Holding Townstone Financial Accountable for Redlining Practices

Redlining for Profit: Townstone Financial’s Air War On Black Chicago

TL;DR

  • The U.S. government, via the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, filed a lawsuit (Case No. 1:20-cv-04176) against Townstone Financial for illegal racial discrimination in mortgage lending between 2014 and 2017.
  • Townstone used its popular radio show to systematically discourage Black people from applying for loans by painting their neighborhoods as dangerous “war zones” and “jungles,” while referring to the people in racist and derogatory terms.
  • The company’s application rate from Black communities was a fraction of its competitors, revealing a clear pattern of redlining. The company’s owner, Barry Sturner, allegedly transferred $2.4 million out of the company to his personal accounts after learning of the federal investigation.

The CEO’s alleged $2.4 million escape plan is detailed in Section 6.

The Non-Financial Ledger

Homeownership is more than a financial transaction. It’s about putting down roots. It’s about safety, community, and dignity. The federal complaint against Townstone Financial exposes a business model built on stripping that dignity away from Black Chicagoans before they could even fill out an application.

For years, Townstone used its radio show, “The Townstone Financial Show,” as its primary marketing tool. Up to 90% of its business came from these broadcasts. The show’s hosts, including CEO and owner Barry Sturner, presented themselves as “Chicago real-estate experts.” But their expertise was weaponized. They used the public airwaves to tell a story about Black neighborhoods designed to keep people out.

They weren’t just selling mortgages. They were selling a segregated vision of Chicago, one where Black communities were cast as violent, undesirable, and unworthy of investment.

Imagine being a prospective homebuyer, listening to the radio for advice, and hearing the host describe Chicago’s majority-Black South Side as a “hoodlum weekend” and a “real war zone.” Imagine hearing someone compare a walk through your neighborhood to the adrenaline rush of skydiving. This is the language Townstone used. It’s a calculated attack designed to make people feel unsafe in their own homes and unwelcome in the market.

Societal Impact Mapping

This racist rhetoric had a measurable, devastating impact. The practice of redlining—denying services to residents of certain areas based on their race or ethnicity—is illegal. Townstone’s actions, according to the federal government, amounted to a modern-day version of this practice, using discouraging language instead of drawing lines on a map.

The data from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) between 2014 and 2017 shows a stark statistical gap. In an area where its peers received nearly 10% of their applications from Black homebuyers, Townstone received a minuscule 1.4%. The disparity is even clearer when looking at neighborhoods.

Application Gap: Townstone vs. Peers in Majority-Black Neighborhoods (2014-2017 Avg.)

Bar chart comparing mortgage applications from majority-Black neighborhoods between Townstone Financial and peer lenders. 10% 7.5% 5% 2.5% 0% % of Applications 1.6% Townstone Financial 7.9% Peer Lenders

During this period, majority-African-American neighborhoods made up 18.7% of the census tracts in the Chicago MSA. While Townstone’s peers drew an average of 7.9% of their applications from these areas, Townstone drew a pathetic average of just 1.6%. The company had no legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for this massive disparity. Furthermore, of the 17 loan officers Townstone employed, not a single one was African American.

The “Cost of a Life” Metric

When a corporation gets caught, its leaders often try to protect their personal wealth from the consequences. The complaint against Townstone alleges a classic example of this maneuver. In the months after the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection began its investigation, Townstone’s sole owner, Barry Sturner, allegedly made his move.

$2,400,000
Transferred to CEO to Evade Accountability

Between December 2018 and January 2019, Townstone transferred over $2.4 million to Sturner. The government alleges this transfer was fraudulent, made with the “actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud the Bureau.” The transfer left the company insolvent, with no cash and less than $100,000 in liquid assets. Sturner then allegedly used the money he had taken from the company to pay the company’s bills, effectively treating the corporate entity as his personal piggy bank while shielding its assets from any potential judgment.

What Now?

This is not a story about a few “bad apples.” This is a documented system of discrimination and evasion. Accountability starts with knowing the names and roles of those in charge and watching the institutions meant to protect us.

  • Corporate Leadership Barry Sturner: Co-founder, Sole Owner, Sole Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Townstone Financial.
  • Regulatory Watchlist Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB): The federal agency that brought this case. Their power to hold corporations like Townstone accountable is constantly under threat from corporate lobbying and political pressure.

Legal action from the government is a critical tool, but it is slow and often results in fines that are just the cost of doing business. Real change comes from the ground up. Support local housing justice organizations, tenant unions, and community land trusts in the Chicago area. Power is built through mutual aid and local organizing, which directly counter the divisive tactics used by companies like Townstone Financial.

The source document for this investigation is attached below.


Explore by category

01

Antitrust

Monopolies and anti-competition tactics used to crush rivals.

View Cases →
02

Product Safety Violations

When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.

View Cases →
03

Environmental Violations

Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.

View Cases →
04

Labor Exploitation

Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.

View Cases →
05

Data Breaches & Privacy

Misuse and mishandling of personal information.

View Cases →
06

Financial Fraud & Corruption

Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.

View Cases →
07

Intellectual Property

IP theft that punishes originality and rewards copying.

View Cases →
08

Misleading Marketing

False claims that waste money and bury critical safety info.

View Cases →
Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 1786