Safrax Lied About EPA Approval. The Government Just Shut Them Down.
Safrax Inc. told people its products were EPA-registered, government-approved killers of Ebola, HIV, MRSA, bed bugs, and rodents. The EPA says every single one of those products was never registered a single day in its life.
A Company Built on a Fake Government Stamp
Safrax Inc., a Delaware-incorporated company run by a person the EPA addressed as Steve Dan, has been selling chlorine dioxide tablets online since at least 2011 under its own claim of being “the leader and manufacturer of Instant Chlorine Dioxide Generating Tablets.” The company sold at least seven distinct product lines, all based on chlorine dioxide, through its own website where any person could click, add to cart, enter a payment card, and receive the products at their door.
The problem: under U.S. federal law, any product that claims to kill bacteria, viruses, fungi, mold, insects, or rodents is legally classified as a pesticide. Pesticides require federal registration before they can be sold. Safrax’s products carried none of the required registration numbers. The EPA confirmed in its July 30, 2025 enforcement order that these products “are not and have never been registered with the EPA.”
The EPA began its investigation in September 2024, after receiving a tip that Safrax was selling an unregistered chlorine dioxide product in the United States. From there, federal inspectors pulled the thread on every product in the Safrax catalog, reviewed labels, website claims, import records, and customs documentation. What they found was a company operating in clear, documented violation of federal law across multiple product lines and multiple years.
The Products Safrax Was Selling
These are the specific products the EPA identified on the Safrax website, all of which are now covered by the federal Stop Sale order:
- DISIN-CLO2 Chlorine Dioxide Tablets
- DISIN-CLO2 CARTON
- SPA-CLO2 Chlorine Dioxide Tablets
- SPA-CLO2 CARTON
- ODOR-CLO2
- SLOW RELEASE-Clo2 Air Purifier
- PRO-CLO2 CARTON
— EPA Stop Sale, Use, or Removal Order, July 30, 2025
A Shipment Turned Away at the Border
On November 27, 2024, a Safrax shipment arrived at Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas. Federal inspectors reviewed the products and found no EPA registration number on the label, no EPA establishment number, and no required Notice of Arrival filed with Customs and Border Protection. On December 16, 2024, the EPA issued a formal Notice of Refusal of Admission, and the shipment was denied entry into the United States.
Inspectors also confirmed that in January 2024, Safrax was the importer of record for at least three separate chlorine dioxide shipments into the U.S., none of which had the required government notification filed. That means unregistered, mislabeled chemical products reached American consumers at least three times before any alarm was raised at the border.
Timeline: Safrax Federal Enforcement
The Non-Financial Ledger: What Trust Costs When Companies Betray It
When you buy a product that tells you it kills Ebola, MRSA, and HIV, you are making a decision based on trust. You trust that someone, somewhere, has verified that claim. You trust that the government seal of approval the label implies is real. You trust that the company selling you this product gave enough of a damn about your health to follow the rules designed to protect it. Safrax collected that trust, and the money attached to it, while giving customers nothing in return but an unregistered chemical and a fake credential.
Consider who buys products marketed as “hospital grade disinfectants.” Parents trying to protect immunocompromised children. Elderly people managing chronic illness. Small business owners trying to keep their restaurants or spas sanitary. People with severe allergies reaching for something labeled as a reducer of allergens. These are people making purchasing decisions under the assumption that the extraordinary claims on the label have been verified by someone with expertise and authority. The EPA confirmed those claims were never reviewed, never tested, and never approved.
Safrax also marketed a product called SLOW RELEASE-Clo2 Air Purifier, designed to continuously release chlorine dioxide gas into indoor spaces over 30 to 60 days. The EPA’s enforcement document notes that Safrax advertised this device as eliminating allergens and harmful volatile organic compounds, making it “perfect for individuals sensitive to mold or pollen.” People with respiratory conditions, asthma, and chemical sensitivities may have placed this device in their bedrooms, nurseries, and offices based on Safrax’s claims. Chlorine dioxide gas at elevated concentrations is a recognized respiratory irritant. No independent safety review of this device’s emissions was on record with the EPA because no registration was ever filed.
The SPA-CLO2 product line was marketed directly for swimming pools and spas, with claims about eliminating E. coli, Pseudomonas, and Giardia. Families with children, elderly relatives, and immunocompromised members depend on pool sanitation products to actually work. A product sold as the “ultimate solution” for pool safety, carrying the implicit weight of government endorsement through the false “EPA-registered” claim, that does not have verified efficacy data on file, introduces genuine unknowns into environments where failure has direct health consequences. Customers had no way to know those unknowns existed.
Legal Receipts: The Documents That Prove It
These are verbatim quotes pulled directly from the EPA’s official Stop Sale, Use, or Removal Order. Every word below comes from a signed federal enforcement document.
“Safrax Inc. is the leader and manufacturer of Instant Chlorine Dioxide Generating Tablets since 2011. EPA registered disinfectant and sanitizer that kills bacteria, viruses, algae, mold, mildew and odors at its source. Safrax Chlorine Dioxide is non-irritating to skin, non-corrosive and ‘No rinse on food contact surfaces.'” — Safrax company website, as documented by EPA inspectors. The EPA confirmed this claim is false: the products were never registered.
“Effective disinfectant that kills 99.999% of bacteria and viruses, including H1N1; MRSA; Norovirus; HIV; Legionella; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Hepatitis A, B, and C; Ebola virus; and others.” — Safrax website claim about DISIN-CLO2, documented by EPA. No registered efficacy data exists to support this claim.
“The Website states that the chlorine dioxide products are ‘EPA-registered’, but as stated previously, the products are not registered with the EPA and an EPA registration number was not present on or attached to the label of the inspected chlorine dioxide. Accordingly, the products’ labeling bears a statement that is false or misleading and the products are misbranded.” — EPA Stop Sale, Use, or Removal Order, paragraph 46, July 30, 2025
“In addition to its disinfectant properties, chlorine dioxide controls Odors, Insects and Rodents.” [The EPA noted that] “Below the text there are graphics of a mouse, cockroach, and a fly and each graphic has a red circle with a strikethrough it on top.” — EPA Stop Sale, Use, or Removal Order, paragraph 31(e), documenting Safrax’s website claims
“Safrax’s chlorine dioxide products are not and have never been registered with the EPA.” — EPA Stop Sale, Use, or Removal Order, paragraph 45, July 30, 2025. This is the simplest and most damning sentence in the document.
“The EPA has reason to believe that Safrax distributed or sold and intends to further distribute or sell the unregistered pesticide products […] The EPA has reason to believe that Safrax distributed or sold and intends to further distribute or sell the misbranded pesticide products.” — EPA Stop Sale, Use, or Removal Order, paragraphs 48–49. The EPA is saying explicitly that without this order, Safrax would have kept selling.
Societal Impact: Who Gets Hurt When Corporations Skip the Rules
Public Health: Fake Credentials in a Real Disease Environment
Safrax marketed its DISIN-CLO2 product as a killer of Ebola, HIV, MRSA, Norovirus, Hepatitis A, B, and C, Legionella, and H1N1. These are specific, named, deadly pathogens. People who purchase disinfectants claiming efficacy against these organisms often do so because they genuinely face elevated risk from them. Hospital workers doing supplemental home sanitizing. Immunocompromised patients. Family members of people undergoing chemotherapy. Safrax collected premium pricing for “hospital grade” protection while providing a product with zero federally verified safety or efficacy data.
The SLOW RELEASE-Clo2 Air Purifier raises a specific respiratory concern. The device was designed to release chlorine dioxide gas continuously into enclosed indoor spaces over 30 to 60 days. Safrax marketed this product to people “sensitive to mold or pollen,” explicitly targeting people with respiratory vulnerabilities. The EPA’s pesticide registration process exists precisely to evaluate whether devices like this are safe for continuous human exposure. Safrax bypassed that process entirely. People with asthma, COPD, or chemical sensitivities may have used this product in enclosed bedrooms for months based on nothing more than Safrax’s unverified marketing.
The SPA-CLO2 line was sold directly to pool and spa owners with claims about eliminating E. coli, Giardia, and Pseudomonas. Pool sanitation is a genuine public health function. A family that replaced a verified, registered pool treatment with Safrax’s unregistered product, relying on the false “EPA-registered” label, may have swum in water that received inadequate microbial control. The consequences of pool sanitation failure range from gastrointestinal illness to serious infections, particularly for children and elderly swimmers.
Safrax: Pathogens Claimed vs. Verified by EPA Registration
Economic Inequality: Who Bears the Cost of Unverified Products
People with money hire professional cleaning crews and have access to commercial-grade, verified sanitation systems. People without money buy products from websites promising hospital-grade results at consumer prices. Safrax positioned itself squarely in that second market, using “hospital grade” and “professional” language to attract consumers who needed reliable results but could not afford institutional solutions. Those consumers paid full price for a product that offered exactly zero verified protection.
Small business owners are another direct casualty here. Spa owners who used SPA-CLO2 based on its unregistered pool sanitation claims. Restaurant or food-prep operators who used DISIN-CLO2 believing in its claimed “food-safe” and “no rinse on food contact surfaces” properties. These are businesses operating on thin margins where a sanitation failure can cost a health inspection, a customer illness lawsuit, or a forced closure. Safrax captured their trust and their dollars while exposing them to regulatory liability they didn’t know they were absorbing.
The federal registration system for pesticides exists as a minimum floor of consumer protection. Companies pay registration fees, submit safety and efficacy data, and undergo EPA review precisely so that consumers do not have to personally evaluate whether a chemical product is safe for their family. Safrax pocketed years of revenue by free-riding on the trust that system generates while contributing nothing to it and submitting to none of its requirements. That is a textbook transfer of risk from a corporation to the people least equipped to bear it.
The “Cost of a Life” Metric
The amount Safrax spent on EPA registration fees, safety testing, and efficacy data submission for any of its seven product lines sold to the American public across at least four years of documented importing and sales.
Meanwhile, the company marketed products as “hospital grade” killers of Ebola, HIV, and MRSA to families, small businesses, and vulnerable people with respiratory conditions.
Maximum civil penalty per violation of the Stop Sale order (roughly three months rent for a working-class family in most U.S. cities, per infraction)
Distinct product lines ordered halted. Every single one unregistered. Every single one actively marketed with false government endorsement.
Confirmed U.S. import shipments in January 2024 alone, all without required federal notification filings.
The EPA requested sales and distribution records going back to January 2021, suggesting this operation ran unchecked for at least four years before federal action.
Potential Penalty Exposure: $24,885 Per Violation
What Now: Who to Contact and How to Push Back
The People Named in This Document
The EPA enforcement order was addressed to Steve Dan, identified as a principal of Safrax Inc. The contact emails listed in the order are jacob@safrax.com and sdan@safrax.com. The order was signed by Christina Cobb, Branch Chief of the Pesticides and Tanks Enforcement Branch at the EPA. The EPA attorney handling this matter is Christine Trostler at trostler.christine@epa.gov.
Regulatory Watchlist: Who Has Jurisdiction
- U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency): The lead agency. The SSURO is active. Track enforcement updates through EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): Already involved; issued a Notice of Refusal of Admission for the Dallas/Fort Worth shipment. Additional import activity may trigger further CBP enforcement.
- FTC (Federal Trade Commission): False advertising claims, especially the fake “EPA-registered” label, may fall within FTC jurisdiction alongside EPA’s FIFRA authority.
- State Attorneys General: Multiple EPA regions were copied on the enforcement letter, covering Regions 2, 3, 5, 6, and 9, meaning this company’s products reached consumers across a large swath of the country. Your state AG can pursue parallel consumer protection actions.
- Amazon / E-commerce Platforms: If Safrax products appear on third-party retail platforms, report them directly to those platforms’ safety teams with reference to this EPA enforcement order.
Please visit this link for the source from the EPA demanding at this product be stopped selling: https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/rhc/epaadmin.nsf/Filings/B407E4340F8A421485258CF1006EB760/$File/Safrax%20SSURO_07.30.2025.pdf
Explore by category
Product Safety Violations
When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.
View Cases →Financial Fraud & Corruption
Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.
View Cases →
