CFTC Cracks Down on Flip 2 Futures for Defrauding Working-Class Investors

Trading Advisor Defrauds Investors of $400K, Court Orders $1.65M Penalty
Corporate Misconduct Accountability Project

Trading Advisor Defrauds Investors of $400K, Court Orders $1.65M Penalty

Richard Miller and Flip 2 Futures falsely promised returns, misappropriated investor funds, and lost nearly all pooled money through reckless commodity trading. Nine individuals were defrauded.

HIGH SEVERITY
TL;DR

Richard Miller and his company Flip 2 Futures, along with Punch Drunk Marketing, solicited $400,000 from nine investors for commodity futures trading while operating without required federal registration. Miller falsely claimed he was successfully managing millions of dollars. Instead, he misappropriated over $13,000, lost $329,666 through disastrous trading, and returned only $27,000 to investors. The court ordered $364,000 in restitution and $1.65 million in civil penalties.

This case shows how easily unregistered operators can exploit investors when oversight fails. Verify registration before you invest.

$400K
Total investor funds solicited
$364K
Restitution ordered by court
$1.65M
Total civil monetary penalties
$329,666
Lost through failed trading
9
Investors defrauded
$27K
Total returned to investors
97%
Portfolio loss Miller admitted to

The Allegations: A Breakdown

⚠️
Core Allegations
What they did · 8 points
01 Richard Miller and Flip 2 Futures operated as commodity trading advisors without required federal registration, soliciting funds from the public through their website, YouTube, Twitter, Craigslist, and Discord. Punch Drunk Marketing similarly operated as an unregistered commodity pool operator. high
02 Miller showed Dendinger falsified trading reports on his phone that misrepresented his past futures trading as generating substantial gains. He also falsely claimed he was managing a trading fund holding millions of dollars from multiple investors. high
03 Flip 2 Futures and Miller misappropriated $13,724.21 of investor funds by transferring them to a personal bank account used for living expenses and failing to transfer them for trading. They retained an additional $10,574.23 that should have been transferred to the pool operator. high
04 Punch Drunk Marketing misappropriated $20,595 by failing to transfer investor funds to the trader or return funds repaid by Flip 2 Futures. The company commingled pool participant funds with its own business funds and personal funds of its managing member. high
05 Neither Flip 2 Futures nor Punch Drunk Marketing delivered required disclosure documents to investors that would have informed them of risks and the operators’ backgrounds. Flip 2 Futures also failed to maintain and produce required records when subpoenaed by the Commission. medium
06 Miller’s trading from August 2019 through November 2020 lost $329,666.38, sustaining net losses in all but one month. In May 2020, Miller admitted they had lost 97% of the portfolio because of adding to losing trades, yet he continued trading the remaining funds until they were depleted. high
07 Dendinger promised pool participants 6% monthly returns for fourteen months, guarantees that were never realistic given Miller’s actual trading performance. These promises induced investors to contribute funds based on false expectations. high
08 Miller solicited the public by advertising on Craigslist in the Financial Services category, stating he was looking for more investors and owned and operated Flip 2 Futures. He posted at least 72 videos on YouTube directing viewers to his trading services. medium
🏛️
Regulatory Failures
How the system failed to protect investors · 6 points
01 Neither Miller, Flip 2 Futures, nor Punch Drunk Marketing registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission despite federal law requiring registration for commodity trading advisors and pool operators. This lack of registration meant no preliminary checks or ongoing oversight occurred. high
02 The defendants solicited hundreds of thousands of dollars through online platforms like Discord, YouTube, and Craigslist before regulatory authorities detected and intervened. The reactive nature of enforcement meant investors were victimized before the Commission acted. high
03 Flip 2 Futures was administratively terminated in February 2020, yet claims against the defunct entity were not barred under Minnesota law. This allowed the company to continue operating in violation even after its corporate status lapsed. medium
04 When the Commission subpoenaed Miller for required records including trading statements and customer documents, he responded with only a copy of the investment agreement and a 1099B tax form. His failure to maintain records violated multiple federal regulations. medium
05 The Commission relied on default judgment because the defendants failed to adequately respond to the complaint. This meant no trial tested the evidence, and the full story of the defendants’ motivations was never publicly aired through adversarial process. low
06 Miller illegally collected investor funds in his own personal bank and trading accounts rather than properly segregated accounts. The regulations requiring such segregation are designed to prevent exactly the kind of misappropriation that occurred here. high
💰
Profit Over People
Greed driving the fraud · 6 points
01 The investment agreement gave Flip 2 Futures 50% of any profits from trading, creating a strong financial incentive for Miller to secure large sums for trading regardless of his actual trading skill or track record. This profit-sharing structure encouraged reckless behavior. medium
02 Before accepting funds from Punch Drunk Marketing, Miller traded in only nine out of fifteen months from May 2018 through July 2019, earning net profits in only three months and sustaining net losses in six. He concealed this poor performance when soliciting new investors. high
03 Miller and Flip 2 Futures transferred investor funds into a Wells Fargo bank account held jointly with Miller’s wife, which contained personal funds used to pay personal living expenses. They prioritized personal enrichment over proper handling of client money. high
04 Dendinger retained $13,000 of the $250,000 provided by pool participants in early 2020, failing to transfer it for trading. Punch Drunk Marketing also failed to return to pool participants funds that Flip 2 Futures had repaid, keeping the money for itself. high
05 The defendants’ misrepresentation of trading success and funds under management were calculated moves to attract investment. The promise of 6% monthly returns was a lure targeting individuals seeking wealth growth, which the defendants exploited for personal gain. high
06 Miller admitted in May 2020 that they were in a very bad spot and had lost 97% of the portfolio. Despite this catastrophic failure, Miller and Dendinger decided to continue trading the remaining funds in an attempt to recoup losses rather than returning what little remained to investors. high
📉
Economic Fallout
The financial devastation · 6 points
01 Nine individual investors from Minnesota and Wisconsin lost $364,000 of their invested capital after receiving back only $27,000 from their original $400,000 investment. One investor had agreed to have $9,000 placed in a separate personal account, accounting for the difference. high
02 In March 2020 alone, Miller’s trading sustained net losses of over $128,000, representing almost 50% of the account’s monthly beginning balance. The following month, April 2020, his trading lost over $39,000, approximately 37% of that month’s starting balance. high
03 From August 2019 through November 2020, Miller’s trading earned net profits in only one month, July 2020, totaling just $3,035.95. His net monthly trading losses during this period ranged from $1,224.76 to $128,139.69. high
04 Miller was entitled to at most $1,517.97 in profit-sharing fees based on the single profitable month, yet he retained $10,574.23 in pool participant funds and failed to transfer them to Punch Drunk Marketing. This represented direct theft from investors. high
05 The loss of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars can be devastating to individual investors, impacting savings, retirement plans, and overall financial security. Such losses diminish consumer trust in investment opportunities and can have ripple effects on other economic activities. medium
06 Pool participants each received only partial payments from Punch Drunk Marketing ranging from $500 to $1,500 between October 2019 and June 2020, totaling just $27,000. Despite repeated requests for payment, Punch Drunk Marketing returned no additional amounts. medium
⚖️
Corporate Accountability Failures
Justice delayed and incomplete · 8 points
01 The court entered default judgment because Richard Miller, Flip 2 Futures, and Punch Drunk Marketing failed to adequately respond to the Commission’s complaint. This meant the factual allegations were accepted as true without a contested trial. medium
02 Miller provided only minimal documentation when subpoenaed, submitting just a copy of the investment agreement and a 1099B tax form. He never produced trading account statements, customer documents, or bank account statements despite explicit legal requirements. high
03 Justin Dendinger, the managing member of Punch Drunk Marketing, passed away on September 23, 2023. The Commission voluntarily dismissed charges against him individually, meaning he never faced personal accountability for his role in the fraud. medium
04 Flip 2 Futures was administratively terminated in February 2020 and Punch Drunk Marketing was dissolved in January 2024. The ability of these defunct entities to pay the ordered $1.65 million in penalties and $364,000 in restitution is highly questionable. high
05 Punch Drunk Marketing attempted to file a self-represented answer through Dendinger, but it was stricken because a limited liability company cannot represent itself in federal court. No counsel ever entered an appearance on behalf of the company. low
06 The court imposed permanent injunctions prohibiting Miller and Flip 2 Futures from future trading and commodity advisory activities. However, the ease with which they set up and solicited funds before detection points to ongoing challenges in preventing such fraud proactively. medium
07 The Commission brought this enforcement action, but only after investors had already suffered significant losses. The regulatory system caught the misconduct, but the reactive nature of enforcement meant protection came too late for the nine victims. high
08 The National Futures Association was appointed as Monitor to oversee restitution payments and distribution to victims. However, if payments prove too small to justify administrative costs, the Monitor may treat them as civil penalties rather than returning money to investors. medium
💸
Wealth Disparity
Exploiting the desire for financial security · 4 points
01 The promise of 6% monthly returns is a classic lure used in schemes targeting individuals seeking to grow their wealth, often appealing to those feeling left behind by traditional investment avenues or seeking faster gains in an environment of increasing wealth inequality. medium
02 The defendants misappropriated over $34,000 in total directly into their own control or for personal use rather than for the benefit of the investors whose capital it was. This behavior prioritizes personal enrichment over fiduciary responsibility to those who trusted them with savings. high
03 Miller’s false claim that he was managing a trading fund holding millions of dollars from multiple investors was designed to create an impression of success and legitimacy. This exploited the investors’ desire to participate in wealth creation alongside supposedly successful traders. high
04 The case reflects a pattern where the pursuit of high financial returns is prized, sometimes leading individuals to pursue wealth through illicit means. The emphasis on profit maximization can foster environments where exploitative behaviors emerge and harm vulnerable investors. medium
📊
The Bottom Line
What this case reveals · 5 points
01 Nine individuals saw $400,000 of their invested capital largely evaporate through a combination of deceit, disastrous trading, and misappropriation. Beyond the monetary figures, such incidents erode trust in financial markets and can have devastating impacts on victims’ financial security. high
02 The ability of these entities to solicit substantial sums while operating outside of fundamental registration requirements highlights persistent vulnerabilities in the financial system. Enforcement often follows harm rather than preventing it. high
03 While the Commission successfully pursued this case, leading to significant penalties and injunctions, the outcome arrives after the damage is done. The emphasis must shift toward more proactive and preventative regulation that protects people before they become victims. high
04 The court ordered $364,000 in restitution and $1.65 million in civil penalties, but recovering these amounts from defunct entities and individuals with limited assets remains uncertain. Many victims may never be made whole despite the legal victory. medium
05 This case is not isolated but illustrates how the pursuit of profit can trample over investor trust when regulatory frameworks are bypassed. It reflects broader systemic failures where oversight and accountability fall short until substantial harm has occurred. high

Timeline of Events

December 2018
Flip 2 Futures Trading Company LLC formed in Minnesota
June 2018
Miller registers the domain name flip2futures.com
April 2018
Miller opens personal trading account at Dorman Trading
Early 2019
Dendinger begins paying monthly fee for access to Flip 2 Futures’ trading room
July 2019
Miller meets Dendinger in person, shows falsified trading reports claiming substantial gains
July 22, 2019
Punch Drunk Marketing and Flip 2 Futures sign Investment Agreement for $150,000
July 2019
Punch Drunk Marketing solicits and accepts $150,000 from four pool participants
July 23, 2019
PDM transfers $150,000 to Flip 2 Futures’ Wells Fargo account
January 2020
Dendinger solicits additional investors, repeating Miller’s misrepresentations
January-February 2020
Five additional investors and one 2019 participant deposit $250,000 with PDM
February 2020
Flip 2 Futures administratively terminated in Minnesota (though claims not barred)
February 2020
PDM pays two 2019 pool participants $3,000 total; retains $13,000 of new investments
March 2020
Miller’s trading loses over $128,000 (nearly 50% of account balance)
April 2020
Miller’s trading loses over $39,000 (37% of account balance)
May 12, 2020
Miller emails Dendinger claiming only 4% loss, concealing true 50%+ losses
May 19, 2020
Miller admits to Dendinger they lost 97% of portfolio due to adding to losing trades
July 2020
Only profitable month: Miller’s trading earns $3,035.95 net profit
June 11, 2020
Flip 2 Futures website removed from public access
June 2020
Last partial payments to pool participants; no further returns despite requests
August 2019-November 2020
Miller’s trading loses total of $329,666.38 over entire period
May 18, 2021
Commission serves subpoena on Miller requesting CTA-related documents
June 25, 2021
Miller responds to subpoena with only Investment Agreement and 2020 1099B form
February 22, 2023
Commission files complaint against all defendants in U.S. District Court, Minnesota
March 1, 2023
Commission serves Punch Drunk Marketing via Dendinger as registered agent
March 21, 2023
Commission serves Miller and Flip 2 Futures through personal service
May 16, 2023
Clerk of Court enters default against Miller and Flip 2 Futures
June 6, 2023
Clerk of Court enters default against Punch Drunk Marketing
September 23, 2023
Justin Dendinger passes away; charges against him individually later dismissed
January 2024
Punch Drunk Marketing dissolved in Wisconsin
December 3, 2024
Court grants default judgment: $364K restitution, $1.65M penalties, permanent injunctions

Direct Quotes from the Legal Record

QUOTE 1 Admission of catastrophic loss allegations
“[W]e are in a very bad spot right now. I took an ELE—Extinction Level Event . . . . We’ve lost 97% of our portfolio because of adding to losing trades . . . .”

💡 Miller admitted in writing that he had lost almost all investor funds through reckless trading decisions, yet continued trading what little remained.

QUOTE 2 Misrepresenting losses to investor profit
“Profits fell for the fund last month over 90% due to increased margins. Once again just like March we are seeing things I have never seen in the market. Regardless I am going to give it to you straight. March was down 12% I was able to recoup 8% in April so we are still down 4% as of fast Friday.”

💡 Miller claimed only a 4% loss when his trading had actually lost over $128,000 in March (nearly 50% of the account) and $39,000 in April (37%).

QUOTE 3 Promise of guaranteed high returns allegations
“Dendinger also promised that each participant would earn 6% monthly returns on his or her investment for a period of fourteen months.”

💡 These unrealistic guaranteed returns were used to lure investors into a scheme that had no reasonable prospect of delivering such profits.

QUOTE 4 Solicitation on public platforms regulatory
“Our team has been trading for over 5 years. We are looking for roughly 150 traders form [sic] all over the world to form our futures trading room . . . . Trading Strategy Learn how to take the exact trades our team does and profit consistently!”

💡 Flip 2 Futures openly solicited the public through its website despite having no registration and no legitimate track record of consistent profits.

QUOTE 5 Craigslist solicitation for investors allegations
“Miller paid to post at least one advertisement on Craigslist in the ‘Financial Services’ category for the Minneapolis, MN, area in which he represented that he owned and operated Flip 2 Futures and was ‘looking for 2 more investors’ to contribute funds for trading.”

💡 Miller actively sought investors through classified ads while operating without required federal registration or oversight.

QUOTE 6 Actual trading performance before fraud profit
“With respect to Miller’s trading in Dorman Trading account **402, from May 2018 through July 2019—before accepting funds from PDM—Miller traded in only nine out of fifteen months, executing trades in crude oil and E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts. During this time, Miller’s trading earned net profits in only three months and sustained net losses in the remaining six months.”

💡 Miller concealed his poor trading history showing more losing months than profitable ones when soliciting investors with false claims of success.

QUOTE 7 Misappropriation into personal account profit
“Once deposited into Flip 2 Futures’ Wells Fargo Bank account **8004, Miller and Flip 2 Futures transferred all of the funds received from PDM in 2019 and 2020 to Wells Fargo Bank account **0711, which was held in the names of Miller and his wife and contained personal funds that Miller and his wife used to pay personal living expenses.”

💡 Investor funds intended for trading were instead commingled with personal money and used to pay Miller’s household bills.

QUOTE 8 Court finding on fraud knowledge accountability
“Flip 2 Futures and Miller engaged in the acts and practices described above knowingly, willfully, or with reckless disregard for the truth.”

💡 The court explicitly found the fraud was intentional or recklessly indifferent to harming investors, not mere negligence.

QUOTE 9 Continued trading after massive losses economic
“Miller and Dendinger decided to continue trading the remaining funds in an effort to recoup the losses. However, from June 2020 through November 2020, Miller’s trading suffered overall losses, depleting the remaining funds from PDM.”

💡 Even after admitting 97% losses, Miller kept trading with investors’ remaining money rather than returning it, losing everything.

QUOTE 10 Total trading losses economic
“From August 2019 through November 2020, Miller’s trading in Dorman Trading account **402 lost a total of $329,666.38.”

💡 This quantifies the direct trading losses separate from misappropriated funds, showing Miller destroyed nearly $330,000 through failed trades.

QUOTE 11 Failure to provide mandatory disclosures regulatory
“Neither Flip 2 Futures nor Miller delivered to PDM a Disclosure Document as required by 17 C.F.R. § 4.31. … Neither PDM nor Dendinger delivered to the 2019 pool participants a Disclosure Document as described in 17 C.F.R. §§ 4.21, 4.24.”

💡 Required disclosure documents inform investors of risks and operator backgrounds; withholding them denied investors critical information needed to make informed decisions.

QUOTE 12 Minimal response to federal subpoena accountability
“On June 25, 2021, Miller sent an email to Commission staff in response to the subpoena. The only documents accompanying the response were a copy of the Investment Agreement with PDM and a copy of a form 1099B from Dorman Trading for the year 2020.”

💡 Miller’s refusal to produce required records when legally compelled shows contempt for regulatory oversight and an attempt to conceal evidence.

QUOTE 13 Commingling pool funds with personal money allegations
“PDM collected the funds in a bank account held in its name at US Bank (account **4501), the same account in which PDM held its own business funds and conducted its regular business financial transactions, including compensation payments to Dendinger and his partner.”

💡 Mixing investor money with business and personal funds violates basic fiduciary duty and makes misappropriation much easier.

QUOTE 14 Court’s injunction justification accountability
“Although Flip 2 Futures is currently administratively terminated as an LLC in Minnesota, it can return to active status if Miller files renewal paperwork and pays a fee. … More important is that Miller not shown a willingness to abide by federal statutes and regulations, nor has he participated in this litigation or given assurances that he will no longer violate federal law.”

💡 The court found Miller poses ongoing danger to the public because he has shown no remorse or compliance, justifying permanent trading bans.

QUOTE 15 Restitution calculation conclusion
“Defendants wrongfully obtained $400,000 from the Pool Participants. Of those funds, $27,000 was returned, and Dendinger agreed with one pool participant to deposit $9,000 into a personal trading account held in Dendinger’s name. Accordingly, restitution is warranted in the amount of $364,000.”

💡 This shows the court’s math: $400,000 solicited minus $27,000 returned minus $9,000 in separate account equals $364,000 owed to victims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Richard Miller and Flip 2 Futures do wrong?
Miller and his company Flip 2 Futures operated as unregistered commodity trading advisors, falsely claimed successful trading performance to attract investors, misappropriated over $13,000 of investor funds for personal use, and lost $329,666 through disastrous trading. They returned only $27,000 of the $400,000 they solicited from nine investors.
What was Punch Drunk Marketing’s role in the fraud?
Punch Drunk Marketing (PDM) operated as an unregistered commodity pool operator that solicited $400,000 from nine individuals and pooled their money to give to Miller for trading. PDM misappropriated $20,595 of investor funds, commingled investor money with company and personal accounts, and failed to provide required disclosure documents to investors.
How much money did investors lose?
Nine investors collectively lost $364,000 net. They contributed $400,000 total, received back only $27,000, and one investor had $9,000 placed in a separate account. The losses came from $329,666 lost in trading plus over $34,000 directly misappropriated by the defendants.
What false promises did the defendants make?
Miller falsely claimed he had been successfully trading and managing millions of dollars from multiple investors. He showed falsified trading reports depicting substantial gains. Dendinger then promised pool participants guaranteed 6% monthly returns for fourteen months. In reality, Miller’s trading lost money in 15 out of 16 months.
Why didn’t Miller and Flip 2 Futures have to register with the government?
They did have to register. Federal law requires commodity trading advisors and pool operators to register with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Miller and Flip 2 Futures violated the law by operating without registration, which meant they avoided background checks, disclosure requirements, and regulatory oversight designed to protect investors.
What happened when Miller’s trading lost almost all the money?
In May 2020, Miller admitted to Dendinger they had lost 97% of the portfolio by adding to losing trades. Instead of returning the remaining 3% to investors, Miller and Dendinger decided to keep trading in an attempt to recoup losses. They lost the rest of the money over the following months.
What penalties did the court impose?
The court ordered Miller and Flip 2 Futures to jointly pay $900,000 in civil penalties, PDM to pay $750,000 in penalties, and all defendants jointly to pay $364,000 in restitution to victims. The court also permanently banned Miller and Flip 2 Futures from trading or operating as commodity advisors.
Will the investors actually get their money back?
It’s uncertain. Flip 2 Futures is administratively terminated and PDM is dissolved. The defendants’ ability to pay $364,000 in restitution plus $1.65 million in penalties is questionable given the entities are defunct. The court appointed the National Futures Association as Monitor to collect and distribute any restitution payments.
How did Miller and Flip 2 Futures find investors?
Miller advertised through the Flip 2 Futures website, YouTube videos (at least 72 posted), Twitter, Craigslist ads in the Financial Services category, and Discord channels. He offered paid access to a live trading room and solicited direct investments. Dendinger then approached personal acquaintances to invest.
What can I do to avoid investment fraud like this?
Always verify that anyone offering investment advice or managing your money is properly registered with federal or state regulators. Check the SEC or CFTC websites. Be extremely skeptical of guaranteed high returns (like 6% monthly). Never invest based solely on performance claims without independent verification. Ask for and read all disclosure documents. Research the person’s actual track record, not just what they claim.
Post ID: 3870  ·  Slug: cftc-late-stage-capitalism-ftc-punch-drunk-flip-neoliberalism  ·  Original: 2025-05-20  ·  Rebuilt: 2026-03-20

The CFTC has a press release about this too! Feel free to check it out: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9019-24

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 1747
🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights are human rights 🏳️‍⚧️
Theme