While Kenneth Courtright promised his investors a “guaranteed, perpetual” income stream, his own accountant was telling him to his face that the company was paying people with money it had no right to touch.
Kenneth Courtright’s Ponzi Empire and the Myth of Endless Growth
He sold the dream of passive income to hundreds of investors. The Income Store was built on a lie from day one, and the courts have now made that official.
Confirmed Fraud Wire Fraud Ponzi SchemeThe Pitch That Was Always a Lie
Kenneth Courtright owned and operated Today’s Growth Consultant (TGC), which branded itself as “The Income Store.” The premise was simple and seductive: pay an upfront fee, TGC builds or buys a website for you, that website earns advertising money, and you receive a monthly check. Forever. The contracts, called Consulting Performance Agreements (CPAs), guaranteed investors a monthly payment “into perpetuity” equal to whichever was greater: 50% of their website’s ad revenue, or at least 15% of their upfront investment per year. It sounded like a passive income machine. It was a trap.
The CPAs also contained a warranty that TGC was “in satisfactory financial condition, solvent, able to pay its bills when due and financially able to perform its contractual duties.” That statement was false from the beginning of the charged period. The company’s websites never generated enough advertising money to fund the guaranteed payments. The entire operation depended on a constant flow of new investors handing over upfront fees that would then quietly flow out to older investors as their “monthly income.”
From January 2015 to December 2019, TGC generated approximately $27.8 million from website revenue and business loans combined. Its mandatory payment obligation to site partners totaled $49.3 million over that same period. The gap was covered entirely by $132.6 million in upfront fees collected from new investors. That is the structural definition of a Ponzi scheme: old money paid with new money, dressed up in the language of a legitimate business.
— U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
The Numbers That Expose Everything
Where The Money Actually Came From (2015–2019)
The Collateral Damage When It Collapsed
As revenue fell from 2017 to 2019, Courtright testified himself that the decline was “substantial.” To keep the machine running, he personally secured a $2.5 million loan ($2.5 million, roughly what 50 median American workers earn in a year combined) from a private individual. He also took out business loans with interest rates as high as 200%. Those are loan shark rates. That is the financial condition of a company simultaneously promising investors it was “solvent” and “in satisfactory financial condition.”
TGC had expanded fast, hiring over 100 employees within a few years. Those workers, their salaries, their health benefits, their livelihoods: all of it was built on a foundation that was structurally insolvent from the start. When the SEC brought a civil enforcement action against TGC in 2019 and a receiver was appointed to manage the wreckage, those employees were left holding nothing. The investors were left fighting for scraps.
While investors watched their monthly payments slow and stop, Courtright transferred $2.9 million ($2.9 million, enough to fund free school lunches for approximately 2,300 children for an entire year) from TGC’s accounts into his personal bank accounts. He used $975,000 ($975,000, roughly the cost of a down payment on 8 to 10 median-priced American homes) of company money to pay his own mortgage and school tuition for people close to him. He did this while his investors’ upfront fees were sitting in the same pool of money.
The Non-Financial Ledger
What Money Cannot Measure
Every investor who walked through the door of The Income Store was sold the same dream: you work hard your whole life, you save up enough to invest, and then your money finally starts working for you. That dream has a name. It is called financial security. It is the thing working people spend decades chasing and rarely catch. Courtright weaponized that dream deliberately. He understood exactly what he was selling and who he was selling it to, because the CPAs were specifically designed to appeal to people who needed a dependable, predictable monthly income.
The contracts promised payments “into perpetuity.” That word, perpetuity, is not accidental marketing language. It is a promise designed to reach the people who are most afraid of outliving their savings. Retirees. Parents setting up income streams for a family member who cannot work. Small business owners who had finally scraped together enough capital to invest. The people who signed these contracts were not reckless gamblers looking for a fast return. They were people who did exactly what they were told to do: they saved, they researched, they signed a contract, and they trusted that the law and the other party’s word meant something. That trust was systematically violated, for five years, by design.
The court record reveals that site partners who testified uniformly confirmed one fact: how their upfront fees would be used and where their monthly income would come from was material to their decision to invest. In plain English, that means if they had known the truth, they never would have handed over their money. Courtright did not make an honest business miscalculation. His own accountant told him the fees were being misused, and the practice continued for years afterward. The harm to investors was not a side effect of failure. The harm to investors was the operating model.
The receivership process that followed the SEC’s 2019 enforcement action forced investors into a bureaucratic claims process to recoup any portion of their losses. The government’s broadest loss estimate was $91.3 million ($91.3 million, enough to cover a year of groceries for over 21,000 average American families). The narrowest was $69.3 million. Some investors who did not file claims with the receiver were excluded from the official loss count entirely, meaning the human toll runs wider than any single dollar figure captures. Every investor who did not navigate the paperwork, who gave up, who did not know they could file, or who could not afford to wait for a claim to resolve, is a name that does not appear in the official tally. Their loss was real. The ledger simply does not record it.
There is a specific cruelty in the mechanics of a Ponzi scheme that goes beyond the financial loss itself. The early investors received their payments on time and in full, paid with the money of the people who came after them. This structure guaranteed that by the time the scheme was exposed, the most recent investors, often the most trusting, often those who joined based on the testimonials of people who had already been paid, had the largest unrecovered losses. The scheme used trust as a transmission mechanism. Every satisfied early investor became an unwitting advertisement that recruited the next victim.
When the moratorium letter arrived in 2019, it told investors only that TGC was experiencing “new challenges and headwinds” and asked them to pause their guaranteed payments for four months. It said nothing about the years of fee misappropriation. It said nothing about the $2.5 million emergency personal loan, the 200% interest-rate business loans, or the millions Courtright had already moved into his own accounts. Investors received a vague corporate euphemism in place of the truth they were legally owed. By the time the full picture came out through the SEC’s enforcement action, the money was already gone.
Legal Receipts: Straight From the Court Record
Every Word Below Is Directly from Official Documents
“TGC never generated sufficient advertising revenue to cover its guaranteed monthly payment obligations to site partners. During the charged scheme (from January 2015 to December 2019), TGC posted approximately $27.8 million from website revenue and business loans, far less than its $49.3 million mandatory payment obligation. It was only due to the $132.6 million in revenue generated from upfront fees (that is, signing on new site partners) that TGC was able to make the guaranteed monthly payments.”
— United States v. Kenneth D. Courtright, No. 24-1115, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Decided October 17, 2025
“The court ultimately denied Courtright on this point because, the court said, that would be tantamount to permitting an armed bank robber to be credited for expenses like the robber’s gun, bullets, mask, and getaway car.”
— Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, describing the district court’s rejection of Courtright’s request to deduct $34 million in operating expenses from his loss calculation
“The government established that ‘Mr. Courtright approved, authorized, and directed the use of the contractual language that promised the guaranteed, perpetual returns … knowing full well that the company could not fulfill the extravagant promises it had made.'”
— U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, quoted in the Seventh Circuit opinion
“TGC’s accountant testified that he notified Courtright that upfront fees were being used to pay investors, yet the practice continued for years. The evidence establishing the perpetual shortfall in revenue was overwhelming … Even Courtright testified several times on cross-examination that he used investors’ upfront fees to make the guaranteed minimum monthly payments in violation of the CPAs.”
— United States v. Kenneth D. Courtright, No. 24-1115, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, October 17, 2025
“[The moratorium letter] simply stated that TGC was experiencing new ‘challenges and headwinds’ and asked site partners for a four-month moratorium on guaranteed payments. It never mentioned the company’s usage of upfront fees, let alone its long-standing financial problems.”
— Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, rejecting Courtright’s argument that the moratorium letter constituted disclosure
Four Ways the Government Counted the Damage
Societal Impact: Who Really Paid the Price
Economic Inequality: How Fraud Flows Downward
The Income Store operated in the specific vocabulary of the financial independence movement: passive income, perpetual returns, website revenue, “your money working for you.” These concepts have enormous appeal to people who work hourly jobs, who have no pension, who watched their parents retire into poverty, and who believe that owning an asset is the only way to escape the wage cycle. Courtright did not aim at Wall Street hedge funds. He aimed at the part of the economy where people are most desperate to believe the system can work for them.
The loss calculations in this case tell the story of economic harm with brutal clarity. At the high end, investors lost $91.3 million ($91.3 million, equivalent to the annual Medicaid budget for a small U.S. city). The court-adopted figure of $52.5 million ($52.5 million, enough to provide a year of rent assistance to over 14,000 low-income families) still represents the wiped-out savings of real people. Every dollar in that figure was money someone chose to invest instead of spend, money that represented restraint, planning, and sacrifice. Courtright spent it on his own mortgage.
The structure of the receivership process compounded the inequality. Investors who had the time, resources, and legal literacy to file claims with the court-appointed receiver recovered something. Investors who lacked those advantages, who may have been elderly, who did not understand the claims process, or who could not wait for a legal resolution, recovered nothing. The official loss count excluded investors who did not submit claims. The law drew a line between those who knew how to navigate it and those who did not, and the people on the wrong side of that line simply disappeared from the record.
Courtright also led a company that employed over 100 people at its peak. Those workers did not defraud anyone. They built websites, managed accounts, and did the actual labor that Courtright sold to investors. When the company collapsed under the weight of its own structural insolvency, those jobs disappeared. The SEC enforcement action, the receivership, the criminal prosecution: none of those proceedings put those workers’ paychecks back. They are the invisible third category of victim in this case, present in the story but absent from the settlement math.
Public Health: The Slow Violence of Financial Betrayal
Financial fraud of this type inflicts documented psychological harm that the courts do not typically quantify. Research consistently links sudden, unexpected financial loss, particularly when caused by betrayal of trust rather than market risk, to elevated rates of depression, anxiety disorders, sleep disruption, and in severe cases, suicidal ideation among older adults. The site partners in this case were not told their investment was speculative. They were told it was guaranteed. The gap between that promise and reality is not just a breach of contract. It is a psychological ambush.
For investors who used these monthly payments as retirement income, the cessation of payments and the subsequent receivership process represented an acute financial crisis arriving at the stage of life when people are least equipped to recover from one. A 65-year-old who loses $100,000 of retirement capital to a Ponzi scheme does not have the same recovery horizon as a 35-year-old who loses the same amount. The time horizon itself is part of the injury. The court record does not capture the sleepless nights, the canceled medical appointments, the family conflicts, or the psychological weight of watching a guaranteed income stream collapse into a claims form.
The Cost of a Life: Running the Numbers
What Now: Watchlist and Next Steps
The People and Institutions Still in the Picture
- Kenneth D. Courtright — Convicted on seven counts of wire fraud. Sentenced to 90 months (7.5 years) in federal prison plus two years of supervised release. Appeal affirmed October 17, 2025 by the Seventh Circuit.
- SEC Civil Enforcement Case (SEC v. Courtright) — A court-appointed receiver continues to manage the recovery of funds for investors. Investors with outstanding claims should monitor the receiver’s updates through the Northern District of Illinois.
- The Receiver — Appointed by the district court in the SEC action, the receiver is tasked with ensuring investors recoup as much of their losses as possible. The recovery process is ongoing.
Regulatory Bodies That Should Be on Your Radar
- SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) — Filed the civil enforcement action that stopped Courtright’s scheme. Report investment fraud at SEC.gov/tcr.
- FBI Financial Crimes Unit — Provided the forensic accounting testimony that helped convict Courtright. Report Ponzi schemes and investment fraud at tips.fbi.gov.
- DOJ (Department of Justice) / U.S. Attorney’s Office — Prosecuted the criminal case. Wire fraud convictions like this one depend on victims willing to testify and report.
- CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) — Tracks patterns of financial fraud targeting consumers. Submit complaints at consumerfinance.gov/complaint.
- FINRA Investor Education Foundation — Provides free fraud detection resources specifically designed for retail investors and retirees at saveandinvest.org.
The Ground-Level Response
Cases like this one do not start with government agencies. They start when investors talk to each other, compare notes, and realize the promises they were made do not match the reality they are living. The most effective fraud prevention tool in existence is a community of people who share information freely and refuse to let shame silence them. If you or someone you know lost money in The Income Store or any similar scheme, local investor protection clinics, legal aid societies, and mutual aid networks can help navigate the claims process without the cost of a private attorney. The receiver process is not over. Participation matters.
The source document for this investigation is attached below.
There is also a press release on the SEC’s website on this pyramid scheme https://www.sec.gov/enforce/claims-todays-growth-consultant-kenneth-courtright
Explore by category
Product Safety Violations
When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.
View Cases →Financial Fraud & Corruption
Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.
View Cases →
