πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ trans rights are human rights πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ
Theme

Hyponex Fined $100K After Releasing Toxic Waste Into Ohio Waterway | Scotts

Environmental Misconduct • Clean Water Act Violation • Ohio

Scotts Dumped Sewage Into an Ohio Waterway for Nearly Three Years. The Fine Was $100,000.

TL;DR

  • Hyponex Corporation, a subsidiary of Scotts, repeatedly pumped illegal levels of sewage-linked pollutants into Kiser Ditch, a tributary feeding the Lower Muddy Fork Mohican River in Shreve, Ohio. The violations ran from March 31, 2018 through December 31, 2020, nearly three uninterrupted years.
  • The pollutants documented in the official permit violation log include E. coli, ammonia-nitrogen, total suspended solids (TSS), chlorine, and biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD). These are the same markers regulators measure when sewage contaminates a waterway.
  • Some of the recorded exceedances were catastrophic. In June 2019, ammonia-nitrogen discharged at 1,927% over the permitted monthly average loading limit. In September 2019, E. coli measured at 1,821% over the permitted monthly geometric mean.
  • On top of the discharge violations, Hyponex failed to conduct required quarterly benchmark monitoring for nitrate-nitrite, lead, zinc, and phosphorous from 2017 through 2020, meaning the full scope of contamination may never be known.
  • The company waived its right to contest the allegations and settled for a $100,000 fine, a figure the EPA itself acknowledged is well below the statutory ceiling of $333,552 for these violations. The penalty is explicitly non-deductible for federal tax purposes.
  • The respondent’s contact email in the settlement documents routes directly to christina.grasseschi@scotts.com, confirming Scotts Miracle-Gro’s corporate umbrella over the Hyponex facility.
The ammonia reading that hit 1,927% over the legal limit is broken down pollutant by pollutant in the Legal Receipts section, with the raw EPA violation table translated into plain language.

The Non-Financial Ledger: What a Number Cannot Capture

Kiser Ditch is a small waterway. It feeds into the Lower Muddy Fork Mohican River, which feeds into the Mohican River system of north-central Ohio. This is farm country, small-town Ohio, the kind of place where kids fish with their parents on summer weekends and people have a relationship with the water that is older than any corporation.

For close to three years, the Hyponex facility’s discharge pipes put illegal amounts of human sewage markers, rotting organic matter indicators, and chemical disinfectants directly into that water. Not once, not as a one-time accident, but in documented violation after documented violation across multiple monitoring periods per year, year after year.

E. coli in a waterway tells you one specific thing: fecal matter got in. It is the biological signature of waste from humans or warm-blooded animals. When the measured level hits 2,420 MPN per 100 milliliters, as it did at Hyponex’s Outfall 602 in both September 2019 and June 2020, and the permitted monthly average ceiling is 126 MPN per 100 milliliters, the water is not a little contaminated. It is almost twenty times over the line that regulators drew to protect human health.

Ammonia-nitrogen at the levels discharged in May and June 2019 is not a nuisance. Ammonia strips oxygen from water. It kills fish. At the concentrations Hyponex was releasing, 26.4 mg/L against a permitted limit of 2 mg/L, you are looking at conditions that can produce dead zones downstream. The June 2019 monthly average loading of ammonia reached 1,927% over its legal ceiling. That is not a paperwork error. That is a waterway being used as a waste disposal system.

Nobody is quoted in the EPA settlement documents as having lost anything. There is no victim impact statement. The structure of a Consent Agreement and Final Order does not require one. The company neither admits nor denies the factual allegations. A number goes into a federal account in New York. The case is closed.

But someone lived downstream of that ditch during those three years. Farmers draw irrigation water from regional tributaries. Kids swim in rivers fed by those tributaries. Anglers eat what they catch. The monitoring data shows the contamination was worst in the warmer months of 2019 and 2020, the months when people are most likely to be in or near the water. That is not a coincidence. It is the shape of what was done to this community while the company was skipping its required benchmark monitoring tests for lead, zinc, and phosphorous, the tests that might have shown exactly how much more damage was being caused beyond the already-illegal levels that were actually measured.

One hundred thousand dollars is what Scotts Miracle-Gro’s subsidiary paid for nearly three years of documented contamination of a public waterway. Scotts reported net sales of $4.13 billion in fiscal year 2021. The fine represents approximately 0.0024% of that revenue. It does not clean the ditch. It does not restore the river. It does not compensate a single person who fished it, drank from a well near it, or let their child wade in it.

Timeline: From First Violation to Settlement Jan 31, 2017 NPDES Permit OH0107077 Issued Mar 31, 2018 First Documented Discharge Violation ~14 months May–Sep 2019 Peak Contamination Ammonia +1,927% E. coli +1,821% ~14 months Dec 31, 2020 Last Recorded Violation in Log ~21 months Apr 29, 2024 CAFO Signed $100K Fine ~3.3 yrs later Total Violation Period: ~2 years, 9 months (Mar 2018 – Dec 2020)

Legal Receipts: What the EPA Documents Actually Say

These are direct quotes from the EPA’s Consent Agreement and Final Order (Docket No. CWA-05-2024-0013). The language is bureaucratic but the facts are plain.

“From March 31, 2018, through December 31, 2020, Respondent discharged effluent from Outfalls 002 and 602 in excess of permitted limits. Those discharges are listed in Attachment A.” (Paragraph 24)
  • This is the foundational admission of the entire case. The company’s own certified Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs), filed as required by their permit with Ohio EPA, documented these violations. The company’s own paperwork proved the contamination.
  • The phrase “in excess of permitted limits” understates what Attachment A contains. Several readings were hundreds or thousands of percent over legal ceilings, confirmed by the raw violation table reproduced in this article.
“Respondent failed to perform quarterly benchmark monitoring as required by the Permit from 2017 through 2020.” (Paragraph 34)
  • This second violation count covers an entirely separate failure: the company did not conduct mandatory quarterly tests for nitrate-nitrite, lead, zinc, and phosphorous at Outfalls 002 and 003. This monitoring gap spans the full four-year period from the moment the permit was issued.
  • Because this monitoring was never done, there is no data on how much lead, zinc, nitrates, or phosphorous entered Kiser Ditch during the same years the E. coli and ammonia readings were spiking. The full contamination footprint is unknown and will remain unknown.
“Respondent waives any right to contest the allegations and its right to appeal the proposed final order accompanying the consent agreement.” (Paragraph 8)
  • Hyponex gave up the right to fight back or appeal. While this is standard in CAFO settlements, it means no court ever examined the facts, no judge weighed the severity of the violations, and no public hearing was required. The deal was struck administratively.
  • The company “neither admits nor denies the factual allegations” (Paragraph 7) while simultaneously waiving the right to contest them. The practical result is that liability was paid off without any official finding of fault on the public record.
“Based upon the facts alleged in this CAFO, and upon the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violations alleged, as well as Respondent’s ability to pay, prior history of such violations, degree of culpability, economic benefit or savings (if any) resulting from the violations, and such other matters as justice may require, U.S. EPA has determined that an appropriate civil penalty to settle this action is $100,000.” (Paragraph 37)
  • The law allows for a maximum penalty of up to $26,685 per day of violation, capped at $333,552 for this class of case (Paragraph 36). The EPA chose $100,000. No explanation is provided for why the agency settled at roughly 30% of the statutory ceiling despite violations that spanned nearly three years and included contamination readings at multiples of 10 to 20 times the legal limit.
  • The document explicitly notes the EPA considered the company’s “ability to pay.” Hyponex is owned by Scotts Miracle-Gro, a company with billions in annual revenue. The ability-to-pay consideration typically reduces penalties for small or struggling operations, not for subsidiaries of Fortune 500-adjacent corporations.
“The parties consent to service of this CAFO by email at the following valid email addresses: frasco.lisa@epa.gov (for Complainant) and christina.grasseschi@scotts.com (for Respondent).” (Paragraph 44)
  • The Respondent’s email domain is @scotts.com. This is the Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, which markets itself as a trusted home and garden brand. Its subsidiary was operating an industrial facility that contaminated an Ohio waterway for years.
“Each day the pollutant remains in the navigable waters and/or each day the pollutant is discharged to the navigable waters constitutes a continuing violation of the CWA.”
EPA CAFO, Paragraph 31 — Docket No. CWA-05-2024-0013
Worst Recorded Exceedances by Pollutant (% Over Legal Limit) 0% 500% 1,000% 1,500% 2,000% 1,821% E. coli Sep 2019 1,927% Ammonia Jun 2019 503% Suspended Solids (TSS) 230% CBOD Jul 2020 742% Chlorine May 2019 Legal Limit % Over Legal Limit

Societal Impact Mapping: Who Pays When Corporations Pollute

Environmental Degradation

The documented contamination of Kiser Ditch produced specific, measurable ecological harms to Ohio’s connected waterway system.

  • Ammonia-nitrogen at the concentrations discharged by Hyponex, peaking at 27.3 mg/L against a legal ceiling of 2-3 mg/L, is directly lethal to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Ammonia toxicity increases with water temperature, meaning summer discharges are the most destructive; the peak violations occurred in May, June, July, and September.
  • E. coli readings as high as 2,420 MPN per 100 mL, recorded in both September 2019 and June 2020, indicate fecal contamination at levels that would trigger swimming bans and fishing advisories if detected in recreational monitoring. The Kiser Ditch feeds the Lower Muddy Fork Mohican River, extending the contamination zone downstream.
  • Elevated total suspended solids (TSS) cloud water and smother riverbeds. Sediment layers deposited over multiple years of TSS exceedances bury aquatic insect habitat and fish spawning grounds, causing harm that persists long after the discharges stop.
  • High CBOD (Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand) is a measure of how much organic waste is rotting in the water and consuming dissolved oxygen. At the July 2020 peak reading of 33 mg/L against a limit of 10 mg/L, the oxygen demand created conditions hostile to fish and other aerobic aquatic life in warm summer water.
  • The four years of skipped benchmark monitoring for lead, zinc, nitrate-nitrite, and phosphorous means there is no regulatory record of those contaminants’ levels in the waterway from 2017 through 2020. The true ecological damage cannot be fully assessed.

Public Health

E. coli and ammonia in surface water carry direct health risks to any human who comes into contact with the contaminated waterway or consumes downstream resources.

  • E. coli contamination at documented levels poses a risk of gastrointestinal illness, urinary tract infections, and in vulnerable populations, kidney failure (hemolytic uremic syndrome), to anyone who swims in or ingests water from the affected waterway or its downstream connections.
  • Chlorine discharged at 742% over the daily maximum limit in May 2019 is acutely toxic to aquatic life and can form harmful disinfection byproducts (chloramines, trihalomethanes) when it reacts with organic matter in natural water. These byproducts are linked to long-term cancer risk with repeated exposure.
  • The benchmark monitoring failures for lead and zinc from 2017 to 2020 created a regulatory blind spot during the same period the facility was known to be violating discharge limits for other parameters. If lead or zinc was also being discharged at illegal levels during those years, no test exists to prove or disprove it. Communities near industrial facilities that skip safety monitoring carry the residual risk of undetected contamination.
  • Agricultural communities in Wayne County, Ohio, where Shreve is located, rely on regional waterways for irrigation. Crops irrigated with water carrying fecal contamination above safe thresholds can transmit pathogens to produce, creating a food safety risk that operates entirely outside the narrow frame of this enforcement action.

Economic Inequality

The structure of this settlement reflects a system where the financial cost of polluting a rural waterway is set far below what it would cost to simply prevent the pollution in the first place.

  • Scotts Miracle-Gro, the corporate umbrella over Hyponex, reported net sales exceeding $4 billion in fiscal year 2021. The $100,000 fine represents a rounding error in any budget line tied to a $4 billion operation. There is no financial deterrent embedded in this penalty.
  • The law permitted a maximum fine of $333,552 for this class of violation. The EPA settled at roughly 30 cents on every dollar of available enforcement power. The legal framework already sets penalty ceilings far below the economic benefit of non-compliance for large industrial operators; the actual settlement went even lower than the already-insufficient ceiling.
  • Small-scale farmers, rural homeowners, and low-income communities near contaminated waterways bear costs that never enter the financial calculus of a corporate settlement: degraded property values, costs of well testing, medical expenses from waterborne illness, and lost recreational and subsistence fishing. None of these costs were addressed or compensated in this CAFO.
  • The penalty is explicitly stated to be non-deductible for federal tax purposes (Paragraph 40), but that provision itself signals that the parties understood the payment would be structured and tracked as a business expense. No community remediation fund, no cleanup requirement, and no third-party monitoring obligation appears anywhere in the settlement terms.
What Scotts Sells vs. What Its Facility Discharged WHAT SCOTTS SELLS WHAT THE EPA FOUND Scotts/Hyponex: a trusted name in plant nutrition and soil products Its Shreve, OH facility pumped E. coli into a public waterway NPDES permit issued Jan 2017; company legally required to comply Violations began within 14 months of permit issuance; continued ~3 yrs Permit requires quarterly monitoring for lead, zinc, nitrates, phosphorous Zero tests conducted for these pollutants from 2017 through 2020 Ammonia-nitrogen monthly avg limit: 2 mg/L Actual discharge, June 2019: 27.3 mg/L (+1,265% over limit) E. coli monthly geometric mean limit: 126 MPN/100mL Actual discharge, Sep 2019: 2,420 MPN/100mL (+1,821%) Legal penalty ceiling for this violation class: up to $333,552 Actual fine assessed: $100,000 (~30% of maximum) Source: EPA CAFO Docket No. CWA-05-2024-0013 and Attachment A

The “Cost of a Life” Metric

$100,000

The total penalty Scotts’ subsidiary paid for nearly three years of documented toxic discharges into an Ohio waterway.

Broken down across the 1,006-day violation window (March 31, 2018 to December 31, 2020), this amounts to approximately $99 per day of contamination. The median American household spends more than that per month on groceries.

The law permitted the EPA to fine up to $26,685 per day. The agency collected less than 0.4% of what it could have charged per day of violation.

Scotts Miracle-Gro FY2021 net sales: ~$4.13 billion. This fine: ~0.0024% of that revenue. Source: EPA CAFO CWA-05-2024-0013, Paragraphs 36-37.

Corporate Chain of Accountability: Who Signed, Who Paid, Who Owns What SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO. Corporate Parent | @scotts.com email domain owns/controls HYPONEX CORPORATION Respondent | Shreve, Ohio | Industrial Facility discharged pollutants into KISER DITCH Tributary β†’ Lower Muddy Fork Mohican River fined by U.S. EPA REGION 5 Complainant | Chicago, IL $100,000 penalty assessed Settlement signed by: VP, Supply Chain, Hyponex Corporation EPA signed by: Michael D. Harris, Division Director, Enforcement & Compliance Assurance, EPA Region 5

What Now? Who to Watch and What to Do

This settlement is final. The $100,000 went to the U.S. Treasury. Hyponex certified compliance with the Clean Water Act. No cleanup requirement exists in the order. What follows is what accountability looks like going forward.

Key Parties

  • Hyponex Corporation, Vice President of Supply Chain: The VP of Supply Chain signed the CAFO on behalf of Hyponex. Their identity is confirmed in the document but the name itself does not appear in the signed version reproduced in the source. The role is on record; the corporate structure sits under Scotts Miracle-Gro.
  • Michael D. Harris, Division Director, Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division, EPA Region 5: Signed the agreement on the EPA side on April 29, 2024. His division is responsible for overseeing ongoing compliance at this facility.
  • Ann L. Coyle, Regional Judicial Officer, EPA Region 5: Signed the Final Order on June 25, 2024, making the settlement legally effective.

The Watchlist: Regulatory Bodies with Ongoing Jurisdiction

  • U.S. EPA Region 5 (Chicago): Retains authority to pursue criminal sanctions and injunctive relief independent of this civil penalty (Paragraph 45). File complaints about ongoing violations at epa.gov/enforcement/report-environmental-violations.
  • Ohio EPA: Issues and enforces NPDES Permit OH0107077 at the state level. Ohio EPA’s Division of Surface Water monitors ongoing discharge monitoring reports submitted by Hyponex. Contact the Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water to request DMR records from 2021 onward.
  • U.S. Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division: Can pursue civil collection if Hyponex fails to pay, and retains authority for criminal referral. The settlement explicitly reserves criminal prosecution rights.
  • Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR): Regulates fisheries and wildlife in the Mohican River watershed. Documented fish kills or habitat damage in the Lower Muddy Fork Mohican River fall within ODNR’s reporting authority.
$99 per day. That is what nearly three years of pumping E. coli and industrial waste into an Ohio waterway cost this Scotts subsidiary after the EPA settled at less than a third of the legal maximum.

What You Can Do: Mutual Aid and Grassroots Action

  • Request the Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs). Hyponex is required to file certified DMRs with Ohio EPA. These are public records. File a public records request with Ohio EPA for all DMRs submitted by Hyponex Corporation under Permit OH0107077 from 2021 to present. If post-settlement readings show continued exceedances, that is a new violation.
  • Contact local watershed groups. The Mohican Soil and Water Conservation District and the Mohican Valley Trails organization are active in this watershed. Connect with them about ongoing water quality monitoring and community-based environmental advocacy in Wayne and Ashland Counties.
  • Use the ECHO database. EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance History Online (echo.epa.gov) tracks Hyponex’s compliance status. Any future violations will appear there. Bookmark the facility record and check it periodically.
  • Amplify the economics. Scotts Miracle-Gro products are sold at every major home improvement and garden retailer in the country. Consumer pressure and shareholder campaigns on environmental compliance have moved large companies. Bring this settlement to the attention of any investment platform that holds Scotts stock (NYSE: SMG) under ESG criteria.
  • Support Ohio environmental legal aid. Organizations like Earthjustice’s Midwest office and the Ohio Environmental Council legal program can petition for stronger enforcement, challenge inadequate penalties, and represent community members harmed by industrial pollution in regulatory proceedings.

The source document for this investigation is attached below.

You can read about this scandal on the EPA’s website: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-05/cwa-05-2024-0013_proposedcafo_hyponexcorporation_shreveohio.pdf

Explore by category

01

Antitrust

Monopolies and anti-competition tactics used to crush rivals.

View Cases →
02

Product Safety Violations

When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.

View Cases →
03

Environmental Violations

Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.

View Cases →
04

Labor Exploitation

Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.

View Cases →
05

Data Breaches & Privacy

Misuse and mishandling of personal information.

View Cases →
06

Financial Fraud & Corruption

Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.

View Cases →
07

Intellectual Property

IP theft that punishes originality and rewards copying.

View Cases →
08

Misleading Marketing

False claims that waste money and bury critical safety info.

View Cases →
Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 1902