure, networks, and in-person academic culture received a remote product equivalent to what any domestic or online student could access. | medium |
| 03 | The Spring 2020 term, which accounts for 75% of the net settlement fund allocation, was the period of most significant disruption: campuses closed, students were sent home, and the on-campus experience was eliminated entirely mid-term. | high |
| 04 | The settlement provides no recovery for graduate fees, housing and dining contracts broken by the university’s campus closure, or other fees paid in expectation of on-campus access. The scope of financial harm to students exceeds what the settlement addresses. | medium |
Corporate Accountability Failures
Weak penalties, no admission of wrongdoing · 5 points
▾
| 01 | Northwestern settled without admitting any wrongdoing or liability. The agreement explicitly states that no part of the settlement constitutes an admission of fault, wrongdoing, or evidence of any violation of law. | high |
| 02 | No executives, trustees, or administrators face any personal accountability or financial consequence under the settlement. The cost is borne entirely by the institutional budget, which is funded in part by current and future students. | high |
| 03 | The settlement terms prohibit parties from making public statements about the case beyond characterizing it as a resolution to avoid further risk and expense. Students and the public are discouraged from learning the full scope of what was alleged and what occurred. | medium |
| 04 | Northwestern contested the lawsuit vigorously for over five years, filing two motions to dismiss, a motion for reconsideration, and engaging in extensive fact discovery, dramatically increasing litigation costs for all parties involved and delaying compensation for students. | medium |
| 05 | The settlement contains no injunctive relief, no requirement to change institutional practices, and no commitment that Northwestern will handle future disruptions to campus services differently. Students receive cash; the institution receives a full release and closure. | high |
Exploiting Delay
Five years of legal attrition against students · 4 points
▾
| 01 | Northwestern filed a motion to dismiss in February 2021, just two months after the class action was filed. After the court allowed the case to proceed, Northwestern filed a second motion to dismiss in November 2021, then a motion for reconsideration in 2023, each adding months or years to the timeline before students saw any relief. | high |
| 02 | Fact discovery continued for over two years after Northwestern’s reconsideration motion was denied. The institution produced documents and deposed plaintiffs before the first mediation session took place in June 2023, more than three years after the original harm. | medium |
| 03 | The first mediation session in June 2023 failed to produce a settlement. A second session was required in May 2025. Students waited nearly five years from the original campus closure before any settlement was agreed upon in principle. | medium |
| 04 | Class counsel acknowledged that continued litigation risked producing no recovery at all, or a recovery years further away. This structural asymmetry (a large institution with unlimited legal resources versus individual students) is precisely what allows universities and corporations to delay, reduce, and ultimately minimize accountability. | high |
The Bottom Line
What this case reveals · 4 points
▾
| 01 | Higher education institutions charged students and their families top-tier tuition during COVID-19 while the services that justify those costs were entirely unavailable. This case documents what happened when one group of students decided that was unacceptable. | high |
| 02 | The $4 million settlement, while a real financial win, represents a fraction of the total tuition collected from the affected class during the three impacted quarters. Students collectively recover a symbolic sum relative to what the institution retained. | high |
| 03 | This case is part of a nationwide wave of tuition refund lawsuits against universities filed in 2020 and 2021. Northwestern’s settlement joins a pattern in which institutions settle without admitting fault, pay relatively modest sums, and face no structural accountability. | medium |
| 04 | The named plaintiffs who carried this case for five years receive service awards of up to $15,000 each. The law firms representing the class receive up to $1.39 million in fees. The thousands of other students receive between $36 and $153. That distribution speaks to where power lies in these settlements. | medium |
Timeline of Events
March 2020
Northwestern closes its campuses and transitions all instruction and campus services to remote formats in response to COVID-19 and public health mandates. Students are sent home mid-term.
Summer / Fall 2020
Northwestern continues remote-only instruction for Summer 2020 and Fall 2020 terms, collecting full tuition while campus-based services remain unavailable.
Dec 22, 2020
Plaintiffs Nancy Quiroz, Surya Veeravalli, and Daniel Greenwald file a consolidated class action complaint in the Northern District of Illinois, alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment.
Feb 5, 2021
Northwestern files its first motion to dismiss the class action for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs file a motion to strike and an opposition.
Oct 15, 2021
After the court grants in part Northwestern’s first motion to dismiss, plaintiffs file a First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint.
Nov 19, 2021
Northwestern files a second motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. The court denies this motion.
Feb 17, 2023
The court denies Northwestern’s motion for reconsideration of the second dismissal ruling. Fact discovery, which continued for over two years, follows.
June 20, 2023
First private mediation session through JAMS fails to produce a settlement.
May 6, 2025
Second private mediation session results in agreement in principle for a class-wide settlement of $4,000,000.
June 13, 2025
Parties advise the court that the action has been settled. Settlement agreement and release is executed in late December 2025.
Jan 7, 2026
Settlement agreement filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 1:20-cv-04798). Motion for preliminary approval to follow.
Direct Quotes from the Legal Record
QUOTE 1
Northwestern’s settlement rationale
Accountability Failures
“Northwestern has concluded, despite its belief that it is not liable for the claims asserted and that it has good and valid defenses thereto, that it would be in its best interests to enter this Agreement.”
💡 Northwestern openly states it is not settling because it believes it did anything wrong; it is settling because continued litigation was inconvenient and expensive. Students receive no acknowledgment of harm.
QUOTE 2
No admission of wrongdoing
Accountability Failures
“Northwestern in no way admits any violation of law or any liability whatsoever to Plaintiffs and/or Class Members, individually or collectively, all such liability being expressly denied.”
💡 The institution writes a $4 million check while expressly denying that any student was harmed. This is the language of institutional impunity: consequences without accountability.
QUOTE 3
What the lawsuit was about
Core Allegations
“…alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims as a result of [Northwestern’s] transition of in-person instruction and other educational services to a virtual environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic…”
💡 The legal record makes clear: students paid for in-person instruction and received something categorically different. The university enriched itself by delivering less than what was contracted.
QUOTE 4
Settlement fund allocation
Economic Fallout
“This equal pro rata amount for Spring term claims is approximately $153… Summer term claims is approximately $61… Fall term claims is approximately $36.”
💡 Northwestern’s quarterly tuition costs tens of thousands of dollars. Students harmed across three terms recover between $36 and $153. This is not restitution. It is a settlement of convenience that protects the institution far more than it compensates students.
QUOTE 5
Where unclaimed funds go
Profit Over People
“Once 270 days pass after the mailing of Settlement Checks and all outstanding issues are resolved, any amounts remaining in the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Northwestern emergency aid fund for Northwestern students.”
💡 Money students could not or did not claim flows back to an institutional fund controlled by Northwestern. The university benefits from the residual of a settlement caused by its own conduct.
QUOTE 6
Risk of no recovery without settlement
Delay Tactics
“Plaintiffs and Class Counsel recognize the risks of litigation, including the possibility that the Action, if not settled now, might not result in any recovery whatsoever, or might result in a recovery that is less favorable and that would not occur for several years.”
💡 This is how institutional delay works. By contesting every procedural step for five years, Northwestern created conditions in which plaintiffs had no realistic choice but to accept a fraction of the harm caused. Delay is a litigation strategy, and students paid for it.
QUOTE 7
Media gag provision
Accountability Failures
“The Parties agree that they will not themselves, nor will they authorize anyone, including their counsel, to contact the media, issue any press release, or otherwise initiate any public disclosure… regarding the terms of this Agreement.”
💡 A settlement that resolves harm to thousands of students contains a provision designed to prevent public discussion of what happened. Silence is a feature of this settlement, not an accident.
Commentary
?
How serious is this case, and is the lawsuit legitimate?
▾
The lawsuit is serious and legally credible. Two separate motions to dismiss filed by Northwestern were denied by the federal court. The court also rejected Northwestern’s motion for reconsideration. This means a federal judge found, on multiple occasions, that students had stated valid legal claims. The settlement itself is not evidence of wrongdoing under its explicit terms, but the fact that Northwestern paid $4 million to make the case disappear after five years of resistance speaks plainly about what was at stake.
?
Was Northwestern doing something illegal, or was this just COVID?
▾
The lawsuit was not about the decision to close campuses. It was about charging students full tuition as if nothing had changed after the campus experience was eliminated. COVID-19 is what forced the closure. Northwestern’s choice to keep full tuition without refund or proportional reduction is what forced the lawsuit. Many institutions offered at least partial refunds. Northwestern did not, and students carried the entire financial cost of a disruption they did not cause.
?
Why is the individual payout so small if the settlement is $4 million?
▾
The gross settlement fund of $4 million must cover attorney fees of up to $1.39 million, settlement administration costs of approximately $63,873, and service awards of up to $15,000 per named plaintiff. What remains, the net fund, is then divided on a pro-rata basis among all eligible class members across three terms. With potentially thousands of students in the class, individual payouts fall between $36 and $153. This is a direct consequence of settling for a fraction of the total harm caused. Institutions count on this math to make accountability cheap.
?
Why did it take five years to settle?
▾
Northwestern deployed every available legal mechanism to extend the timeline: two motions to dismiss, a motion for reconsideration, and more than two years of contested fact discovery. The first mediation attempt in 2023 failed. The second, in May 2025, finally produced a settlement. This is not unusual for institutional defendants with substantial legal resources. The longer the litigation, the higher the cost and risk for the plaintiffs, and the more pressure builds to accept a reduced settlement. Delay is a strategy, and it worked.
?
Does Northwestern have to change any of its practices as part of the settlement?
▾
No. The settlement contains no injunctive relief, no required policy changes, no commitment to refund future students in comparable situations, and no structural reforms of any kind. Students receive cash in exchange for permanently releasing all claims. Northwestern receives a complete legal release and returns to business as usual. The settlement resolves liability without creating any obligation to prevent the same harm from recurring.
?
Is Northwestern the only university facing lawsuits like this?
▾
No. Tuition refund class actions were filed against dozens of universities across the United States during 2020 and 2021, including Columbia, Boston University, Drexel, USC, Michigan, and many others. Some cases were dismissed. Others settled for comparable amounts. The pattern is consistent: institutions collected full tuition, students received diminished services, students filed lawsuits, institutions settled without admitting fault, and students received token compensation relative to actual harm. Northwestern is one data point in a systemic failure of higher education accountability.
?
What can I do to prevent this from happening again?
▾
Several concrete actions make a difference. First, demand tuition transparency: ask your institution for a detailed breakdown of what your tuition covers and under what conditions fees are refundable. Second, support legislative action requiring universities to publish tuition refund policies and honor them contractually. Third, if you were a Northwestern student during the affected terms, register at the settlement website (northwesterntuitionrefund.com) before the deadline to receive your share. Fourth, share this case with others who were affected: many eligible students may not know a settlement exists. Fifth, pressure university accreditation bodies and state higher education oversight boards to establish enforceable standards for service delivery and tuition refunds when institutions cannot deliver what students paid for.
?
What does this case say about the cost of elite higher education?
▾
This case exposes a fundamental contradiction in elite university pricing. Northwestern charges tens of thousands of dollars per term, justified partly on the value of the campus environment: proximity to faculty, research infrastructure, peer networks, and physical facilities. The moment that environment was unavailable, the institution continued to charge as if it was fully operational. This reveals that tuition pricing is not purely tied to educational delivery costs. It is tied to brand, prestige, and institutional revenue needs. Students pay for a promise; when the promise disappears, the price should follow. In 2020, at Northwestern and many other institutions, it did not.
💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category
Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.
- 💀 Product Safety Violations — When companies risk lives for profit.
- 🌿 Environmental Violations — Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.
- 💼 Labor Exploitation — Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.
- 🛡️ Data Breaches & Privacy Abuses — Misuse and mishandling of personal information.
- 💵 Financial Fraud & Corruption — Lies, scams, and executive impunity.
