The Anatomy of a $100M Crypto Fraud | Unicoin

Unicoin Executives Accused of Massive $100M+ Fraud, Fake Assets Exposed
Corporate Misconduct Accountability Project

Unicoin Executives Accused of Massive $100M+ Fraud, Fake Assets Exposed

SEC alleges company and executives lied about billions in assets, fabricated sales figures, and defrauded over 5,000 investors in unregistered crypto offering.

CRITICAL SEVERITY
TL;DR

From February 2022 through 2025, Unicoin Inc. and its executives allegedly orchestrated a massive securities fraud, raising over $100 million from more than 5,000 investors worldwide by selling unregistered cryptocurrency certificates through false promises. The SEC alleges executives systematically lied about fundamental aspects of the investment: they claimed tokens were backed by billions in real estate and company equity when assets were worth only a tiny fraction of stated values, fabricated sales milestones claiming billions in revenue when actual proceeds were around $110 million, falsely marketed products as SEC-registered when they were not, and misrepresented the company’s financial health as having a runway of decades or centuries when internal documents showed it could only operate for months without new funding. The scheme allegedly enriched executives through compensation and personal token sales while leaving thousands of investors with worthless certificates in a company facing substantial doubt about its ability to continue operations.

This case demonstrates how crypto hype, fabricated metrics, and regulatory gaps can enable systematic investor fraud at massive scale.

$100M+
Total raised from defrauded investors
5,000+
Investors deceived by false claims
$3B
Falsely claimed sales (actual: $110M)
$1.4B
Fake property values announced
$300M
Actual value of announced properties
4 months
Real financial runway (claimed: centuries)

The Allegations: A Breakdown

⚠️
Core Allegations
What they did · 8 points
01 Company executives sold over $100 million in unregistered securities called Unicoin Rights Certificates to more than 5,000 investors from February 2022 through 2025, using false and misleading statements to induce purchases. The certificates purportedly gave buyers rights to future crypto tokens that executives falsely claimed were asset-backed, SEC-registered, and highly profitable. high
02 Executives repeatedly and falsely claimed Unicoin tokens were backed by billions of dollars in real estate and equity in pre-IPO companies. In reality, the company never intended to back tokens with these assets, and the assets themselves were worth only a small fraction of claimed values. Executives admitted under oath they never intended tokens to be asset-backed. high
03 Company announced property acquisitions in Argentina, Thailand, Antigua, and the Bahamas with purported values totaling over $1.4 billion between September 2023 and January 2024. Most transactions never closed, and the actual combined value of the four properties was no more than $300 million. Argentine mining rights claimed at $150 million were later valued at just $580,000 on audited financials. high
04 Executives fabricated sales milestones throughout the scheme, publicly claiming $200 million in sales by November 2022, $500 million by June 2023, $2 billion by March 2024, and over $3 billion by June 2024. Company SEC filings revealed actual proceeds totaled no more than $110 million during the entire period, meaning executives overstated sales by more than 27 times actual figures. high
05 Company and executives repeatedly told investors Unicoin tokens were SEC-registered, U.S.-registered, or SEC-compliant when none of these claims were true. No registration statement was ever filed with the SEC for the offering, and the company never registered the securities under federal law. high
06 Executives claimed company had financial runway measured in decades or centuries while knowing from internal documents and auditor assessments that the company could only operate for approximately four months without additional funding. Company SEC filings explicitly stated substantial doubt existed about ability to continue as a going concern. high
07 CEO Alexander Konanykhin personally sold over 37.9 million Unicoin Rights Certificates to more than 180 investors for total proceeds exceeding $2.6 million, often at prices below what the company was charging. He deliberately targeted unaccredited U.S. investors who had been refused by the company, creating what he called a secondary market to evade securities law restrictions. high
08 Company inflated sales figures by improperly counting unpaid balances from a Five Year Plan where investors pledged only 20% as collateral and had no obligation to make future payments. Company counted full five-year amounts as completed sales despite knowing many investors did not intend to pay and company held no valid receivable for these amounts. high
⚖️
Regulatory Failures
How the system failed · 5 points
01 Unicoin operated for over three years raising $100 million from thousands of investors before SEC enforcement action, demonstrating reactive rather than proactive regulatory oversight. The company filed periodic reports with the SEC throughout this period that showed discrepancies between public claims and actual financial condition, yet continued operations unimpeded. high
02 Company exploited regulatory gray areas by selling certificates through private placement memoranda that purported to rely on Regulation D exemptions while simultaneously conducting general solicitation through widespread advertising. This allowed the scheme to reach thousands of public investors while claiming exemption from registration requirements. medium
03 Executives co-opted language of regulatory compliance to deceive investors, repeatedly using terms like SEC-compliant and U.S.-registered in marketing materials, paid advertisements, and investor communications. This false legitimacy helped overcome investor skepticism and gave the appearance of regulatory approval that did not exist. high
04 Company registration requirements designed to protect investors proved ineffective when CEO sold his personal allocation of securities directly to investors without broker-dealers or legal oversight. Despite company policies requiring transfer approval, executives never sought legal review of these personal sales that circumvented investor protections. medium
05 Regulatory framework failed to prevent company from making hundreds of promotional statements on social media, in paid interviews, and at conferences that contained material falsehoods, as these communications fell outside traditional disclosure regimes. Modern platforms enabled rapid dissemination of false claims to global audience with minimal regulatory constraint. medium
💰
Profit Over People
Prioritizing wealth extraction · 5 points
01 Every executive defendant received substantial Unicoin Rights Certificates as compensation and bonuses, directly tying personal wealth to the perceived value of the securities they were fraudulently promoting. This created powerful conflict of interest where protecting investors took backseat to personal enrichment through continued inflation of token value. high
02 CEO exploited his position to personally profit from the scheme by selling his own allocation of certificates when he knew company claims were false. In one instance, he deliberately sold 8 million certificates at a discount to close a $1.2 million deal, stating he would rather use personal holdings than lose the investment, demonstrating prioritization of capital raising over honest dealing. high
03 Executives continued aggressive fundraising and made increasingly grandiose claims about company success even after being warned internally about impending financial collapse. When company burn rate analysis showed only four months of operating capital remaining, executives publicly claimed centuries of runway to keep money flowing in. high
04 Company spent over $14 million on sales and marketing in 2024 alone, with total marketing expenses exceeding $38 million from 2022 through 2024. This massive spending on promotional campaigns served to attract new investors whose money sustained operations and executive compensation while company produced no viable product. medium
05 Executives structured compensation to include discretionary bonuses paid in Unicoin Rights Certificates, allowing them to award themselves additional securities based on fabricated performance metrics. Company distributed over 521 million certificates valued at tens of millions to employees and contractors as compensation during the fraud period. medium
📉
Economic Fallout
The human cost · 6 points
01 Over 5,000 investors from the United States and abroad lost money in the scheme, having invested over $100 million based on systematic lies about asset backing, sales success, regulatory compliance, and financial stability. These investors believed they were buying into a secure, next-generation crypto asset when they were actually funding executive compensation and unsustainable operations. high
02 Many victims were unaccredited investors who lacked sophistication to evaluate the investment and were supposed to be protected by securities laws. CEO deliberately targeted these individuals by personally selling certificates to those the company had turned away, exploiting regulatory protections meant to shield vulnerable investors from high-risk ventures. high
03 Investors who participated in the Five Year Plan lost their 20% collateral deposits when they declined to make additional payments after learning more about the company. Over 75% of these deposits consisted of previously received certificates or stock rather than cash, meaning investors saw paper holdings evaporate when they refused to invest more real money. medium
04 Company financial condition as of December 2024 showed it had acquired less than $1.5 million in real estate despite claims of over $2.5 billion in property acquisitions, meaning the purported asset backing that attracted investors never materialized. Certificate holders were left with rights to tokens backed by virtually nothing while executives had extracted millions in compensation. high
05 Company periodic filings consistently warned of substantial doubt about ability to continue as going concern throughout the fraud period, but these warnings were buried in technical documents while executives loudly proclaimed financial strength in accessible marketing materials. This information asymmetry meant sophisticated readers of SEC filings knew the truth while ordinary investors received false narrative. medium
06 Victims face lengthy and uncertain path to recovery even if SEC prevails in enforcement action. Disgorgement and penalties often fail to fully compensate defrauded investors, and company assets available for distribution are minimal compared to the $100 million raised, meaning many investors will never recover their losses. high
📢
The PR Machine
Manufacturing false reality · 6 points
01 Company conducted extensive paid advertising campaign including thousands of taxi cab ads, wrapped buses, ferry ads, digital billboards in Times Square and major airports, elevator screen ads, and television commercials on financial news networks. This saturation marketing in major metropolitan areas like New York City created appearance of legitimate, thriving enterprise to casual observers and potential investors. medium
02 Executives participated in paid promotional interviews with media firms that were presented to public as objective journalism without disclosure of payment. These interviews were posted to company websites, circulated in investor updates, and shared on social media to build credibility, blurring line between advertising and editorial content. high
03 Company and executives made hundreds of promotional posts on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and company website touting fabricated milestones and false claims about asset values. This created echo chamber where success narrative was constantly reinforced across multiple platforms, making lies seem more credible through repetition and omnipresence. medium
04 CEO regularly issued investor updates via email to large distribution list and posted them publicly on company website, using these communications to repeatedly make false statements about sales figures, asset values, and financial runway. These updates were crafted to appear as transparent communication with stakeholders while actually serving as vehicle for sustained deception. high
05 Executives used appearances at national securities exchanges in New York, including photo opportunities at Nasdaq and NYSE, to create impression of legitimacy and impending public offering. They posted these images on social media and conducted paid interviews at exchange locations in front of exchange logos, exploiting association with established financial institutions. medium
06 Company issued press releases announcing fabricated real estate acquisitions and sales milestones that were picked up by financial news outlets, further amplifying false narrative. These press releases served as seemingly authoritative third-party validation that company cited in subsequent marketing, creating self-reinforcing cycle of misinformation. medium
🔍
Corporate Accountability Failures
Where oversight broke down · 5 points
01 Company General Counsel Richard Devlin drafted private placement memoranda containing false and misleading statements while also reviewing company SEC filings that contradicted those claims. He failed to correct misstatements despite having access to accurate financial information and knowledge of outstanding contingencies in announced transactions. high
02 Company board of directors, which included CEO and president for most of the fraud period, received quarterly financial updates showing actual asset values and sales figures that contradicted public statements, yet took no action to correct false narrative. Board oversight mechanisms failed to prevent or stop the systematic deception. high
03 Company Chief Financial Officer warned executives in February 2022 not to claim tokens were backed by a fund since no fund had been technically set up, but executives ignored this advice and continued making asset-backed claims for years afterward. Internal financial controls and ethical guardrails proved ineffective against executive determination to mislead. medium
04 Company auditors included explanatory paragraph in audit opinion stating substantial doubt existed about company ability to continue as going concern, but this critical warning had no impact on executive behavior or public claims. Executives continued marketing securities aggressively while knowing auditors had raised red flag about viability. medium
05 No internal whistleblowers or compliance officers appear to have successfully halted fraudulent practices despite numerous red flags including discrepancies between public claims and filed financials, questionable property transactions with sellers who had fraud histories, and CEO personal sales that circumvented company policies. Internal accountability mechanisms were either absent or overridden by executive authority. high
⚖️
The Bottom Line
What this means · 5 points
01 Unicoin case represents systematic securities fraud enabled by crypto market hype, regulatory gaps, and executive willingness to deceive thousands of investors for personal gain. The scheme combined false claims about asset backing, fabricated sales figures, misrepresentation of regulatory status, and concealment of financial distress into a multi-year fraud that raised over $100 million. high
02 Case demonstrates how modern corporate executives can exploit information asymmetries, using accessible marketing channels to broadcast false narratives while burying contradictory facts in technical SEC filings that few investors read. This enables systematic deception at scale in ways that would have been impossible before digital communication era. high
03 SEC enforcement action came only after the fraud had been running for three years and executives had already raised $100 million from thousands of victims, illustrating limitations of reactive regulatory approach. By the time authorities intervened, company had minimal assets available for investor recovery and executives had already extracted substantial personal compensation. high
04 Success of SEC lawsuit will test whether legal system can impose meaningful consequences on corporate executives who engage in systematic fraud. Requested remedies including injunctions, disgorgement, civil penalties, and officer and director bars represent significant sanctions, but ultimate accountability depends on court willingness to impose substantial personal consequences. medium
05 Case serves as warning about crypto industry vulnerabilities to fraud where novel assets and regulatory uncertainty create opportunities for bad actors to exploit investor enthusiasm and lack of technical understanding. The pattern of inflated claims, fake partnerships, and fabricated metrics appears repeatedly across crypto frauds. medium

Timeline of Events

February 2022
Unicoin pivots to selling Unicoin Rights Certificates and begins fraudulent scheme
February 7, 2022
Company issues first PPM falsely claiming tokens are asset-backed and SEC-compliant
July 2022
CEO Konanykhin begins personally selling his Unicoin certificates to investors
October 2022
Executives announce $100M sales milestone (actual proceeds: $37.5M for all of 2022)
November 2022
Company claims $200M in sales through press releases and social media
December 2022
Executives tout $250M sales milestone and claim next-generation crypto leadership
June 2023
Company announces half a billion dollars in sales (actual: $48.4M)
August 2023
Company announces Argentine mining rights acquisition valued at $150M
September 2023
Executives announce Thailand resort acquisition for purported $335M
October 2023
Company claims Antigua property acquisition worth $680M
January 2024
Unicoin announces Bahamas properties acquisition valued at $554M
February 2024
Going concern assessment warns company can only operate four more months
February 29, 2024
Executive falsely claims company has real estate giving runway measurable in decades
March 2024
Executives claim $2B in sales at shareholders meeting (actual: ~$110M)
April 2, 2024
Company files 2023 10-K admitting it can only operate four more months
April 3, 2024
CEO issues investor update claiming runway measured in centuries, one day after 10-K filing
June 2024
Executives claim to have exceeded $3B in sales (actual maximum: $110M)
November 2024
Argentine mining rights finally appraised at $7.1M, less than 5% of claimed $150M value
April 2025
Company files 2024 10-K valuing Argentine mining rights at only $580,000
May 20, 2025
SEC files enforcement action charging company and executives with securities fraud

Direct Quotes from the Legal Record

QUOTE 1 Executives knew tokens were not asset-backed allegations
“Konanykhin testified under oath that cryptocurrency cannot be backed by something or reporting, et cetera. Moschini testified under oath that when she called Unicoin asset-backed, she meant only that the Company owned assets. Dominguez testified under oath, So we don’t say, you know, the coin [Unicoin] is backed by assets.”

💡 This proves executives privately admitted the central marketing claim about asset backing was false, while continuing to promote that claim publicly to investors.

QUOTE 2 CFO warned against false asset-backing claims allegations
“In fact, no steps have been taken during the Relevant Period to securitize (or otherwise back) Unicoin tokens with real world assets. Unicoin’s chief financial officer identified this issue as early February 2022, when he advised Konanykhin, Moschini, and Devlin not to say [Unicoin tokens are] backed by a find [sic] since a fund has not been technically set up.”

💡 Company’s own CFO explicitly warned top executives not to make asset-backing claims because they were false, but executives ignored this advice and continued making the claims for years.

QUOTE 3 Argentine property value fabricated allegations
“On November 4, 2024, nearly 15 months after Unicoin announced the Argentine mining rights acquisition, the Company received for the first time an appraisal of the Argentine Mining Rights. This appraisal valued the Argentine Mining Rights at $7.1 million—less than 5% of the $150 million that Unicoin had announced in August 2023 and repeatedly touted through mid-2024.”

💡 When property executives claimed was worth $150 million was finally appraised, it was worth only $7.1 million, exposing how drastically they inflated asset values to deceive investors.

QUOTE 4 Sales figures inflated by factor of 27 allegations
“In fact, during the entire Relevant Period, Unicoin sold no more than $110 million in Unicoin Rights Certificates.”

💡 This single sentence exposes that when executives claimed over $3 billion in sales, actual proceeds were only $110 million, meaning they overstated sales by more than 2,700%.

QUOTE 5 CEO deliberately evaded securities laws profit
“In response, Dominguez stated that selling to unaccredited investors who had been precluded from purchasing directly from Unicoin could create a secondary market with these guys for the coins. Konanykhin wrote, I own about 250M ú [Unicoin tokens] and can sell him $1.2M at 15 ¢/ú. He added, It is NOT my preference, but if [the potential investor] says 15¢/ú or I don’t invest, I’d rather use my personal unicoins than lose this deal.”

💡 CEO explicitly stated he would personally sell certificates at a discount to close deals the company legally could not make, demonstrating intentional circumvention of investor protection laws.

QUOTE 6 False runway claims contradicted own filings allegations
“The Company’s 1Q2024 10-Q stated, Based on currently available capital resources (cash and cash equivalents on hand as of March 31, 2024) of approximately $4,345,000, we estimate that we would be able to conduct our planned operations for approximately four additional months without raising additional equity or debt financing. Nevertheless, on May 31, 2024, in another Investor Update email, Konanykhin claimed, I see it as a crucial element of risk minimization, because such a portfolio will provide us with the resources to continue operating Unicoin for decades, if not centuries.”

💡 This shows CEO publicly claimed company could operate for centuries just weeks after company’s own SEC filing stated it could only operate four more months, demonstrating knowing and deliberate false statements.

QUOTE 7 Property acquisition announcements were false allegations
“For example, between September 2023 and January 2024, the Promoting Defendants announced acquisitions of properties in Argentina, Thailand, Antigua, and the Bahamas, purportedly with appraised values totaling more than of $1.4 billion; in fact, the majority of those transactions never closed and the actual combined value of the four properties was no more than $300 million.”

💡 Executives announced over $1.4 billion in property acquisitions that either never closed or were worth only $300 million, creating false impression of massive asset base.

QUOTE 8 Included non-obligated payments as sales allegations
“Under the Five Year Plan, investors’ investment risk was limited to their initial 20% collateral deposit—investors were not obligated to make any of the annual installment payments. Unicoin’s website prominently advertised that investors’ risks at signing are limited to 20% of the deal value and that investors had no credit risk: pay only if satisfied with our progress. Each of the Company’s purported fundraising milestones was false and misleading by, among other things, including as purported sales of Unicoin Rights Certificates amounts that investors were not obligated to pay under the Five Year Plan.”

💡 Company counted full value of five-year payment plans as completed sales even though investors had no obligation to pay beyond initial 20% and company advertised this no-obligation feature.

QUOTE 9 Dominguez admitted sales claims were false allegations
“On February 29, 2024, Dominguez claimed, To date, we have already sold over $2 billion worth of Unicoins, despite knowing that many investors had not made even their first payments under the Five Year Plan.”

💡 Chief Investment Officer publicly claimed $2 billion in sales while knowing investors were not making promised payments, showing executives knowingly made false statements.

QUOTE 10 Never registered with SEC despite claims allegations
“In fact, neither Unicoin tokens nor Unicoin Rights Certificates were ever registered with the Commission or any other U.S. regulator. Unicoin never filed a Securities Act registration statement with the Commission to register its offering of Unicoin Rights Certificates or to register the Unicoin Rights Certificates as a class of securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.”

💡 Company and executives repeatedly told investors tokens were SEC-registered when no registration ever existed, exploiting regulatory terminology to create false sense of legitimacy and oversight.

QUOTE 11 Bahamas property red flags ignored accountability
“On July 20, 2023, Dominguez told Konanykhin in a WhatsApp conversation, by the way [the sellers’ representative’s] dad went to jail for medical fraud. I didn’t like those people. On September 8, 2023, Dominguez sent Konanykhin a WhatsApp message containing a link to a DOJ Press Release identifying the Associate as a convicted felon who had been sentenced in 2015 to 12.5 years in prison for defrauding more than 100 investors out of more than $8 million in a Bahamas land development scheme.”

💡 Executives knew sellers of Bahamas properties had criminal fraud backgrounds but proceeded with transaction anyway, demonstrating reckless disregard for investor protection in pursuit of deals they could promote.

QUOTE 12 Thailand property value deliberately inflated allegations
“This $241 million valuation in the Seller’s Appraisal reflected the total anticipated cost of constructing the resort on the completely undeveloped Thailand Property, not an as-is market value for the property. In fact, in August 2023, the as-is market value of the Thailand Property was no more than $15 million. Indeed, the Seller’s Appraisal itself stated that the market value of the undeveloped Thailand Property was less than $10 million.”

💡 Executives announced $335 million Thailand acquisition based on construction cost estimate of $241 million when the land itself was worth only $10-15 million, inflating value by over 2,000%.

QUOTE 13 Antigua seller credibility doubted internally accountability
“On October 15, 2023, Dominguez wrote to a real estate agent friend of his, Looks [l]ike the Antigua deal for [$]680 million is going to happen, and shared a screenshot that included the seller’s representative’s name. His friend replied, I believe I know this guy and those people. I do not trust them. Nevertheless, on October 17, 2023, Konanykhin announced the acquisition of the Antigua Properties in an investor update.”

💡 Chief Investment Officer received explicit warning not to trust Antigua property sellers but executives announced the deal anyway, showing they prioritized promotable transactions over due diligence and investor protection.

QUOTE 14 Company acknowledged going concern issues accountability
“Every annual and quarterly report that Unicoin filed with the Commission during the Relevant Period, starting with its first Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, stated that there was substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”

💡 Company’s own audited filings consistently warned of substantial doubt about its survival, but executives buried these warnings in technical documents while loudly proclaiming financial strength in marketing materials.

QUOTE 15 Marketing budget funded by investor money profit
“In 2024 alone, Unicoin’s sales and marketing expenses—which consisted of third-party marketing, advertising, and branding in addition to compensation and benefits of the Company’s own marketing personnel—exceeded $14 million. Unicoin spent approximately $6 million on sales and marketing in 2023 and approximately $17.8 million in 2022.”

💡 Company spent over $38 million on marketing to attract new investors while having no viable product, meaning investor money primarily funded promotional campaigns to attract more victims rather than building actual business.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly did Unicoin sell to investors?
Unicoin sold certificates called Unicoin Rights Certificates that supposedly gave buyers rights to receive crypto tokens called Unicoins in the future if and when the company minted and distributed them. The company raised over $100 million by selling these certificates to more than 5,000 investors from February 2022 through 2025. The certificates were securities that should have been registered with the SEC but were not.
What were the main lies executives told investors?
Executives told four categories of lies: First, they claimed tokens were backed by billions in real estate and company equity when this was false and they never intended backing. Second, they vastly overstated property values, claiming over $1.4 billion in acquisitions that were worth at most $300 million and mostly never closed. Third, they fabricated sales figures claiming over $3 billion in sales when actual proceeds were only $110 million. Fourth, they claimed financial runway of decades or centuries when internal documents showed the company could only operate for four months without new funding.
How much money did investors lose?
Investors paid over $100 million to Unicoin for certificates that are now likely worthless since the company’s own filings show it faces substantial doubt about continuing operations. The company’s assets are minimal compared to what it raised, and most announced property acquisitions never closed. Even if the SEC wins and orders disgorgement, recovery for investors is uncertain because company assets available for distribution are far less than the amount raised.
Were the Unicoin tokens actually backed by real assets?
No. Despite repeated public claims that tokens were asset-backed, executives admitted under oath they never intended tokens to be backed by assets. The company’s own CFO warned executives in February 2022 not to make asset-backing claims because no backing structure had been set up, but executives ignored this and continued making the claims for years. By the end of 2024, the company had acquired less than $1.5 million in actual real estate despite claiming over $2.5 billion in property acquisitions.
Was Unicoin actually registered with the SEC?
No. Executives repeatedly claimed Unicoin tokens and certificates were SEC-registered, SEC-compliant, or U.S.-registered, but none of this was true. The company never filed a registration statement with the SEC for its offering of certificates, and the offering was never registered under federal securities law. The company’s common stock was registered for reporting purposes, but this is completely different from registering the securities offering itself.
How did they inflate sales figures so dramatically?
Executives counted the full value of five-year payment plans as completed sales even though investors were only required to pay 20% initially and had no obligation to pay the remaining 80%. The company’s website even advertised this as a feature, promising investors had no credit risk and would only pay if satisfied with progress. By counting these non-obligated future payments as current sales, executives inflated figures by more than 27 times actual proceeds.
What happened with the real estate acquisitions they announced?
Most announced acquisitions either never closed or were worth far less than claimed. Argentine mining rights announced at $150 million were later valued at $7.1 million and ultimately at only $580,000. Thailand resort claimed at $335 million (based on $241 million appraisal) had actual land value of only $10-15 million. Antigua property claimed at $680 million was worth approximately $50-89 million. Bahamas properties announced at $554 million never closed and still do not appear as company assets. Overall, announced acquisitions of $1.4 billion were worth at most $300 million, and most never completed.
Who were the executives behind this scheme?
The main defendants are Alexander Konanykhin (CEO and Chairman), Maria Silvina Moschini (President and board member), Alejandro Dominguez (Chief Investment Officer), and Richard Devlin (General Counsel). Konanykhin and Moschini were previously married and each own about 36% of the company. They were the primary public faces making false claims in interviews, at conferences, and on social media. Dominguez ran the real estate program and made false statements about acquisitions. Devlin drafted the legal documents containing false statements.
How did the CEO personally profit from investor money?
CEO Konanykhin sold over 37.9 million of his personal Unicoin Rights Certificates to more than 180 investors for proceeds exceeding $2.6 million. He sold these certificates, which he had received from the company as compensation, often at prices below what the company was charging. He deliberately targeted unaccredited investors the company had turned away, explicitly stating he would use his personal holdings to close deals the company legally could not make, circumventing investor protection laws for personal gain.
What can investors who lost money do now?
Investors should monitor the SEC enforcement case and may be able to file claims for any disgorgement fund that is established if the SEC prevails. However, recovery is uncertain because company assets are minimal compared to the $100 million raised. Investors may also want to consult with securities attorneys about potential private legal actions, though these face similar recovery challenges. Going forward, investors should be extremely skeptical of crypto investments claiming to be asset-backed or SEC-registered, and should always verify registration status directly with the SEC rather than trusting company marketing materials.
Post ID: 4518  ·  Slug: unicoin-corporate-misconduct-sec-fraud-crypto  ·  Original: 2025-06-10  ·  Rebuilt: 2026-03-20

There is a press release on the SEC’s website about this cryptocurrency fraud: https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-75

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm the creator this website. I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher studying corporatocracy and its detrimental effects on every single aspect of society.

For more information, please see my About page.

All posts published by this profile were either personally written by me, or I actively edited / reviewed them before publishing. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Articles: 1683