Monsanto’s PCB Empire & Neoliberal Exploitation of San Diego Bay

Monsanto Poisoned San Diego Bay With Cancer-Causing PCBs for Decades
Corporate Misconduct Accountability Project

Monsanto Poisoned San Diego Bay With Cancer-Causing PCBs for Decades

As the sole US manufacturer, Monsanto sold 1.4 billion pounds of PCBs despite knowing they caused cancer and contaminated water. San Diego Bay remains poisoned, fish are unsafe to eat, and taxpayers are paying millions for cleanup.

CRITICAL SEVERITY
TL;DR

Monsanto manufactured and sold over 1.4 billion pounds of PCBs from 1935 to 1979, knowing these chemicals caused cancer, persisted in the environment indefinitely, and contaminated water supplies. The company gave customers disposal instructions it later admitted were inadequate, leading PCBs to flow into San Diego Bay through storm drains and landfills. Today, the Bay remains severely contaminated with some of the highest PCB levels ever recorded in California, fish are unsafe to eat, and San Diego taxpayers have spent over $17 million on cleanup while Monsanto fights liability in court.

This case shows how corporations externalize costs, profit from dangerous products, then leave communities to pay for the damage.

1.4B lbs
PCBs Monsanto sold despite toxicity evidence
$17.3M
Public funds spent investigating and cleaning contamination
44 years
Monsanto produced PCBs before federal ban
65-81%
Fish in Bay under do-not-eat advisory for women and children
2000°F
Temperature required to destroy PCBs Monsanto told customers to just bury

The Allegations: A Breakdown

⚠️
Core Allegations
What Monsanto did · 8 points
01 Monsanto was the sole US manufacturer of PCBs from 1935 to 1979, producing and selling 1.4 billion pounds of these cancer-causing chemicals that account for 99% of all PCBs used domestically. high
02 The company knew PCBs presented health risks and were causing widespread environmental contamination, yet continued to promote their use and sale for decades. high
03 A 1971 internal Monsanto memo acknowledged the company’s previous instructions telling customers to discard PCB products by dumping or burying them near water was no longer adequate due to the PCB pollution problem. high
04 Monsanto advised customers that PCBs required incineration at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit to be destroyed, but only after admitting its earlier disposal guidance led to water contamination. high
05 PCBs are virtually indestructible, largely non-biodegradable, and persist in the environment for exceptionally long periods, readily binding to sediment and accumulating in living organisms. high
06 San Diego Bay sediment contains some of the most severe PCB contamination on the California coast, with PCB concentrations in mussel tissue from Convair Lagoon measuring the highest ever recorded in the State Mussel Watch Program’s history. critical
07 The Regional Water Quality Control Board declared parts of San Diego Bay polluted and issued multiple Cleanup and Abatement Orders for various contaminated sites. high
08 San Diego Bay has been listed as impaired for PCBs under the Clean Water Act continuously since 2006 due to Monsanto’s chemical contamination. high
🏛️
Regulatory Failures
How the system enabled the harm · 6 points
01 Despite growing concerns about environmental persistence and health risks, comprehensive federal regulation of PCBs came 40 years after Monsanto began manufacturing them. high
02 The EPA did not issue rules prohibiting future PCB production until 1979, allowing Monsanto to profit from sales for over four decades while contamination accumulated. high
03 Monsanto only voluntarily restricted domestic PCB sales for certain uses in 1970, after public concern arose about environmental persistence, not out of proactive responsibility. medium
04 The Toxic Substances Control Act providing for total PCB regulation was not enacted until 1976, decades after evidence of harm emerged. high
05 Regulatory action lagged significantly behind industrial innovation and the discovery of associated harms, allowing harmful products to remain on the market and increase the scale of environmental problems. high
06 PCBs were required in critical infrastructure like schools and hospitals due to fire-resistant properties, showing products with immediate benefits can be adopted without full accounting of long-term costs. medium
💰
Profit Over People
Monetizing poison · 6 points
01 Monsanto continued PCB production and sales for many years despite internal acknowledgments of pollution problems and the known persistence of these chemicals. high
02 The sale of 1.4 billion pounds of PCBs generated substantial revenue for Monsanto and its shareholders over several decades. high
03 Monsanto externalized the environmental cleanup and public health burdens onto society at large while privatizing profits from PCB sales. high
04 The company’s voluntary 1970 sales restriction can be viewed as minimal action taken only when public pressure mounted, protecting market share while minimizing changes to profitable business lines. medium
05 Monsanto’s behavior aligns with corporate ethics under systems that structurally incentivize maximizing shareholder value at the expense of public and environmental well-being. high
06 The decades during which Monsanto endorsed less stringent disposal methods contributed significantly to environmental contamination forming the basis of public nuisance claims. high
💸
Economic Fallout
Who pays for the damage · 7 points
01 The City of San Diego spent $15.4 million investigating and cleaning up the Shipyard Sediment Site’s South and North Yards. high
02 The City incurred $1,726,598.05 to investigate PCB and other pollutant contamination at the Chollas, TAMT, CMSD, and Campbell sites in the Bay. medium
03 San Diego spent $159,463.97 to clean up the City’s storm drains adjacent to the former Shipyard Sediment Site. medium
04 The San Diego Unified Port District funded construction of sediment caps at sites like Campbell Shipyard to contain pollutants Monsanto released. medium
05 Resources spent on cleaning up pollution are diverted from other public goods and services, with taxpayers bearing burdens through public entities. high
06 The Port District’s ongoing litigation seeks to shift future abatement costs back to Monsanto, the originator of the pollution, but outcomes remain uncertain. medium
07 Potential costs for large-scale environmental remediation of San Diego Bay are immense, involving extensive study, dredging, and long-term monitoring. high
🏥
Public Health and Safety
Cancer, contamination, and cover-ups · 8 points
01 Both the US EPA and California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment classified PCBs as probable human carcinogens causing rare liver cancers and malignant melanoma. critical
02 Studies of workers exposed to PCBs found increases in rare liver cancers and malignant melanoma, showing the risks manifested in serious illnesses among the most exposed. high
03 The EPA warned that PCB types that bioaccumulate in fish and bind to sediment are the most carcinogenic components, meaning people eating contaminated Bay fish face even more toxic exposures than workers. critical
04 PCBs cause damage to immune, reproductive, nervous, and endocrine systems, plus skin and eye problems, liver toxicity, and elevations in blood pressure and serum cholesterol. high
05 The EPA stated animal studies could not identify any level of PCB exposure that did not cause effects on the immune system. critical
06 California issued Fish Consumption Advisories for San Diego Bay in 2013 and again in 2018, making them more restrictive for women of childbearing age and children due to PCB and mercury levels. high
07 Between 65% and 81% of all fish caught in San Diego Bay are now subject to do-not-eat advisories for women 45 and under and children. critical
08 The 2018 advisory added Pacific chub mackerel, identified as the largest or most consumed fish in San Diego Bay, to the list of fish women and children should never consume. high
🏘️
Community Impact
Lives disrupted, resources stolen · 7 points
01 Fish Consumption Advisories effectively declare a significant portion of San Diego Bay’s fish unsafe, eroding cultural practices and eliminating a free food resource for residents. high
02 The County Health Department quarantined the Convair Lagoon area, entirely preventing the collection of shellfish for human consumption and obstructing free use of property. high
03 Sediment caps in areas like Convair Lagoon and Campbell Shipyard curtail public use, with buoys warning DO NOT ANCHOR, NO FISHING ALLOWED, and DO NOT DISTURB. medium
04 These necessary interventions to contain Monsanto’s pollution simultaneously shrink accessible areas of the Bay for boaters and anglers. medium
05 The knowledge that waters and marine life are tainted with probable carcinogens breeds fear and diminishes overall quality of life for San Diego residents. high
06 The comfortable enjoyment of the Bay is compromised when its use is fraught with health warnings and visible signs of pollution control. medium
07 Health impacts disproportionately affect lower-income communities who have less healthcare access, rely more on subsistence fishing, or live closer to contaminated sites. high
⚖️
Corporate Accountability Failures
Justice delayed, justice denied · 8 points
01 The court granted summary judgment in favor of Monsanto against the City of San Diego’s claims, concluding the City failed to prove its stormwater system suffered damage specifically from PCBs alone. high
02 The City could not demonstrate cleanup expenditures were directly and exclusively attributable to Monsanto’s PCBs rather than multiple pollutants, closing its avenue for cost recovery. high
03 The stringent burden of proof can shield polluters even when their products are known contributors to the overall environmental problem. high
04 The San Diego Unified Port District’s purpresture claim was dismissed because PCBs as chemical contaminants do not fit the legal definition of physical obstruction. medium
05 The Port District’s public nuisance claim survived, with the court finding sufficient evidence that PCBs polluted the Bay and caused substantial harm to human health and public use. medium
06 The journey to this point has been long, with the case initiated in 2015 and key orders issued in 2020, underscoring the protracted nature of environmental litigation. high
07 Such delays often benefit corporate defendants who leverage significant financial and legal resources, while accountability may come long after responsible individuals have moved on. high
08 Limited outcomes like dismissal of the City’s claims reflect how legal standards can fall short of delivering what the public perceives as full justice for widespread environmental degradation. high
📢
The PR Machine
Spin over substance · 5 points
01 Monsanto’s 1970 voluntary sales restriction came only after public concern arose about PCB persistence, representing a reactive measure under pressure rather than proactive responsibility. medium
02 Voluntary actions taken under public or regulatory pressure are often part of a strategy to preempt stringent mandatory regulations or project an image of corporate social responsibility. medium
03 The 1971 internal memo acknowledging previous disposal advice as no longer adequate represents an internal admission of prior inadequacy only after pollution became evident. medium
04 Changing disposal advice after the problem emerged suggests a reactive rather than preventative stance focused on managing fallout rather than early assumption of responsibility. medium
05 These actions can be seen as efforts to manage legal and reputational damage once harm becomes undeniable, a common pattern for industries with products proving long-term negative externalities. medium
📊
Wealth Disparity
Profits privatized, costs socialized · 6 points
01 Monsanto reaped substantial profits from selling over 1.4 billion pounds of PCBs, with profits accruing to the corporation and its shareholders over several decades. high
02 The immense costs associated with environmental damage and public health risks have been externalized, falling upon public entities, communities, and the environment itself. high
03 Taxpayers through bodies like the City of San Diego and Port District have borne and will continue bearing the financial burden of investigation, remediation, and long-term abatement. high
04 This dynamic where a corporation benefits financially while society pays for harmful consequences is a significant contributor to wealth disparity. high
05 Resources diverted to pollution cleanup are resources taken from other public goods and services, entrenching socio-economic divides. medium
06 The immense legal resources corporations deploy to defend against liability represent a power imbalance when pitted against public entities or affected individuals. high
Exploiting Delay
Time as a corporate weapon · 7 points
01 Monsanto manufactured and sold PCBs for over four decades from roughly 1935 to 1979 while contamination accumulated. high
02 The environmental contamination PCBs caused is exceptionally long-lasting, with these chemicals persisting in the environment indefinitely. high
03 Legal battles to address historical pollution are protracted, with lawsuits initiated in 2015 and key summary judgment orders issued only in 2020. medium
04 This extended timeframe works to the advantage of the original polluter, as profits from the harmful product were realized and distributed long ago. high
05 Over time, direct evidence of specific corporate decisions becomes harder to obtain and corporate entities may undergo restructuring, obscuring lines of responsibility. medium
06 Understaffed regulatory agencies and overburdened court systems contribute to delays, allowing harm to continue while legal processes slowly unfold. high
07 For affected communities and the environment, delay means prolonged exposure to harm and a longer wait for remediation and justice. high
🎯
The Bottom Line
What this case reveals · 7 points
01 The PCB contamination of San Diego Bay is a predictable outcome of a system where profit generation is structurally prioritized over public and environmental health. high
02 Under neoliberal capitalism with emphasis on deregulation and shareholder primacy, corporations are incentivized to maximize profits by externalizing environmental and health costs onto society. high
03 Monsanto’s decades-long production of a profitable but hazardous chemical, inadequate disposal advice, and slow regulatory intervention are not surprising outcomes within this framework. high
04 Legal and regulatory systems operate reactively and can be influenced by corporate power, leading to situations where significant harm persists before accountability is sought. high
05 This case is less an anomaly and more a reflection of inherent tensions within a socio-economic system that struggles to reconcile private profit pursuit with protection of public goods. high
06 The presence of persistent, cancer-causing chemicals in San Diego Bay serves as a reminder of long-term consequences when industrial activities are pursued without adequate accountability. high
07 This legal battle illustrates deeper systemic failures in how modern economies prioritize corporate interests over community well-being, leaving a legacy of damage taking generations to address. high

Timeline of Events

1935
Monsanto begins manufacturing PCBs as sole US producer
1960s-1971
Monsanto advises customers to discard PCB fluid by dumping or burying near water
1970
Monsanto voluntarily restricts some PCB sales after public concern arises
1971
Internal Monsanto memo admits previous disposal instructions no longer adequate due to PCB pollution problem
1976
Congress enacts Toxic Substances Control Act providing for PCB regulation
1979
EPA bans future PCB production; Monsanto stops manufacturing
October 1986
Regional Board issues Cleanup and Abatement Order for Convair Lagoon PCB hot-spot
1992
Sand cap with eelgrass approved as partial fix for Convair Lagoon
May 1995
Cleanup Order issued for Campbell Shipyard where ship-repair PCBs leached into Bay
2006
San Diego Bay listed as impaired for PCBs under Clean Water Act Section 303(d)
March 2012
Final Cleanup Order issued for multi-party cleanup; city designated as discharger
2013
California issues first Fish Consumption Advisory for San Diego Bay due to PCBs
October 2015
Cleanup Order cites one outfall with highest PCB sediment concentrations ever recorded
2015
City of San Diego and Port District file lawsuits against Monsanto
April 2017
Cleanup Order issued for Lockheed site where transformers leaked PCBs into East Basin
2018
California issues more restrictive Fish Consumption Advisory adding Pacific chub mackerel to do-not-eat list
2020
Court issues key summary judgment orders; Port District’s public nuisance claim survives

Direct Quotes from the Legal Record

QUOTE 1 Monsanto admits disposal instructions were inadequate allegations
“Because of the advent of the PCB pollution problem, these instructions are no longer adequate… scrap askarel must not be allowed to contaminate a water supply. The material needs to be destroyed by proper incineration at 2,000°F.”

💡 Monsanto’s own 1971 internal memo proves the company knew its earlier advice to dump or bury PCBs near water caused pollution, yet continued profiting from sales for eight more years.

QUOTE 2 PCBs are virtually indestructible allegations
“PCBs are largely non-biodegradable and virtually indestructible, requiring incineration at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit to be destroyed, and persist in the environment for exceptionally long periods.”

💡 The very properties that made PCBs profitable for Monsanto make them an enduring environmental menace that will threaten public health for generations.

QUOTE 3 Highest contamination ever recorded in California health
“PCB concentrations in mussel tissue from Convair Lagoon were the highest ever measured in the history of the State Mussel Watch Program.”

💡 San Diego Bay contains record-breaking levels of Monsanto’s poison, demonstrating the severity of contamination the company caused.

QUOTE 4 Most of Bay fish unsafe for women and children health
“Between 65% and 81% of all fish caught in the Bay are now subject to a do-not-eat advisory for women 45 and under and children.”

💡 Monsanto’s PCBs have made the majority of San Diego Bay fish too dangerous for vulnerable populations to consume, eliminating a food source and cultural practice.

QUOTE 5 No safe level of PCB exposure exists health
“The EPA stated that animal studies could not identify any level of PCB exposure that did not cause effects on the immune system.”

💡 Scientific evidence shows even minimal PCB exposure causes harm, yet Monsanto sold 1.4 billion pounds knowing there was no safe threshold.

QUOTE 6 PCBs in fish more toxic than original product health
“People who ingest PCB-contaminated fish or come into contact with contaminated sediment may be exposed to PCB mixtures even more toxic than those encountered by workers or initially released into the environment.”

💡 The PCBs bioaccumulating in Bay fish are more carcinogenic than what Monsanto originally sold, creating greater cancer risks for anyone eating contaminated seafood.

QUOTE 7 Court documents prove knowledge of harm allegations
“Legal filings allege that Monsanto was aware that PCBs presented health risks and were causing widespread contamination of the environment, yet continued to promote their use and sale.”

💡 This was not an accident or oversight but a deliberate business decision to keep selling a product Monsanto knew was poisoning communities.

QUOTE 8 San Diego taxpayers forced to pay millions economic
“The City of San Diego incurred $15.4 million for the investigation and cleanup of the Shipyard Sediment Site’s South and North Yards, $1,726,598.05 to investigate PCB contamination at multiple Bay sites, and $159,463.97 to clean up City storm drains.”

💡 Public funds that could have supported schools, healthcare, or infrastructure instead went to cleaning up Monsanto’s profitable poison.

QUOTE 9 Bay officially declared impaired allegations
“San Diego Bay has been consistently listed as impaired for PCBs under the Clean Water Act since 2006.”

💡 Federal law recognizes San Diego Bay as too polluted to meet water quality standards due to Monsanto’s contamination, a designation that persists nearly two decades later.

QUOTE 10 Cleanup orders issued for decades allegations
“The Regional Water Quality Control Board repeatedly identified elevated levels of PCBs in San Diego Bay sediments and aquatic life, leading the Board to declare parts of the Bay polluted and issue Cleanup and Abatement Orders for various sites.”

💡 State regulators have been forced to issue cleanup order after cleanup order, proving the contamination is widespread, severe, and ongoing.

QUOTE 11 Port District’s nuisance claim survives accountability
“The court denied Monsanto’s motion for summary judgment on the Port District’s public nuisance claim, finding sufficient evidence for a reasonable trier of fact to conclude that PCBs have polluted the Bay and caused substantial harm to human health or the public’s use and enjoyment of the Bay.”

💡 Despite Monsanto’s legal challenges, the court found enough evidence of harm to allow the case seeking corporate accountability to proceed to trial.

QUOTE 12 City’s claims dismissed on technicality accountability
“The court granted summary judgment to Monsanto against the City of San Diego’s claims, primarily because the City was found unable to definitively prove that its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System suffered direct physical harm specifically from PCBs as distinct from other pollutants.”

💡 Legal technicalities allowed Monsanto to avoid paying San Diego back even though the City spent millions cleaning up contamination Monsanto caused, showing how the system protects polluters.

QUOTE 13 Most severe contamination on California coast health
“The Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program concluded in a 2012 report that the Bay suffers from some of the most severe PCB contamination on the California coast.”

💡 Independent scientific monitoring confirms San Diego Bay ranks among the worst PCB contamination sites in the entire state due to Monsanto’s chemicals.

QUOTE 14 Sole US manufacturer for 44 years allegations
“Monsanto stands as the sole manufacturer of PCBs in the United States from 1935 until their production was banned in 1979. Over this period, the company produced and sold an astounding 1.4 billion pounds of PCBs, accounting for approximately 99% of all PCBs used domestically.”

💡 There is no question about where San Diego Bay’s PCB contamination came from because Monsanto was the only company making this poison in America.

QUOTE 15 Public resources stolen by pollution community
“The knowledge that the waters and marine life are tainted with probable carcinogens breeds fear and diminishes the overall quality of life for residents. The comfortable enjoyment of the Bay is compromised when its use is fraught with health warnings and visible signs of pollution control.”

💡 Monsanto’s contamination robbed San Diego residents of their right to safely enjoy a public waterway that belongs to the community, not the corporation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are PCBs and why are they dangerous?
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) are synthetic chemicals Monsanto manufactured from 1935 to 1979. They are classified as probable human carcinogens causing rare liver cancers and malignant melanoma. PCBs damage immune, reproductive, nervous, and endocrine systems. They are virtually indestructible, persist in the environment indefinitely, and accumulate in fish and wildlife. The EPA found no safe level of PCB exposure that does not harm the immune system.
Did Monsanto know PCBs were harmful?
Yes. Court documents and a 1971 internal Monsanto memo prove the company knew PCBs presented health risks and were causing widespread environmental contamination. The memo specifically acknowledged that Monsanto’s previous disposal instructions were no longer adequate due to the PCB pollution problem. Despite this knowledge, Monsanto continued promoting and selling PCBs for eight more years until the federal ban in 1979.
How did PCBs get into San Diego Bay?
Monsanto advised customers to discard PCB products by dumping or burying them where they would not contaminate water supplies. However, this guidance was inadequate and PCBs entered the Bay through storm drains, landfills not designed for hazardous waste, and industrial facilities like shipyards where transformers and capacitors leaked. PCBs bind to sediment and persist for decades, accumulating to toxic levels in Bay waters and marine life.
Is it safe to eat fish from San Diego Bay?
No, not for most people. California issued Fish Consumption Advisories warning that 65% to 81% of all fish caught in the Bay are subject to do-not-eat advisories for women of childbearing age (45 and under) and children. The 2018 advisory specifically warns these groups to never eat Pacific chub mackerel, the largest and most commonly consumed fish in the Bay. PCBs concentrate in fish fat and skin, and the contaminated fish contain PCB mixtures even more carcinogenic than the original chemicals Monsanto sold.
Who is paying to clean up the contamination?
San Diego taxpayers are bearing the burden. The City of San Diego spent over $17.3 million investigating and cleaning up contamination at various Bay sites and storm drains. The Port District also funded sediment caps and other remediation efforts. While the Port District’s lawsuit against Monsanto seeking future abatement costs is ongoing, the City’s attempt to recover its cleanup expenses from Monsanto was dismissed by the court on legal technicalities. This means public money that could have funded schools, healthcare, or infrastructure is instead cleaning up Monsanto’s profitable poison.
Why did it take so long to ban PCBs?
PCBs were in widespread use for over 40 years before comprehensive federal regulation. Despite growing concerns about environmental persistence and health risks, the Toxic Substances Control Act was not enacted until 1976, and the EPA did not ban PCB production until 1979. This delay is characteristic of regulatory action lagging behind industrial innovation and discovery of harm. In a system prioritizing deregulation and corporate interests, the impetus for swift precautionary measures is often blunted by economic arguments and corporate lobbying, allowing harmful products to remain profitable for extended periods.
What happened to Monsanto’s lawsuit?
The legal battle is mixed. The City of San Diego’s claims for damages were dismissed because the court found the City could not prove its stormwater system suffered harm specifically from PCBs alone versus multiple pollutants. However, the San Diego Unified Port District’s public nuisance claim survived Monsanto’s attempt to dismiss it. The court found sufficient evidence that PCBs polluted the Bay and caused substantial harm to human health and public use. The Port District’s case seeking an abatement fund to pay for future cleanup is ongoing, meaning Monsanto still faces potential liability.
How long will PCBs remain in San Diego Bay?
PCBs are virtually indestructible and persist in the environment for exceptionally long periods, potentially generations. They require incineration at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit to be destroyed. San Diego Bay has been listed as impaired for PCBs under the Clean Water Act continuously since 2006, and despite cleanup efforts costing millions, contamination remains severe enough that most fish are unsafe to eat. The legacy of Monsanto’s four decades of PCB production will threaten public health and the Bay ecosystem for many more decades to come.
What can I do about corporate pollution?
Support stronger regulations requiring companies to test chemicals for long-term environmental and health impacts before sale. Advocate for extended producer responsibility laws making manufacturers financially responsible for the entire lifecycle of their products, including cleanup. Push for campaign finance reform to reduce corporate influence over environmental policy. Support public interest litigation and whistleblower protections. Vote for candidates who prioritize environmental protection over corporate profits. Stay informed about local contamination issues and participate in public comment periods for cleanup plans.
Are there other communities affected by Monsanto PCBs?
Yes. PCBs are recognized as global pollutants due to their historical widespread use and extreme persistence. Many industrialized regions across the world have grappled with costly and complex PCB contamination cleanup. This pattern of a useful industrial chemical manufactured for decades with escalating evidence of harm, followed by long processes of regulation, remediation, and litigation, has played out in various forms globally. San Diego Bay is not unique but rather an example of a widespread pattern of corporate behavior that prioritizes short-term profits over long-term public health and environmental stewardship.
Post ID: 4049  ·  Slug: monsanto-pcb-corporate-greed-san-diego  ·  Original: 2025-05-23  ·  Rebuilt: 2026-03-20

I’m contractually not allowed to post a PDF of the exact legal documents I used for this article, but they can be found here: https://www.law360.com/cases/550355ea80ea7013cd000001/articles

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm the creator this website. I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher studying corporatocracy and its detrimental effects on every single aspect of society.

For more information, please see my About page.

All posts published by this profile were either personally written by me, or I actively edited / reviewed them before publishing. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Articles: 1681