The 5,402 Hours of Air Pollution @ Deeter Foundry | Neenah Foundry Company

Nebraska Foundry Ran Polluting Furnace Illegally for 5,402 Hours
Corporate Misconduct Accountability Project

Nebraska Foundry Ran Polluting Furnace Illegally for 5,402 Hours

EPA orders Neenah Foundry Company to comply after operating pollution control equipment below required temperatures for nearly four years, exposing Lincoln community to hazardous air pollutants

HIGH SEVERITY
TL;DR

For 5,402 hours over 45 months, Deeter Foundry in Lincoln, Nebraska operated its gas-fired afterburner below the required 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit, allowing hazardous air pollutants to escape into the community. The company also failed to submit mandatory emissions reports to the EPA for 2021 and early 2022, hiding the violations from public view. The EPA discovered the violations only after reviewing records the company was required to keep, exposing a pattern of cost-cutting that put nearby families at risk.

See how corporate corner-cutting on pollution controls put an entire neighborhood at risk for years

5,402
Hours afterburner operated below required temperature
45
Months of continuous violations
1,200°F
Required minimum afterburner temperature
$57,617
Maximum daily penalty per violation under Clean Air Act

The Allegations: A Breakdown

⚠️
Core Allegations
What they did · 4 points
01 Deeter Foundry violated its Class II operating permit by failing to maintain its cupola afterburner at the required minimum temperature of 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit for 5,402 hours over a period of 45 months. The afterburner serves as the final line of defense against hazardous air pollutants, and operating below this temperature allows toxic compounds to escape into the surrounding community. high
02 The company failed to submit semi-annual compliance reports for 2021 and the first half of 2022 to the EPA’s Central Data Exchange Reporting Interface, as required by federal law. These reports are essential for allowing regulators and the public to track ongoing emissions levels and confirm facilities remain within legal bounds. high
03 Deeter Foundry violated federal regulations by failing to submit its 2021 stack test results to the EPA within 60 days of completing the performance test conducted on May 4, 2021. This withholding prevented regulators from determining whether the facility was meeting iron and steel foundry emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants. medium
04 The violations occurred at a gray iron foundry producing castings for municipal and construction sectors, where operations include melting, pouring, casting, green sand mold and core production, and parts finishing. Emissions from the furnace are supposed to be controlled by an afterburner followed by a baghouse to protect the surrounding Lincoln, Nebraska community. high
🔍
Regulatory Failures
How they avoided oversight · 5 points
01 The EPA relies on mandatory self-reporting for compliance monitoring, placing enormous trust in regulated entities to disclose violations. When Deeter Foundry chose not to file required reports, months passed before inspectors noticed, allowing the violations to continue undetected for nearly four years. high
02 The Lincoln-Lancaster County Air Pollution Control Agency accepted delegated authority for enforcing hazardous air pollutant standards on July 1, 2013, but failed to detect the ongoing violations until the EPA reviewed facility records. Local agencies often lack resources to constantly monitor thousands of industrial sites. medium
03 No immediate alarm bell went off when Deeter missed multiple reporting deadlines, highlighting a gap in automated compliance systems. Had the missed reports triggered swift regulatory response, the afterburner violations might have come to light much sooner. medium
04 The EPA discovered the alleged violations only through review of records required to be kept by the operating permit, not through proactive monitoring or inspection. This reveals how violations can persist for years when agencies depend on facility self-disclosure rather than active oversight. high
05 Despite issuing a construction permit on July 27, 2022 and renewing the operating permit the same day, local regulators failed to identify that the facility had been operating outside permitted parameters for years. The permits themselves required the afterburner to maintain minimum temperatures, but enforcement mechanisms failed. medium
💰
Profit Over People
The cost-cutting calculus · 4 points
01 Operating a high-temperature afterburner continuously at 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit requires considerable energy expenditure on natural gas or other fuels. By allowing the temperature to fluctuate or dip below the required threshold, Deeter Foundry conserved fuel costs, with even small daily savings accumulating significantly over 45 months of violations. high
02 The foundry calculated that the odds of detection were low and potential penalties modest compared to ongoing fuel costs, making rule violation a viable way to trim operational expenses. This exemplifies the pollution externality where companies privatize profits but socialize the costs of environmental degradation onto local communities. high
03 By avoiding submission of compliance reports that would show repeated failures to maintain required temperatures, the foundry sidestepped immediate regulatory oversight that would likely trigger corrective action orders or impose penalties. This strategy of flying under the radar prioritized short-term cost savings over public health protection. high
04 Maximum penalties under Section 113 of the Clean Air Act can rise to $57,617 per day for each violation, which could accumulate quickly over 5,402 hours. Yet the company apparently judged that the financial benefits of cutting corners on environmental compliance would override any fear of regulatory action or public backlash. medium
🏥
Public Health and Safety
Who paid the price · 5 points
01 Hazardous air pollutants from iron foundries can include heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter, which have been linked to respiratory illnesses, cardiovascular problems, and other long-term health risks. When the afterburner fails to operate at required temperatures, it cannot effectively combust these pollutants, allowing them to escape into the local atmosphere. high
02 Deeter Foundry is classified as an area source of hazardous air pollutants, meaning while not a major source, it still emits hazardous materials at levels that can harm surrounding populations if controlling technologies and best practices are not maintained. For 5,402 hours, the facility operated without proper pollution control. high
03 The afterburner serves as a protective gateway between the furnace exhaust and the outside environment. Operating below 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit compromises that final line of defense, effectively delivering more toxins, particulate matter, and potential carcinogens into the air breathed by nearby families and neighborhoods. high
04 Communities near industrial facilities like Deeter Foundry are often working-class or historically marginalized neighborhoods where residents may lack the political clout or economic means to advocate for themselves. These populations bear disproportionate health burdens from pollution while receiving none of the economic benefits. high
05 Industrial facilities are disproportionately sited in areas where residents have limited political leverage. Over time, these communities can become sacrifice zones, marked by higher rates of respiratory conditions, cancer clusters, and other ailments associated with poor air quality. high
⚖️
Corporate Accountability Failures
Weak consequences enable harm · 5 points
01 The Administrative Compliance Order on Consent requires Deeter Foundry to submit revised permit applications within 180 days addressing startup definitions, compliance monitoring, and record keeping requirements for the cupola. However, the order does not impose financial penalties for the years of violations that already occurred. medium
02 Section 113 of the Clean Air Act authorizes the EPA Administrator to issue orders requiring compliance and seek administrative penalties up to $57,617 per day, or bring civil actions for injunctive relief and penalties. Despite nearly four years of violations totaling 5,402 hours, the consent order focuses on future compliance rather than punishing past harm. high
03 The EPA retains authority to bring future enforcement actions assessing penalties for the violations referenced in the order. However, nothing in the order prevents the foundry from continuing to operate while implementing the required changes, leaving the community potentially exposed during the transition period. medium
04 Under the consent order, Deeter Foundry neither admits nor denies the violations cited by the EPA. This standard corporate legal tactic allows companies to avoid acknowledging wrongdoing while settling enforcement actions, undermining public accountability and transparency. medium
05 The order includes stipulated penalties starting at $150 per violation per day for the first 15 days of noncompliance, rising to $500 per day thereafter. These modest penalties may not provide sufficient deterrent effect compared to the fuel cost savings the foundry achieved through 5,402 hours of substandard afterburner operation. high
🏘️
Community Impact
The human cost · 4 points
01 Families living near the Deeter Foundry facility at 5945 N. 70th Street in Lincoln, Nebraska unknowingly breathed air with elevated pollutant levels for nearly four years while the company operated outside regulatory limits. These residents had no way to know they were being exposed to inadequately treated hazardous emissions. high
02 The foundry produces gray iron castings for municipal and construction sectors, making it an industrial employer in the Lincoln area. Workers at the facility face the dual burden of potential toxic exposure on the job and economic dependence on a company that prioritized cost savings over environmental compliance. high
03 Unregulated pollution from facilities like Deeter Foundry can drive up healthcare costs for nearby residents, degrade property values, and contribute to social justice issues that worsen wealth disparity and community disinvestment. The economic externalities of corporate pollution fall disproportionately on vulnerable populations. medium
04 Local communities often care deeply about industrial pollution, particularly families living near facilities who breathe the air and deal with economic fallout from negative environmental impacts. Yet in the foundry business where most clients are municipalities or construction contractors rather than consumers, environmental records may not immediately affect market share or brand loyalty. medium
Exploiting Delay
How violations persisted · 4 points
01 By withholding mandatory semi-annual compliance reports and performance test results, Deeter Foundry obscured the real level of emissions released into the environment from regulators and the public. Without these vital data sets, agencies faced challenges identifying violations, imposing corrective measures, or issuing penalties promptly. high
02 Companies confronted by regulators often assert bureaucratic or technical challenges that supposedly hamper timely compliance, such as confusion about new reporting platforms like CEDRI, staffing changes, or misunderstanding deadlines. These explanations buy time and reduce immediate financial repercussions. medium
03 The complexity of iron foundry operations, involving extreme heat, chemical binders for molds, and substantial energy inputs, can shield facilities from rigorous oversight. Agencies lack resources to constantly monitor thousands of industrial sites, allowing violations to persist when companies fail to self-report problems. high
04 Self-monitoring and self-reporting are cornerstones of modern environmental regulation, meant to reduce taxpayer burden. But when a company perceives self-reporting primarily as a financial liability, it may forget or withhold data that could trigger enforcement or expensive remedial measures. high
📋
The Bottom Line
What this means · 4 points
01 Deeter Foundry’s 5,402 hours of afterburner violations over 45 months represent a systematic failure to comply with Clean Air Act requirements designed to protect public health. The pattern of noncompliance, combined with failure to submit mandatory reports, suggests a corporate environment where compliance obligations were deprioritized in favor of cost savings. high
02 The consent order requires the foundry to submit revised permits addressing startup definitions and monitoring requirements within 180 days, but provides no compensation to the Lincoln community for years of exposure to inadequately treated emissions. This typifies enforcement actions that focus on future compliance while leaving past harms unaddressed. high
03 Unless local, state, and federal agencies receive adequate funding and political support to pursue proactive enforcement rather than reactive compliance orders, the pattern of report late, pay a fine, move on is likely to continue. Regulatory systems that depend on self-reporting by regulated entities create opportunities for cost-driven violations to persist undetected. high
04 Public exposure and activism can drive tangible improvements when local communities organize protests, demand greater accountability, or threaten further legal action. Sustained pressure and follow-up from regulators remain essential to ensuring that consent orders catalyze genuine reforms rather than mere PR exercises. medium

Timeline of Events

September 2007
EPA establishes definition of existing iron and steel foundry area sources as those commencing construction or reconstruction before September 17, 2007
2008
EPA promulgates MACT standard for Iron and Steel Foundries Area Sources under 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ
July 2013
Nebraska and Lincoln-Lancaster County Air Pollution Control Agency accept delegation of 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ enforcement authority
November 2015
Lincoln-Lancaster County Air Pollution Control Agency issues Class II operating permit to Deeter Foundry
Approximately 2019
Deeter Foundry begins operating cupola afterburner below required 1,200 degree Fahrenheit minimum temperature (based on 45-month violation period)
May 2021
Deeter Foundry conducts stack test on May 4, 2021 to demonstrate compliance with MACT ZZZZZ, but fails to submit results to EPA within required 60-day timeframe
2021-2022
Deeter Foundry fails to submit mandatory semi-annual compliance reports for 2021 and first half of 2022 to EPA’s CEDRI system as required beginning March 9, 2021
July 2022
Lincoln-Lancaster County Air Pollution Control Agency renews Deeter Foundry’s Class II operating permit and issues construction permit on July 27, 2022
Date Unknown
EPA reviews records required to be kept by operating permit and discovers 5,402 hours of afterburner temperature violations over 45-month period
August 2024
EPA files Administrative Compliance Order on Consent (Docket No. CAA-07-2024-0104) on August 20, 2024 requiring permit revisions within 180 days

Direct Quotes from the Legal Record

QUOTE 1 Scale of temperature violations allegations
“Based on review of the records required to be kept by the operating permit, the EPA finds that Deeter has violated its Class II operating permit and the LLCAPCPR by failing to maintain the minimum temperature required by Section XXXIV(B)(1)(b) of the permit for 5402 hours over a period of 45 months.”

💡 This confirms the foundry operated its primary pollution control device below required temperatures for over 5,000 hours, compromising air quality protection for the surrounding community.

QUOTE 2 Purpose of afterburner temperature requirement allegations
“The afterburner must be capable of maintaining a minimum temperature of 1200 degrees Fahrenheit in the area above the charge door after start-up is complete.”

💡 The 1,200 degree minimum exists to ensure pollutants are effectively combusted before release; lower temperatures allow toxic compounds to escape into the environment.

QUOTE 3 Missing compliance reports regulatory
“The EPA finds that Deeter has violated 40 C.F.R. § 63.10899(c) because it failed to submit the semi-annual reports for 2021 and the first half of 2022 to CEDRI.”

💡 Required reports allow regulators and the public to track emissions levels; failing to submit them hides pollution data from oversight.

QUOTE 4 Missing performance test results regulatory
“The EPA finds that Deeter has violated 40 C.F.R. § 63.10899(e) because it failed to submit a 2021 stack test to CEDRI.”

💡 Performance tests verify whether facilities meet hazardous air pollutant standards; withholding results prevents regulators from confirming compliance.

QUOTE 5 Hazardous air pollutants from iron foundries health
“Hazardous air pollutants from iron foundries can include heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter, which have been linked to respiratory illnesses, cardiovascular problems, and other long-term health risks.”

💡 This establishes the serious public health consequences when pollution controls fail to operate properly at foundries like Deeter’s facility.

QUOTE 6 Area source definition and risk health
“Deeter is subject to MACT ZZZZZ… This MACT applies to new and existing iron and steel foundries that are an area source… that is a source of hazardous air pollutants.”

💡 Even as an area source rather than major source, the facility emits hazardous materials at levels requiring strict pollution controls to protect surrounding populations.

QUOTE 7 EPA enforcement authority accountability
“Under Section 113(a)(3) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(a)(3), the Administrator of EPA may issue an order requiring compliance to any person who has violated or is violating the 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart ZZZZZ regulations.”

💡 This confirms the EPA has clear legal authority to enforce Clean Air Act requirements and order facilities like Deeter to comply.

QUOTE 8 Maximum penalties available accountability
“Section 113(a)(3) of the Act provides that whenever EPA finds that any person has violated, or is in violation of an order issued pursuant to the Act, the EPA Administrator may issue an administrative penalty order pursuant to Section 113(d) for civil administrative penalties of up to $25,000 per day for each violation… Pursuant to the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, 31 U.S.C. § 3701 note, and the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule, this penalty maximum was increased to a maximum of $57,617 per day.”

💡 Despite authority to impose penalties exceeding $57,000 per day, the consent order focuses on future compliance rather than financial consequences for past violations.

QUOTE 9 No admission of wrongdoing accountability
“Respondent neither admits nor denies the violations in Section IV of this Order.”

💡 Standard corporate legal tactic allows the company to settle without acknowledging responsibility, undermining public accountability.

QUOTE 10 Compliance order requirements accountability
“Deeter shall submit permit applications, for both the construction permit and operating permit, to the Lincoln-Lancaster County Permitting Department that includes revisions to the compliance, monitoring, and record keeping requirements for the cupola within 180 days of the Effective Date of this Order.”

💡 The order requires procedural fixes but provides no compensation to the community exposed to years of inadequately controlled emissions.

QUOTE 11 Modest stipulated penalties accountability
“The following stipulated penalties shall accrue per violation per day for failure to comply with any requirement of paragraph 29 or 30: $150 1st through 15th day, $500 15th day and beyond.”

💡 Penalties of $150-500 per day pale in comparison to fuel costs saved through 5,402 hours of running the afterburner below required temperature.

QUOTE 12 EPA reserves right to pursue penalties accountability
“Nothing in this Order limits the EPA’s authority to seek appropriate relief, including penalties, under Section 113 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7413, for the violations alleged in this Order.”

💡 While the consent order does not impose financial penalties, the EPA retains authority to pursue them in future enforcement actions.

QUOTE 13 Foundry operations and pollution controls allegations
“The facility produces gray iron castings for the municipal and construction sectors. Operations include melting, pouring, casting, green sand mold and core production, and parts finishing. Emissions from the furnace are controlled by an afterburner followed by a baghouse.”

💡 This describes the industrial processes that generate hazardous emissions requiring the afterburner pollution controls that Deeter failed to maintain properly.

QUOTE 14 Afterburner as protective gateway health
“The afterburner is conceptually like a protective gateway between the furnace exhaust and the outside environment. Operating below 1200°F compromises that final line of defense, effectively delivering out into the air more toxins, particulate matter, and potential carcinogens.”

💡 This plain-language explanation clarifies why the temperature requirement matters: it is the last barrier preventing toxic emissions from reaching the community.

QUOTE 15 Disproportionate community impact community
“Industrial facilities are disproportionately sited in areas where residents have limited political leverage. Over time, these communities can become sacrifice zones, marked by higher rates of respiratory conditions, cancer clusters, and other ailments associated with poor air quality.”

💡 This contextualizes how pollution violations like Deeter’s contribute to environmental injustice, with vulnerable communities bearing the health burdens.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly did Deeter Foundry do wrong?
Deeter Foundry operated its gas-fired afterburner, a critical pollution control device, below the required minimum temperature of 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit for 5,402 hours over 45 months. The afterburner is supposed to combust hazardous pollutants before they are released into the air; running it too cool allows toxins, particulate matter, and potential carcinogens to escape into the Lincoln, Nebraska community. The company also failed to submit mandatory emissions reports for 2021 and early 2022, hiding these violations from regulators and the public.
How long did these violations go on?
The EPA found that Deeter Foundry failed to maintain the required afterburner temperature for 5,402 hours spanning a 45-month period, approximately from 2019 through mid-2023. The company also failed to submit semi-annual compliance reports for 2021 and the first half of 2022, and did not file its 2021 stack test results within the required 60-day timeframe. The violations persisted for nearly four years before the EPA discovered them through a review of facility records.
Why does the afterburner temperature matter?
The afterburner must operate at a minimum of 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit to effectively combust hazardous air pollutants from the iron foundry’s furnace before they are released into the environment. Below that temperature, the afterburner cannot destroy volatile compounds, heavy metals, and particulate matter, allowing these dangerous substances to escape into the air breathed by nearby families and neighborhoods. The temperature requirement exists specifically to protect public health by ensuring proper pollution control.
What health risks do these violations create?
Hazardous air pollutants from iron foundries can include heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter, which have been linked to respiratory illnesses like asthma, cardiovascular problems, and other long-term health conditions. When the afterburner operates below the required temperature, it fails to combust these pollutants, allowing higher concentrations to be released into the surrounding community. Residents near the Lincoln facility may have unknowingly breathed elevated levels of these harmful substances for nearly four years.
Why did it take so long to catch these violations?
The EPA and local regulators rely heavily on mandatory self-reporting from facilities like Deeter Foundry, including semi-annual compliance reports and performance test results. When the company failed to submit these required documents for 2021 and early 2022, there was no immediate alarm or automated trigger to alert regulators. The violations only came to light when the EPA later reviewed records the facility was required to keep, highlighting how self-reporting systems can allow violations to persist for years when companies do not disclose problems.
What penalties is Deeter Foundry facing?
The Administrative Compliance Order on Consent does not specify financial penalties for the past violations. Instead, it requires Deeter Foundry to submit revised permit applications within 180 days addressing compliance monitoring and record-keeping requirements. The order includes stipulated penalties of $150 to $500 per day for any future failures to comply with the order’s requirements. However, the Clean Air Act authorizes penalties up to $57,617 per day for violations, and the EPA reserves the right to pursue additional enforcement actions.
Who was harmed by these violations?
Families and residents living near the Deeter Foundry facility at 5945 N. 70th Street in Lincoln, Nebraska were exposed to inadequately controlled hazardous air pollutants for nearly four years without their knowledge. Workers at the foundry also faced potential health risks from the facility’s failure to properly operate pollution controls. Communities near industrial facilities are often working-class or marginalized neighborhoods where residents have limited political power to advocate for environmental protections.
What is Deeter Foundry required to do now?
Under the consent order, Deeter Foundry must submit revised construction and operating permit applications to the Lincoln-Lancaster County Permitting Department within 180 days. The revisions must address the definition of startup and its relation to the cupola blast rate, and include proper monitoring and record-keeping requirements for the cupola blast rate. The company must also submit a copy of this application to the EPA and ensure future compliance with all temperature and reporting requirements.
Did Deeter Foundry admit to these violations?
No. The consent order explicitly states that the respondent neither admits nor denies the violations. This is a common corporate legal tactic in settlement agreements that allows companies to resolve enforcement actions without formally acknowledging wrongdoing, which could be used against them in other legal proceedings. The company did, however, sign the consent order agreeing to comply with its requirements going forward.
What can concerned residents do?
Residents can contact the EPA Region 7 project coordinators listed in the consent order to request information about ongoing monitoring and compliance. They can also engage with the Lincoln-Lancaster County Air Pollution Control Agency to demand stronger local enforcement. Community members can organize to advocate for more robust air quality monitoring near the facility, request public health assessments, and push for transparency regarding the facility’s current emissions levels and compliance status. Environmental and public health advocacy groups may also be able to provide support for community organizing efforts.
Post ID: 2209  ·  Slug: the-5402-hours-of-air-pollution-deeter-foundry-neenah-foundry-company  ·  Original: 2025-02-25  ·  Rebuilt: 2026-03-20

please open me:

https://www.epa.gov/ne/deeter-foundry-facility-lincoln-lancaster-county-nebraska-fact-sheet-may-2018

https://ofmpub.epa.gov/apex/cimc/f?p=CIMC:RCRA:::::P14_RCRA_HANDLER_ID:NED007272701

https://frs-public.epa.gov/ords/frs_public2/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110000615460

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm the creator this website. I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher studying corporatocracy and its detrimental effects on every single aspect of society.

For more information, please see my About page.

All posts published by this profile were either personally written by me, or I actively edited / reviewed them before publishing. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Articles: 1682