Trading Advisor Defrauds Investors of $400K, Court Orders $1.65M Penalty
Richard Miller and Flip 2 Futures falsely promised returns, misappropriated investor funds, and lost nearly all pooled money through reckless commodity trading. Nine individuals were defrauded.
Richard Miller and his company Flip 2 Futures, along with Punch Drunk Marketing, solicited $400,000 from nine investors for commodity futures trading while operating without required federal registration. Miller falsely claimed he was successfully managing millions of dollars. Instead, he misappropriated over $13,000, lost $329,666 through disastrous trading, and returned only $27,000 to investors. The court ordered $364,000 in restitution and $1.65 million in civil penalties.
This case shows how easily unregistered operators can exploit investors when oversight fails. Verify registration before you invest.
The Allegations: A Breakdown
| 01 | Richard Miller and Flip 2 Futures operated as commodity trading advisors without required federal registration, soliciting funds from the public through their website, YouTube, Twitter, Craigslist, and Discord. Punch Drunk Marketing similarly operated as an unregistered commodity pool operator. | high |
| 02 | Miller showed Dendinger falsified trading reports on his phone that misrepresented his past futures trading as generating substantial gains. He also falsely claimed he was managing a trading fund holding millions of dollars from multiple investors. | high |
| 03 | Flip 2 Futures and Miller misappropriated $13,724.21 of investor funds by transferring them to a personal bank account used for living expenses and failing to transfer them for trading. They retained an additional $10,574.23 that should have been transferred to the pool operator. | high |
| 04 | Punch Drunk Marketing misappropriated $20,595 by failing to transfer investor funds to the trader or return funds repaid by Flip 2 Futures. The company commingled pool participant funds with its own business funds and personal funds of its managing member. | high |
| 05 | Neither Flip 2 Futures nor Punch Drunk Marketing delivered required disclosure documents to investors that would have informed them of risks and the operators’ backgrounds. Flip 2 Futures also failed to maintain and produce required records when subpoenaed by the Commission. | medium |
| 06 | Miller’s trading from August 2019 through November 2020 lost $329,666.38, sustaining net losses in all but one month. In May 2020, Miller admitted they had lost 97% of the portfolio because of adding to losing trades, yet he continued trading the remaining funds until they were depleted. | high |
| 07 | Dendinger promised pool participants 6% monthly returns for fourteen months, guarantees that were never realistic given Miller’s actual trading performance. These promises induced investors to contribute funds based on false expectations. | high |
| 08 | Miller solicited the public by advertising on Craigslist in the Financial Services category, stating he was looking for more investors and owned and operated Flip 2 Futures. He posted at least 72 videos on YouTube directing viewers to his trading services. | medium |
| 01 | Neither Miller, Flip 2 Futures, nor Punch Drunk Marketing registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission despite federal law requiring registration for commodity trading advisors and pool operators. This lack of registration meant no preliminary checks or ongoing oversight occurred. | high |
| 02 | The defendants solicited hundreds of thousands of dollars through online platforms like Discord, YouTube, and Craigslist before regulatory authorities detected and intervened. The reactive nature of enforcement meant investors were victimized before the Commission acted. | high |
| 03 | Flip 2 Futures was administratively terminated in February 2020, yet claims against the defunct entity were not barred under Minnesota law. This allowed the company to continue operating in violation even after its corporate status lapsed. | medium |
| 04 | When the Commission subpoenaed Miller for required records including trading statements and customer documents, he responded with only a copy of the investment agreement and a 1099B tax form. His failure to maintain records violated multiple federal regulations. | medium |
| 05 | The Commission relied on default judgment because the defendants failed to adequately respond to the complaint. This meant no trial tested the evidence, and the full story of the defendants’ motivations was never publicly aired through adversarial process. | low |
| 06 | Miller illegally collected investor funds in his own personal bank and trading accounts rather than properly segregated accounts. The regulations requiring such segregation are designed to prevent exactly the kind of misappropriation that occurred here. | high |
| 01 | The investment agreement gave Flip 2 Futures 50% of any profits from trading, creating a strong financial incentive for Miller to secure large sums for trading regardless of his actual trading skill or track record. This profit-sharing structure encouraged reckless behavior. | medium |
| 02 | Before accepting funds from Punch Drunk Marketing, Miller traded in only nine out of fifteen months from May 2018 through July 2019, earning net profits in only three months and sustaining net losses in six. He concealed this poor performance when soliciting new investors. | high |
| 03 | Miller and Flip 2 Futures transferred investor funds into a Wells Fargo bank account held jointly with Miller’s wife, which contained personal funds used to pay personal living expenses. They prioritized personal enrichment over proper handling of client money. | high |
| 04 | Dendinger retained $13,000 of the $250,000 provided by pool participants in early 2020, failing to transfer it for trading. Punch Drunk Marketing also failed to return to pool participants funds that Flip 2 Futures had repaid, keeping the money for itself. | high |
| 05 | The defendants’ misrepresentation of trading success and funds under management were calculated moves to attract investment. The promise of 6% monthly returns was a lure targeting individuals seeking wealth growth, which the defendants exploited for personal gain. | high |
| 06 | Miller admitted in May 2020 that they were in a very bad spot and had lost 97% of the portfolio. Despite this catastrophic failure, Miller and Dendinger decided to continue trading the remaining funds in an attempt to recoup losses rather than returning what little remained to investors. | high |
| 01 | Nine individual investors from Minnesota and Wisconsin lost $364,000 of their invested capital after receiving back only $27,000 from their original $400,000 investment. One investor had agreed to have $9,000 placed in a separate personal account, accounting for the difference. | high |
| 02 | In March 2020 alone, Miller’s trading sustained net losses of over $128,000, representing almost 50% of the account’s monthly beginning balance. The following month, April 2020, his trading lost over $39,000, approximately 37% of that month’s starting balance. | high |
| 03 | From August 2019 through November 2020, Miller’s trading earned net profits in only one month, July 2020, totaling just $3,035.95. His net monthly trading losses during this period ranged from $1,224.76 to $128,139.69. | high |
| 04 | Miller was entitled to at most $1,517.97 in profit-sharing fees based on the single profitable month, yet he retained $10,574.23 in pool participant funds and failed to transfer them to Punch Drunk Marketing. This represented direct theft from investors. | high |
| 05 | The loss of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars can be devastating to individual investors, impacting savings, retirement plans, and overall financial security. Such losses diminish consumer trust in investment opportunities and can have ripple effects on other economic activities. | medium |
| 06 | Pool participants each received only partial payments from Punch Drunk Marketing ranging from $500 to $1,500 between October 2019 and June 2020, totaling just $27,000. Despite repeated requests for payment, Punch Drunk Marketing returned no additional amounts. | medium |
| 01 | The court entered default judgment because Richard Miller, Flip 2 Futures, and Punch Drunk Marketing failed to adequately respond to the Commission’s complaint. This meant the factual allegations were accepted as true without a contested trial. | medium |
| 02 | Miller provided only minimal documentation when subpoenaed, submitting just a copy of the investment agreement and a 1099B tax form. He never produced trading account statements, customer documents, or bank account statements despite explicit legal requirements. | high |
| 03 | Justin Dendinger, the managing member of Punch Drunk Marketing, passed away on September 23, 2023. The Commission voluntarily dismissed charges against him individually, meaning he never faced personal accountability for his role in the fraud. | medium |
| 04 | Flip 2 Futures was administratively terminated in February 2020 and Punch Drunk Marketing was dissolved in January 2024. The ability of these defunct entities to pay the ordered $1.65 million in penalties and $364,000 in restitution is highly questionable. | high |
| 05 | Punch Drunk Marketing attempted to file a self-represented answer through Dendinger, but it was stricken because a limited liability company cannot represent itself in federal court. No counsel ever entered an appearance on behalf of the company. | low |
| 06 | The court imposed permanent injunctions prohibiting Miller and Flip 2 Futures from future trading and commodity advisory activities. However, the ease with which they set up and solicited funds before detection points to ongoing challenges in preventing such fraud proactively. | medium |
| 07 | The Commission brought this enforcement action, but only after investors had already suffered significant losses. The regulatory system caught the misconduct, but the reactive nature of enforcement meant protection came too late for the nine victims. | high |
| 08 | The National Futures Association was appointed as Monitor to oversee restitution payments and distribution to victims. However, if payments prove too small to justify administrative costs, the Monitor may treat them as civil penalties rather than returning money to investors. | medium |
| 01 | The promise of 6% monthly returns is a classic lure used in schemes targeting individuals seeking to grow their wealth, often appealing to those feeling left behind by traditional investment avenues or seeking faster gains in an environment of increasing wealth inequality. | medium |
| 02 | The defendants misappropriated over $34,000 in total directly into their own control or for personal use rather than for the benefit of the investors whose capital it was. This behavior prioritizes personal enrichment over fiduciary responsibility to those who trusted them with savings. | high |
| 03 | Miller’s false claim that he was managing a trading fund holding millions of dollars from multiple investors was designed to create an impression of success and legitimacy. This exploited the investors’ desire to participate in wealth creation alongside supposedly successful traders. | high |
| 04 | The case reflects a pattern where the pursuit of high financial returns is prized, sometimes leading individuals to pursue wealth through illicit means. The emphasis on profit maximization can foster environments where exploitative behaviors emerge and harm vulnerable investors. | medium |
| 01 | Nine individuals saw $400,000 of their invested capital largely evaporate through a combination of deceit, disastrous trading, and misappropriation. Beyond the monetary figures, such incidents erode trust in financial markets and can have devastating impacts on victims’ financial security. | high |
| 02 | The ability of these entities to solicit substantial sums while operating outside of fundamental registration requirements highlights persistent vulnerabilities in the financial system. Enforcement often follows harm rather than preventing it. | high |
| 03 | While the Commission successfully pursued this case, leading to significant penalties and injunctions, the outcome arrives after the damage is done. The emphasis must shift toward more proactive and preventative regulation that protects people before they become victims. | high |
| 04 | The court ordered $364,000 in restitution and $1.65 million in civil penalties, but recovering these amounts from defunct entities and individuals with limited assets remains uncertain. Many victims may never be made whole despite the legal victory. | medium |
| 05 | This case is not isolated but illustrates how the pursuit of profit can trample over investor trust when regulatory frameworks are bypassed. It reflects broader systemic failures where oversight and accountability fall short until substantial harm has occurred. | high |
Timeline of Events
Direct Quotes from the Legal Record
“[W]e are in a very bad spot right now. I took an ELE—Extinction Level Event . . . . We’ve lost 97% of our portfolio because of adding to losing trades . . . .”
💡 Miller admitted in writing that he had lost almost all investor funds through reckless trading decisions, yet continued trading what little remained.
“Profits fell for the fund last month over 90% due to increased margins. Once again just like March we are seeing things I have never seen in the market. Regardless I am going to give it to you straight. March was down 12% I was able to recoup 8% in April so we are still down 4% as of fast Friday.”
💡 Miller claimed only a 4% loss when his trading had actually lost over $128,000 in March (nearly 50% of the account) and $39,000 in April (37%).
“Dendinger also promised that each participant would earn 6% monthly returns on his or her investment for a period of fourteen months.”
💡 These unrealistic guaranteed returns were used to lure investors into a scheme that had no reasonable prospect of delivering such profits.
“Our team has been trading for over 5 years. We are looking for roughly 150 traders form [sic] all over the world to form our futures trading room . . . . Trading Strategy Learn how to take the exact trades our team does and profit consistently!”
💡 Flip 2 Futures openly solicited the public through its website despite having no registration and no legitimate track record of consistent profits.
“Miller paid to post at least one advertisement on Craigslist in the ‘Financial Services’ category for the Minneapolis, MN, area in which he represented that he owned and operated Flip 2 Futures and was ‘looking for 2 more investors’ to contribute funds for trading.”
💡 Miller actively sought investors through classified ads while operating without required federal registration or oversight.
“With respect to Miller’s trading in Dorman Trading account **402, from May 2018 through July 2019—before accepting funds from PDM—Miller traded in only nine out of fifteen months, executing trades in crude oil and E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts. During this time, Miller’s trading earned net profits in only three months and sustained net losses in the remaining six months.”
💡 Miller concealed his poor trading history showing more losing months than profitable ones when soliciting investors with false claims of success.
“Once deposited into Flip 2 Futures’ Wells Fargo Bank account **8004, Miller and Flip 2 Futures transferred all of the funds received from PDM in 2019 and 2020 to Wells Fargo Bank account **0711, which was held in the names of Miller and his wife and contained personal funds that Miller and his wife used to pay personal living expenses.”
💡 Investor funds intended for trading were instead commingled with personal money and used to pay Miller’s household bills.
“Flip 2 Futures and Miller engaged in the acts and practices described above knowingly, willfully, or with reckless disregard for the truth.”
💡 The court explicitly found the fraud was intentional or recklessly indifferent to harming investors, not mere negligence.
“Miller and Dendinger decided to continue trading the remaining funds in an effort to recoup the losses. However, from June 2020 through November 2020, Miller’s trading suffered overall losses, depleting the remaining funds from PDM.”
💡 Even after admitting 97% losses, Miller kept trading with investors’ remaining money rather than returning it, losing everything.
“From August 2019 through November 2020, Miller’s trading in Dorman Trading account **402 lost a total of $329,666.38.”
💡 This quantifies the direct trading losses separate from misappropriated funds, showing Miller destroyed nearly $330,000 through failed trades.
“Neither Flip 2 Futures nor Miller delivered to PDM a Disclosure Document as required by 17 C.F.R. § 4.31. … Neither PDM nor Dendinger delivered to the 2019 pool participants a Disclosure Document as described in 17 C.F.R. §§ 4.21, 4.24.”
💡 Required disclosure documents inform investors of risks and operator backgrounds; withholding them denied investors critical information needed to make informed decisions.
“On June 25, 2021, Miller sent an email to Commission staff in response to the subpoena. The only documents accompanying the response were a copy of the Investment Agreement with PDM and a copy of a form 1099B from Dorman Trading for the year 2020.”
💡 Miller’s refusal to produce required records when legally compelled shows contempt for regulatory oversight and an attempt to conceal evidence.
“PDM collected the funds in a bank account held in its name at US Bank (account **4501), the same account in which PDM held its own business funds and conducted its regular business financial transactions, including compensation payments to Dendinger and his partner.”
💡 Mixing investor money with business and personal funds violates basic fiduciary duty and makes misappropriation much easier.
“Although Flip 2 Futures is currently administratively terminated as an LLC in Minnesota, it can return to active status if Miller files renewal paperwork and pays a fee. … More important is that Miller not shown a willingness to abide by federal statutes and regulations, nor has he participated in this litigation or given assurances that he will no longer violate federal law.”
💡 The court found Miller poses ongoing danger to the public because he has shown no remorse or compliance, justifying permanent trading bans.
“Defendants wrongfully obtained $400,000 from the Pool Participants. Of those funds, $27,000 was returned, and Dendinger agreed with one pool participant to deposit $9,000 into a personal trading account held in Dendinger’s name. Accordingly, restitution is warranted in the amount of $364,000.”
💡 This shows the court’s math: $400,000 solicited minus $27,000 returned minus $9,000 in separate account equals $364,000 owed to victims.
Frequently Asked Questions
The CFTC has a press release about this too! Feel free to check it out: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9019-24
💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category
Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.
- 💀 Product Safety Violations — When companies risk lives for profit.
- 🌿 Environmental Violations — Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.
- 💼 Labor Exploitation — Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.
- 🛡️ Data Breaches & Privacy Abuses — Misuse and mishandling of personal information.
- 💵 Financial Fraud & Corruption — Lies, scams, and executive impunity.