🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights are human rights 🏳️‍⚧️
Theme

Fabspeed Motorsport was fined $50k by the EPA. Is that enough for 900+ violations?

EvilCorporations.com
Investigative Accountability Journalism
Clean Air Act Enforcement  |  EPA Region 3  |  April 2025

930 Illegal Parts, $50,000 Fine, and Five Years of Poisoned Air

The Non-Financial Ledger

There is no dramatic accident to describe here. No single body to point to. That is the design. The harm done by defeat devices is invisible, statistical, and distributed across lungs that will never know what hit them.

When a catalytic converter is bypassed, the vehicle stops converting carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides into less harmful gases. Those pollutants go directly into the air around the vehicle. When a diesel particulate filter is removed, fine particulate matter flows straight out of the exhaust pipe. When an EGR system is disabled, nitrogen oxide production spikes at high engine temperatures. When an SCR system is defeated, NOx that would have been converted to nitrogen and water stays in the air as a respiratory irritant.

These aren’t hypothetical harms. NOx and particulate matter have well-documented links to asthma attacks, cardiovascular disease, reduced lung development in children, and premature death. The communities most exposed to vehicle emissions are not the ones buying Lamborghini Aventadors or Porsche 991 GT3s. They are the people who live near the roads and highways those cars drive on. The kids waiting for school buses in neighborhoods with high traffic density. The elderly residents whose windows face a busy street. The delivery workers who spend all day breathing what the cars ahead of them put out.

Fabspeed’s customers knew their cars would be louder and faster. They paid for that. The people breathing the extra exhaust had no idea, no consent, and no compensation. They still don’t.

When the EPA reduced the penalty because Fabspeed claimed it couldn’t afford to pay more, there was no corresponding acknowledgment that the communities who absorbed five years of illegally elevated pollution also couldn’t afford the healthcare costs that follow. The settlement closes the legal file. It doesn’t close the damage.

Legal Receipts

The following statements come directly from U.S. EPA Docket No. CAA-03-2025-0073, filed April 24, 2025. Nothing below has been invented, summarized, or paraphrased into something softer.

Consent Agreement, Paragraph 38 — Count I: Tampering
“EPA alleges, based on Respondent’s RFI Response, [that] from September 1, 2018 through July 1, 2020 [Respondent] knowingly removed or rendered inoperative emissions-related elements of design on at least eleven (11) unique motor vehicles by installing hardware that impact the vehicle’s OBD, EGR, DPF, SCR, or DOC systems installed by vehicle OEMs in compliance with Title II of the CAA.”
  • What this proves: The EPA found, using Fabspeed’s own submitted records, that the company didn’t just sell illegal parts for customers to install themselves. Fabspeed employees physically worked on 11 specific vehicles and disabled their federally-required pollution controls.
  • What “knowingly” means legally: Under Section 203(a)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act, knowingly removing or rendering inoperative emissions controls is a separate and distinct violation from selling defeat devices. This is the harder charge. It requires proof of deliberate action, and the EPA found it.
  • The OBD reference matters: On-board diagnostic systems are designed to detect and report when emissions equipment fails or is disabled. Tampering with OBD systems means the vehicle is also programmed to hide the tampering from future emissions inspections.
Consent Agreement, Paragraph 43 — Count II: Sale of Defeat Devices
“EPA alleges, based on Respondent’s RFI Response and the information obtained by the EPA subsequent to issuance of the June 1, 2022 Notice to Show Cause letter that from September 1, 2018 through March 29, 2023 Respondent sold at least 930 parts or components that have a principal effect of bypassing, defeating, or rendering inoperative motor vehicle EGR, DPF, SCR, or DOC systems installed by vehicle OEMs in compliance with Title II of the CAA; and that it knew or should have known such parts were being offered for sale or installed for such use.”
  • “Knew or should have known” is a critical legal phrase. It closes the “I didn’t know buyers would use them illegally” defense. The parts are described in Fabspeed’s own product listings as “cat bypass pipes,” “catless race headers,” and “DPF delete” components. The names describe the function. The function is illegal on road-registered vehicles under federal law.
  • The timeline is significant: Fabspeed kept selling these parts for nearly ten months after the EPA issued its June 2022 Notice to Show Cause letter telling the company it suspected multiple violations. The last documented sale date in the consent agreement is March 29, 2023.
  • 930 confirmed sales is likely a floor figure, not a ceiling. The document references that the EPA discovered additional violations after the initial RFI response, suggesting the 930 number comes from two separate investigations combined.
Consent Agreement, Paragraph 49 — Ability to Pay
“Based upon Respondent’s documented inability to pay claim, and in accordance with applicable laws, the EPA conducted an analysis of Respondent’s financial information and determined that a penalty of $[Fifty Thousand] is an appropriate amount to settle this action, which Respondent consents to pay.”
  • What this admits: The EPA accepted Fabspeed’s claim that a larger penalty would threaten the company’s ability to continue operating. The financial analysis was based on tax years 2017 through 2019, years that predate the bulk of the documented violations and the company’s continued expansion of its defeat device product line.
  • The penalty calculation context: Under updated 2025 Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment rules cited in the same document, each violation of Section 203(a)(3)(A) or (B) after November 2, 2015 carries a maximum penalty of $5,911 per violation. Applied to 941 total violations (11 tampering plus 930 defeat device sales), the maximum theoretical penalty was approximately $5,562,251. The company paid $50,000, or roughly 0.9% of the maximum.

“Each sale of a defeat device shall constitute a separate violation… Respondent committed 930 violations.” Yet the fine came to less than what some of the targeted vehicles cost in service fees alone.

Societal Impact Mapping

Environmental Degradation

The Clean Air Act systems Fabspeed’s products disabled each target a specific class of pollutant. Every bypass represents a direct and ongoing contribution to air quality degradation for every mile the affected vehicle travels.

  • Catalytic converter bypass pipes, the most numerous product in Fabspeed’s lineup, eliminate the conversion of carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons into carbon dioxide and water vapor. CO is a direct poison. Unburned hydrocarbons are a precursor to ground-level ozone, the primary component of urban smog.
  • EGR system removal increases NOx emissions by preventing the exhaust recirculation that cools combustion temperatures. NOx reacts in the atmosphere to form both ozone and fine particulate matter, compounding harm through multiple pollution pathways simultaneously.
  • DPF deletion releases fine and ultrafine particulate matter directly into the air. PM2.5 and smaller particles penetrate deep into lung tissue and can cross into the bloodstream. The World Health Organization classifies outdoor air pollution, of which vehicle particulate matter is a major source, as a Group 1 carcinogen.
  • SCR system defeat on diesel vehicles prevents the conversion of NOx to nitrogen and water, allowing nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide to accumulate in local air. Nitrogen dioxide is a known lung irritant with documented links to asthma development in children.
  • The vehicles targeted by Fabspeed’s catalog range from 1974 Porsches to 2020 Corvettes and Lamborghini Uruses. A defeat device installed on a vehicle that will be driven for another decade or more generates pollution continuously for that entire period. The harm is not a one-time event; it compounds with every mile driven.

Public Health

Defeat devices don’t just violate the law on paper. They produce measurable increases in exposure to documented health hazards for every person in the vicinity of the vehicle.

  • NOx exposure at elevated levels, such as those produced by vehicles with disabled EGR and SCR systems, is linked to increased emergency room visits for asthma and reduced lung function over time, particularly in children under 12 whose lungs are still developing.
  • CO from bypassed catalytic converters poses an acute danger in enclosed or partially enclosed spaces such as parking garages, tunnels, and dense urban streets. At high concentrations, CO causes headaches, dizziness, confusion, and death. The vehicles targeted by Fabspeed include high-performance cars frequently driven in urban environments.
  • Communities adjacent to roads with high concentrations of modified vehicles bear a disproportionate health burden. Environmental justice research consistently shows that lower-income communities and communities of color are more likely to live near high-traffic corridors, making them the primary absorbers of emissions from illegally modified vehicles owned by wealthier buyers in other zip codes.
  • On-board diagnostic tampering, documented in Count I of this case, means 11 specific vehicles were also modified to conceal their non-compliance from state emissions inspection programs. These vehicles could pass routine inspections while continuing to emit at illegal levels, bypassing the one mechanism designed to catch this kind of ongoing harm.

Economic Inequality

The defeat device market is a luxury goods problem with a public health price tag paid by everyone else.

  • The vehicles in Fabspeed’s product catalog are not economy cars. The list includes Lamborghini Aventadors, Ferrari 488s, McLaren 720S, Porsche 991 GT3 RS, Aston Martin DB9, and Lamborghini Urus SUVs. The owners of these vehicles are not struggling. The communities breathing their illegal exhaust frequently are.
  • The penalty paid, $50,000, represents a fraction of annual revenue for a company that was actively expanding its catalog of illegal parts throughout the investigation period. Between the EPA’s May 2020 information request and the March 2023 final documented sale, Fabspeed continued selling defeat devices to customers nationwide.
  • The economic benefit to Fabspeed from non-compliance is explicitly identified as a penalty factor in Section 205(c)(2) of the Clean Air Act, but the final settlement amount does not appear to have clawed back profits from five years of illegal sales, nor to have imposed a deterrent penalty meaningful enough to change industry behavior.
  • The cost of asthma treatment, increased healthcare utilization, and reduced productivity tied to air pollution exposure is borne primarily by working-class families and public health systems. None of that cost appears in the $50,000 settlement. It was simply externalized onto everyone else.

Fabspeed Violations by Emissions System Targeted

0 100 200 300 400 ESTIMATED UNITS SOLD ~500 CAT BYPASS ~150 EGR SYSTEMS ~120 DPF DELETE ~100 SCR SYSTEMS ~80 DOC SYSTEMS Total confirmed violations: 941 (11 tampering + 930 defeat device sales). Bar estimates derived from product catalog distribution in Attachment A.

The “Cost of a Life” Metric

$53.76
What Fabspeed paid per illegal defeat device sold
$50,000 total penalty ÷ 930 illegal parts = $53.76 per unit.
A single asthma emergency room visit in the United States costs an average of $1,200 to $2,000.
0.9%
Percentage of the maximum possible penalty that was actually assessed
Max penalty: ~$5,562,251 (941 violations × $5,911/violation under 2025 inflation-adjusted rates).
Penalty paid: $50,000. The EPA accepted a financial hardship claim to justify the reduction.
122
Separate illegal product listings documented in Attachment A of the consent agreement
Products span vehicles from 1974 through at least 2020, targeting Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini, BMW, McLaren, Maserati, Aston Martin, Volkswagen, Range Rover, Alfa Romeo, Acura, and Chevrolet.

What Now?

The consent agreement is signed and the $50,000 has been paid. That does not mean the story is over, and it does not mean accountability has been achieved.

The Responsible Parties

  • Joe Fabiani, President of Fabspeed.com, Inc., signed the consent agreement on April 16, 2025 and is directly identified in the Certificate of Service. The company operates at 155 Commerce Drive, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania 19034.
  • [REDACTED – Not in Source]: Other board members or corporate officers are not named in the public-facing consent agreement. The company’s full corporate structure is not disclosed in this filing.
  • The attorneys representing Fabspeed were Joel T. Bowers of Barnes and Thornburg LLP (South Bend, IN) and Andrew S. Levine of Stradley Ronan Stevens and Young LLP (Philadelphia, PA).

Regulatory Watchlist

  • U.S. EPA Region 3: The agency that prosecuted this case. Contact EPA Region 3 (Philadelphia) to report ongoing violations or to request information on whether Fabspeed’s compliance certification holds. Enforcement Officer: Carly Joseph (Joseph.Carly@epa.gov).
  • EPA National Enforcement and Compliance Assurance: The broader EPA division responsible for Clean Air Act Title II vehicle enforcement. The public docket for this case (CAA-03-2025-0073) is a public record and can be requested in full.
  • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection: State-level air quality enforcement has concurrent jurisdiction over emissions violations in Pennsylvania. If Fabspeed continues operating, state regulators have independent authority to act.
  • State Attorneys General: Several states, including California, New York, and Massachusetts, have pursued independent defeat device enforcement actions beyond federal settlements. State AG offices in states where Fabspeed products were sold can receive complaints.
  • FTC (Federal Trade Commission): If Fabspeed marketed defeat devices with claims that obscured their emissions-defeating function or their legal status, the FTC has jurisdiction over deceptive trade practices.

The fine is paid. Fabspeed certified current compliance. The 930 sold devices are still on 930 vehicles. The exhaust keeps coming.

What You Can Do

  • Report suspected defeat devices to the EPA directly via the agency’s online tip portal at epa.gov. If you see a vehicle that sounds like it has had its catalytic converter or DPF removed, you can file a report. These tips feed into exactly the kind of investigation that produced this case.
  • Contact your state emissions testing program and ask whether your state conducts physical inspection for tampered OBD systems in addition to emissions readings. Advocate for stronger physical inspection requirements, particularly in high-income areas where modified performance vehicles are concentrated.
  • Support environmental justice organizations working on air quality in communities near highways and high-traffic corridors. Groups like Earthjustice, the Clean Air Task Force, and local environmental health coalitions are pushing for stronger vehicle emissions enforcement and community monitoring.
  • Document and share this case widely. The defeat device aftermarket is an industry, not a fringe phenomenon. Fabspeed’s 122-product catalog targeting vehicles from 14 manufacturers over nearly 50 model years suggests this was a systematic business operation, not an accident. Public attention creates political pressure for meaningful penalties instead of $54-per-device settlements.
  • Engage with local air quality monitoring networks. Organizations like PurpleAir and EPA’s AirNow publish real-time local air quality data. Supporting community-level air quality monitoring makes invisible harm visible and creates the data record needed to hold polluters accountable.

The source document for this investigation is attached below.

You can read this consent agreement by visiting the EPA’s website: https://yosemite.epa.gov/OA/RHC/EPAAdmin.nsf/Filings/6830B1536809A5A085258C7A006F28F8/$File/Fabspeed%20com%20Inc_CAA%20CAFO_April%2024%202025_Redacted.pdf

Explore by category

01

Antitrust

Monopolies and anti-competition tactics used to crush rivals.

View Cases →
02

Product Safety Violations

When companies sell dangerous goods, consumers pay the price.

View Cases →
03

Environmental Violations

Pollution, ecological collapse, and unchecked greed.

View Cases →
04

Labor Exploitation

Wage theft, worker abuse, and unsafe conditions.

View Cases →
05

Data Breaches & Privacy

Misuse and mishandling of personal information.

View Cases →
06

Financial Fraud & Corruption

Lies, scams, and executive impunity that distort markets.

View Cases →
07

Intellectual Property

IP theft that punishes originality and rewards copying.

View Cases →
08

Misleading Marketing

False claims that waste money and bury critical safety info.

View Cases →
Aleeia
Aleeia

I'm Aleeia, the creator of this website.

I have 6+ years of experience as an independent researcher covering corporate misconduct, sourced from legal documents, regulatory filings, and professional legal databases.

My background includes a Supply Chain Management degree from Michigan State University's Eli Broad College of Business, and years working inside the industries I now cover.

Every post on this site was either written or personally reviewed and edited by me before publication.

Learn more about my research standards and editorial process by visiting my About page

Articles: 1865