Kushly Industries Sold CBD Products With False Health Claims
FTC alleged the company falsely marketed CBD products as treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s, PTSD, and other serious diseases without scientific evidence, misleading consumers nationwide.
Kushly Industries LLC and its CEO Cody Alt marketed CBD products claiming they could treat or cure serious diseases including cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, insomnia, and skin conditions without competent scientific evidence. The FTC found these health claims were unsubstantiated and deceptive. The company agreed to pay over $30,000 and must notify all customers who purchased products between May 2019 and August 2020 about the false claims.
This case shows how companies exploit regulatory gaps in emerging markets to profit from unproven medical claims.
The Allegations: A Breakdown
| 01 | Kushly Industries claimed their CBD products effectively treated, mitigated, or cured serious diseases including sleep disorders like insomnia and narcolepsy, psychiatric disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, general anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and social anxiety disorder without supporting scientific evidence. | high |
| 02 | The company marketed CBD products as treatments for cancer, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and hypertension despite having no competent and reliable scientific evidence to support these claims. | high |
| 03 | Kushly represented that their CBD products could treat skin conditions including acne, psoriasis, and eczema, as well as arthritis, muscle spasms, pain from endometriosis, and dysmenorrhea without the required randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled human clinical testing. | high |
| 04 | The company made representations that their products were clinically proven to treat chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, depression, cancer, and other serious conditions when no such clinical proof existed. | high |
| 05 | Kushly misrepresented the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of tests, studies, or other research to support their health benefit claims. | high |
| 06 | CEO Cody Alt, as owner, chief executive officer, and manager of Kushly, controlled or had the authority to control the company’s deceptive marketing practices and participated directly in the alleged violations. | high |
| 01 | The FTC investigation revealed that Kushly operated for over 15 months making unsubstantiated health claims before facing enforcement action, allowing the company to profit extensively from deceptive practices during this period. | high |
| 02 | The consent order requires only that Kushly stop making false claims going forward and notify past customers, with no admission of wrongdoing by the respondents, demonstrating how settlements may not fully deter corporate misconduct. | medium |
| 03 | The Order allows an exception for FDA-approved claims, revealing the regulatory gap where CBD products could be marketed aggressively before comprehensive federal guidance was established for this emerging product category. | medium |
| 04 | The settlement permits Kushly to continue operating and selling CBD products as long as they comply with substantiation requirements, rather than forcing the company out of business despite the serious nature of false medical claims. | medium |
| 05 | The Order requires Kushly to preserve records and undergo compliance monitoring for years, but places the burden on the already resource-limited FTC to actively monitor rather than creating automatic penalties for future violations. | medium |
| 01 | Kushly aggressively marketed CBD products with disease-treatment claims across multiple platforms including their website, social media posts, blog articles, and direct marketing to maximize sales volume in the rapidly expanding CBD market. | high |
| 02 | The company chose to invest resources in marketing and promotional materials making bold health claims rather than conducting the expensive, time-consuming randomized clinical trials necessary to substantiate those claims. | high |
| 03 | By making unproven claims about treating serious diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s, Kushly exploited consumer fears and desperation for affordable healthcare alternatives to drive product purchases. | high |
| 04 | The monetary penalty of $30,583 paid by Kushly may have been substantially lower than the profits generated during 15 months of deceptive marketing, suggesting the financial consequences did not match the scale of potential harm. | high |
| 05 | Kushly continued making false claims until the FTC intervened, demonstrating a business model based on aggressive expansion in loosely regulated markets with an expectation that regulatory action would come too late to prevent profitable growth. | high |
| 06 | The company marketed a wide range of CBD products including tinctures, gummies, lotions, and toothpicks with sweeping health claims, maximizing product lines and revenue streams without corresponding increases in scientific validation. | medium |
| 01 | Consumers who believed Kushly’s false claims about treating cancer, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, or other serious diseases may have delayed or forgone proven medical treatments, potentially worsening their health conditions or missing critical intervention windows. | high |
| 02 | The customer notification letter required by the Order warns that CBD products could be dangerous if taken with other medicines or at high doses and could interfere with medications or treatments, risks that Kushly failed to adequately disclose while making treatment claims. | high |
| 03 | Patients with psychiatric disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, PTSD, and anxiety who purchased Kushly products based on treatment claims may have experienced worsening symptoms or delayed access to evidence-based mental health care. | high |
| 04 | Consumers spent money on products they believed would cure or alleviate serious health conditions based on Kushly’s representations about scientific studies and clinical proof that did not actually exist. | high |
| 05 | The Order requires Kushly to provide sufficient customer information to enable consumer redress to all purchasers from May 26, 2019 through August 27, 2020, acknowledging the broad scope of consumers potentially harmed by the deceptive practices. | medium |
| 06 | By pointing to non-existent or misrepresented scientific research, Kushly undermined public trust in legitimate CBD research and made it harder for consumers to distinguish between credible and fraudulent health claims in an emerging product category. | medium |
| 01 | The Consent Agreement includes statements by respondents that they neither admit nor deny any allegations in the complaint, allowing Kushly and its CEO to avoid acknowledging wrongdoing while agreeing to stop the practices. | high |
| 02 | The facts alleged in the complaint establish all elements necessary to sustain bankruptcy non-dischargeability action, but this provision primarily protects the FTC’s ability to collect payment rather than imposing meaningful accountability on the company. | medium |
| 03 | The Order terminates 20 years from issuance, an extended timeline that reflects the seriousness of violations but also demonstrates how long corporate misconduct cases can remain active without full resolution. | medium |
| 04 | Individual Respondent Cody Alt faces personal liability as owner and CEO, but the Order allows him to continue operating businesses in the CBD industry as long as he complies with substantiation requirements, despite his direct participation in deceptive practices. | medium |
| 05 | The compliance monitoring provisions require Kushly to submit reports and allow FTC inspection, but enforcement depends on the Commission’s limited resources to actively monitor rather than automatic penalties for non-compliance. | medium |
| 06 | Each day of nonpayment is deemed a separate violation for which civil penalties accrue, but this provision only applies to monetary obligations rather than to ongoing false advertising or failure to notify customers. | low |
| 01 | The required customer notification letter frames the FTC’s findings with distancing language stating ‘The FTC says’ rather than direct acknowledgment of wrongdoing, allowing Kushly to present allegations as claims rather than established facts. | medium |
| 02 | The Order requires Kushly to post website notices linking to the Order and providing contact information for redress inquiries, but allows the company to control how this information is presented within their ongoing marketing presence. | medium |
| 03 | By settling without admitting liability, Kushly can publicly claim they resolved misunderstandings with regulators while maintaining their business operations, potentially preserving brand reputation despite serious allegations. | medium |
| 04 | The customer notification must be mailed within 180 days and posted on social media for at least one year, but these requirements end while the company’s overall online presence and brand continue indefinitely. | low |
| 01 | Kushly operated from at least May 26, 2019 through August 27, 2020 making false health claims before facing enforcement, demonstrating how companies can profit extensively during the time it takes regulators to investigate and file complaints. | high |
| 02 | The settlement allows 180 days after the Order’s issuance date for Kushly to notify all eligible customers, extending the timeline before consumers learn they were misled and potentially delaying any individual legal actions. | medium |
| 03 | The Order requires compliance reports only one year after issuance, creating a substantial gap during which the company’s adherence to requirements may not be formally assessed despite the serious nature of public health violations. | medium |
| 04 | Monetary payment was required within only 5 days of the Order’s effective date, but respondents stipulated their counsel already held this amount in escrow, suggesting the settlement terms were negotiated to minimize immediate financial impact. | medium |
| 01 | Kushly Industries exploited regulatory gaps in the emerging CBD market to make sweeping, unsubstantiated health claims about treating serious diseases, prioritizing rapid market share growth over scientific validation or consumer safety. | high |
| 02 | The case demonstrates how companies can operate for extended periods making false medical claims before enforcement actions catch up, during which time they profit while potentially endangering public health and eroding consumer trust. | high |
| 03 | The settlement’s financial penalty and notification requirements may not fully deter similar misconduct by other companies if potential profits from deceptive marketing exceed eventual enforcement costs. | high |
| 04 | Consumers harmed by purchasing products based on false disease-treatment claims may never be fully compensated for money spent, delayed medical care, or worsened health conditions, while the company continues operating in the same industry. | high |
| 05 | This case illustrates broader systemic problems where profit-driven companies in loosely regulated markets can exploit consumer anxieties about health and healthcare costs to market unproven products as miracle cures. | medium |
Timeline of Events
Direct Quotes from the Legal Record
“Respondents must not make, or assist others in making, expressly or by implication, any representation that such Covered Product effectively treats, mitigates, or cures diseases or health conditions including: sleep disorders, including insomnia and narcolepsy; headaches; psychiatric disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, general anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and social anxiety disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, and anorexia nervosa; cancer; multiple sclerosis; chronic drowsiness; Parkinson’s disease; hypertension; Alzheimer’s disease; acne, psoriasis, eczema; arthritis; muscle spasms; pain resulting from endometriosis; and dysmenorrhea”
๐ก This comprehensive list shows the extensive range of serious diseases Kushly falsely claimed their products could treat without scientific evidence.
“For purposes of this Provision, competent and reliable scientific evidence must consist of human clinical testing of the Covered Product, or of an Essentially Equivalent Product, that is sufficient in quality and quantity based on standards generally accepted by experts in the relevant disease, condition, or function to which the representation relates, when considered in light of the entire body of relevant and reliable scientific evidence, to substantiate that the representation is true. Such testing must be: (1) randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled; and (2) conducted by researchers qualified by training and experience to conduct such testing.”
๐ก The Order specifies the rigorous scientific standards Kushly failed to meet before making disease-treatment claims to consumers.
“Respondent Cody Alt is the owner, chief executive officer, and manager of Kushly. Individually or in concert with others, he controls or had the authority to control, or participated in the acts and practices alleged in this complaint.”
๐ก This establishes personal liability for the CEO who directed the company’s deceptive marketing strategy.
“Respondents must not misrepresent, in any manner, expressly or by implication: that any Covered Product is clinically proven to: treat, alleviate, or cure chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, depression, cancer, sleep disorders, hypertension, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, acne, psoriasis, and eczema”
๐ก The Order specifically prohibits false claims that products are clinically proven when no such clinical proof exists.
“Respondents must not misrepresent the existence, contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or other research.”
๐ก This prohibition addresses Kushly’s practice of pointing to non-existent or distorted studies to support their health claims.
“The FTC says we do not have scientific evidence that our CBD products can treat or cure diseases and health conditions… The FTC says studies do not prove that our CBD products treat or cure any of the diseases and health conditions listed above.”
๐ก Kushly must explicitly tell customers that the FTC found their disease-treatment claims were not supported by scientific evidence.
“CBD products could be dangerous if you take them with other medicines or at a high dose. They also could interfere with other medications you’re taking or treatments you’re getting. Talk to your doctor before you use CBD products.”
๐ก The required customer notification reveals safety risks Kushly failed to adequately disclose while marketing products as disease treatments.
“The Consent Agreement includes: 1) statements by Respondents that they neither admit nor deny any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as specifically stated in this Decision and Order, and that only for purposes of this action, they admit the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction”
๐ก Despite serious public health violations, the settlement allows the company to avoid acknowledging wrongdoing.
“Respondents must pay to the Commission $30,583.14, which Respondents stipulate their undersigned counsel holds in escrow for no purpose other than payment to the Commission.”
๐ก The financial penalty may be substantially less than profits generated during 15 months of deceptive marketing to consumers nationwide.
“Respondents must identify all consumers who purchased Kushly Industries LLC’s CBD Products from May 26, 2019 through August 27, 2020. Such eligible customers, and their contact information, must be identified to the extent such information is in Respondents’ possession, custody or control, including from third parties such as resellers”
๐ก The 15-month violation period shows how long the company made false claims before facing enforcement, affecting a large customer base.
“For 10 years after the issuance date of this Order, each Respondent must submit a compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 14 days of any change… Within 10 days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the Commission, each Respondent must: submit additional compliance reports or other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury, and produce records for inspection and copying.”
๐ก The monitoring system places ongoing burden on the resource-limited FTC rather than creating automatic penalties for violations.
“Nothing in this Order prohibits Respondents, or Respondents’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, or all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, from: For any drug, making a representation that is approved in labeling for such drug under any tentative final or final monograph promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration”
๐ก Despite serious violations, Kushly can continue operating in the CBD industry as long as they comply with substantiation requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
The FTC did a press release about this act of corporate misconduct: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/08/federal-trade-commission-returning-almost-21000-consumers-nationwide-who-bought-deceptively-marketed
๐ก Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category
Corporations harm people every day โ from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.
- ๐ Product Safety Violations โ When companies risk lives for profit.
- ๐ฟ Environmental Violations โ Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.
- ๐ผ Labor Exploitation โ Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.
- ๐ก๏ธ Data Breaches & Privacy Abuses โ Misuse and mishandling of personal information.
- ๐ต Financial Fraud & Corruption โ Lies, scams, and executive impunity.