πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ trans rights are human rights πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ
Theme
◀
▶

A Former Okta Manager Tipped a Friend Before a 34% Stock Drop, SEC Finds

Insider trading and market integrity

A Former Okta Manager Tipped a Friend Before a 34% Stock Drop, SEC Finds

Andrew Neller learned that Okta’s internal plan was too optimistic, bought put options and told a former colleague to do the same. The SEC says their options produced a combined $269,613.52 in profits after the company lowered its outlook.

What the SEC found

  • Okta sales manager Andrew Neller attended a confidential meeting where executives said the company had missed internal targets and needed to revise an overly optimistic plan.
  • Neller later spent $22,741.95 on short-dated Okta put options, which increase in value when the underlying stock falls.
  • The next day, he warned friend and former colleague Jack Alexander about a likely guidance reduction and specifically advised him to buy September 9 put options.
  • Alexander sold all 1,958 Okta shares he owned and spent $31,567.92 on put options before the company’s earnings announcement.
  • Okta lowered its calculated billings outlook by approximately $140 million. Its stock fell 34% the next day.
  • The SEC ordered Neller to pay $441,566.95 in disgorgement, interest and a civil penalty under a settlement in which he did not admit most findings.

The order also records a final exchange after the trades were closed: Alexander told Neller to delete their conversation, and Neller agreed.

The text that came after the profits

On the morning after Okta disclosed a weaker full-year outlook, its shares fell from $91.40 to $60.60. Neller and Alexander sold the put options they had bought before the announcement. According to the SEC, Neller made $98,754 and Alexander made $170,859.52.

Then Alexander sent a short instruction that placed the prior day’s messages in a different light.

β€œDelete this text conversation. I will.” Jack Alexander to Andrew Neller, as quoted in the SEC order

Neller replied, β€œYou got it,” and deleted the messages exchanged on August 31 and through that point on September 1, the order says.

Those deleted texts sat at the end of a month-long sequence that began inside a confidential Okta meeting. The SEC’s account shows how internal operating problems moved from an employee-only call into brokerage accounts before public investors received the same information.

The confidential warning inside Okta

On August 4, 2022, Neller remotely joined an Okta companywide meeting that was open only to company personnel. Okta’s chief executive said the company had missed its internal financial targets for the first half of the fiscal year, according to the order.

The internal plan was wrong, too optimistic and in need of adjustment. The chief executive also discussed high employee attrition, particularly in sales, and difficulty integrating Auth0, an identity platform Okta had acquired. He told employees to keep the information confidential.

Neller was not unfamiliar with the rules. Okta had a policy prohibiting employees from trading on material nonpublic information or passing that information and trading advice to others. The SEC says Neller completed training on the policy in 2019, 2020 and 2021.

  1. Confidential informationInternal targets were missed, the plan needed revision and sales problems were affecting performance.
  2. Neller’s tradeHe spent $22,741.95 on out-of-the-money Okta put options on August 30.
  3. The tip and second tradeHe warned Alexander and recommended a specific put option. Alexander sold his shares and bought puts.
  4. Public disclosureOkta reduced its outlook, the stock fell 34% and both options positions were sold for profits.

The record therefore does not describe an absence of corporate rules. It describes an employee who had received repeated training and a direct confidentiality warning, then traded and tipped a friend anyway, according to the Commission’s findings.

The trades were placed before the public announcement

  • Confidential company meeting: Neller learned that Okta’s internal plan was too optimistic, sales attrition was high and the Auth0 integration was causing difficulty.
  • Neller bought puts: He spent $22,741.95 on options expiring September 9 with strike prices between $85 and $88.
  • The warning: Neller texted Alexander that he expected β€œa pretty rough day tomorrow” and thought Okta would report its β€œfirst miss.”
  • Alexander sold his shares: He sold all 1,958 Okta shares he owned for $178,036.58.
  • A specific recommendation: Neller wrote, β€œBuy Sept 9, $87 put options.” Alexander bought $31,567.92 of those options at 12:33 p.m.
  • Okta disclosed the problems publicly: The company lowered its calculated billings outlook by approximately $140 million, citing sales integration problems and attrition among the principal reasons.
  • The stock fell and the options were sold: Okta shares dropped 34%. Neller and Alexander closed their options positions that morning.

Neller’s prediction was not precise in every respect. Okta’s quarterly results beat expectations, according to the order. The consequential disclosure was the reduction in full-year calculated billings guidance, a non-GAAP business metric, and the explanation that sales integration trouble and attrition were hurting momentum.

The financial result

The options magnified the effect of the stock’s decline. Alexander also avoided losses by selling his Okta shares before the announcement. The order attributes the following amounts to the trades:

34% Okta’s one-day share-price decline, from $91.40 to $60.60
$98,754 Neller’s profit from the put options
$170,859.52 Alexander’s profit from his put options
$59,381.78 Losses Alexander avoided by selling his Okta shares
$441,566.95 Total disgorgement, interest and civil penalty ordered against Neller

The order does not identify individual investors who were harmed, determine losses suffered by particular market participants or state who took the opposite side of the options trades. It also directs Neller’s payments to the U.S. Treasury rather than establishing a distribution to investors.

The broader market concern is the information imbalance documented by the SEC: an employee and his friend were positioned for a decline before Okta’s operating problems and reduced outlook became public.

What the SEC order establishes, and what it does not

The Commission found that Neller violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, which prohibit fraud in connection with securities transactions. This was a settled civil administrative proceeding, not a trial verdict or criminal conviction.

Issue What the order says Limit of the record
Neller’s conduct The SEC found that he traded on material nonpublic information and tipped Alexander. Neller settled without admitting most findings.
Alexander’s conduct The order describes his stock sale, options purchase, profits, avoided losses and deletion request. The supplied order does not state the outcome of any separate proceeding involving him.
Okta’s role The order records Okta’s insider trading policy, employee training and the confidentiality warning at the meeting. Okta is not a respondent, and the order does not accuse the company of securities-law violations.
Investor harm The order quantifies profits and avoided losses tied to the trades. It does not identify specific investor victims or calculate their losses.

The order contains no Okta response to the enforcement action. Its quoted statements from Okta executives concern the internal meeting and the company’s public earnings call, not a defense of Neller’s conduct.

The settlement takes back the profit and adds a larger penalty

Neller agreed to cease and desist from future violations of the federal antifraud provisions. The SEC also ordered three categories of payment:

$98,754.00 Disgorgement of Neller’s profit
$13,817.65 Prejudgment interest
$328,995.30 Civil penalty

The payment schedule requires $200,000 within 10 days of the order and the remaining balance by July 30, 2027. Post-order interest applies. If a scheduled payment is missed, SEC staff may make the outstanding amount immediately due.

The central lesson in the order is narrower than a claim that Okta lacked rules. Okta had a policy, Neller had completed multiple trainings and the meeting carried an explicit confidentiality warning. According to the SEC, those safeguards were followed by a personal trade, a tip to a friend and a recommendation precise enough to name the option’s date and strike price.

The sequence shows why insider trading enforcement is ultimately about access. Public investors learned about Okta’s reduced outlook after the market closed. Neller and Alexander were already positioned before that disclosure, and the next morning converted the information advantage described by the SEC into six-figure options profits.

Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 106363, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-22722, order concerning Andrew T. Neller dated September 15, 2026. All quoted messages, trading figures, findings and sanctions in this article are drawn from that order.
Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 2347