Financial Fraud Investigation
The GDLogix Deception: How $1.5 Million in Investor Cash Evaporated
Source Filed: July 10, 2017 | U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Daniel Winston LaMarco and GDLogix Inc.
When federal investigators finally closed Daniel Winston LaMarco’s trading accounts in April 2016, two accounts that had swallowed $1.3 million of ordinary people’s savings held a combined balance of $43.44 (about the cost of a fast food dinner for four).
A Software Consultant Who Played Fake Hedge Fund Manager
LaMarco was a home-based independent software consultant working out of Huntington, New York. He built GDLogix as a software consultancy, then quietly converted it into a vehicle for collecting other people’s money to trade foreign currency on the forex markets. The company’s real business had nothing to do with finance; LaMarco simply repurposed its name and bank account to look legitimate.
Starting in January 2011, LaMarco began recruiting investors through word of mouth, targeting friends and acquaintances in Suffolk County, New York, and eventually pulling in people from Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Ohio. He called the investment vehicle the “Diamond Head Capital Commodity Pool” and issued a written “Memorandum of Offering” listing himself as both the “Principal” and “Pool Manager.” He presented himself as a proven, profitable forex trader. Every single one of those representations was false.
LaMarco deposited incoming funds into a GDLogix bank account at JPMorgan Chase, as well as two personal JPMorgan Chase accounts, all under his exclusive control. He then transferred approximately $1.3 million (enough to put a down payment on 13 median-priced homes in the United States) of that money into two personal trading accounts he had opened at registered futures broker Gain Capital, accounts held entirely in his own name with no connection to the pool he had promised investors. The money stopped being “their” money the moment it landed in his accounts.
The Fake Statements That Kept the Machine Running
Beginning in February 2011, LaMarco emailed investors a fabricated monthly spreadsheet he called a “Monthly Statement.” These documents showed account activity, purported profits, and each investor’s balance in the pool. Every number in every one of those statements was invented. The pool was not earning returns; it was hemorrhaging money through LaMarco’s failed trades and personal spending.
As late as February 2016, LaMarco sent a statement claiming the total value of the commodity pool had grown to $1,796,126.22 (more than the average American worker earns in 25 years of full-time employment). In reality, LaMarco already knew that virtually all of the money was gone. He knew this because he was the sole person with access to every account. He chose to lie anyway.
In March 2016, the statements simply stopped. LaMarco went silent, stopped answering emails, and stopped picking up the phone. His investors were left staring at the last fake statement, holding numbers that represented nothing.
Where Did $1,492,650 Go? β The Flow of Investor Funds
The Non-Financial Ledger: What Money Can’t Measure
Two people handed Daniel LaMarco their trust before they handed him their money. In January 2011, LaMarco verbally approached two individuals, people he knew, and told them he had a gift for trading foreign currency. He painted a picture of steady profits and calculated safety. They believed him. They gave him $25,000 (roughly the annual take-home pay of a minimum-wage worker) to start.
That should have been the end of the exposure. It was not. LaMarco went back to these same two people and told them his forex strategy was safe. He encouraged them to go further. Based entirely on his representations, they took out a home equity loan, borrowing against the roof over their heads, and handed him an additional $440,000 (enough to buy the median U.S. home outright, with money to spare). These were people who believed in LaMarco enough to risk their home to invest with him. He knew the entire time that the money would disappear.
The broader pool of 13 investors included friends and neighbors spread across four states: New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Ohio. These were ordinary people, the kind who hear about an investment opportunity through someone they know and trust a personal referral over a financial advertisement. The source document confirms that at least one or more of these participants did not even meet the federal financial thresholds that would classify them as sophisticated investors. LaMarco was legally soliciting people who the law specifically recognized as needing protection from exactly this kind of scheme.
For up to five years, these investors received monthly statements showing their balances growing. They made financial plans around those numbers. They may have delayed retirement, declined other opportunities, or made spending decisions based on a pool balance that was entirely fabricated. Then in March 2016, the statements stopped and LaMarco went silent. The investors discovered they had been living inside a fiction. The psychological weight of that revelation, of realizing that someone you trusted had been lying to your face for years while your real money evaporated, cannot be entered as a line item in a federal complaint. This ledger exists because someone has to account for it.
Legal Receipts: The Government’s Own Words
These are direct quotations and factual statements from the CFTC’s sworn federal complaint. Read them slowly.
“All of the information in the Monthly Statements was false. In reality, by late 2015 all of the funds LaMarco had misappropriated had been spent on LaMarco’s personal expenses or lost in LaMarco’s unprofitable trading in his personal accounts. LaMarco intentionally issued false Monthly Statements to mislead and lull participants into continuing to deposit investment funds in the pool.” β CFTC Complaint, Paragraph 35
“According to the fraudulent Monthly Statements, in February 2016, LaMarco represented to the pool participants the total value of the commodity pool had increased to $1,796,126.22. In reality, however, LaMarco knew that he had lost nearly all of the participants’ funds through unsuccessful trading and by diverting $630,050 of the $1,492,650 total principal invested to some participants as purported ‘profits’ in the nature of a ‘Ponzi’ scheme.” β CFTC Complaint, Paragraph 36
“LaMarco also omitted material facts in his solicitations to actual and prospective pool participants, including but not limited to: failing to disclose that he had never been registered with the Commission in any capacity; that GDLogix had never been registered with the Commission in any capacity; that he was misappropriating participants’ funds; that no trading took place on behalf of participants; and that he was losing money trading retail forex in his personal accounts.” β CFTC Complaint, Paragraph 33
“LaMarco returned $630,050 to certain pool participants who requested withdrawals from their accounts as either a portion or all of their original investment, as purported trading profits, or other payments. LaMarco lost the remaining funds trading or used them to pay his personal expenses.” β CFTC Complaint, Paragraph 42
“When LaMarco represented to current and prospective pool participants that the Pool had achieved high rates of return and profits, he knew that his representations were false. Similarly, LaMarco knew that the statements he provided to pool participants, showing fictitious returns, were false because he owned the accounts and controlled the trading in the forex accounts.” β CFTC Complaint, Paragraph 38
Five Years of Fraud: The Timeline
Key Events in the GDLogix Fraud (2009β2017)
Societal Impact: Who Actually Gets Hurt by “Small” Fraud
Economic Inequality: When Your Network Is Your Only Safety Net
The CFTC complaint makes clear that LaMarco targeted people through personal relationships, recruiting “friends and acquaintances” from his local community in Suffolk County, New York. This is a textbook exploitation of social trust. Working and middle-class people rarely have access to professional financial advisors, institutional investment products, or SEC-regulated funds. They invest through people they know. That social fabric is the only safety net many families have, and LaMarco deliberately shredded it for personal gain.
The complaint explicitly notes that at least one or more investors did not meet the financial thresholds to qualify as a sophisticated “eligible contract participant” under federal law. Federal law draws this line because it recognizes that ordinary people lack the financial cushion to absorb the losses that come with high-risk, unregulated investment pools. LaMarco was legally barred from soliciting these individuals for exactly this reason. He did it anyway.
The home equity loan detail is the most visceral evidence of economic damage in this case. Two investors borrowed against their home, a physical asset representing decades of payments and accumulated stability, because LaMarco told them the investment was safe. The $440,000 (the equivalent of roughly 8,800 hours of work at the federal minimum wage) they raised and handed to him is not an abstract figure. It represents the risk of losing shelter itself. This is the specific kind of harm that separates predatory fraud targeting ordinary people from white-collar crime between financial equals.
LaMarco also operated the Ponzi component of the scheme with calculated precision. He returned $630,050 (enough to cover the annual median rent for roughly 140 U.S. households) to some participants as fake “profits.” This kept the quietest investors satisfied and the loudest ones pacified, extending the fraud by years and allowing LaMarco to continue extracting new money. The people who received these payouts likely reinvested the supposed profits or told others how well the pool was performing, unwittingly becoming amplifiers for the scheme. The damage to community trust within these networks of friends and neighbors is permanent and unquantifiable.
The Cost of a Life: By the Numbers
The Lie vs. Reality: Reported Pool Balance vs. Actual Account Balance (Feb/Apr 2016)
What Now: Who Watches the Watchmen
The CFTC filed this complaint on July 10, 2017. The source document confirms LaMarco was already residing in a federal prison in Manhattan at the time of filing, suggesting a prior criminal proceeding had already moved against him. The corporate entity, GDLogix Inc., is listed as inactive.
Before You Invest in Anything: Three Questions That Could Save Your Life Savings
Every person who lost money to LaMarco could have verified in under five minutes whether GDLogix or LaMarco was registered with the CFTC or NFA. They were not registered. The NFA’s public database, called BASIC, lists every registered commodity pool operator and associated person in the country. If a name is not there, the money should not go there. Registration is a legal requirement. Absence from the database is a red flag that federal law treats as a crime.
On the community level: financial fraud targeting ordinary people through personal networks is a collective problem. Local credit unions, community organizations, and mutual aid networks can create peer financial literacy programs that teach exactly these verification steps. If someone in your circle is pitching an investment opportunity, help them look it up before they write a check. The people who lost money to LaMarco were his neighbors and friends. Those networks can be protective instead of exploitable.
If you have already lost money to a scheme like this: contact your state Attorney General’s office, file with the CFTC’s whistleblower program (which offers financial awards for information leading to enforcement), and connect with a legal aid organization. You are not alone and you are not stupid. You were targeted by someone who understood exactly how to exploit trust. The fault sits entirely with the person who chose to exploit it.
The source document for this investigation is attached below.
There is a press release about this scandal on the CFTC’s website: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9107-27
Explore by category
Product Safety Violations
When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.
View Cases →Financial Fraud & Corruption
Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.
View Cases →


