A person in active addiction, crying, terrified, finally ready to ask for help, dialed what they believed was the phone number for a rehab they trusted. The number connected them to a secret call center. The agent on the line lied about who they were, extracted the caller’s insurance details, and pressured them onto a plane to California. The caller’s own doctor had already arranged their admission to a local facility. None of that mattered to the people running this scheme.

A Trap Built Into Google Itself

The scheme began with a technology most people trust completely: a Google search. When someone Googled the name of a specific addiction treatment center, Mercury Marketing’s fake ads appeared at the top of the results, displaying the exact name of the facility the person searched for, complete with a phone number that looked like it belonged to that facility.

Mercury Marketing used a Google tool called Dynamic Keyword Insertion to automatically insert the name of whatever facility someone searched for into the headline of their advertisement. The FTC complaint documents that the Mercury Defendants registered keywords covering hundreds of specific SUD treatment facilities, meaning their fake ads could impersonate almost any rehab in America.

The phone numbers in those ads routed to the Malibu Defendants’ call center, not to the facility being impersonated. Between June 15, 2021, and October 10, 2022, a single one of Mercury’s ad campaigns triggered nearly 29,000 phone calls. That is 29,000 people reaching out in crisis and landing somewhere they never intended to go.

The Impersonation Was Industrial-Scale

The FTC documents show three real examples of this in action: ads impersonating Cumberland Heights Nashville TN, The Menninger Clinic, and Chandler Valley Hope all displayed the same phone number, the same URL, and virtually identical text. The only thing that changed was the name of the facility at the top of the ad.

Mercury Marketing paid Google at least $8.01 million (the equivalent of giving free addiction counseling sessions to roughly 80,000 uninsured Americans) in 2021 and at least $10.9 million (enough to run a community-based recovery house for over 1,000 years) in 2022 to run these campaigns. That is how central this fraud was to their business model. Every dollar paid to Google was a dollar invested in getting between vulnerable people and the care they were asking for.

Mercury Marketing’s total revenue from SUD advertising and lead sales was at least $9 million (enough to pay for residential treatment for roughly 1,800 uninsured patients at national average cost) in 2021 and at least $12.9 million (roughly equivalent to what 430 average American workers earn in an entire year) in 2022. Between January 2021 and May 2022, Mercury Marketing billed Malibu Detox and BHG nearly $1.8 million (enough to fund a full-time crisis intervention team serving a mid-sized American city for three years) for these pay-per-click campaigns alone, covering more than 25,000 consumer clicks.

The Agents Who Lied on Command

Once the deceptive ad did its job, a caller desperate for help was instantly connected to a call center called Behavioral Healthcare Group of America (BHG), operating out of Owings Mills, Maryland. The agents there had been trained using scripts written by Mercury Marketing’s majority owner, Christopher LiVolsi, who authored documents titled “3 Call Model (Trust & Warm Hand off),” “Beginning Script,” “CALL 2,” and “Closing Call” in June 2021.

The script instructed agents to identify themselves only as “admissions,” to never confirm the name of the facility the caller was trying to reach, and to extract insurance information first, before doing anything else. When callers pushed back, agents were trained to claim they worked for “a central admissions line for substance abuse and mental health” that “works with several different facilities.” This was a lie. They worked for one operation with one goal: fill beds at Malibu Detox.

The entire structure depended on keeping callers confused long enough to get their insurance information. Once an agent confirmed that a caller had private insurance with SUD coverage, the system kicked into high gear. A fabricated “clinical team” would supposedly review the case, and then the agent would call back with “great news” that the patient was approved for treatment at Malibu Detox. The recommendation was presented as objective medical advice. It was a sales pitch.

They Called It “Snaking” Insurance Information

Jennifer Russ, the owner of JLux Consulting who monitored hundreds of these calls and provided monthly performance reports, explicitly praised agents for “snaking VOBs” (verifications of insurance benefits) from callers who had clearly stated they wanted to go somewhere else. Russ reviewed actual recordings of these conversations with full knowledge that callers had been deceived about who they were talking to.

Agents who correctly told callers “that’s not us” when asked if they were a specific facility were flagged for poor performance. One agent was criticized in writing for “playing directory assistance” by giving desperate callers the actual phone number of the facility they had asked for. The complaint documents Russ explicitly coaching that giving someone the right phone number was a failure, not a success.

Callers who wanted to return to a facility where they had previously received care were steered away using the catchphrase: you need to change your “people, places, and things.” The script framed this as clinical wisdom. The actual reason, documented throughout the complaint, was that these patients with private insurance represented maximum billing potential and Malibu Detox had beds available.

They Kept Going After the FTC Showed Up

In December 2022, the FTC formally notified Mercury Marketing, Fennaside, Malibu Detox, LiVolsi, Rinker, and Stempler that they were under investigation for violations of the FTC Act and the Opioid Addiction Recovery Fraud Prevention Act. The attorneys working on the Malibu Detox asset sale also notified the Aliya Defendants of the investigation at that time.

Every single defendant continued operating. Aliya Health Group proceeded with the purchase of Malibu Detox’s assets in June 2023, co-guaranteed a $2.5 million (enough to fund recovery coaching programs in roughly 25 rural counties for a full year) promissory note to finance it, and immediately continued using the same deceptive advertising, the same call center, and the same JLux analytics operation. As recently as July 3, 2024, Mercury Marketing was still running fake ads impersonating a facility called Serenity Lane using a Google verified account.

The Non-Financial Ledger

The FTC complaint uses the word “vulnerable” once to describe the people this scheme targeted. That single word is doing an enormous amount of work. The people who picked up the phone and dialed what they believed was the admissions line for a specific, trusted treatment facility were at one of the most dangerous moments a human being can face: the moment they decided to try to survive their addiction.

That moment of decision is fragile. It takes immense courage and is often preceded by years of pain, shame, and failed attempts. The people behind Mercury Marketing and BHG knew this. They built their entire business model around exploiting the exact vulnerability that makes addiction so deadly. They designed a system to intercept that moment of readiness and redirect it toward their own profit.

The transcripts in the complaint reveal what this exploitation looked like in real time. One caller told agents they had been to the facility they were calling three previous times and was familiar with the staff. Another had already packed their bags, had a letter from their doctor ready, and had told their employer they were leaving. Another was on probation, could not legally leave the state of Pennsylvania, and had children at home. Every one of these people had legitimate reasons to want the specific care they asked for. Every one of them was steamrolled by a scripted agent whose job was to override those reasons and put them on a plane to California.

One of the most disturbing details in the complaint documents the agents’ use of a fabricated HIPAA justification to steal insurance information from returning patients. When a caller said “you should have my insurance on file, I was just there two weeks ago,” the agent responded that “due to HIPAA laws they do get rid of that information.” This is false. HIPAA does not require treatment facilities to delete a patient’s insurance information after discharge. The agents made this up specifically to extract information from people who would otherwise have no reason to provide it. They targeted people whose trust in the healthcare system was already fragile and used a law designed to protect patients as a weapon against them.

The agent who spoke to a woman who was crying, actively withdrawing, and begging to stay local told her, “It’s okay! You’re gonna get on the airplane.” That woman was terrified. She said she could not get on an airplane while detoxing. The agent told her someone from Malibu Detox would pick her up at the airport. She was being managed, not helped. Every word of warmth in that call was manufactured to serve a sales goal. The “clinical team” recommendation was a fiction. The insurance coverage confirmation was used to identify billing potential. Her tears were a buying signal, not a cue to offer her real support.

The man who told the agent “I’m just gonna F*** it, I’m just going to spend all my money on drugs” and hung up represents the worst possible outcome of this scheme. He called looking for help. He was pressured, manipulated, guilt-tripped with the phrase “it’s morally wrong” to want the care he had planned, and pushed past the point of breaking. What happened to him after that call is not in the complaint. That absence is its own kind of verdict.

Legal Receipts: Their Own Words

FTC Complaint — Paragraph 53(A) | Agent to caller who had already arranged local admission, had doctor’s letter, and was on probation preventing interstate travel “AGENT: Sir, it’s morally wrong to go somewhere that you haven’t been clinically recommended to go to… Look, sir, you just said you’re spending all your checks on pills… What good are you right now to your family?”

FTC Complaint — Paragraph 50(A) | Agent lying to a returning patient to extract their insurance information “CONSUMER: I’ve been there twice before… I don’t but I’ve been to Sunrise two other times and I have the same insurance. AGENT: So due to HIPAA laws they do get rid of that information so when you come in we have to get the information again because they do get rid of it.”

FTC Complaint — Paragraph 57 | Jennifer Russ (JLux Consulting) in written performance reports to Stempler, LiVolsi, and Rinker — multiple months, 2021–2023 “[Agent] needs a better answer to ‘Is this ________?’ She just kept saying central admissions which made the caller mad; She could explain the process of verification/assessment, we work with them, etc.” (Sept. 2021) … “[Agent] knows a lot about recovery, he just needs to keep in mind this is sales, not a helpline. When callers ask is this… He sometimes answers no.” (May 2022)

FTC Complaint — Paragraph 58 | Russ in emails to Stempler, copied to LiVolsi and Rinker, criticizing agents for helping callers find the right number “Her no pitches are high; directory assistance on specific facilities.” … “No pitches at 21%; directory assistance BAD when a Spec Facility is mentioned.”

FTC Complaint — Paragraph 49(A) | Full exchange: caller asks six times if they have reached Greenleaf Hospital “CONSUMER: [more loudly] At Greenleaf? I’m asking you is it Greenleaf? I want to make sure I’m in the right place. Ma’am? AGENT: Yes, I’m a central admissions line for substance abuse and mental health. How can I help you? CONSUMER: But is this Greenleaf Hospital, again? AGENT: I’m a central admissions line for substance abuse and mental health. I work with several different facilities. CONSUMER: Oh no, I need to get straight to the hospital [hang up]”

Societal Impact Mapping

Public Health: A Fraud Tax on Recovery

The United States is in the middle of an overdose crisis that kills tens of thousands of people every year. The window in which a person with a substance use disorder is willing and able to seek help is often narrow and unpredictable. Every time this scheme intercepted one of those calls and redirected it away from the facility a person had specifically chosen and trusted, it introduced friction, confusion, and potential abandonment of care into a process where any breakdown can be fatal.

The complaint documents callers who hung up in frustration after being unable to reach the facility they searched for. It documents a man who said he would “just spend all my money on drugs” after being pressured to fly across the country against his wishes. Each of these is a public health failure manufactured for profit. The defendants extracted financial value from the act of disrupting someone’s path to treatment.

The fake “clinical recommendation” system is a particular public health danger. When an agent told a caller that a real clinical team had assessed their history and determined that Malibu Detox was the medically appropriate choice, they were impersonating the healthcare decision-making process itself. Patients who trusted that recommendation and traveled to California were placed in a treatment environment they did not choose, possibly far from their social support networks, their families, and the local resources that support long-term recovery. The complaint documents callers explicitly saying they needed to stay near home because of their children, their jobs, their legal obligations. These factors are clinically meaningful for recovery outcomes. They were dismissed as “objections to overcome.”

Economic Inequality: The Insurance Extraction Machine

The complaint makes explicit that patients with private insurance were the most valuable targets. The fronters’ first job was to determine whether a caller had private insurance coverage for SUD treatment. Callers without private insurance were deprioritized. The entire system was engineered to capture the billing potential of insured patients and route them to Malibu Detox, which could then bill their insurance companies for residential treatment services the patient never specifically chose.

This means the scheme disproportionately affected working people: people with employer-sponsored health coverage who were already navigating the complexity of using their insurance for mental health and addiction care. These are people who did everything “right” in the American healthcare framework. They had coverage. They looked up a facility. They made the call. The reward for their diligence was to be deceived, manipulated, and redirected to serve someone else’s financial interests.

Mercury Marketing billed Malibu Detox and BHG nearly $1.8 million (roughly what 60 average American workers earn in a full year) for more than 25,000 consumer clicks between January 2021 and May 2022 alone. These are not abstract figures. Every click represents a person who typed the name of a treatment center into their phone because they needed help. Each click was sold. Each caller was a commodity. The revenue figures confirm that this was a sophisticated, high-volume extraction operation built on top of people’s medical crises.

The complaint also documents that fronters earned bonuses based on conversion rates, number of admits per month, and whether admits were “cash pay” patients. The agents who worked this call center were themselves caught in an economic incentive structure that rewarded deception. The people at the top, including Christopher LiVolsi, Dennis Rinker, and Robby Stempler, set up a system where front-line workers profited from lying to sick people. That is how corporate misconduct reproduces itself: by making the lie economically rational for everyone in the chain.

The FTC has a press release about this scandal with Mercury Detox and Malibu marketing on their website: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/06/ftc-sues-stop-mercury-marketing-others-deceptively-advertising-substance-use-disorder-treatment

Malibu Detox has since shuttered its doors (while not admitting to having done any harms to anybody) but Aliya Health Group remains!

Related posts:

How FloatMe’s Illegal Actions Drowned Consumer Trust How RivX Illegally Drove Investors to Bankruptcy Inside a Telehealth Giant’s Broken Promises Where “Cancel Now” Actually Meant “Pay More Money” | Cerebral The FTC cracks down on D&B for illegal auto-renewals and misleading credit services.