The FTC sued Kushly for its misleading marketing materials on CBD’s miracle cure for cancer and Alzhemier’s.

Kushly Industries Sold CBD Products With False Health Claims
Corporate Misconduct Accountability Project

Kushly Industries Sold CBD Products With False Health Claims

FTC alleged the company falsely marketed CBD products as treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s, PTSD, and other serious diseases without scientific evidence, misleading consumers nationwide.

HIGH SEVERITY
TL;DR

Kushly Industries LLC and its CEO Cody Alt marketed CBD products claiming they could treat or cure serious diseases including cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, insomnia, and skin conditions without competent scientific evidence. The FTC found these health claims were unsubstantiated and deceptive. The company agreed to pay over $30,000 and must notify all customers who purchased products between May 2019 and August 2020 about the false claims.

This case shows how companies exploit regulatory gaps in emerging markets to profit from unproven medical claims.

$30,583
Monetary penalty paid to FTC
15+ months
Period of deceptive marketing practices
25+ diseases
Medical conditions falsely claimed to treat

The Allegations: A Breakdown

โš ๏ธ
Core Allegations
What they did · 6 points
01 Kushly Industries claimed their CBD products effectively treated, mitigated, or cured serious diseases including sleep disorders like insomnia and narcolepsy, psychiatric disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, general anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and social anxiety disorder without supporting scientific evidence. high
02 The company marketed CBD products as treatments for cancer, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and hypertension despite having no competent and reliable scientific evidence to support these claims. high
03 Kushly represented that their CBD products could treat skin conditions including acne, psoriasis, and eczema, as well as arthritis, muscle spasms, pain from endometriosis, and dysmenorrhea without the required randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled human clinical testing. high
04 The company made representations that their products were clinically proven to treat chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, depression, cancer, and other serious conditions when no such clinical proof existed. high
05 Kushly misrepresented the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of tests, studies, or other research to support their health benefit claims. high
06 CEO Cody Alt, as owner, chief executive officer, and manager of Kushly, controlled or had the authority to control the company’s deceptive marketing practices and participated directly in the alleged violations. high
๐Ÿ›๏ธ
Regulatory Failures
How oversight fell short · 5 points
01 The FTC investigation revealed that Kushly operated for over 15 months making unsubstantiated health claims before facing enforcement action, allowing the company to profit extensively from deceptive practices during this period. high
02 The consent order requires only that Kushly stop making false claims going forward and notify past customers, with no admission of wrongdoing by the respondents, demonstrating how settlements may not fully deter corporate misconduct. medium
03 The Order allows an exception for FDA-approved claims, revealing the regulatory gap where CBD products could be marketed aggressively before comprehensive federal guidance was established for this emerging product category. medium
04 The settlement permits Kushly to continue operating and selling CBD products as long as they comply with substantiation requirements, rather than forcing the company out of business despite the serious nature of false medical claims. medium
05 The Order requires Kushly to preserve records and undergo compliance monitoring for years, but places the burden on the already resource-limited FTC to actively monitor rather than creating automatic penalties for future violations. medium
๐Ÿ’ฐ
Profit Over People
Prioritizing revenue over consumer safety · 6 points
01 Kushly aggressively marketed CBD products with disease-treatment claims across multiple platforms including their website, social media posts, blog articles, and direct marketing to maximize sales volume in the rapidly expanding CBD market. high
02 The company chose to invest resources in marketing and promotional materials making bold health claims rather than conducting the expensive, time-consuming randomized clinical trials necessary to substantiate those claims. high
03 By making unproven claims about treating serious diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s, Kushly exploited consumer fears and desperation for affordable healthcare alternatives to drive product purchases. high
04 The monetary penalty of $30,583 paid by Kushly may have been substantially lower than the profits generated during 15 months of deceptive marketing, suggesting the financial consequences did not match the scale of potential harm. high
05 Kushly continued making false claims until the FTC intervened, demonstrating a business model based on aggressive expansion in loosely regulated markets with an expectation that regulatory action would come too late to prevent profitable growth. high
06 The company marketed a wide range of CBD products including tinctures, gummies, lotions, and toothpicks with sweeping health claims, maximizing product lines and revenue streams without corresponding increases in scientific validation. medium
๐Ÿฅ
Public Health and Safety
Risks to consumer wellbeing · 6 points
01 Consumers who believed Kushly’s false claims about treating cancer, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, or other serious diseases may have delayed or forgone proven medical treatments, potentially worsening their health conditions or missing critical intervention windows. high
02 The customer notification letter required by the Order warns that CBD products could be dangerous if taken with other medicines or at high doses and could interfere with medications or treatments, risks that Kushly failed to adequately disclose while making treatment claims. high
03 Patients with psychiatric disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, PTSD, and anxiety who purchased Kushly products based on treatment claims may have experienced worsening symptoms or delayed access to evidence-based mental health care. high
04 Consumers spent money on products they believed would cure or alleviate serious health conditions based on Kushly’s representations about scientific studies and clinical proof that did not actually exist. high
05 The Order requires Kushly to provide sufficient customer information to enable consumer redress to all purchasers from May 26, 2019 through August 27, 2020, acknowledging the broad scope of consumers potentially harmed by the deceptive practices. medium
06 By pointing to non-existent or misrepresented scientific research, Kushly undermined public trust in legitimate CBD research and made it harder for consumers to distinguish between credible and fraudulent health claims in an emerging product category. medium
โš–๏ธ
Corporate Accountability Failures
Inadequate consequences · 6 points
01 The Consent Agreement includes statements by respondents that they neither admit nor deny any allegations in the complaint, allowing Kushly and its CEO to avoid acknowledging wrongdoing while agreeing to stop the practices. high
02 The facts alleged in the complaint establish all elements necessary to sustain bankruptcy non-dischargeability action, but this provision primarily protects the FTC’s ability to collect payment rather than imposing meaningful accountability on the company. medium
03 The Order terminates 20 years from issuance, an extended timeline that reflects the seriousness of violations but also demonstrates how long corporate misconduct cases can remain active without full resolution. medium
04 Individual Respondent Cody Alt faces personal liability as owner and CEO, but the Order allows him to continue operating businesses in the CBD industry as long as he complies with substantiation requirements, despite his direct participation in deceptive practices. medium
05 The compliance monitoring provisions require Kushly to submit reports and allow FTC inspection, but enforcement depends on the Commission’s limited resources to actively monitor rather than automatic penalties for non-compliance. medium
06 Each day of nonpayment is deemed a separate violation for which civil penalties accrue, but this provision only applies to monetary obligations rather than to ongoing false advertising or failure to notify customers. low
๐Ÿ“ข
The PR Machine
Controlling the narrative · 4 points
01 The required customer notification letter frames the FTC’s findings with distancing language stating ‘The FTC says’ rather than direct acknowledgment of wrongdoing, allowing Kushly to present allegations as claims rather than established facts. medium
02 The Order requires Kushly to post website notices linking to the Order and providing contact information for redress inquiries, but allows the company to control how this information is presented within their ongoing marketing presence. medium
03 By settling without admitting liability, Kushly can publicly claim they resolved misunderstandings with regulators while maintaining their business operations, potentially preserving brand reputation despite serious allegations. medium
04 The customer notification must be mailed within 180 days and posted on social media for at least one year, but these requirements end while the company’s overall online presence and brand continue indefinitely. low
โฐ
Exploiting Delay
Gaming the timeline · 4 points
01 Kushly operated from at least May 26, 2019 through August 27, 2020 making false health claims before facing enforcement, demonstrating how companies can profit extensively during the time it takes regulators to investigate and file complaints. high
02 The settlement allows 180 days after the Order’s issuance date for Kushly to notify all eligible customers, extending the timeline before consumers learn they were misled and potentially delaying any individual legal actions. medium
03 The Order requires compliance reports only one year after issuance, creating a substantial gap during which the company’s adherence to requirements may not be formally assessed despite the serious nature of public health violations. medium
04 Monetary payment was required within only 5 days of the Order’s effective date, but respondents stipulated their counsel already held this amount in escrow, suggesting the settlement terms were negotiated to minimize immediate financial impact. medium
๐Ÿ“‹
The Bottom Line
What this means · 5 points
01 Kushly Industries exploited regulatory gaps in the emerging CBD market to make sweeping, unsubstantiated health claims about treating serious diseases, prioritizing rapid market share growth over scientific validation or consumer safety. high
02 The case demonstrates how companies can operate for extended periods making false medical claims before enforcement actions catch up, during which time they profit while potentially endangering public health and eroding consumer trust. high
03 The settlement’s financial penalty and notification requirements may not fully deter similar misconduct by other companies if potential profits from deceptive marketing exceed eventual enforcement costs. high
04 Consumers harmed by purchasing products based on false disease-treatment claims may never be fully compensated for money spent, delayed medical care, or worsened health conditions, while the company continues operating in the same industry. high
05 This case illustrates broader systemic problems where profit-driven companies in loosely regulated markets can exploit consumer anxieties about health and healthcare costs to market unproven products as miracle cures. medium

Timeline of Events

May 2019
Kushly Industries begins marketing CBD products with unsubstantiated disease-treatment claims
May 2019 – August 2020
Company continues deceptive advertising across website, social media, and direct marketing channels
Undisclosed
Federal Trade Commission initiates investigation into Kushly’s marketing practices
Undisclosed
FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection prepares draft complaint and proposes enforcement action
Undisclosed
Kushly Industries and Cody Alt execute Agreement Containing Consent Order
Undisclosed
Commission places Consent Agreement on public record for 30-day comment period
June 29, 2021
FTC issues final Decision and Order against Kushly Industries and Cody Alt
Within 5 days of Order
Respondents required to pay $30,583.14 to the Commission
Within 180 days of Order
Kushly must notify all customers who purchased CBD products during the violation period
One year after Order
Respondents must submit first compliance report to the Commission

Direct Quotes from the Legal Record

QUOTE 1 Scope of False Disease Claims allegations
“Respondents must not make, or assist others in making, expressly or by implication, any representation that such Covered Product effectively treats, mitigates, or cures diseases or health conditions including: sleep disorders, including insomnia and narcolepsy; headaches; psychiatric disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, general anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and social anxiety disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, and anorexia nervosa; cancer; multiple sclerosis; chronic drowsiness; Parkinson’s disease; hypertension; Alzheimer’s disease; acne, psoriasis, eczema; arthritis; muscle spasms; pain resulting from endometriosis; and dysmenorrhea”

๐Ÿ’ก This comprehensive list shows the extensive range of serious diseases Kushly falsely claimed their products could treat without scientific evidence.

QUOTE 2 Required Scientific Evidence Standard allegations
“For purposes of this Provision, competent and reliable scientific evidence must consist of human clinical testing of the Covered Product, or of an Essentially Equivalent Product, that is sufficient in quality and quantity based on standards generally accepted by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, to substantiate that the representation is true. Such testing must be: (1) randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled; and (2) conducted by researchers qualified by training and experience to conduct such testing.”

๐Ÿ’ก The Order specifies the rigorous scientific standards Kushly failed to meet before making disease-treatment claims to consumers.

QUOTE 3 CEO’s Direct Control and Participation accountability
“Respondent Cody Alt is the owner, chief executive officer, and manager of Kushly. Individually or in concert with others, he controls or had the authority to control, or participated in the acts and practices alleged in this complaint.”

๐Ÿ’ก This establishes personal liability for the CEO who directed the company’s deceptive marketing strategy.

QUOTE 4 Prohibited Clinical Proof Claims allegations
“Respondents must not misrepresent, in any manner, expressly or by implication: that any Covered Product is clinically proven to: treat, alleviate, or cure chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, depression, cancer, sleep disorders, hypertension, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, acne, psoriasis, and eczema”

๐Ÿ’ก The Order specifically prohibits false claims that products are clinically proven when no such clinical proof exists.

QUOTE 5 Misrepresentation of Scientific Research allegations
“Respondents must not misrepresent the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or other research.”

๐Ÿ’ก This prohibition addresses Kushly’s practice of pointing to non-existent or distorted studies to support their health claims.

QUOTE 6 Customer Notification Requirement accountability
“The FTC says we do not have scientific evidence that our CBD products can treat or cure diseases and health conditions… The FTC says studies do not prove that our CBD products treat or cure any of the diseases and health conditions listed above.”

๐Ÿ’ก Kushly must explicitly tell customers that the FTC found their disease-treatment claims were not supported by scientific evidence.

QUOTE 7 Consumer Safety Warning health
“CBD products could be dangerous if you take them with other medicines or at a high dose. They also could interfere with other medications you’re taking or treatments you’re getting. Talk to your doctor before you use CBD products.”

๐Ÿ’ก The required customer notification reveals safety risks Kushly failed to adequately disclose while marketing products as disease treatments.

QUOTE 8 No Admission of Wrongdoing accountability
“The Consent Agreement includes: 1) statements by Respondents that they neither admit nor deny any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as specifically stated in this Decision and Order, and that only for purposes of this action, they admit the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction”

๐Ÿ’ก Despite serious public health violations, the settlement allows the company to avoid acknowledging wrongdoing.

QUOTE 9 Monetary Penalty Amount profit
“Respondents must pay to the Commission $30,583.14, which Respondents stipulate their undersigned counsel holds in escrow for no purpose other than payment to the Commission.”

๐Ÿ’ก The financial penalty may be substantially less than profits generated during 15 months of deceptive marketing to consumers nationwide.

QUOTE 10 Extended Compliance Period accountability
“Respondents must identify all consumers who purchased Kushly Industries LLC’s CBD Products from May 26, 2019 through August 27, 2020. Such eligible customers, and their contact information, must be identified to the extent such information is in Respondents’ possession, custody or control, including from third parties such as resellers”

๐Ÿ’ก The 15-month violation period shows how long the company made false claims before facing enforcement, affecting a large customer base.

QUOTE 11 Burden on Already-Limited FTC Resources regulatory
“For 10 years after the issuance date of this Order, each Respondent must submit a compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 14 days of any change… Within 10 days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the Commission, each Respondent must: submit additional compliance reports or other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury, and produce records for inspection and copying.”

๐Ÿ’ก The monitoring system places ongoing burden on the resource-limited FTC rather than creating automatic penalties for violations.

QUOTE 12 Continuing Business Operations regulatory
“Nothing in this Order prohibits Respondents, or Respondents’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, or all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, from: For any drug, making a representation that is approved in labeling for such drug under any tentative final or final monograph promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration”

๐Ÿ’ก Despite serious violations, Kushly can continue operating in the CBD industry as long as they comply with substantiation requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

โ“What exactly did Kushly Industries do wrong?
Kushly Industries marketed CBD products claiming they could treat or cure over 25 serious diseases including cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, insomnia, arthritis, and skin conditions without having scientific evidence to support these claims. The FTC found these representations were false and deceptive because the company had not conducted the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials necessary to make such health claims.
โ“How long did Kushly make these false claims?
According to the FTC Order, Kushly made unsubstantiated disease-treatment claims from at least May 26, 2019 through August 27, 2020, a period of over 15 months. During this time, the company continued marketing across their website, social media, blog articles, and direct marketing channels before the FTC intervened.
โ“What penalty did Kushly face?
Kushly Industries and CEO Cody Alt agreed to pay $30,583.14 to the FTC. They must also notify all customers who purchased CBD products during the violation period about the false claims, post notices on their website and social media accounts, stop making unsubstantiated health claims, and undergo compliance monitoring for up to 20 years. However, they did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
โ“Who was harmed by these false claims?
All consumers who purchased Kushly CBD products between May 26, 2019 and August 27, 2020 based on the false disease-treatment claims were harmed. People with serious conditions like cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, or psychiatric disorders may have delayed proven medical treatments in favor of these ineffective products, potentially worsening their health. Others spent money on products that could not deliver the promised health benefits.
โ“Will customers get refunds?
The Order requires Kushly to provide customer information to enable the FTC to administer consumer redress. The FTC issued a press release in August 2022 stating they were returning almost $21,000 to consumers nationwide who bought these deceptively marketed CBD products, though this amount is substantially less than the company likely collected during 15 months of sales.
โ“Is Kushly still in business?
The Order does not force Kushly out of business. The company can continue selling CBD products as long as they do not make unsubstantiated health claims and comply with the Order’s requirements for scientific substantiation, customer notification, and ongoing compliance monitoring. CEO Cody Alt can also continue operating businesses in the CBD industry under these restrictions.
โ“What scientific evidence did Kushly actually have?
According to the FTC, Kushly did not possess competent and reliable scientific evidence to support their disease-treatment claims. The company had not conducted randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled human clinical trials of their products. The Order indicates Kushly may have pointed to studies or scientific evidence that either did not exist, were misinterpreted, or did not actually prove their products treated the claimed conditions.
โ“Are CBD products dangerous?
The customer notification letter required by the Order warns that CBD products could be dangerous if taken with other medicines or at high doses and could interfere with medications or treatments. The letter instructs customers to talk to their doctor before using CBD products. However, the Order does not ban CBD products generally, only false claims about treating diseases.
โ“Why did it take so long for the FTC to stop these false claims?
The FTC must investigate marketing practices, collect evidence, assess the veracity of health claims, and follow administrative procedures before issuing enforcement actions. Government agencies operate with limited resources and must prioritize cases. Kushly was able to market products with false claims for over 15 months before the final Order was issued in June 2021, demonstrating how regulatory action often comes after companies have already profited extensively from deceptive practices.
โ“What can consumers do to protect themselves from similar false claims?
Consumers should be skeptical of products claiming to treat or cure serious diseases, especially without FDA approval. Look for peer-reviewed scientific studies published in reputable journals. Be wary of companies that cite vague scientific research or studies without providing details. Consult with healthcare providers before using supplements or CBD products for medical conditions. Report suspected false advertising to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.
Post ID: 2528  ยท  Slug: ftc-kushly-misleading-cbd-neoliberalism-lawsuit  ยท  Original: 2025-03-16  ยท  Rebuilt: 2026-03-20

The FTC did a press release about this act of corporate misconduct: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/08/federal-trade-commission-returning-almost-21000-consumers-nationwide-who-bought-deceptively-marketed

๐Ÿ’ก Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day โ€” from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm the creator this website. I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher studying corporatocracy and its detrimental effects on every single aspect of society.

For more information, please see my About page.

All posts published by this profile were either personally written by me, or I actively edited / reviewed them before publishing. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Articles: 1675