Corporate Misconduct Case Study: Loral Langemeier & Live Out Loud’s Impact on Everyday Investors

---

TLDR: Financial mentor Loral Langemeier and her company, Live Out Loud, Inc. (LOL), are accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of betraying the trust of their clients for personal enrichment. The complaint alleges they convinced retirees and small business owners to liquidate safer retirement funds and invest over $7.4 million into risky, unregistered oil and gas securities. While presenting themselves as objective advisors, Langemeier and LOL concealed that they were receiving up to 10% in sales commissions—totaling over $400,000—and held secret ownership stakes that netted Langemeier an additional payout of nearly $280,000. Many of these clients, who had paid thousands for what they believed was expert financial guidance, suffered significant financial losses as a result.

The following investigation delves into the specific claims, the systemic failures that enabled this conduct, and the devastating human cost when corporate ethics are allegedly abandoned in the pursuit of wealth.

---

Inside the Allegations: A Betrayal of Trust

At the heart of the SEC’s complaint against Loral Langemeier and Live Out Loud lies a fundamental betrayal. Loral Langemeier got accused of cultivating an image of a sophisticated financial mentorship, only to exploit that trust by recommending high-risk investments from which they secretly profited. Clients, including small business owners and retirees, were drawn in by Langemeier’s persona as a “Millionaire Maker,” paying substantial fees for what they believed was objective advice.

These clients were offered tiered access to Langemeier’s services, with costs designed to create an aura of exclusivity and value. The fee structure illustrates a business model predicated on high-cost advisory services that allegedly became a gateway to predatory investment schemes.

Service Tier	Description	Cost
Fast Cash Coaching	Promised expert advice on development and financing for small business owners over a three-month period.	$399
“Big Table” Platform	Promised unlimited lifetime business, financial, and investment advice from Langemeier and other LOL advisers.	$2,000 to $30,000
“Head of the Table” Platform	Guaranteed lifetime access to Langemeier herself for existing “Big Table” clients.	An additional $25,000

The SEC alleges that once clients were in the fold, Langemeier and LOL aggressively pushed them to liquidate conservative investments, such as 401(k)s and IRAs. They were then advised to reinvest that money into unregistered oil and gas offerings from two companies, Resolute Capital Partners (RCP) and Homebound Resources (Homebound). While Langemeier presented these as low-risk, tax-advantaged opportunities and touted her own supposed success with similar ventures, she allegedly failed to disclose her deep financial ties to them.

A Timeline of Alleged Misconduct

The legal filings lay out a pattern of behavior spanning several years, where advisory services and securities sales became dangerously intertwined. This timeline, constructed from the SEC’s complaint, shows key moments in the alleged scheme.

Date	Event
Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 31, 2018	The “Relevant Period” during which the alleged misconduct occurred.
April 2016	Langemeier enters into a formal partnership agreement with the heads of RCP and Homebound to “align the interests” of the parties and “create a lead generation funnel” for investors. The agreement entitled her to commissions of up to 10% on sales to her clients.
2016	Thomas Powell of RCP presents at numerous “Big Table” seminars hosted by LOL in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, and San Diego, California, promoting the oil and gas securities directly to Langemeier’s clients.
June 2016	Loral Langemeier allegedly received a commission tracker spreadsheet titled “LOL (HBR VI) Tracker,” detailing the commissions owed to Langemeier from her clients’ investments.
Late June 2016	Langemeier allegedly uses high-pressure sales tactics, texting one client that a deal is “closing soon… u will miss this huge one” and advising them to “wire more. $100-250k”.
June 19, 2017	An LOL staff member, at Langemeier’s direction, sends a mass email to clients stating, “Loral and I have hand-picked you to be educated and/or involved in a special Gas & Oil Project”.
January 18, 2018	Langemeier emails clients to promote an online “Assets Blitz” where they would learn to invest in “off-Wall Street opportunities such as gas & oil”.
August 2018	Two of the oil and gas ventures in which Langemeier held an undisclosed ownership stake, HBR VI and SEA III, are sold. Langemeier receives a payout of approximately $279,854 from the sale, having invested no personal funds to obtain her stake.
Sept 24, 2021	The SEC issues an order finding that Langemeier’s partners—RCP, Homebound, and their principals—violated federal securities laws, citing inadequate disclosures and materially misleading statements in their marketing materials.

The commissions were tracked in detail. An excerpt from a spreadsheet sent to the defendants shows how each investment from an LOL client was tracked to calculate Langemeier’s 10% commission.

Regulatory Capture & Loopholes: The Wild West of Financial Advice

This case highlights a gaping vulnerability in the financial system, a gray area where “mentorship” and “coaching” can function as unregistered, unregulated investment advice. The SEC complaint alleges that Loral Langemeier and LOL operated as de facto broker-dealers without ever registering with the Commission or any state regulator, a direct violation of federal law designed to protect investors. This avoidance of registration is a classic maneuver in a deregulated landscape, allowing entities to sidestep the stringent disclosure rules, oversight, and ethical duties that apply to legitimate brokers.

Loral Langemeier’s business model appears to have been built within this loophole. By framing their services as “coaching” and “advising on business,” they could attract a client base under one pretext while allegedly engaging in securities transactions under another. This strategy is a hallmark of systems where regulation has been weakened or defunded over decades, creating opportunities for actors to operate outside of established investor protection frameworks. Neoliberal ideology, which champions minimal government intervention, has systematically hollowed out the very agencies meant to police such behavior, leaving consumers to navigate a treacherous market on their own.

Furthermore, the SEC filing notes a particularly telling detail: Loral Langemeier had clients sign agreements containing disclaimers that their services should not be construed as investment advice.

However, the legal complaint argues this was a “transparent attempt to dodge their fiduciary responsibilities”. This tactic of “legal minimalism”—complying with the bare-minimum letter of the law while violating its spirit—is a common strategy in late-stage capitalism, where legal documents are weaponized to indemnify corporations rather than to genuinely inform consumers. The disclaimer was allegedly negated by their actions, as they proceeded to give specific, aggressive investment advice, turning the protective shield of a contract into a sword against their own clients.

Profit-Maximization at All Costs: A System of Perverse Incentives

The allegations against Langemeier and LOL paint a vivid picture of a business model where profit-maximization was structurally prioritized over the clients’ best interests. The entire financial arrangement described in the complaint created a powerful—and hidden—incentive for Loral Langemeier to push specific products, regardless of their suitability for the investors. We live in a society which rewards such behavior.

According to the SEC, Langemeier’s partnership agreement with RCP and Homebound was explicitly designed to “align the interests” of the parties and “create a lead generation funnel”. This language, pulled from corporate documents, reveals a focus on sales and capital acquisition, not on prudent financial stewardship.

With a 10% commission on the line, every dollar a client invested in the oil and gas securities allegedly translated directly into cash for Langemeier, creating a massive and undisclosed conflict of interest. Her advice could no longer be considered objective, as her personal income was directly tethered to her clients’ investment decisions.

This incentive structure allegedly fueled aggressive, high-pressure sales tactics. In one instance detailed in the complaint, Langemeier sent a text message to a client warning that an investment opportunity was “[i]s closing soon… u will miss this huge one” and instructing them to “wire more. $100-250k”. When the client hesitated, she followed up days later, urging them to “Do the [RCP] deal. Even if 100k”. This is not the language of a cautious financial advisor; it is the language of a commissioned salesperson racing to close a deal, a direct outcome of a system where her profit was contingent on the transaction.

The Economic Fallout: From Retirement Savings to Ruin

For the clients of Loral Langemeier and Live Out Loud, the consequences of this alleged advice were devastating.

The SEC complaint states plainly that “many of Defendants’ clients suffered significant losses”. These were not sophisticated Wall Street speculators but retail investors—retirees and entrepreneurs who had entrusted their financial futures to a supposed mentor. The fallout represents a direct transfer of wealth from the vulnerable to the well-connected, a recurring theme in a neoliberal economy with insufficient guardrails.

The risky nature of the unregistered oil and gas securities, which Langemeier allegedly portrayed as safe, soon became apparent. The complaint details how the issuers of these securities eventually failed to make profit distributions, stopped paying interest on debt instruments, and in some cases, refused to return investors’ principal when their promissory notes came due. The dream of “off-Wall Street” wealth turned into a nightmare of frozen capital and broken promises.

The scale of the individual losses was catastrophic. One client, according to the filing, lost nearly $1,000,000 after being convinced to invest in the ventures. This is not just an abstract number on a page; it represents a lifetime of savings, a retirement plan, or a small business’s capital, all vanished. The issuers even added insult to injury by reportedly conditioning even partial returns of principal on the signing of non-disclosure agreements—a tactic used to silence victims and conceal the extent of the financial collapse from the public.

Wealth Disparity & Corporate Greed: A Tale of Two Fortunes

The case of Loral Langemeier and Live Out Loud serves as a telling microcosm of modern wealth disparity. It pits the financial aspirations of everyday Americans against the alleged secretive and extractive practices of a financial guru. The SEC complaint meticulously documents a flow of capital from the retirement accounts of many to the pockets of a few. This is not an accident of the market; it is the logical outcome of a system where corporate greed is given fertile ground to grow, shielded by complexity and a lack of regulatory oversight.

On one side of the ledger are the clients—small business owners and retirees who paid up to $30,000 for a seat at the “Big Table”, and in one case, lost nearly $1,000,000 of their investment capital. On the other side is Langemeier, who allegedly built a lucrative funnel for herself. The complaint specifies she received approximately $407,807 in undisclosed commissions from her clients’ investments. This income was a direct percentage of the money her clients put at risk, a fact she allegedly never disclosed.

Beyond the commissions, Langemeier allegedly profited from a hidden ownership stake.

Through a company called Mountain High Capital, she was part owner of the very investment vehicles she was recommending. When those ventures were sold, she received a payout of approximately $279,854, despite not having invested any of her own funds to acquire the stake. The system was allegedly designed so that whether her clients won or lost, she was positioned to profit handsomely from their participation alone.

Profiting from Complexity: When Obscurity Shields Misconduct

A key feature of late-stage capitalism is the use of complex corporate structures to obscure relationships and diffuse responsibility. The SEC complaint alleges that the financial arrangements between Langemeier, RCP, and Homebound were a masterclass in this strategy. Their partnership was not a simple, transparent agreement; it involved multiple entities and layers that would be nearly impossible for an average investor to untangle.

The creation of Mountain High Capital (MHC) is a prime example. This entity, co-owned by Langemeier and the principals of RCP and Homebound, was the majority owner of two of the investment funds being sold to clients. This structure effectively hid Langemeier’s ownership interest from her clients, who believed she was an objective advisor, not a part-owner with a vested interest in the sale of the ventures. By adding this corporate layer, the conflict of interest was laundered through a separate legal entity, making it less visible but no less potent.

This deliberate complexity serves a strategic purpose: it shields misconduct from scrutiny. When financial dealings are routed through a web of LLCs and partnerships, it becomes exceedingly difficult for regulators, and especially for individual investors, to follow the money and identify the ultimate beneficiaries. This opacity is not a bug in the system; it is a feature that allows insiders to profit from arrangements that would not withstand the light of day.

Global Parallels: A Pattern of Predation

While the specifics of this case are unique, the underlying pattern of behavior is distressingly common. The actions alleged in the complaint against Langemeier and LOL are not an isolated event but mirror a broader ecosystem of financial predation. In fact, the SEC had already taken action against Langemeier’s business partners, RCP and Homebound, for their roles in marketing the very same oil and gas securities.

In a previous order, the Commission found that RCP, Homebound, and their principals had violated federal securities laws. The order cited them for inadequate offering disclosures and for making materially misleading statements to investors. These misrepresentations included unsupported oil production projections, false claims about tax benefits, and incomplete information about how investor funds would be used—including for making payments to earlier investors.

This shows that Langemeier wasn’t just recommending a risky product as some rando, but was a key partner in a wider operation that was already deemed to have been misleading investors.

This is a recurring theme in financial fraud: a network of seemingly independent actors who are, in reality, collaborating to sell dubious products to an unsuspecting public. The system of specialized roles—the charismatic front-person, the product sponsor, the back-office operator—allows each participant to deny full responsibility while the network as a whole profits.

Corporate Accountability Fails the Public

The SEC’s lawsuit seeks to hold Langemeier and LOL accountable by demanding they return their “ill-gotten gains” and pay civil penalties. It also seeks to permanently bar Langemeier from participating in the sale of securities. While these measures are significant, they often represent a frustratingly incomplete form of justice for victims and the public. In a system where financial misconduct can generate millions, civil penalties can feel like a mere cost of doing business rather than a true deterrent.

The legal process itself can be a form of strategic delay that benefits the accused. The complaint notes that the parties entered into tolling agreements that paused the statute of limitations for over a year, a common legal maneuver that extends the timeline of a case. For victims who have lost their life savings, such prolonged timelines can feel like justice delayed and denied.

Moreover, the resolution of such cases often falls short of what the public might expect. Langemeier’s partners, RCP and Homebound, were able to reach a settlement with the SEC. While settlements enforce penalties, they also allow individuals and companies to resolve charges without admitting to or denying the allegations. This legal nuance means that while they accept the consequences, there is no definitive, public admission of wrongdoing, allowing them to sidestep the full reputational damage that a trial might inflict.

This Is the System Working as Intended

It is tempting to view this case as a story of rules being broken. But a deeper critique reveals a system that is, in many ways, working exactly as it was designed to under neoliberal capitalism. It is a system that structurally prioritizes capital formation and salesmanship over fiduciary duty and consumer protection. When “financial innovation” is celebrated and regulation is framed as a barrier to growth, the predictable result is an environment ripe for exploitation.

The very existence of a “financial coach” who can operate as an unregistered broker highlights a regulatory gap born from a philosophy of minimal government intervention. The use of boilerplate disclaimers to create legal cover for unethical behavior is a direct product of a legal system that often values contractual form over substantive fairness. The immense profits to be made from commissions and hidden ownership stakes create incentives that are far more powerful than the abstract duty to act in a client’s best interest.

This case is not an aberration. It is a manifestation of a system where trust is a commodity to be exploited, complexity is a tool to evade accountability, and the pursuit of profit is permitted to override all other ethical considerations. The significant losses suffered by clients are not an unfortunate side effect; they are the necessary raw material for the profits extracted by those at the top of the food chain.

Conclusion: The Human Cost of a Flawed System

The legal complaint filed by the SEC against Loral Langemeier and Live Out Loud tells a story about the human cost of a financial system that has become dangerously imbalanced. It documents how the trust of ordinary people—retirees, small business owners, and families—was cultivated and then systematically betrayed for personal gain. The case is an important reminder that behind the complex jargon of securities law and corporate structures, there are real people whose life savings and financial security hang in the balance.

The allegations demonstrate a profound failure at multiple levels. It is a failure of individual ethics, where a trusted mentor is accused of placing her own enrichment above the well-being of her clients. It is a failure of regulation, where individuals can act as unregistered brokers, operating in the shadows of the law. And most importantly, it is a failure of a broader economic ideology that champions profit-maximization and deregulation, creating a fertile ground for such conduct to flourish.

This is not a story without hope, however. It is also a story about the power of regulatory enforcement to bring such conduct to light. The legal battle, whatever its outcome, serves as a crucial public record of how these systems of exploitation operate, providing a powerful lesson for investors and a clear call to action for policymakers to strengthen the guardrails that protect us all.

Frivolous or Serious Lawsuit?

This lawsuit is unequivocally serious. It has been brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the nation’s primary enforcer of federal securities laws, after what was likely a lengthy investigation. The complaint is not based on vague accusations but is supported by specific, documented evidence, including partnership agreements, email communications, text messages, and internal commission tracking spreadsheets.

The gravity of the lawsuit is further underscored by the fact that the Loral’s partners, RCP and Homebound, have already settled with the SEC over charges related to the very same securities offerings. This prior enforcement action lends significant credibility to the allegations against Langemeier and LOL, suggesting they were key participants in a broader scheme that regulators had already found to be in violation of federal law.

The complaint alleges multiple, clear violations of foundational securities laws, including acting as an unregistered broker-dealer, participating in the sale of unregistered securities, and breaching fiduciary duty as an investment adviser by failing to disclose material conflicts of interest. The detailed nature of the claims and the authority of the plaintiff establish this as a significant legal action aimed at addressing serious corporate misconduct.

Here is an SEC press release on Live Out Loud: https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26303

💡 Explore Corporate Misconduct by Category

Corporations harm people every day — from wage theft to pollution. Learn more by exploring key areas of injustice.

• 💀 Product Safety Violations — When companies risk lives for profit.
• 🌿 Environmental Violations — Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.
• 💼 Labor Exploitation — Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.
• 🛡️ Data Breaches & Privacy Abuses — Misuse and mishandling of personal information.
• 💵 Financial Fraud & Corruption — Lies, scams, and executive impunity.