One Man. Forty Companies. Zero Safety Certifications.

Since at least 2015, Orlando Askins has been flipping pre-1978 homes in St. Louis neighborhoods. These homes are classified as “Target Housing” under federal law because they almost certainly contain lead-based paint — the kind that, when disturbed during renovation without proper precautions, releases toxic dust that settles into the soil, drifts into the air, and gets on the hands of children. Askins knew this. The EPA told him directly, multiple times, at multiple job sites. He kept doing it anyway.

Federal law requires that any firm renovating Target Housing must hold EPA certification. It requires a certified renovator present at every project. It requires plastic sheeting on the ground, closed windows and doors, contained waste, posted warning signs. These are not complicated asks — the EPA noted in court that a firm can apply for certification online in minutes. Askins, across every single one of his documented projects spanning nearly a decade, obtained that certification exactly zero times.

According to the federal complaint, Askins built a network of more than 40 separate Missouri limited liability companies to conduct his renovation business. Missouri Secretary of State records and city permit data confirm this web of entities. The federal government argues this corporate maze served a specific function: to obscure accountability, evade enforcement, and keep operating even after regulatory penalties were assessed and ignored.

The Man Behind the Curtain Lives in Anaheim

Askins physically resides in Anaheim, California, while his companies operate in St. Louis. When EPA inspectors showed up at 3331–3333 Nebraska Ave. in March 2024, they were told to call Askins for permission to enter. They reached him by phone. He was not in Missouri. He refused to identify when he would be there and refused to authorize any inspection of any of the four properties they were trying to examine.

His primary operating vehicle, The Askins Development Group LLC, was formally dissolved in November 2022 — filed its own death certificate with the state, legally ceased to exist. Askins kept running it anyway. The company website continued advertising renovation services on “historical homes” and “dilapidated housing” even after the dissolution. The federal government argues that the defunct company continues to operate as a direct alter ego of Askins himself.

Shaw Holding Group LLC, his second major entity, was organized with his sister listed as the official organizer — even though Askins is identified in state records as the actual manager. Shaw is the entity that holds the property titles and pulls the building permits. It is the legal face that signs the paperwork, while Askins runs the work. Shaw itself was briefly administratively cancelled by the Missouri Secretary of State in 2017 for failing to maintain a legitimate registered agent, then reinstated in early 2018.

The Fake Agent and the 34 Ghost Companies

When the EPA tried to contact Shaw after the first inspection in 2015, it sent letters to Shaw’s listed registered agent — a man named Eric Benford. The letters came back unclaimed. EPA tracked Benford down at his home in March 2017. Benford told investigators he had no idea he was listed as a registered agent. He had not seen Askins since working as a handyman for him six years prior. Benford was, at that moment, listed as the registered agent for at least 34 other Missouri limited liability companies organized by Askins or his associates — none of which Benford had agreed to represent.

This detail is worth sitting with. Thirty-four companies. One unwitting handyman listed as their legal contact. Most or all of those companies, the government alleges, perform or performed renovation work on pre-1978 homes. Not a single one holds EPA certification. The entire structure exists, in the government’s framing, to make accountability effectively impossible — by the time any single entity faces consequences, it can be dissolved, renamed, or redirected through a new LLC while business continues unchanged.

The Non-Financial Ledger: What Money Can’t Measure

Lead poisoning does not announce itself. It does not produce a visible rash or an immediate fever. It moves quietly — accumulating in a child’s blood over weeks and months of low-level exposure, rewiring developing brains in ways that are sometimes permanent. The federal law that Askins violated was written specifically because of this invisibility. Congress passed the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act in 1992 because communities — particularly low-income and majority-Black urban communities — were being poisoned by renovation debris and nobody was connecting the dots. The law exists because the harm is real, it is proven, and it is preventable. Askins decided it was optional.

At 3537 California Ave. in May 2021, EPA inspectors arrived to find renovation debris spread across the front lawn and spilled onto the public sidewalk — with no plastic sheeting, no warning signs, no containment of any kind. A child was playing in that debris. The inspectors put up caution tape. They came back the next day to find the tape had been disturbed. The debris had not been touched. Workers were actively dumping more uncontained material into an open dumpster as inspectors watched. Askins was there. He had been told about lead-safe work practices the day before, face-to-face. He looked at the inspectors and said he would immediately implement them. The next morning, windows were open, visible dust clouds were emerging from the building, and debris remained scattered across the lawn, sidewalk, and street.

This is not a story about a company that made a mistake. Askins received direct, in-person instruction from federal inspectors at the Shaw Boulevard site in 2015. Neighbors filed formal complaints about the Missouri Avenue site in 2016. The EPA pursued administrative enforcement starting in 2018, held multiple settlement conferences, sent letters, made phone calls, and obtained a court judgment. At every turn, Askins either went silent, sent a lawyer to stall the proceedings, blamed COVID-19 (for a deadline that predated the pandemic by months), or simply ignored orders. He then dissolved his primary company and kept running it anyway.

The residents who live adjacent to these properties — who share sidewalks, whose children play on those streets, whose soil absorbs lead dust that doesn’t decompose or wash away on its own — received nothing. There was no notice to them that their neighbor’s renovation was releasing lead. There were no warning signs posted, as the law requires. At least at one site, neighbors were alarmed enough to file formal complaints with both the city and the EPA. Those residents took it upon themselves to document what was happening, photographing and videotaping the violations from their own properties. Their documentation became part of the government’s enforcement record. They were doing the job that Askins refused to do: protecting their own community from harm he was creating.

The Workers Nobody Mentions

The federal complaint notes that Defendants’ violations “threaten irreparable harm to the health and safety of people living in or near the homes where Defendants perform renovations, visitors to these homes and nearby areas, and the workers involved in these renovations.” Those workers — the people actually swinging hammers, cutting through century-old plaster, and hauling debris — had no certified renovator directing them in proper lead-safe procedures. They had no posted signs telling them where the contamination zone ended. They may not have known the full danger of what they were breathing and touching every day on these job sites. They are largely invisible in these court documents, but their exposure was the most direct and sustained of anyone involved.

Every one of the eight documented properties was built before 1978 — the oldest constructed in 1879, more than 140 years before Askins’s workers tore into it without a single safety certification in place. These are not technically complex buildings. They are the old residential housing stock of working-class St. Louis neighborhoods: South St. Louis blocks where families live close together, where kids walk to school past open dumpsters, and where a man operating from a home office in Anaheim, California, was pocketing the profit from flipping them while leaving the contamination behind for the community to absorb.

Legal Receipts: The Documents Don’t Lie

These are direct quotations and factual statements from the federal civil complaint and the EPA administrative default judgment. Every word below came from official government legal filings.

“Defendants have violated TSCA and the RRP Rule by, among other things, failing to: obtain firm certification from EPA before commencing a renovation; assign a certified renovator to each renovation project; contain, collect, and prevent the escape of lead-based paint dust and debris during and at the conclusion of renovation projects; post signs clearly defining the work area and warning occupants and other persons not involved in the renovation activities to remain outside the work area; and permit reasonable entry to or inspection of renovation sites by credentialed EPA inspectors.” — Federal Complaint, United States v. Askins et al., Nature of the Action, ¶3

“Renovation debris was spread across the front lawn on the bare ground and had spilled onto the sidewalk, where a child was playing. […] On May 21, 2021, EPA inspectors returned to the site to find the same violations of lead-safe work practices as before the previous day’s conversation with Askins. At that time, windows and doors remained open, visible dust clouds were observable emerging from the work area, and uncontained debris remained in the street and on the sidewalk and front lawn.” — Federal Complaint, ¶¶ 53, 59 — Attempted Inspection of 3537 California Ave.

“Askins has obscured his involvement or otherwise evaded responsibility for his companies by, among other things, naming an individual as a registered agent without that individual’s knowledge or consent and listing his sister or others as the organizer of companies he actually created.” — Federal Complaint, ¶77 — Need for Injunction

“Respondent was apparently able to continue to renovate houses during the same time it claims it was unable to respond to EPA or file an answer, severely undermining [its] claim that COVID-19 pandemic circumstances justify its non-responsiveness.” — EPA Initial Decision and Default Order, TSCA-07-2019-0280, Section II.B.2

“Other than participating in a conference call on November 29, 2018, Respondent appears to have literally done nothing whatsoever to advance this case to the present and is still not firm certified and has not provided any of the financial information sought.” — EPA Initial Decision and Default Order, TSCA-07-2019-0280, Section II.B.2 — Complainant’s argument, adopted by the Regional Judicial Officer

“Askins stated that an inspection could only occur in his presence, then refused to meet with EPA inspectors for the remainder of the week to allow the inspection.” — Federal Complaint, ¶64 — Attempted Inspection of 3330 Illinois Ave.

Societal Impact Mapping: Who Pays the Real Price

Public Health: The Invisible Epidemic of Lead Exposure

The federal government’s own complaint opens with a plain statement of biological fact: “Lead poisoning, especially in children, can lead to severe health problems.” This is not contested science. Lead accumulates in blood and bone. In children under six, whose brains are in active development, lead exposure is associated with reduced IQ, attention disorders, impulsive behavior, and learning disabilities. These effects are dose-dependent and cumulative — meaning every exposure matters, and there is no established safe level of lead in a child’s blood.

The 1992 law Askins violated was written precisely because Congress recognized that renovation activity in older housing is one of the primary vectors for childhood lead exposure. When you tear into walls, strip paint, and rip out window frames in a home built before 1978, you release lead dust. That dust settles on soil. It gets tracked inside. It lands on surfaces where toddlers put their hands and then their mouths. Without plastic sheeting, without sealed waste, without closed windows and posted warning signs, that contamination spreads. At eight documented properties across South St. Louis neighborhoods — all residential, all occupied or neighboring occupied homes — Askins released that hazard without a single protective measure in place.

The community member who was photographed playing in the debris at 3537 California Ave. was a child. That detail appears in a federal court document as a subordinate clause. It deserves to be named for what it is: a child, in a St. Louis neighborhood, playing in lead-contaminated construction waste because a property flipper based in Anaheim, California, decided the cost of plastic sheeting and a certified renovator was not worth his profit margin.

Economic Inequality: The Extraction Model of Urban Renovation

The business model documented in these court filings follows a pattern familiar to anyone who has watched what happens to older working-class urban housing stock. An outside investor acquires distressed pre-war properties in lower-income St. Louis neighborhoods at low prices. The investor hires workers — without certified oversight, without the required safety infrastructure, without EPA certification — to renovate those properties as cheaply as possible. The investor then resells or rents the renovated properties at market rate.

Every dollar saved by skipping lead-safe work practices is a dollar transferred from the neighborhood to the investor’s profit margin. The neighbors absorb the contamination risk. The workers absorb the occupational exposure. The children absorb the lead. The investor banks the margin, dissolves the LLC, forms a new one, and moves to the next property. The court documents confirm this pattern across at least 87 documented units in St. Louis — and that is only what EPA could document from permit records. The true scope, across the more than 40 companies Askins formed, is not yet fully known.

The $42,003 judgment ($42,003 — roughly the annual cost of childcare for two children in Missouri) entered against Askins Development was never paid. Askins dissolved the company before the ink was dry on the judgment and kept operating through Shaw and through himself personally. The federal government now argues the injunction must extend to any future company Askins organizes, because without that provision, he will simply open LLC number 41 and start over. The communities whose soil still contains whatever lead dust was released across those eight properties do not get to dissolve and start over.

Regulated renovation firms that follow the rules — obtaining certification, hiring certified renovators, buying plastic sheeting and containment materials — incur costs that Askins systematically avoided. This creates an economic race to the bottom: compliant contractors cannot compete on price with someone who simply ignores the law. The EPA administrative default order specifically names this harm, stating that ongoing violations cause damage “to other regulated entities that perform renovations in compliance with applicable regulations.” Law-abiding contractors are undercut. Communities are poisoned. The flipper profits.

The Cost of a Life: Running the Numbers

What Now? The Watchlist and What You Can Do

The federal government has filed for a court injunction that would bar Askins and his companies from performing any further renovation work until they prove compliance — and would bind any future companies Askins organizes to the same rules. That is the immediate legal demand. But injunctions require court action, enforcement, and political will. The regulatory bodies below have jurisdiction and documented track records on this case. Apply pressure to all of them.

The Defendants

• Orlando Askins — Principal, Owner and/or Manager. Resides: Anaheim, California. Operates: St. Louis, Missouri renovation market.
• The Askins Development Group, LLC — Formally dissolved November 7, 2022. Continues operating as alter ego of Askins. Website still active as of the date of the federal complaint.
• Shaw Holding Group LLC — Active LLC. Holds property titles. Pulls building permits. Managed by Askins, organized by his sister on paper.

The legal complaint against Orlando Askins can be found here on the Justice Department’s website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/media/1413761/dl?inline

A link to the consent decree can be found by visiting this DOJ link: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/media/1413756/dl?inline

Here is a relevant EPA link: https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/EAB_Web_Docket.nsf/DocketsByAppeal/TSCA+22-(03)

Related posts:

Bee Remodeling lead-based paint violations underscore the failings of neoliberal capitalism in protecting workers. Security Building Loft Partners Paid Just $21,374 For Endangering Tenants With Lead Paint Geronimo Concrete potentially exposed elementary school children to lead paint. How Two Corporations Coated Baltimore in 2.5 Tons of Lead Paint