Litman Excavating’s pollution shows how profit-maximization undermines public health and ecological stability

EPA Orders Excavation Company to Restore Stream After Illegal Dumping
Corporate Misconduct Accountability Project

EPA Orders Excavation Company to Restore Stream After Illegal Dumping

Litman Excavating illegally dumped 500-foot culverts and fill into West Virginia waterway, destroying 600 feet of stream habitat and contaminating water for downstream communities.

HIGH SEVERITY
TL;DR

Litman Excavating illegally placed two massive 10-foot diameter, 500-foot long culverts directly on top of Coon Run, a West Virginia stream flowing into the Ohio River, blocking water flow and dumping unauthorized fill material across 600 linear feet. The company lacked permits for this destruction and violated the Clean Water Act. EPA inspections found degraded aquatic life, compromised culvert integrity, severe sediment buildup, and altered stream flow that threatens downstream communities with flooding and contaminated water.

This case shows how corporations cut costs by illegally destroying waterways when they think no one is watching.

600 feet
Stream length illegally filled and destroyed
500 feet
Length of each unauthorized culvert placed in stream
10 feet
Diameter of culverts dumped on streambed
$66,712
Maximum daily fine per violation under Clean Water Act
5 years
Required monitoring period after restoration

The Allegations: A Breakdown

⚠️
Core Allegations
What Litman Excavating Did · 8 points
01 Litman Excavating placed two 10-foot diameter, 500-foot long culverts directly on top of Coon Run without authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The company surrounded the culverts with boulders and fill material, obstructing natural water flow underneath and forcing minimal flow inside the compromised culverts. high
02 The company dumped unauthorized dredged and fill material into 600 linear feet of Coon Run starting in August 2022 through January 2023. This activity violated Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act because Litman never obtained the required Section 404 permit for discharging fill into waters of the United States. high
03 Litman placed bridge footings below the Ordinary High Water Mark of Coon Run in direct violation of its Corps Permit, which specifically prohibited any fill placement below that mark. The permit authorized only wetland impacts, not stream destruction. high
04 The company caused approximately 100 additional linear feet of secondary stream damage through altered flow patterns and impairment caused by the unauthorized culvert placement. This extended the total environmental destruction to 600 feet of impacted waterway. high
05 EPA inspectors discovered gravel bar deposits in the streambed, scour pools at culvert outfalls, downstream sediment deposition, channel narrowing, and bank erosion. The inspectors observed that some water flowed underneath the culverts with minimal flow inside them, indicating severe flow obstruction. high
06 The culverts appeared structurally compromised, misshapen, and buckling when EPA inspected the site in October 2023. This physical deterioration creates immediate flood and collapse risks for downstream residents and infrastructure. high
07 Sediment accumulation filled the natural streambed with fine sediment measured at 12 to 14 inches deep before reaching the original stream bottom. This sediment burial smothers aquatic habitats and degrades water quality throughout the affected reach. high
08 Litman used the site to dispose of excess earth and waste material from a West Virginia Route 2 road widening project. The company treated the waterway as a convenient dumping ground rather than properly managing construction waste according to permit requirements. high
🔍
Regulatory Failures
How Oversight Broke Down · 6 points
01 Litman operated for at least five months illegally filling Coon Run before the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sent a Cease and Desist Letter in March 2023. This delay allowed extensive environmental destruction to occur before regulators intervened. high
02 The EPA did not conduct its site inspection until October 2023, more than a year after the illegal dumping began in August 2022. By that time, 600 feet of stream had been destroyed, aquatic life degraded, and culverts structurally compromised. high
03 Litman held permits for construction stormwater discharge and limited wetland impacts, creating a paper trail that may have provided cover for unauthorized activities. The company exceeded permit scope without triggering immediate regulatory response. medium
04 No permit authorized any discharge of dredged or fill material into Coon Run itself. Despite this clear prohibition, the company proceeded with massive fill placement, suggesting either regulatory confusion or deliberate violation. high
05 The Corps Permit specifically stated that the Coon Run Bridge would not result in fill placement below the Ordinary High Water Mark. Litman violated this explicit condition by placing bridge footings below that mark, yet continued operations for months. high
06 The site is located on property owned by CNX PCPC LLC, but Litman operated as the contractor. This separation between property owner and operator may create enforcement complications and diffuse accountability. medium
💰
Profit Over Environmental Protection
Cost-Cutting at Nature’s Expense · 5 points
01 Litman chose to dump 500-foot culverts directly onto the streambed rather than properly installing them according to engineering standards. This shortcut avoided the time and expense of proper installation but destroyed the natural waterway. high
02 The company used Coon Run as a disposal site for excess earth and waste from a road construction project. This eliminated costs for proper waste management and disposal at authorized facilities. high
03 Proper compliance would have required detailed engineering studies, additional permits, impact assessments, and careful construction methods to protect the stream. Litman bypassed all these requirements to reduce project costs and timeline. high
04 The company began work at the site on April 8, 2021, and received its Corps Permit on April 1, 2021. The quick timeline between permit and construction start suggests pressure to move fast, potentially contributing to permit violations. medium
05 Litman provides excavating services in West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, operating across state lines. This multi-state operation means violations in one location could reflect systematic cost-cutting practices across the company’s entire service area. medium
🏥
Environmental and Public Health Damage
Ecological Destruction and Community Risk · 8 points
01 EPA bioassessment sampling found that macroinvertebrates were degraded at both the site adjacent to the culverts and downstream compared to upstream control samples. These insects form the foundation of aquatic food webs, and their decline indicates systematic ecosystem damage. high
02 The Bioassessment Report concluded that the culverts are fragmenting the habitat of species in Coon Run and causing large taxonomic disparities despite close geographic proximity of sampling sites. This fragmentation can lead to local species extinctions. high
03 Sediment accumulation filled the streambed 12 to 14 inches deep with fine sediment. This sediment smothers bottom-dwelling organisms, reduces oxygen levels, and degrades water quality for all downstream users. high
04 The compromised, buckling culverts create immediate structural failure risks. If these 500-foot culverts collapse, they could cause sudden flooding, debris flows, and infrastructure damage to downstream communities. high
05 Downstream deposition and bar formation narrowed the natural stream channel while causing erosion along the opposite bank. This alteration increases flood risk and creates unstable banks that can collapse during storm events. high
06 Coon Run flows into the Ohio River, a Traditional Navigable Water used for commerce, recreation, and drinking water supplies. Contamination and sediment from the site can affect water quality far beyond the immediate impact zone. high
07 Scour pools formed at each culvert outfall where obstructed water forces its way through. These erosion features indicate powerful flow disruption that will worsen over time, potentially causing catastrophic culvert failure. medium
08 The site is located near the intersection of State Route 2 and Burch Ridge Road in Moundsville, Marshall County. Local residents depend on this waterway for recreation, fishing, and as part of their natural environment and community identity. medium
🏘️
Community Impact
How Local Residents Pay the Price · 6 points
01 The site sits in Moundsville, Marshall County, West Virginia, a rural community where residents depend on local streams for fishing, recreation, and quality of life. The destruction of 600 feet of Coon Run eliminates these community resources. high
02 Downstream residents face increased flooding risk from the obstructed flow, narrowed channel, and potential culvert collapse. These residents had no say in Litman’s decision to use their waterway as a dumping ground. high
03 Property values near the contaminated stream likely declined due to visible environmental damage, flood risk, and the stigma of living near a Superfund-style cleanup site. Local homeowners absorb these financial losses while the company profited. medium
04 The site’s property owner is CNX PCPC LLC, not Litman, but local residents still suffer the consequences. This separation between ownership and operation can leave communities without clear accountability or recourse. medium
05 Local wildlife that depended on Coon Run for habitat lost 600 feet of functional stream ecosystem. Birds, amphibians, mammals, and fish that used this corridor now face fragmented habitat and degraded water quality. medium
06 Community members who fished, waded, or recreated in Coon Run lost access to 600 feet of stream for years during cleanup and the required five-year monitoring period. These intangible losses damage community cohesion and quality of life. medium
⚖️
Corporate Accountability Failures
Weak Enforcement Enables Violations · 8 points
01 The EPA Administrative Order on Consent allows Litman to restore the stream and avoid trial. This settlement approach means the company faces no criminal charges, potential imprisonment, or the full civil penalties of $66,712 per day per violation that could have accumulated to millions. high
02 Litman must submit a Restoration and Mitigation Plan by July 19, 2024, and complete all construction activities including plantings by April 12, 2025. These deadlines are more than two years after the company received the Cease and Desist Letter, allowing prolonged environmental damage. high
03 The order requires five years of monitoring after restoration completion, but this timeline means the stream will remain impaired for potentially seven years or more from the initial violation. The community waits while the company operates on its own schedule. high
04 Litman retains the right to enter the site throughout the restoration and monitoring period. The company that caused the damage maintains control over the cleanup process with EPA oversight but no community enforcement mechanism. medium
05 The order states that compliance with its terms shall not relieve Litman of any obligation under other laws and that EPA reserves the right to seek additional remedies. However, these reservations are rarely exercised, making the consent order effectively the final resolution. medium
06 Litman waives all rights to judicial or administrative review of the order’s factual and legal findings. This waiver prevents public scrutiny of the settlement’s adequacy and eliminates any appellate process that might strengthen environmental protections. medium
07 The order requires Litman to pay for restoration using the West Virginia Stream and Wetland Valuation Metric to calculate mitigation, but no monetary penalty is specified in the public document. The company may restore the damage it caused without additional financial punishment. high
08 The EPA filed this order on May 8, 2024, nearly 15 months after the Army Corps sent its Cease and Desist Letter. This delay in formal enforcement gave the company more than a year of continued site control before facing binding restoration requirements. medium
📋
The Bottom Line
What This Case Reveals · 5 points
01 Litman Excavating violated the Clean Water Act by discharging dredged and fill material into waters of the United States without authorization. The company placed two 500-foot culverts, bridge footings, boulders, and fill into 600 feet of Coon Run between August 2022 and January 2023. high
02 EPA inspections documented severe environmental damage including degraded aquatic life, compromised culvert integrity, extensive sedimentation, altered stream flow, and habitat fragmentation. The Bioassessment Report confirmed that macroinvertebrates suffered population declines due to the unauthorized fill. high
03 The case demonstrates how corporations can operate for months in violation of environmental law before regulators intervene. Five months passed between the start of illegal filling and the Cease and Desist Letter, and over a year passed before EPA issued its formal order. high
04 Rural communities bear the burden of corporate environmental violations through degraded natural resources, increased flooding risk, property value decline, and loss of recreational access. Meanwhile, the company that profited from cutting corners faces only restoration requirements and potential fines. high
05 The consent order approach allows Litman to restore the stream on an extended timeline without criminal prosecution or maximum civil penalties. This settlement pattern creates weak deterrence against future violations by this company or others in the excavation industry. high

Timeline of Events

April 1, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issues Individual Permit LRP-2020-00452 for wetland impacts only, explicitly prohibiting fill below Ordinary High Water Mark of Coon Run
April 8, 2021
Litman Excavating begins work at the site, creating stockpiles of excess earth and waste material from Route 2 road widening project
August 2022
Litman begins illegally discharging fill material into Coon Run, placing two 10-foot diameter, 500-foot long culverts directly on streambed without authorization
January 2023
Illegal discharge of fill material into Coon Run continues through this month, impacting approximately 600 linear feet of stream
March 24, 2023
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sends Cease and Desist Letter ordering Litman to stop all work at the site
October 25, 2023
EPA conducts site inspection, documenting compromised culverts, flow obstruction, sediment accumulation, degraded macroinvertebrates, and extensive stream damage
December 19, 2023
EPA provides Inspection Report and Bioassessment Report to Litman, documenting degraded aquatic life and habitat fragmentation caused by unauthorized culverts
May 8, 2024
EPA issues Administrative Order on Consent requiring stream restoration, finding Litman violated Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act
July 19, 2024
Deadline for Litman to submit detailed Restoration and Mitigation Plan to EPA for approval
April 12, 2025
Required completion date for all restoration construction activities including plantings, subject to permit approvals

Direct Quotes from the Legal Record

QUOTE 1 Unauthorized Culvert Placement allegations
“500 linear feet of Coon Run impacted when Respondent directly placed two unauthorized 10-foot diameter, 500-foot long culverts on top of Coon Run and placed boulders surrounding the culverts”

💡 This proves the company dumped massive culverts directly onto the stream rather than properly installing them, destroying 500 feet of waterway.

QUOTE 2 No Permit for Stream Filling allegations
“No permit, including the Corps Permit, authorized any discharge of dredge and/or fill material into Coon Run.”

💡 This establishes that Litman had zero legal authority to dump anything into the stream, making every action a clear violation.

QUOTE 3 Compromised Culvert Integrity health
“The integrity of the culverts appeared to be compromised; the culverts appeared misshapen and to be buckling”

💡 The improper installation created immediate collapse and flooding risks for downstream communities.

QUOTE 4 Degraded Aquatic Life health
“Sampling results showing that macroinvertebrates were degraded at both the impacted site adjacent to the culvert and downstream of the culvert when compared to the upstream control site”

💡 Scientific testing confirmed that the illegal dumping destroyed the biological health of the stream ecosystem.

QUOTE 5 Habitat Fragmentation health
“The presence of the culvert is causing large taxonomic disparities despite the close longitudinal proximities of the sampling reaches, and that the culverts are fragmenting the habitat of the species present in Coon Run.”

💡 The culverts act as barriers that prevent species movement and fragment the ecosystem, potentially causing local extinctions.

QUOTE 6 Massive Sediment Burial health
“Sediment accumulation filling the natural stream bed with fine sediment observed approximately 12 to 14 inches below the surface until reaching the natural stream bed.”

💡 Over a foot of sediment now buries the natural streambed, smothering habitats and degrading water quality throughout the reach.

QUOTE 7 Flow Obstruction allegations
“The two 10-foot diameter, 500-foot long culverts were sitting on top of the streambed with flow obstructed underneath the culverts and scour pools at the outfalls of each culvert; Some water flowed underneath with minimal flow inside the culverts”

💡 The culverts block natural stream flow, forcing water into erosive patterns that worsen damage over time.

QUOTE 8 Channel Narrowing and Erosion health
“Downstream deposition and bar formation on the left bank of Coon Run that appeared to have narrowed the natural stream channel and erosion along the right bank”

💡 The illegal fill changed the stream’s natural shape, creating unstable banks and increasing flood risk for downstream areas.

QUOTE 9 Bridge Footing Violation allegations
“The Corps Permit specified that a bridge spanning Coon Run would not result in placement of fill below the Ordinary High Water Mark of the stream… Bridge footing for the Coon Run Bridge placed below the Ordinary High Water Mark of Coon Run.”

💡 Litman violated the explicit terms of its permit by placing footings exactly where the permit prohibited.

QUOTE 10 Clean Water Act Violation accountability
“Respondent, by discharging dredged and/or fill material to the waters of the United States without authorization, has violated Section 301(a) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1311(a).”

💡 EPA formally found that Litman broke federal environmental law by dumping fill into protected waters.

QUOTE 11 Total Stream Impact allegations
“Respondent has impacted approximately 600 linear feet of Coon Run”

💡 The scope of destruction extended across 600 feet of stream, not just the immediate culvert area.

QUOTE 12 Regulatory Delay regulatory
“Since on or about August 20, 2022 through January 2023, Respondent, or persons acting on behalf of Respondent, operated equipment which discharged or caused the discharge of dredged and/or fill material to waters of the United States at the Site, without authorization from the Corps.”

💡 The company illegally dumped for five months before receiving a cease and desist order, showing how weak enforcement allows prolonged violations.

QUOTE 13 Maximum Penalties Available accountability
“Violation of the terms of this Order may result in further EPA enforcement action including, but not limited to, imposition of administrative penalties, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 1319(g) as modified by the Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1996 and the subsequent Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule, 40 C.F.R. Part 19, and/or initiation of judicial proceedings that allow for civil penalties of up to $66,712 per day for each day of violation that occurs”

💡 The company faces potential fines of over $66,000 per day per violation, which could have totaled millions for months of illegal dumping, but the consent order likely avoids these maximum penalties.

QUOTE 14 Waters of the United States allegations
“The Site contains Coon Run, a relatively permanent tributary connected to the Ohio River, a Traditional Navigable Water. Coon Run constitutes waters of the United States within the meaning of Section 502(7) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1362(7).”

💡 The stream is federally protected because it flows into the Ohio River, making this a clear federal jurisdiction case.

QUOTE 15 Five-Year Monitoring Requirement accountability
“Include a post-restoration monitoring plan for five (5) years following the completion of the restoration and mitigation on-Site.”

💡 Even after cleanup, the company must monitor the site for five years, acknowledging that ecological recovery takes extended time and remains uncertain.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly did Litman Excavating do wrong?
Litman illegally dumped two massive culverts, each 10 feet in diameter and 500 feet long, directly onto Coon Run stream in West Virginia. The company also dumped boulders, dirt, and other fill material into 600 feet of the waterway. None of this dumping was authorized by the company’s permits. The culverts blocked natural water flow, caused severe erosion, buried the streambed in sediment, and destroyed aquatic life.
Did Litman have any permits at all?
Yes, Litman had permits for construction stormwater discharge and for impacting certain wetlands on the property. However, no permit authorized the company to dump fill material into Coon Run itself. The Army Corps permit specifically said the bridge over Coon Run should not place any fill below the ordinary high water mark, but Litman violated this by placing bridge footings in the stream and dumping the giant culverts directly on the streambed.
How badly was the stream damaged?
EPA inspections found devastating damage across 600 feet of stream. The culverts were buckling and structurally compromised. Water flow was severely obstructed, with only minimal flow inside the culverts and some underneath. Sediment filled the streambed 12 to 14 inches deep, burying natural habitats. Scientific testing showed aquatic insects were degraded both at the site and downstream. The stream channel narrowed, banks eroded, and the ecosystem was fragmented, preventing species movement.
When did this illegal dumping happen?
Litman began work at the site in April 2021 but didn’t start the illegal dumping until around August 2022. The company continued illegally discharging fill material through January 2023, a five-month period. The Army Corps sent a cease and desist letter in March 2023, but EPA didn’t inspect until October 2023 and didn’t issue its formal order until May 2024, nearly two years after the violations began.
What happens to Litman Excavating now?
The EPA Administrative Order requires Litman to submit a detailed restoration plan, remove all the unauthorized fill including the culverts and boulders, restore Coon Run to its natural condition, stabilize the site against erosion, and monitor the restoration for five years. The company must complete restoration by April 2025. Litman faces potential fines up to $66,712 per day per violation if it fails to comply, though the consent order format typically means the company avoids maximum penalties by agreeing to cleanup.
Why did it take so long for EPA to act?
The illegal dumping started in August 2022, but the Army Corps didn’t send a cease and desist letter until March 2023, seven months later. EPA didn’t conduct its inspection until October 2023, over a year after violations began. The formal administrative order wasn’t issued until May 2024. This timeline shows how understaffed and underfunded environmental agencies often are, allowing companies to operate illegally for extended periods before facing consequences.
Could Litman face criminal charges?
The Clean Water Act allows for criminal penalties including imprisonment and fines up to $25,000 per day for knowing violations. However, EPA chose to issue an Administrative Order on Consent, which is a civil settlement that requires cleanup but typically avoids criminal prosecution. The order specifically states that EPA reserves the right to pursue other remedies, but in practice, consent orders usually represent the final resolution.
Who owns the property where this happened?
The property is owned by CNX PCPC LLC, but Litman Excavating operated as the contractor on the site. Litman was using the location to dispose of excess dirt and waste from a West Virginia Route 2 road widening project. This separation between property ownership and contractor operations can complicate enforcement, though the EPA order targets Litman as the operator responsible for the violations.
How does this affect downstream communities?
Downstream residents face multiple threats. The compromised, buckling culverts could collapse and cause sudden flooding. Sediment washing downstream degrades water quality for miles. The altered stream flow increases erosion and flood risk. Local fishing, recreation, and wildlife are destroyed. Property values near the contaminated stream likely declined. Coon Run flows into the Ohio River, so contamination can affect a much larger area. Meanwhile, local people had no say in Litman’s decision to use their waterway as a dump.
What can citizens do about cases like this?
Citizens can report suspected environmental violations to EPA and state environmental agencies. Local residents can document changes to waterways with photos and notes. Community groups can request inspections and public records about permits and enforcement. People can attend public comment periods for permits and restoration plans. Citizens can also file civil lawsuits under the Clean Water Act’s citizen suit provision if government enforcement is inadequate. Staying informed and vocal about local environmental issues puts pressure on both companies and regulators.
Post ID: 3218  ·  Slug: litman-excavating-clean-water-act-violations-epa-neoliberalism-cwa  ·  Original: 2025-04-06  ·  Rebuilt: 2026-03-20

You can read more about this act of corporate pollution on the EPA’s website: https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/rhc/EPAAdmin.nsf/Filings/427CCD0A807E65A585258B18005D6F83/$File/Litman%20Excavating%20Inc_CWA%20AOC_May%208%202024.pdf

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm the creator this website. I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher studying corporatocracy and its detrimental effects on every single aspect of society.

For more information, please see my About page.

All posts published by this profile were either personally written by me, or I actively edited / reviewed them before publishing. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Articles: 1682