🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights are human rights 🏳️‍⚧️
Theme

The Bountiful Company (Nestle) bought fake reviews on Amazon for its nutritional supplements

Deception for Dollars: The Bountiful Company’s Amazon Review Fraud

The Non-Financial Ledger: Betrayal in Your Shopping Cart

You’re standing in the digital aisle, trying to make a good choice. You want a vitamin to boost your immune system, a supplement to help with stress. You do your research. You read the reviews. You see a product with forty thousand ratings, a near-perfect five-star average, and a shiny “Amazon’s Choice” badge. It feels safe. It feels vetted. So you click “Add to Cart.”

That feeling of confidence was manufactured. The trust you placed in your fellow consumers was hijacked by a boardroom strategy. According to the FTC, The Bountiful Company, which produces the ubiquitous Nature’s Bounty brand, didn’t earn that trust. They stole it. They took the reputation of one product and slapped it onto another, like a forger signing a masterpiece’s name on a cheap print.

The cost here isn’t just the ten or twenty dollars you spent. The real cost is the erosion of trust, the creeping suspicion that every system is rigged against you. When a company selling health products resorts to such blatant deception, it’s not just commerce. It’s a profound violation of the social contract between a company and its customers.

Anatomy of a Digital Lie

The scheme was deceptively simple. Amazon allows sellers to group similar products into “variations.” Think of a t-shirt that comes in different sizes and colors. It’s a useful feature. It lets you see all options on one page, and all the reviews for all the colors and sizes are pooled together.

The Bountiful Company twisted this feature into a weapon. They didn’t group similar products. They variated a brand-new, poorly-reviewed gummy supplement with a completely different, best-selling tablet. Suddenly, the new product, which internal emails admitted “people d[id] not love,” appeared to have thousands of glowing reviews and a 4.5-star rating overnight. Sales, unsurprisingly, “spiked.”

Legal Receipts: The Confession in Their Inbox

This isn’t speculation. The evidence comes from the company’s own leadership. The FTC complaint reveals emails from Bountiful’s “Ecommerce Customer Development Director” that lay the strategy bare.

In an August 2020 email, the Director explained that when Amazon’s own new-product promotion programs were down during Covid, Bountiful “got creative.” They “created variations with some of our [new products] to try and ramp them faster as they were NOT selling and we wanted to give them a little boost in R[atings]&R[eviews] to gain visibility and allow them to also borrow the ‘amazon choice’ badge and best seller badge which worked.”

It was a deliberate, calculated plan to deceive. Another email from November 2020 confirms this was not a one-off trick, but a core business strategy.

The Director explained that her strategy of variating new products with “top sellers” allowed the new products “to essentially ‘borrow’ the best-selling flags, ratings, and reviews, and first page placement” and that she was “using this strategy with all of our launches.”

Societal Impact: A Contaminated Information Ecosystem

Public Health at Risk

When you can’t trust the rating on a bottle of vitamins, the entire system is broken. This practice poisons the well of public information, making it impossible for people to make informed decisions about their health. Consumers are led to buy products they believe are popular and effective, when in reality the opposite may be true.

Economic Deception

This is a direct transfer of wealth from your pocket to their shareholders, engineered by a lie. By creating a false impression of popularity, The Bountiful Company induced sales that would not have otherwise happened. Every dollar spent on a product with hijacked reviews is a dollar taken under false pretenses.

The Lie, Visualized

The numbers from the FTC complaint are staggering. For one product, Nature’s Bounty Immune 24 Hour+, the difference between the manufactured reality and the truth is a chasm. In August 2021, while it was hijacking reviews from another Vitamin C product, it sported over 40,000 ratings. After the link was severed, the truth came out.

40k 30k 20k 10k 0 40,165 Hijacked Ratings 2,751 Actual Ratings

The Deception Multiplier

1,360%
The Inflation of Trust

The company made its product’s social proof appear over 13 times larger than it actually was.

What Now? The Path Forward

A slap-on-the-wrist fine from a federal agency won’t fix the underlying rot. The incentive to deceive is baked into the system. Real change requires vigilance from all of us.

The Resistance

Corporate accountability is a myth until we force it to be a reality. Question everything. Distrust “Best Seller” badges. Support independent journalists who dig into the records, not just press releases. Build networks of trust with people in your community through mutual aid and local organizing. The only reviews you can truly trust are from the people you know, not the ones a corporation can buy or borrow.

The source document for this investigation is attached below.

Explore by category

01

Antitrust

Monopolies and anti-competition tactics used to crush rivals.

View Cases →
02

Product Safety Violations

When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.

View Cases →
03

Environmental Violations

Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.

View Cases →
04

Labor Exploitation

Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.

View Cases →
05

Data Breaches & Privacy

Misuse and mishandling of personal information.

View Cases →
06

Financial Fraud & Corruption

Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.

View Cases →
07

Intellectual Property

IP theft that punishes originality and rewards copying.

View Cases →
08

Misleading Marketing

False claims that waste money and bury critical safety info.

View Cases →
Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 1881