Honeywell Paid a $20K Fine for Endangering Their Workers and Local Community
Filed: August 11, 2025 | Redmond, Washington | EPA Region 10 | RCRA Violations
The Facts Misconduct Confirmed Action RequiredTL;DR
- Honeywell’s Redmond, Washington facility racked up nine separate federal violations of dangerous waste law, including storing unlabeled hazardous chemicals and leaving open containers of flammable solvents on the factory floor.
- A worker named Ms. Joanna Larson worked around dangerous waste for over two years without receiving the legally required safety training; Honeywell simply never scheduled it.
- When an emergency was possible, Honeywell’s official emergency plan listed a contact who had already quit four months earlier, meaning an accident could have unfolded with no qualified coordinator on call.
- The EPA caught Honeywell shipping dangerous waste that sat untracked in transit for up to 58 days across four separate shipments, with zero exception reports ever filed.
- Honeywell settled the entire case for $20,000 (roughly the cost of a used Honda Civic), admitted nothing, and walked away.
The name of the worker left unprotected is in The Non-Financial Ledger. The specific chemicals Honeywell left unlabeled and open on the floor are in the violation breakdown below.
A trillion-dollar multinational corporation stored open containers of ignitable solvent on its factory floor, left hazardous chemicals unlabeled, and sent a worker into a dangerous waste environment for over two full years without a single required safety training session, then settled with the federal government for $20,000 (less than the median American worker earns in six months).
Nine Violations. One Slap. Zero Accountability.
Honeywell International operates a production facility at 15001 NE 36th Street in Redmond, Washington. That facility handles what federal and state law classifies as “dangerous waste,” a legal designation for materials so hazardous that their storage, handling, and transport require a permit, a trained staff, and a functioning emergency plan. Honeywell had none of these things in proper working order.
During a federal inspection, EPA investigators documented nine distinct violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Washington State’s Dangerous Waste Regulations. The violations span every basic layer of hazardous waste safety: labeling, inspections, training, emergency preparedness, and transport tracking. The pattern shows a company that treated legal safety requirements as optional paperwork.
“The inspector observed numerous containers lacking labels or markings reading ‘dangerous waste’ or ‘hazardous waste,’ including containers of potassium hydroxide stored in lieu of disposal.”
Every Single Violation, Documented
Honeywell skipped required weekly checks of their central hazardous waste storage area. Two separate weeks are confirmed missing: one in July 2022 and one in September 2023.
The emergency contact listed as Primary Incident Manager had left the company four months before the inspection. In a real emergency, responders would have called a number for someone who no longer worked there.
Employee Ms. Joanna Larson worked on-site for over 26 months. She never received her required annual dangerous waste training in 2023, and never received HAZWOPER certification at all.
General facility inspection logs were missing printed names of inspectors. One remedial action taken with response equipment had no recorded date at all, meaning the timeline of a potential contamination event is unverifiable.
Multiple containers in the Central Accumulation Area chemical storage sheds lacked any “dangerous waste” or “hazardous waste” labeling, including containers of potassium hydroxide. Staff on-site confirmed these were waste materials.
Four containers of hazardous waste had no accumulation start date. The specific materials: two containers of “Handy Flux” (toxic), one of “Surface Strip 419” (corrosive), and one of “Chrome Etch” (corrosive).
In the Metal Parts area, inspectors found an open container holding ignitable solvent and a second open container holding solvent-contaminated debris. Both are classified as dangerous waste. Both were sitting open on the floor.
Four shipments of dangerous waste spent more than 45 days unaccounted for in transit, the legal threshold requiring a report to regulators. Honeywell filed zero reports. The EPA found the violations by checking federal databases themselves.
A container of spent oil in the Flex Test area carried no “Used Oil” label as required by federal regulations. A straightforward label requirement, ignored.
Dangerous Waste Shipments: Days in Transit vs. 45-Day Legal Limit
The Manifest Cover-Up Hidden in Plain Sight
Federal law requires that when dangerous waste ships, a manifest must be signed by both the shipping facility and the receiving facility. If 45 days pass without a confirmed receipt, the generator must file an exception report with regulators. The point of this rule is simple: hazardous waste that disappears in transit is a public safety emergency.
Honeywell sent four shipments of dangerous waste into transit. All four exceeded 45 days. The shortest overage was 8 days over the limit. The longest sat unaccounted for in transit for 69 days. Honeywell filed zero exception reports for any of them.
| Manifest Number | Shipped | Received | Days in Transit | Days Over Legal Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 018795032FLE | Nov 21, 2023 | Jan 18, 2024 | 58 days | +13 days |
| 018789967FLE | Oct 24, 2023 | Jan 1, 2024 | 69 days | +24 days |
| 018620013FLE | Aug 22, 2023 | Oct 14, 2023 | 53 days | +8 days |
| 018754191FLE | May 24, 2023 | Jul 19, 2023 | 56 days | +11 days |
The Non-Financial Ledger
What $20,000 Cannot Buy Back
Ms. Joanna Larson showed up to work at Honeywell’s Redmond facility in May of 2022. She was assigned to an environment where dangerous waste was present, stored, and handled daily. Honeywell’s own written training plan acknowledged this reality and required her to receive annual, eight-hour dangerous waste management training and HAZWOPER certification before she worked in that environment unsupervised. HAZWOPER stands for Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response; it is the federal standard for keeping workers alive when chemicals go wrong.
For over 26 months, Honeywell never scheduled that training for her. They did not forget. They had a written plan documenting the requirement. They simply did not do it. Ms. Larson spent more than two years working around toxic, corrosive, and ignitable waste materials while the company that employed her quietly sat on paperwork proving she was unprotected.
“Training records indicated Ms. Larson did not take dangerous waste training in 2023 and had not taken HAZWOPER.”
The emergency contact situation is a different kind of failure, and in some ways a more revealing one. Honeywell’s contingency plan, the document that tells everyone what to do when hazardous materials spill or ignite or leak, listed Mr. Kyle Peterson as the Primary Incident Manager. Kyle Peterson had been gone for four months by the time inspectors arrived. Honeywell knew he left. Someone processed his departure. His name stayed in the emergency plan anyway.
Imagine working in that facility. You are the next shift. A container of ignitable solvent, one that inspectors found sitting open on the floor, catches a spark. You grab the emergency response binder. You call the Primary Incident Manager. The phone rings somewhere else entirely. The emergency coordinator nobody updated is not coming. This is what “failure to maintain contingency plan” actually means when translated out of regulatory language and into real life.
The unlabeled containers add another layer. Potassium hydroxide, a highly corrosive compound that causes severe chemical burns, sat in the chemical storage sheds without any “dangerous waste” label. Four containers of toxic and corrosive waste, including Chrome Etch and Surface Strip 419, had no accumulation start dates, meaning nobody could confirm how long these materials had been sitting there or whether they had already exceeded the legal 90-day storage limit. Workers walking past those containers had no label telling them what was inside or what risks those containers carried.
The open containers of flammable solvent in the Metal Parts area are the violation that sits in your stomach. Ignitable waste is a fire and explosion hazard. The regulation requiring containers to stay closed “except when necessary to add or remove waste” exists because open containers of flammable material create vapor that can ignite from ordinary factory activities, a forklift spark, a light switch, a tool striking a surface. Honeywell left them open. Workers were in that area. The company later agreed to pay $20,000 (roughly the cost of furnishing an apartment for a young family).
Legal Receipts: The Documents That Bury Them
Straight From the Federal Record
“By failing to inspect their on-site container storage areas at least weekly, Honeywell twice failed to meet this provision of the Dangerous Waste Regulations.”
EPA Expedited Settlement Agreement, Paragraph 3(a)(i) β Inspection Log Failures, July 2022 and September 2023
“Staff on-site during the inspection previously stated that Mr. Peterson had left employment at the site approximately four months previously.”
EPA Expedited Settlement Agreement, Paragraph 3(a)(ii) β Outdated Emergency Contingency Plan
“Training records indicated she began working at the site in May of 2022, more than 26 months prior to the inspection. The training records indicated Ms. Larson did not take dangerous waste training in 2023 and had not taken HAZWOPER.”
EPA Expedited Settlement Agreement, Paragraph 3(a)(iii) β Failure to Complete Required Safety Training
“At the time of inspection, in the Central Accumulation Area (chemical storage sheds), the inspector observed numerous containers lacking labels or markings reading ‘dangerous waste’ or ‘hazardous waste,’ including containers of potassium hydroxide stored in lieu of disposal. Facility staff acknowledged the status of the material as waste during the inspection, and that the waste would designate as characteristically dangerous waste.”
EPA Expedited Settlement Agreement, Paragraph 3(a)(v) β Unlabeled Dangerous Waste Containers
“Respondent: (1) admits that Respondent is subject to RCRA and its implementing regulations; (2) admits that EPA has jurisdiction over Respondent and Respondent’s conduct as alleged herein, (3) neither admits nor denies the factual allegations contained herein; (4) consents to the assessment of this penalty.”
EPA Expedited Settlement Agreement, Paragraph 5 β Terms of Settlement, signed by Honeywell Chief Supply Chain Officer Brian Wenig, July 28, 2025
Societal Impact Mapping
Public Health: The People in the Building
Every violation documented in this case carries a direct public health dimension. HAZWOPER training exists because exposure to hazardous waste without proper knowledge of symptoms, decontamination procedures, and emergency protocols kills and injures workers. Ms. Larson worked for over two years without it. The EPA’s own records confirm she was in a regulated dangerous waste environment the entire time.
Open containers of ignitable solvent in an active manufacturing area create an inhalation hazard before they ever catch fire. Solvent vapors cause dizziness, headaches, and long-term neurological damage with sustained low-level exposure. Unlabeled containers of potassium hydroxide, Chrome Etch, and Surface Strip 419 are corrosives capable of causing severe chemical burns on skin contact and lung damage if inhaled. Workers in those areas had no label telling them what they were standing next to.
The broken emergency plan is the public health failure that could have cost the most. In a chemical emergency at a facility handling flammable solvents, toxic waste, and corrosive agents, the first minutes determine whether workers are evacuated safely or whether injuries escalate. Honeywell’s plan pointed to a person who had been gone for four months. That four-month gap is the window during which any accident would have unfolded with no qualified coordinator reachable.
Environmental Degradation: The Waste That Goes Untracked
The manifest exception reporting system is environmental law’s last line of defense against hazardous waste disappearing in transit. If a truck carrying dangerous materials is in an accident, diverts to an unauthorized location, or simply loses track of its cargo, the 45-day reporting requirement forces generators to flag the discrepancy before the waste simply vanishes into the landscape.
Honeywell allowed four separate shipments to exceed that threshold without filing a single report. The materials in those shipments are not described in detail in the settlement document, but they originated from the same facility where inspectors found corrosives, toxic waste, ignitable solvents, and contaminated debris. The specific fate of these shipments during their extended untracked transit periods is unknown; the whole point of the reporting rule is to ensure that information reaches regulators before it becomes a contamination event rather than after.
Economic Inequality: The Price of Safety for a Trillion-Dollar Company
Honeywell International had a market capitalization of over $100 billion at the time this settlement was signed. The fine the EPA extracted for nine federal violations, violations that left workers unprotected in a dangerous waste environment for years, was $20,000 (about what a minimum-wage worker earns in an entire year of full-time labor). That number requires no exaggeration to make the point. It is the number in the document.
The Expedited Settlement Agreement mechanism, which this case used, is designed for lower-level violations and moves through the regulatory system quickly. It results in a final order without a hearing. Honeywell’s Chief Supply Chain Officer, Brian Wenig, signed the agreement on July 28, 2025. By signing, Honeywell waived its right to contest any fact or law and waived its right to appeal. The company got certainty and speed. Workers got $20,000 worth of accountability distributed across nine violations that could have sent someone to a hospital.
This is the economic logic of regulatory fines as they currently exist for large corporations: a $20,000 penalty for a company of Honeywell’s scale carries zero deterrent weight. It is a rounding error in a quarterly budget line. The workers who absorbed the risk of unlabeled chemicals, open flammable solvent containers, and a phantom emergency coordinator do not receive any portion of that $20,000. The money goes to the U.S. Treasury, payable by check to the order of “Treasurer, United States of America.”
The “Cost of a Life” Metric
You can read this settlement agreement by visiting the EPA’s website: https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/rhc/epaadmin.nsf/Filings/A8EC5A5B681949C785258CE3006F461F/$File/Honeywell%20Intl%20Expedited%20Settlement%20Agreement%20and%20Final%20Order.pdf
Explore by category
Product Safety Violations
When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.
View Cases →Financial Fraud & Corruption
Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.
View Cases →


