A Wrist Slap for Poison: Greenidge Generation’s Toxic Bill Comes Due
A Lake Held Hostage By Yesterday’s Poison
On the shore of Seneca Lake sits the Greenidge Generating Station. The plant itself stopped burning coal in 2011, before Greenidge LLC purchased it in 2014 and restarted it on natural gas. The poison from its past, however, never left. A massive unlined surface impoundment, the “C-Pond,” still holds decades of accumulated coal ash, the toxic byproduct of burning coal since 1937.
This is not inert material. Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) are known to contain heavy metals and other toxins. The C-Pond is an “inactive CCR surface impoundment” under federal law, which means it is a regulated toxic waste site. It was built without a liner, creating a direct pathway for contaminants to seep into the groundwater. Worse, the company continued using this pond for its current operations, channeling non-CCR plant wastewater through the toxic sludge and then discharging it into Seneca Lake through a state-permitted outfall.
Federal law is clear about such hazards. The EPA’s CCR Rule established standards for monitoring, managing, and closing these toxic ponds to protect public health and the environment. Greenidge was legally obligated to comply. The official record shows they did not.
The Non-Financial Ledger
The damage a corporation does cannot be measured only in dollars. There is a human cost, a debt paid in fear and uncertainty. For years, Greenidge operated without a fully functional groundwater monitoring system. This means the local community, which relies on and lives around Seneca Lake, had no way of knowing what was leaking from the C-Pond into their environment. This is a fundamental betrayal.
“Greenidge did not have an upgradient or other monitoring well that accurately represents the quality of background groundwater that has not been affected by leakage from the surface impoundment…”
The company also failed to produce the required annual reports. These are not just bureaucratic paperwork. They are public documents that provide transparency and assurance that a corporation is managing its hazardous waste responsibly. By failing to produce these reports for 2017, 2018, and 2019, Greenidge denied the public its right to information, operating behind a shield of secrecy while its toxic pond sat on the edge of a vital waterway.
Legal Receipts: The Paper Trail of Neglect
In September 2022, the EPA sent Greenidge a Notice of Potential Violations. This document outlines the company’s failures to comply with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The violations are not minor oversights; they represent a systemic breakdown of environmental controls over multiple years.
1. Failure to Install Proper Groundwater Monitoring: From October 2017 through February 2021, Greenidge failed to have the required number of downgradient wells and, critically, lacked a proper upgradient well to establish a clean baseline for groundwater quality.
2. Failure to Sample Groundwater: The company failed to collect the minimum of eight independent samples from each well for analysis by the deadline of October 17, 2017.
3. Failure to Report: Greenidge failed to prepare and post its annual groundwater monitoring reports for 2017, 2018, and 2019, which were due by January 31 of the following year.
4. Failure to Plan for Floods: The company did not design an initial inflow design flood control system plan by April 2017, a key safety measure.
5. Failure to Assess Location Risks: A required Location Restrictions Report, due October 2018, was not completed until November 2020.
6. Failure to Plan for Closure: Initial closure and post-closure plans, due April 2017, were not prepared and posted until November 2020.
The company was supposed to stop dumping wastewater into this unlined pond by April 11, 2021. Instead, they asked for an extension, which the EPA ultimately denied. This settlement is the outcome of that confrontation.
The Price of Pollution: A Management Fee
After years of non-compliance and operating an illegal toxic waste impoundment, Greenidge Generation negotiated a settlement with the EPA. They did not have to admit guilt. The price for their documented failures and the potential harm to a major New York waterway was a civil penalty.
This is not a punishment. For a company of this scale, it is a rounding error, a predictable cost of doing business calculated against the profits gained by delaying expensive infrastructure upgrades and proper waste management.
What Now? The Watchlist
The Consent Agreement forces Greenidge to finally act. They must stop all discharge into the C-Pond within 180 days of the January 9, 2024 order and begin the formal closure process. They must also bring their monitoring and reporting into compliance. Accountability, however, is not guaranteed by a legal document; it is compelled by public pressure.
Corporate Leadership
- President: Dale Irwin
Regulatory Watchlist
- EPA Region 2: This is the agency that agreed to the $105,000 settlement. They are responsible for ensuring Greenidge meets every deadline and requirement in the new order.
- New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC): The NYSDEC issued the permit allowing Greenidge to discharge wastewater into Seneca Lake. Their vigilance is critical to protecting state waters.
The Resistance
This settlement is a beginning, not an end. Local organizing is the only mechanism that can hold this corporation’s feet to the fire. Communities must track the closure deadlines laid out in the Consent Order and demand transparency at every step. Mutual aid efforts can supplement official data by organizing independent water quality testing. The fight is to ensure that the permanent closure of the C-Pond happens on schedule and to the highest safety standards, not just the cheapest ones.
The source document for this investigation is attached below.
You can read about the settlement between the EPA and Greenidge by reading clicking on this press release: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-reaches-settlement-greenidge-generation-llc-actions-address-compliance-coal-ash
Explore by category
Product Safety Violations
When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.
View Cases →Financial Fraud & Corruption
Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.
View Cases →


